Bruce Willis's family has announced the legendary actor will be "stepping away" from acting due to health-related concerns.Willis has been diagnosed with aphasia, a condition that affects someone's abilities to communicate either verbally or through writing. The condition, which progresses slowly, causes degenerative harm and is usually caused by a head injury or a stroke. It is not known what the precise cause of Willis's condition is or whether it may have resulted from his work in action-oriented films. For more, click here.
Enjoy this episode of "The Saint" starring Roger Moore, originally aired in 1963 and presented by Shout! Factory. You'll see some familiar faces in the cast: Dawn Addams, Neil McCallum, Michael Bates and Angus Lennie (who appeared in "The Great Escape" the same year) among them. This episode, "The Fellow Traveler", was the second episode of Season 2. Check out Shout!FactoryTV.com for more classic shows and movies. To watch the film using the "full screen" option, click here)
Thanks to Universal, you can enjoy "Eight on the Lam" (1967) starring Bob Hope, Phyllis Diller, Jill St. John and Jonathan Winters. If you subscribe to their YouTube channel, you'll get access to many other uncut feature films from the studio archives. (To watch the film using the "full screen" option, click here.)
Scholars have long debated whether it was Mark Twain or newspaper editor Charles Dudley Warner who came up with the oft-quoted quip "Everybody complains about the weather but nobody does anything about it." Regardless, the sentiments of the quotation can easily be applied to the annual Academy Awards ceremony. Dwindling ratings, lack of enthusiasm among young movie-goers, an industry bereft of the legendary personalities audiences used to tune in to see- all of these factors have put the Oscars on pop culture life support in recent years. Who knew all it would take was one superstar in meltdown mode to make last night's ceremonies "must-see" TV? Unfortunately, the entire ceremony will always be remembered for Will Smith's act of inexcusable violence against presenter Chris Rock, who remained cool and dignified under very strained circumstances. There's no point in going into details because by now you know what happened. Smith's temper tantrum marginalized everything that followed as the attendees and viewers around the world tried to make sense of what they just saw. Forty minutes later, Smith received the Best Actor Oscar in front of an audience of boot lickers who couldn't resist giving him a standing ovation. In a bizarre speech, Smith did apologize to the Academy and the nominees, but not the man he assaulted. He then delivered a seemingly endless, self-pitying and self-indulgent, teary-eyed acceptance speech in which he insinuated that his actions were in defense of his wife, much as the character he played in the film was defensive of his family. Talk about taking Method Acting to an extreme...Somewhere along the line, Smith became almost incoherent and began to sound like Brando's Colonel Walter E. Kurtz. The Academy considered having him escorted from the auditorium, as they certainly would have if he were a mere mortal. However, they balked and allowed him to stay and enjoy the moment of his Oscar win. Tonight, top brass are meeting to consider ejecting him from the Academy because he clearly violated their ethics policies. More realistically, they are probably meeting to discuss how to justify not ejecting him from the Academy. Perhaps not coincidentally, Smith has issued a formal written statement of apology to all concerned, including Chris Rock. It reads:
“Violence
in all of its forms is poisonous and destructive. My behavior at last night’s
Academy Awards was unacceptable and inexcusable. Jokes at my expense are a part
of the job, but a joke about Jada’s medical condition was too much for me to
bear and I reacted emotionally.
I would
like to publicly apologize to you, Chris. I was out of line and I was wrong. I
am embarrassed and my actions were not indicative of the man I want to be.
There is no place for violence in a world of love and kindness.
I would
also like to apologize to the Academy, the producers of the show, all the
attendees and everyone watching around the world. I would like to apologize to
the Williams Family and my King Richard Family. I deeply regret that my
behavior has stained what has been an otherwise gorgeous journey for all of us.
I am a
work in progress.
Sincerely,
Will”
Well, better late than never. Believe it or not, there was a lot more to the evening than this surrealistic incident. Here are some random observations:
I thought the premise of having a trio hosting the show-Amy Schumer, Regina Hall and Wanda Sykes- sounded like a fairly ill-conceived idea. I was wrong. It was very ill-conceived.Their entire shtick could have been eliminated without much loss to the ceremonies. Keep in mind, ABC-TV demanded that numerous category of awards be presented prior to the show in a separate ceremony, thus setting off a firestorm by insulting and marginalizing those who were affected. They ended up deceiving the audience by using clever editing techniques to imply the acceptance speeches of these winners were taking place live. Why was all this necessary? Because the network had plunked down $100 million for broadcast rights and wanted to ensure there was plenty of time for the hosts to display their comedic talents. Aside from a few good one-liners, the most impressive aspect of their contributions was the ability of potty-mouthed Amy Schumer to keep things relatively clean throughout the show.
There were erratic elements to the program. Beyonce performed one of the nominated songs but she wasn't in the building, as the Academy had her in an elaborate musical extravaganza that had been pre-taped outside of the auditorium. Isn't it traditional to have the songs all performed in front of the audience? She might just as well have been in London. Then there was the pathetic pandering to youth in the quixotic hope that young people will once again make tuning into the Oscars a tradition. Good luck. Many of the people they are trying to reach don't even feel obliged to own a television. Nevertheless, there were bizarre attempts to appeal to youth including the introduction of a celebrity DJ (!) who made a brief appearance before thankfully seeming to fade into oblivion.
I usually gripe about the annual tribute to artists and industry types who passed
away in the last year because inevitably they leave out plenty of
notable people who deserved inclusion. This year, I didn't even attempt
to make a list of the omissions, preferring to use Turner Classic
Movies' annual memorial video as the gold standard of remembering the
dearly departed. The Academy
obviously left out a number of people because they provided a web site
address you can visit to find tributes to the folks they intentionally
snubbed. Oh, and keep in mind that the only reason they refuse to extend
this segment is because they feel it's more important to have more jokes
and comedy skits during the broadcast. I should point out that even the
memorial presentation was strange. It was shown on a big screen in front of a
large group of people singing and dancing as though we were in a Busby
Berkeley musical. Then, Jamie Lee Curtis stopped the proceedings to pay
special tribute to Betty White and later Billy Murray did the same to
remember his friend, director Ivan Reitman. Two observations: I respect
Betty White as much as anyone, but she was not known for her work in
feature films, as she was a television icon. Also, selecting two
people out of all those who passed away to receive special treatment
made everyone else being honored look like chopped liver.
As for fashion, elegance was happily in style and so was cleavage. Many of the ladies were clad in outfits with plunging necklines that would have looked at home on the cover of one of those bodice-ripper romance novels, but no problem in this corner because it provided some old style high fashion. However, it came as a surprise that the most cleavage to be revealed was courtesy of Timothee Chalamet, who was wearing a glittery woman's jacket by Louis Vuitton- minus anything under it. At least he could rest easy that no other guy was going to show up in the same outfit.
There were the usual unwelcome political jokes but they were thankfully in short supply. Schumer, Sykes and Hall decided to stage a comedy bit involving people testing positive for Covid-19. Considering we're losing 800 people a day in America (the equivalent of a 9/11 or Pearl Harbor attack every three days), it's understandable why the premise fell as flat as a pancake.
The Academy chose to use the telecast to promote it's new $400 million museum in L.A., which has been widely panned for favoring politically correct exhibitions over those that would have mainstream appeal for movie lovers. So how did they use this precious telecast time to induce people to visit the museum? By having Wanda Sykes engage in a comedic tour of the premises that was so poorly done that the segment probably persuaded anyone who intended to visit the place to reconsider their plans.
Reunions were the order of the day: Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman and a bald and bearded John Travolta from Pulp Fiction, Woody Harrelson, Wesley Snipes and Rosie Perez from "White Men Can't Jump" and Francis Ford Coppola, Al Pacino and Robert De Niro to honor "The Godfather". Coppola, newly trimmed-down, looked very healthy and happy but he was the only one who spoke in the brief segment, that also included an uninspired film clip compilation that for some reason was set to a hip-hop song! Coppola made some sentimental remarks but Pacino and De Niro said nothing at all...so what was the point of bringing them to the ceremony only to have them stand there silently? Also, Coppola should have explained that De Niro was there because of his contributions to the franchise through his Oscar-winning performance in "The Godfather Part II", as he did not appear in the original film.
James Bond got plenty of justifiable attention for the series' 60th anniversary, even if the Academy shattered fans' hopes that "No Time to Die" would land a Best Picture nomination and Daniel Craig would be nominated for Best Actor in his swansong appearance as 007. Instead, there was a nice but rather perfunctory film clip segment of highlights from the series. In a weird decision, the segment was introduced by three hunky guys who didn't even look vaguely familiar to me. They apparently are "extreme athletes", whatever that means. Presumably, internet "influencers" were not available.) Surely, given the number of illustrious people associated with the Bond series, someone of some stature could have introduced the segment. Also, the trio of "extreme athletes" name-checked each of the Bond actors- except George Lazenby, who at least was seen in the video compilation. (Can this guy ever catch a break?) Billy Eilish and her brother Finneas gave a fine live performance of their haunting title theme to "No Time to Die", which was the best of the songs nominated. It won, too, thus making this the third Bond song to win in a row. At least the Academy is atoning for not nominating so many great ones from the past.
Troy Kotsur's win for Supporting Actor in "Coda" made for a moving segment, as he is only the second deaf actor to be honored with an award.
Kudos to Kevin Costner who recalled the splendor of seeing "How the West Was Won" in Cinerama at age seven and extolled the majesty of the presentation and impact it had on him.
The inclusion of "fan favorite" films was a pathetic attempt to put salve on the wounds of younger movie fans who constantly gripe about their favorite films (i.e superhero flicks) not being nominated in the major categories. Instead of explaining that the nominees are decided by industry professionals in the respective trades and that the ceremony is not a popularity contest, AMPAS decided to allow fans to vote for their favorite films and scenes from movie history. If the winners were any indication of prevailing taste, we'll be giving Pauly Shore a lifetime achievement Oscar in a few years. For the record, the "winners" of these polls were mostly of relatively recent vintage. If you expected to see the likes of "Schindler's List" or "Citizen Kane", you had to settle for "Army of the Dead". Meanwhile, more precious minutes of air time were wasted on showing meaningless clips from these action movies.
Years ago, the Academy decided to stop telecasting the honorary awards to distinguished industry veterans. Fans were outraged. These were often the highlights of the ceremony, but the Academy wanted more time for dumb comedy bits and the network wanted more time for overpriced sponsor advertisements. There was a time they would at least air snippets of the honorees accepting their awards at a separate ceremony, but even that was asking too much. Thus, we got to see this years honorees: Liv Ullmann, Elaine May and Samuel L. Jackson sitting like mannequins as they were acknowledged for a few seconds. If you wonder why some of us pine away for these awards to be an integral part of the ceremonies once again, just watch this segment from the 1972 telecast when Charles Chaplin returned to America from exile in Europe after he had been blacklisted by Hollywood in the 1950s. We're never likely to see anything like this again because the Academy and ABC simply need to have more kitsch.
The show wrapped up with announcement for Best Picture but things went awry. In an admirable sentimental gesture, Lady Gaga accompanied a wheelchair-bound Liza Minnelli to the stage to commemorate the 50th anniversary of "Cabaret" and to have Minnelli read the title of the winning film. Unfortunately, Minnelli was not up to the task. She was clearly feeble and disoriented. Seeing her in such an undignified light was a painful experience, despite Lady Gaga's good intentions.
Believe it or not, I do not enjoy trashing the Oscars. It's a thankless task to bring this lumbering giant to TV every year and countless talented people work endless hours to achieve that task. Even the worst Oscar ceremonies have plenty of entertainment value and this one was no exception. The worst aspect of it- Will Smith's behavior- was beyond the producer's control as it occurred spontaneously. Although in some bizarre fashion, Smith might well have provided a reason for the Oscars to become "must-see" TV once again.
By now, you know about the bizarre incident between Will Smith and Chris Rock at last night's Oscar Awards ceremony. At first, the audience wondered if it wasn't some kind of Three Stooges-style sight gag but it quickly became apparent that the physical assault was for real. As of now, Chris Rock has chosen not to file a criminal complaint against Smith, who later in the broadcast was awarded the Best Actor Oscar. If Rock changes his mind, he won't have a problem providing evidence. Click here for Hollywood Reporter analysis of the show.
Retro movie lovers know that George C. Scott told the Academy in advance that he wouldn't be on hand to accept the Best Actor Oscar if he won for "Patton". When he did win, Scott was home sleeping, having expressed his distaste for the competitive nature of the awards.The film's producer, Frank McCarthy, accepted the award. Just two years later, Marlon Brando was a "no-show" when he won Best Actor for his career-reviving performance in "The Godfather". Instead, he sent a young Native American woman to express why he was declining the honor. Brando, who was actively involved in social justice causes for Native Americans, was protesting the way they had traditionally been treated in Hollywood films. Unlike Scott, however, Brando gave no advance notice, thus leaving presenters Roger Moore and Liv Ullman somewhat confused about what was going on. For the record, years later Scott gave an interview to Playboy in which he criticized Brando's actions. He said that he felt it was ill-mannered to string the Academy along without telling them up front, as he had, that he intended to not accept the award. As related in Far Out Magazine, there was a third Oscar winner who refused the award: screenwriter Dudley Nichols who had won for John Ford's 1935 classic "The Informer". Nichols had refused the honor due to contentious problems relating to the Academy and industry unions. Click here to read.
Finally,
a high definition Blu-ray disk of Robert Redford’s 1980 masterpiece, Ordinary
People, has been released. To date, the film has existed on home video only
on VHS and DVD, and the new Paramount Presents edition is most welcome.
People
was
Redford’s directorial debut, and at the time audiences and critics expected it
to be good, but they didn’t count on it being that good. It took the
Best Picture prize at the Academy Awards, along with a trophy for Redford for
Direction, one for Alvin Sargent’s Adapted Screenplay (based on Judith Guest’s
wonderful novel), and a most deserved Supporting Actor Oscar for Timothy
Hutton. Granted, Hutton’s character, Conrad Jarrett, is really the protagonist,
i.e., the lead in the movie, so it’s one of those infuriating cases in
which an actor is nominated in the wrong category. (That said, there’s no way
Hutton would have won over Robert De Niro’s blistering once-in-a-lifetime
performance in Raging Bull, so the studio was smart to offer up Hutton
in the Supporting category, where he’d have a better than fighting chance.)
Mary
Tyler Moore also received a nomination for Best Actress, and Judd Hirsch a nod
for Supporting Actor (competing with Hutton). They are both brilliant, too.
Moore plays against type, portraying a woman with a cold heart who has
forgotten—or never knew—how to love, and Hirsch is the psychiatrist with whom
we all would want to spend two sessions a week. Missing from the Oscar awards
tally was Donald Sutherland, who, for this reviewer’s money, provides the
performance of his career. In many ways, he’s the center of the picture. We
slowly see that his stable assuredness is also cracking from the pretense going
in his family. Why Sutherland wasn’t at least nominated is a head-scratcher.
The
story is about a mid-to-upper class family living in the Chicago suburb of Lake
Forest. Everything should be as Beth Jarrett (Moore) believes it is—that their
family is happy and their world is perfect. “Neat and easy,” as her husband,
Calvin (Sutherland), describes how she keeps their lives. But under the
polished veneer, all is not well. Not one bit. The Jarretts recently
experienced a tragedy. The oldest son, Buck, drowned in a boating accident
while out on the water with his younger brother, Conrad (Hutton). Not long
afterwards, Conrad attempted suicide and ended up in a psychiatric hospital for
four months. Now he’s home, and Conrad is having a very difficult time
adjusting. He can’t relate the way he once did to his high school buddies. He
can’t feel as if he’s part of the school swim team, the way he could prior to
the incident. Worst of all, his relationship with his mother has deteriorated. Calvin
can see the conflict between them and does his best to play referee and
understanding father, but this only begins to drive a wedge between him and
Beth. It’s only after Conrad starts seeing a psychiatrist, Dr. Berger (Hirsch),
that the teenager embarks on an excruciating but necessary emotional journey
toward wellness.
The
script is an honest and canny depiction of how families bury truths and put up
facades. Redford’s direction is sensitively nuanced, and the acting all around
is impeccable. This is powerful stuff. Ordinary People also provides one
of the better positive depictions of psychiatry ever put on celluloid, and this
reviewer challenges anyone viewing the film not to have welling eyes during the
scene in which Dr. Berger tells Conrad, “I’m your friend.”
Beyond
the quartet of principle stars, Elizabeth McGovern is striking as a high school
romantic interest for Conrad, a young Adam Baldwin is effective as one of the
teen swim team pals, M. Emmet Walsh has a turn as the clueless swimming coach,
and Dinah Manoff has a short but significant scene as a fellow hospital
patient, now out in the real world like Conrad.
But
the movie belongs to Timothy Hutton. Ordinary People was his first
feature film (he had made only one television movie earlier in the year, and
appeared uncredited, briefly, as a child in a picture in the 1960s.) His Conrad
is a virtuoso piece of acting.
The
Paramount Presents feature is remastered from a new 4K film transfer overseen
by Redford, and it looks crisp and colorful. The only supplements are two new,
short featurettes with interviews with Hutton and author Judith Guest, plus the
theatrical trailer.
Ordinary
People merited
every honor it received. It is an emotional roller-coaster that elevates the
Hollywood family drama to an unprecedented high. Enthusiastically recommended.
Some
personal observations and opinions here. There have been critics over the years
(Siskel and Ebert, for example) who have claimed that Ordinary People “stole”
the Oscar from Raging Bull, which is often cited not only as the “best”
movie of 1980, but of the entire 1980s decade.
I
love Raging Bull and consider it a magnificent example of bravura
filmmaking from Martin Scorsese. It’s slick, gorgeously shot in black and
white, brilliantly edited (by Oscar winner Thelma Schoonmaker), and it contains
not only powerhouse performances by Joe Pesci and Cathy Moriarty in supporting
roles, but the crowning screen appearance of Robert De Niro’s career. There is
no question that De Niro’s Jake LaMotta is one of the most accomplished acting
displays ever.
Yes,
Raging Bull is a great film… and I also find it unpleasant as hell. The
brutality is visceral, and of course, that’s the point. It’s about a man who can’t
control his rage. I may love the film, but I can’t say I enjoy it,
if that makes any sense.
Ordinary
People
is not a happy story, either—that’s true. While it’s without physical violence,
it is an emotionally violent tale; but it is so elegantly rendered with
intelligence and, yes, beauty, that I, personally, am always movedby
it. For me, it tugs at the heartstrings and the tear ducts. And while the fate
of the tale’s family is a tragedy, there is the hint of hope at the end that
all will be well for young Conrad Jarrett. I adore Ordinary People more
every time I see it.
Ordinary People deserved the Oscar for Best Picture in 1980.
Now that Amazon's acquisition of MGM has been finalized, the company isn't letting any grass grow when it comes to exploiting the lucrative James Bond franchise, which they now co-own with Eon Productions. According to Indiewire, Eon and British 72 Films will create and produce an "Amazing Race"-style competition show based on the Bond series. The competitors will travel to locations visited by Agent 007 in a quest to win over $1 million in prize money. The series, titled "007's Road to a Million", will stream on Amazon Prime Video. For details, click here.
A
Star is Born has
been made many times—as four Hollywood feature films, one television movie, and
one Bollywood picture. The 1937 original, produced by David O. Selznick,
directed by William A. Wellman, is often forgotten amongst the more recent
versions, such as the celebrated 2018 remake starring Lady Gaga and Bradley
Cooper.
For
this reviewer’s money, the 1937 A Star is Born is superior to them all.
Granted, it is obviously dated and one must place oneself within the context of
the period in which the movie was released. It is also not a musical, as all
the others are. The first version also deals exclusively with the motion
picture industry. The second one, released in 1954 and starring Judy Garland
and James Mason, did as well… but following adaptations went more into the
music professions of the characters and incorporated Grammy Awards rather than
Oscars. If you want A Star is Born without musical numbers, and there is
ample support that the piece works more realistically without them, then the
1937 version is for you.
The
Oscar winning story, by William A. Wellman and Robert Carson, was the basis of
all the remakes, but here it was the origin, turned into a screenplay by Carson,
Dorothy Parker, and Alan Campbell. The tale is by now familiar ground—a young
woman becomes a star overnight while simultaneously her husband experiences ruin.
A rise and a fall, all in lovely Technicolor!
Esther
Blodgett (Janet Gaynor) is an innocent but bright-eyed farmgirl who is intent
on making her way to Hollywood to become an actress. Against her father and
aunt’s wishes, but encouraged by her grandmother, Esther leaves the nest and
goes to Tinsel Town. She quickly learns that things are not so easy. With the
help of a neighbor, Danny (Andy Devine), who happens to be an assistant
director, she is placed in positions where she can “meet” people. Sure enough, she
encounters a big star, Norman Maine (Fredric March). Unfortunately, Norman’s
glory days seem to be behind him as the bottle has dictated a gradual descent in
popularity. Nevertheless, Norman is struck by Esther and finagles a screen test
for her with his producer, Oliver Niles (Adolphe Menjou). Oliver immediately
sees Esther’s potential, gives her the more marketable name of “Vicki Lester,” and
she is off and running. Promising to quit drinking, Norman asks Esther to marry
him, and she accepts. But as Esther/Vicki becomes more successful, Norman falls
off the wagon and their relationship goes off the rails.
There
is one scene that exists in all the versions of A Star is Born, and that
is when the husband embarrasses his wife during her moment of triumph at an
awards ceremony—here the event is the Oscars, as it is in the 1954 edition. The
moment is powerful and excruciating, and it is one of the reasons both Gaynor
and March were nominated for Best Actor and Actress for the film.
Producer
Selznick was known for overseeing lavish, gorgeous productions, and A Star
is Born fits the bill. Beautifully photographed in that distinctive, vivid
1930s Technicolor by W. Howard Greene (who received an Honorary Oscar for his
achievement), the picture displays the glitz and glamour of that bygone,
mythical Hollywood era. Director Wellman was nominated for his efforts, and the
movie was up for Best Picture (the category was called Best Production then).
Gaynor
is especially good, and March is always brilliant. The supporting cast—Menjou,
Devine, May Robson, Lionel Stander, and Edgar Kennedy—is stellar.
The
picture, while assuredly a drama that takes a hard look at the alcoholism
destroying Maine, is also striking for the amount of humor it contains. There
are many Hollywood in-jokes, such as when Gaynor impersonates several leading
actresses of the day when she is waitressing at a star-studded party. Stander,
Devine, and Kennedy, known for their comedic turns, also provide much of the
levity.
The
Warner Archive Blu-ray is a new, meticulous 4K restoration from the original
nitrate Technicolor camera negative, and it looks absolutely fantastic. In
keeping with Warner disks that employ “A Night at the Movies” supplements, this
one contains a treasure trove of extras. The 1938 cartoon, “A Star is Hatched,”
is one of those Looney Tunes that features Hollywood star caricatures, and it’s
hilarious. A 1937 comic short featuring Joe Palooka and Shemp Howard, “Taking
the Count,” is amusing, and two other vintage shorts—“Mal Hallett and His
Orchestra” and “Alibi Mark”—are also entertaining and indicative of the type of
fare one would see at the theater in those days. The disk also incudes two
different Lux Radio Theater broadcasts of the story—one from 1937 featuring
Janet Gaynor and Robert Montgomery, and one from 1952 starring Judy Garland and
Walter Pidgeon. The theatrical trailer rounds out the package.
This
new region-free Blu-ray edition from Warner Archive is a must for fans of any version
of A Star is Born. The 1937 original, though, is and will always be
grand entertainment. Highly recommended.
(NOTE:
Much of this review is repeated from an earlier Cinema Retro review of a
previous Blu-ray release.)
In
the world of the Jewish Conservative Orthodox community, a divorce is truly
final only when the husband presents his wife with a “get”—a document in Hebrew
that grants the woman her freedom to be with other men. Likewise, the wife must
accept the get before the man can re-marry, too.
This
is the crux of the story behind Hester
Street, an independent art-house film that appeared in 1975, written and
directed by Joan Micklin Silver. Starring Carol Kane, who was nominated for
Best Actress for her performance as Gitl, a newly arrived immigrant to New York
City in 1896, and Steven Keats as her husband Yankl, who, in an attempt to
assimilate, in public goes by the name “Jake.” Jake has been in America for a
while and isn’t looking forward to the arrival of his wife and son from Europe,
for he has begun an affair with a wealthy, assimilated actress in the Yiddish
theatre named Mamie. When the very traditional Gitl arrives with her son, the
marriage disintegrates.
Luckily,
Gitl meets Bernstein, an Orthodox man who is much more suited for her
requirements, seeing that Jake has become something of a capitalist cad.
Therefore, she needs a “get” from Jake so that both husband and wife can
divorce and go their separate ways. That’s when Mamie’s money comes into play.
Silver
beautifully rendered this period drama on a miniscule budget. Location shooting
took place in and around New York’s lower east side, where much of the flavor
of the late 19th Century Jewish Orthodox community is still pretty much the
same. Replace the cars with horses and buggies, get the correct vintage
costumes, and you’re more than halfway there. The dialogue is mostly in Yiddish
(with English subtitles), thus making it an American foreign language film—an
oddity in 1975, to be sure (although Coppola’s The Godfather Part II appeared a year earlier with a great amount
of its dialogue spoken in Sicilian).
Keats
plays Jake as a rake and a rascal, but our perception of him is not that of a
villain. In many ways, he is the generic immigrant who came to America and
sincerely tried to assimilate, become “American,” and leave the Old Country
traditions behind. His fault is that he dreams of making big money in the States and this becomes his all-consuming desire,
forgetting that he has a wife and son. Kane’s character and spot-on portrayal
not only illustrates the role of females in the Orthodox community, but in many
ways is a commentary on the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s.
Hester Street is a terrific little
film that went out of print on DVD years ago and became a collector’s item on
the resale market until a Blu-ray release appeared in 2015. With that also now
out of print, Cohen Media Group has issued a welcome new edition in a 4K
restoration. Filmed in black and white by Kenneth Van Sickle, the picture is
grainy and flat—much like the early silent cinema of the that era!—which
actually is quite appropriate for the movie’s setting. That said, the new
restoration considerably sharpens the images and the display is the best seen
since the movie’s 1975 theatrical release. The feature comes with an archival
audio commentary with director Silver and producer Raphael D. Silver.
Also
new to this release is supplementary material not present on the previous
Blu-ray. Approximately eight minutes of an alternate opening sequence, with
commentary by Daniel Kremer (author of an upcoming book about Silver and her
work), is an interesting find. There are two relatively recent video
conversations with director Silver and film historian Shonni Enelow about the
making of Hester Street and Silver’s career as a filmmaker (Silver died
in 2020). There are also vintage interviews with Carol Kane, Doris Roberts, and
both Joan and Raphael Silver, likely ported over from the old DVD release. The restoration
trailer rounds out the package.
Hester Street is an excellent synagogue
discussion-group item for American Jews who want to explore the immigration
scene and the topics of tradition and assimilation; but it is also a good
educational piece for non-Jews who want to learn a little bit about New York
history and the Jewish Orthodox religion. Recommended.
Of
all the actors to emerge in the 1970s, there are few, if any, as captivating,
unpredictable and exciting as James Woods. He began the decade, and his on
screen career for that matter, for legendary director Elia Kazan in The
Visitors (1972), and in the next few years established himself as one of
American film's most promising young performers. He turned up as villains in
such classic TV shows as Kojak and Streets of San Francisco, but he also
appeared in some major 70s movies too, such as 1973's The Way We Were, Arthur
Penn's Night Movies (1975) and The Gambler (1975). But it was his performance
in The Onion Field (1979) which really signalled his arrival, as the
sociopathic cop killer Greg Powell. The film, based on Joseph Wambaugh's best-selling
non-fiction book, was a critical smash and earned Woods his first wave of
acclaim. It was a stunning performance, equally charismatic and frightening,
and it brought in a new face for cinema, an actor so convincing in his
intensity that you would have been scared of him had you met him in the street.
Of
course, it was really only the beginning. Into the next decade he proved
himself to be one of American cinema's most reliable, quirky, and appealing
character actors, appearing in such classics as Eyewitness (1981), David
Cronenberg's Videodrome (1983), Sergio Leone's masterpiece Once Upon a Time in
America (1984), Against All Odds (1984), Oliver Stone's Salvador (1986), for
which he received his first Oscar nomination, Best Seller (1987), Cop (1988)
and True Believer (1989). It was one of the most remarkable runs for any actor
of the era.
Woods
went on to appear in more than his fair share of stand outs in the following
decades, in such films as Chaplin (1991), The Hard Way (1992), The Specialist
(1994), Martin Scorsese's Casino (1995), for Oliver Stone again in both Nixon
(1995) and Any Given Sunday (1999), in Sofia Coppola's Virgin Suicides (1999)
and John Carpenter's Vampires (1998). His filmography reveals an almost
faultless body of work.
I
first had the idea to write a book about Woods' filmography in May 2021. I had
interviewed James in 2020 for a book I had written about Once Upon a Time in
America and, somewhat unexpectedly, we had stayed in touch. After I put
together a retrospective article for a vintage film magazine I sometimes put
out (Scenes), I presented the idea of a full book. He said he was OK with that,
but I presumed I would just write it and that would be it. No, he was happy to
do interviews- and we certainly did. For months in fact, we would speak every
week for hours on end, going over his many classics, from his early career days
in the 1970s, through his iconic films, right up to the most recent work. I got
the chance to interview the likes of Sharon Stone, Debbie Harry, Oliver Stone
and Jim Belushi, not to mention having Dolly Parton herself write the foreword
(she and Woods made a film together, Straight Talk). However, for the most part
the book is a journey through the career of James Woods, with Woods himself
acting as a sort of tour guide through his canon, and in the process, a part of
film history itself; beginning in the early Seventies with his experiences with
such directors as Sydney Pollack, Kazan, Harold Becker and others, through his
turbulent but rewarding work with Oliver Stone and numerous other legendary
filmmakers.
Woods
said to me at one point that the book was turning into a conversation between
two film lovers, one of whom just happened to be James Woods. And that, I
believe, sums it up rather well. This is a film lover's book, and it has the
distinction of having its subject as a kind of co-author. The resulting book,
The Films of James Woods, is a journey through a film career, yes, but it is
also a relaxed, freewheeling chat between two men, one in the UK, one in America,
and one who just happens to be a cinema legend. There is no gossip in the book,
no tell-all tattle, but a lot of movie talk. A hell of a lot, in fact.
Cinema Retro has received the following press release:
First 4K Ultra HD in the Paramount Presents Line Debuts May 17, 2022 with New and Legacy Bonus Content
One
of the greatest Westerns in cinematic history arrives for the first
time ever on 4K Ultra HD with High Dynamic Range (HDR) as part of the
Paramount Presents line when THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE debuts May 17, 2022 from Paramount Home Entertainment.
Four-time Academy Award®-winning*
director John Ford brought together an all-star cast for what is
considered by many critics to be a quintessential—and yet
pioneering—Western late in his storied career. Starring James Stewart
and John Wayne (together for the first time), alongside Vera Miles, Lee
Marvin, John Carradine and Lee Van Cleef, THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE
tells the engrossing story of a senator (Stewart), his old friend
(Wayne), and a despicable outlaw called Liberty Valance (Marvin).
THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCEwas
selected in 2007 for preservation in the United States National Film
Registry by the Library of Congress for being "culturally, historically,
or aesthetically significant.” Adapted from a short story by Dorothy
M. Johnson, the screenplay by James Warner Bellah and Willis Goldbeck
gave us the often-quoted line “When the legend becomes fact, print the
legend.”
Meticulously remastered in stunning 4K Ultra HD for its 60th anniversary this year, THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE
is presented in collectible packaging featuring a foldout image of the
film’s original theatrical poster and an interior spread with key movie
moments. The release also includes access to a Digital copy of the film
and a Blu-ray Disc™ with a new Filmmaker Focus featuring film historian
Leonard Maltin discussing John Ford, the film, and its legacy. The
Blu-ray™ also includes legacy bonus content as detailed below:
·Filmmaker Focus - Leonard Maltin on The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance—NEW!
Feature commentary
by filmmaker Peter Bogdanovich, along with his archival recordings with
John Ford and James Stewart
Selected scene commentary
with introduction by Dan Ford, along with his archival recordings with
John Ford, James Stewart and Lee
Marvin
The Size Of Legends, The Soul Of Myth
Chapter 1: Changing Of The Guard
Chapter 2: The Irascible Poet
Chapter 3: The Hero Doesn't Win, The Winner Isn't Heroic
Chapter 4: Most Things Happen By Accident
Chapter 5: The Great Protector
Chapter 6: Spotlight - Lee Marvin
Chapter 7: Print The Legend
Original Theatrical Trailer
About Paramount Presents
This
collectible line spans celebrated classics to film-lover favorites,
each from the studio’s renowned library. Every Paramount Presents
release features never-before-seen bonus content and exclusive
collectible packaging. Additional titles available in the Paramount
Presents collection on Blu-ray include: Fatal Attraction, King Creole, To Catch a Thief, Flashdance, Days of Thunder, Pretty In Pink, Airplane!, Ghost, Roman Holiday, The Haunting, The Golden Child, Trading Places, The Court Jester, Love Story, Elizabethtown, The Greatest Show on Earth, Mommie Dearest,Last Train From Gun Hill, 48 HRS., Another 48 HRS., Almost Famous, A Place in the Sun, Nashville, Bugsy Malone, Breakdown,The Sheik, Vanilla Sky, Ragtime, Harold and Maude and Ordinary People.
Warner Archive has released a Blu-ray edition of the 1966 thriller Eye of the Devil. The MGM movie, directed by J. Lee Thompson, is one of the last major B&W studio releases. The film had a troubled production history. The female lead had been Kim Novak, but when she was injured during filming, Deborah Kerr took over and had to reshoot all of her scenes - a costly and troublesome process. However, this meant that Kerr was reunited with her Separate Tables co-star David Niven (the pair would be seen on screen again the following year in Casino Royale). Eye of the Devil is an atmospheric thriller with supernatural overtones. Niven plays the heir to a massive French vineyard, though he keeps his distance from the massive rural chateau, preferring to be with wife Kerr and their two young children in an urban setting. An emissary from the vineyard summons him back to the chateau, presumably because the harvest is failing, but Niven's emotional turmoil indicates that there are other factors dictating why he is reluctant to return. When Kerr and the children show up, things deteriorate quickly. Kerr finds the locals to be frightened and unfriendly. Inside the chateau, the staff and Niven appear to be collaborating on hiding information from her. Additionally, a strange brother and sister team (Sharon Tate in her first major role and David Hemmings) are an omnipresent and threatening presence. Kerr ultimate suspects that the presence of a local priest (Donald Pleasence) is inciting people to dabble in witchcraft and the black mass. All of this leads to the prequisite sequences in which a helpless woman is tempted to poke about dark castle corridors and crypts to find the facts.
The film is disturbing from minute one, largely because it is devoid of any humor whatsoever. Every minute exudes a sense of menace. The cinematography adds greatly to the tension and the cast is highly watchable, even if no one attempts to hide their full-throated British accents while playing French characters. (The exteriors were shot in France, the interiors were filmed at MGM's Borehamwood Studios). The movie is consistently engrossing, even if it never reaches the level one might expect, given the sterling cast. Tate makes a significant visual impression, but it should be noted that her immaculate British accent was dubbed. The new region-free Blu-ray release does justice to the crisp B&W photography with a fine transfer. One quibble: Turner Classic Movies often shows an original production featurette from the film. One wishes it was included with this release, which features only the trailer as a supplement. However, spending any time with Niven and Kerr is time well-spent.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
Cinema
Retro has received the following press release from Paramount:
Paramount Pictures Celebrates the 50th Anniversary of Francis Ford Coppala's Cinematic Masterpiece
HOLLYWOOD,
Calif. – March 1, 2022 — In celebration of the 50th anniversary of
Francis Ford Coppola’s Academy Award®-winning* masterworkThe Godfather, Paramount Pictures will be releasing all three films
in the epic trilogy on 4K Ultra HD for the first time ever on March 22, 2022,
with all the films having been meticulously restored under the direction of
Coppola.
“I
am very proud of The Godfather, which certainly defined the first third
of my creative life,” said Francis Ford Coppola. “With this 50th
anniversary tribute, I’m especially proud Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda:
The Death of Michael Corleone is included, as it captures Mario and my original
vision in definitively concluding our epic trilogy. It’s also gratifying to
celebrate this milestone with Paramount alongside the wonderful fans who’ve
loved it for decades, younger generations who still find it relevant today, and
those who will discover it for the first time.”
Coppola’s
masterful film adaptation of Mario Puzo’s novel chronicles the rise and fall of
the Corleone family and the film trilogy is rightfully viewed as one of the
greatest in cinematic history. In preparation for the 50th
anniversary of the first film’s original release on March 24, 1972, Paramount
and Coppola’s production company American Zoetrope undertook a painstaking
restoration of all three films over the course of three years. Every
effort was made to create the finest possible presentation for today’s
audiences who can watch the films using technology that has advanced
dramatically since 2007 when the last restoration was completed by eminent film
historian and preservationist Robert Harris. Using that work as a blueprint,
the team spent thousands of hours to ensure that every frame was evaluated to
create the most pristine presentation while remaining true to the original look
and feel of the films.
The
monumental effort included the following:
Over
300 cartons of film were scrutinized to find the best possible resolution
for every frame of all three films.
Over
4,000 hours were spent repairing film stains, tears, and other anomalies
in the negatives.
Over
1,000 hours were spent on rigorous color correction to ensure the high
dynamic range tools were respectful of the original vision of Coppola and
cinematographer Gordon Willis.
In
addition to the 5.1 audio approved by Walter Murch in 2007, the original
mono tracks on The Godfather and The Godfather: Part II have been restored.
All
work was overseen by Coppola.
“We
felt privileged to restore these films and a little in awe every day we worked
on them,” said Andrea Kalas, senior vice president, Paramount Archives.
“We were able to witness first-hand how the brilliant cinematography, score,
production design, costume design, editing, performances, and, of course,
screenwriting and direction became famously more than the sum of their
parts. It was our commitment to honor all of the filmmakers’ exceptional
work.”
Newly
restored and remastered in Dolby Vision, all three films in the landmark
trilogy will be released together with HDR-10 on 4K Ultra HD Digital and 4K
Ultra HD Blu-ray™ for the first time ever. The 4K Ultra HD
Blu-ray set will include The Godfather, The Godfather: Part II,
and Coppola’s recently re-edited version of the final film, Mario Puzo’s THE
GODFATHER, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone. The disc set includes
legacy commentaries by Coppola, as well as access to Digital copies of The
Godfather, The Godfather: Part II and Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda:
The Death of Michael Corleone.
In
addition to the widely available 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray set, a 4K Ultra HD Limited
Collector’s Edition will also be released in deluxe packaging and includes a
hardcover coffee table book featuring stunning photographs, as well as portrait
art prints on archival paper. Both 4K Ultra HD sets include new bonus
content including an introduction to The Godfather by Coppola, a
featurette about the preservation process, photos by acclaimed photographer
Steve Schapiro, home movie footage, and comparisons of the new restoration to
earlier versions of the films. A full list of new and legacy bonus
content follows:
NEW
BONUS CONTENT:
·
Introduction to The Godfather by Francis Ford Coppola
·
Full Circle: Preserving The Godfather—Paramount Pictures
archivists detail the incredible restoration process with archival footage
showing the evolution of the film through various home entertainment
incarnations as picture and audio technologies make quantum leaps over the
decades.
·
Capturing the Corleones: Through the Lens of Photographer Steve Schapiro—
In this reflective and frank discussion, special photographer Steve Schapiro
shares his unique perspective and cherished memories as a witness to the making
of this seminal film. Commentary on curated archival images makes for a
fascinating, never-before-seen addition to the production’s history.
·
The Godfather: Home Movies— An assortment of 8mm home movie
footage shot in 1971 offers a candid glimpse into the production of The
Godfather. Shot on location at the Norton family estate on Staten
Island’s Emerson Hill, this is the first time it’s been made available to the
public.
·
Restoration Comparisons— Before and after highlights showcase extensive
picture quality improvements to The Godfather.
LEGACY
BONUS CONTENT:
The Masterpiece
That Almost Wasn’t
Godfather World
Emulsional
Rescue—Revealing The Godfather
…when the
shooting stopped
The Godfather on the Red Carpet
Four Short Films
on The Godfather
oThe
Godfather vs. The Godfather: Part II
oCannoli
oRiffing
on the Riffing
oClemenza
·The
Family Tree
·Crime
Organization Chart
·Connie
and Carlo’s Wedding Album
·2008
Credits
·Behind
the Scenes
oA Look
Inside
oOn
Location
oFrancis
Ford Coppola’s Notebook
oMusic
of The Godfather
§Nino
Rota
§Carmine
Coppola
oCoppola
& Puzo on Screenwriting
oGordon
Willis on Cinematography
oStoryboards
– The Godfather: Part II
oStoryboards
– The Godfather: Part III
oThe
Godfather Behind the Scenes 1971
·Additional
Scenes
·Galleries
·Trailers
·Acclaim
& Response
·Additional
Material
·The
Filmmakers
·The
Godfather: Part III—newly
remastered and restored versions of the original theatrical cut and Coppola’s
1991 cut (note: these are exclusive to the 4K Ultra HD Collections)
Newly
restored and remastered versions of The Godfather, The Godfather: Part II, and
Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone will
also be available together on Blu-ray™ with access to Digital copies
and the new and legacy bonus content detailed above.
Few actors had the screen and stage presence of Yul Brynner. There
never was an actor quite like him and there hasn't been since. Like most
thespians, Brynner had his share of good movies as well as those that
fell considerably short of their potential. Nevertheless, the man never
gave a false performance. He came across as supremely self-confidant
even when he must have suspected the material he was given proved to be
far below his considerable talents. Much of his self-confidence seemed
to stem from an inflated ego. Robert Vaughn once told me that when
Brynner arrived on the set of "The Magnificent Seven" in Mexico, he was
still firmly in the King of Siam mode that had seen him win an Oscar.
Vaughn said he carried himself as though he were real life royalty at
all times. You didn't chat with him casually. Rather, he would grant you
an audience. As Brynner's stature as a top boxoffice attraction began
to wane, he returned over and over again to his signature role in stage
productions of "The King and I" and found his mojo and star power were
still very much intact when it came to touring in front of live
audiences. His exotic look and manner of speaking were invariably
intoxicating. Given Brynner's enduring legacy as a Hollywood icon it's
rather surprising to remember that he had very few major hits. "The King
and I" in 1956 was his star-making vehicle and his role in "The Ten
Commandments", released the same year, helped build on his success.
However, with the exception of the surprise success of "The Magnificent
Seven" in 1960, Brynner proved to be more of a reliable on screen
attraction than a powerhouse draw in the way that John Wayne, Cary Grant
and Burt Lancaster were regarded. For most of Brynner's screen career,
he top-lined in major studio releases that were relatively modest in
terms of production budgets. Since this was during an era in which a
decent profit for a film made it a success, Brynner remained popular for
many years. By the 1970s, however, his clout had diminished
considerably. He would have only one memorable big screen success during
the decade- his brilliant appearance as the murderous robot in
"Westworld" (1974). He would concentrate primarily on stage work until
his death in 1985.
"Invitation to a Gunfighter" is the kind of mid-range vehicle that
defined most of Brynner's career in Hollywood. Released in 1964 by
Stanley Kramer's production company, the film is a perfect showcase for
Brynner in that it lacked any rival star power and afforded him a
smorgasbord of scene-stealing opportunities. The story opens in the
wake of the Confederate surrender that marked the end of the Civil War.
Matt Weaver (George Segal), a veteran of the Confederate army, is making
an arduous journey home to his Texas ranch on foot through the desert.
When the exhausted man finally reaches the small town he calls home, he
gets a rude welcome. His ranch is now occupied by another man who claims
he bought the deed from the township. Matt soon learns that he is
despised by the locals because he is the only man to have served in the Southern army. He is notified by the town's political kingpin, Sam
Brewster (Pat Hingle), that a technicality has been used to seize
ownership of his ranch. He also advises him to move on out of town
because he is no longer welcome there. Matt, however, is not about to be
cheated. He confronts the new owner of his house and is forced to shoot
him dead in self-defense. Brewster manipulates the facts and accuses
Matt of being a murderer. Matt takes possession of his ranch and uses
firepower to hold off the townspeople. He is surreptitiously visited by
his former lover Ruth (Janice Rule), who admits that she could no longer
bear waiting for him to return from the war. She reluctantly married
Crane Adams (Clifford David), a local Union war veteran who lost an arm
in the conflict. Since then, Crane has become an alcoholic with a
violent temper and his relationship to Ruth has devolved into a loveless
marriage of convenience.
Unable to lure Matt from his besieged homestead, Brewster takes the
step of announcing to the town council that he will hire a gunslinger to
kill him. Coincidentally, a man with the exotic name of Jules Gaspard
d'Estaing overhears the offer. He is just passing through on a
stagecoach ride but is immediately intrigued. d'Estaing convinces
Brewster that he is a master gunfighter and demonstrates his prowess
with a pistol. Brewster hires him on the spot but d'Estaing is in no
hurry to carry out the mission. Instead, he sees the townspeople for
what they are: cowardly hypocrites and delights in humiliating Brewster
in front of them. d'Estaing is an intimidating presence to the
townspeople. They can't pinpoint his ethnicity and know nothing of his
background. He dresses immaculately, speaks fluent French, plays the
harpsichord and chain smokes Churchill cigars (though I wonder what
they called them in this era before Churchill was born.) Ever
provocative to his hosts, he stirs the pot even further by moving into
the house of Crane and Ruth Adams. Predictably, it isn't long before
Ruth is entranced by this larger-than-life man of mystery who dresses
like a dandy and is highly cultured- the very opposite of her own
husband and Matt. Tensions rise as Crane correctly suspects a romance
may be brewing. d'Estaing insists he intends to carry out his mission to
kill Matt, despite Ruth's protests, but he later makes it clear to her
that he intends to manipulate the situation so that Matt is spared and
Brewster is dragged down in disgrace.
The film, directed with admirable if unremarkable competence by
Richard Wilson, is a slow-moving, talky affair that leads to some
intelligent discussions about race relations and the horrors of bigotry.
(This was, after all, a production financed by Stanley Kramer, who
never heeded the old adage, "Leave the messages to Western Union!").
What saves the movie from devolving into a completely pedantic affair is
the charisma of Yul Brynner. It also helps that he is playing an
interesting character with a mysterious background and the revelations
he makes to Ruth about his life only make him even more intriguing. This
is a "thinking man's" western that touches on social issues as well as
the desperate plight of women in the old West, when their survival often
saw them entering dreadful marriages simply for financial security and
protection. Brynner gets fine support from Janice Rule and rising star
George Segal and Pat Hingle plays the town's pompous boss with
appropriate, sneering superficial charm.
"Invitation to a Gunfighter" is by no means a classic but it does
afford viewers to spend some time with Yul Brynner and that is always
time well-spent.
The film is currently streaming on Amazon Prime.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER KINO LORBER BLU-RAY FROM AMAZON
Cinema Retro continues covering films that are not currently available on home video in the U.S. or U.K.
BY BRIAN HANNAN
"Sanctuary" is an
overheated melodrama that stands as a classic example of Hollywood’s offensive
attitudes to women. Nobel prize-winning author William Faulkner could hardly
blame the movies for sensationalising his misogynistic source material since,
if anything, the movie took a softer line.The story is told primarily in flashback as headstrong southern belle
Temple Drake (Lee Remick) attempts to mitigate the death sentence passed on her
maid Nancy (Odetta). Given that such appeals are directed at Drake’s Governor
father (Howard St John), and that the maid has been condemned for murdering
Drake’s infant child, that’s a whole lot of story to swallow.
Worse is
to follow. Drake takes up with Prohibition bootlegger Candy Man (Yves Montand)
after being raped by him and thereafter appears happy to live with him in a New
Orleans brothel - the “sanctuary,” no irony intended, of the title - despite
him slapping her around. The film steers clear of turning her into the
prostitute of the original book, but pretty much sets up the notion that high
class women will fall for a low-class tough guy whose virility is demonstrated
by his brutality. In other words a “real man” rather than the dilettantes she
has previously rejected.
After the
Candy Man dies, Drake returns home and marries wealthy suitor Gowan Stevens
(Bradford Dillman) who blames himself, rightly, for Drake falling into the
clutches of the gangster in the first place. But a past threatening to engulf
her precipitates the infanticide.
Faulkner
was a Hollywood insider, adapting Sanctuary for The Story of Temple Drake
(1933) and earning high praise for his work on Bogart vehicle To Have and
Have Not (1944) and The Big Sleep (1946). The success of The
Tarnished Angels (1957) starring Rock Hudson, The Long, Hot Summer
(1958) with Paul Newman and The Sound and the Fury (1959) headlined by
Yul Brynner had sent his cachet rocketing. But all three were directed by
Americans – Douglas Sirk and Martin Ritt – who had a distinctive visual style
and an ear for what made melodrama work.
Sanctuary had been handed to British
director Tony Richardson (Look Back in Anger, 1959) and he didn’t quite
understand how to make the best of the difficult project. So while Lee Remick
manages to suggest both strength and fragility, and makes her character’s
wanton despair believable, Yves Montand is miscast and Bradford Dillman fails
to convince even though portraying a weak character. Too many of the smaller
roles appear as cliches. And it’s hard to believe the maid’s motivation in
turning murderer.
What was
acceptable steamy melodrama in the 1930s fails to click three decades on.
Faulkner’s thesis that high-falutin’ women want a man to master them and
furthermore will fall in love with their rapist seems to lack any understanding
of the female mind and will not appeal to the modern sensibility any more than
it did on release. Lee Remick is what holds the picture together, in part
because she plays so well the role of a woman embracing degradation, and
refusing – no matter how insane the idea appears – to let go of the man she
believes is the love of her life. It’s not Fifty Shades of Grey, but
it’s not that far off that kind of fantasy figure, and given the success of
that book, it’s entirely possible there is a market for what Faulkner has to
peddle.
Despite my criticisms of "Sanctuary", it still
deserves to be available on home video for retro movie lovers to form
their own opinions.
(Although "Sanctuary" is not available on home video, it can be streamed as a public domain title on YouTube.)
It isn't often that you might expect to read the word "delightful" in
a review of a Charles Bronson movie but "From Noon Till Three" is just
that: a delightful 1976 send-up of the traditional Western genre. In
fact it seems like this was the year in which numerous revisionist
Westerns were released. They included "Buffalo Bill and the Indians",
"The Outlaw Josey Wales", "The Missouri Breaks" and John Wayne's final
film, "The Shootist". By 1976 Charles Bronson was an established screen
presence for about two decades.He was a familiar face to American
movie-goers who liked his work as a supporting actor but it was the
European market that elevated him to star status. Bronson finally began
to get top-billing in Westerns and action films and became reasonably
popular in America. But it was the 1974 release of his smash hit "Death
Wish" that saw him soar to the level of superstar. The film was a mixed
blessing. Bronson made some good films in the following years but
eventually succumbed to the lure of a quick pay check, cranking out
low-end urban crime movies that were often as absurd as they were
over-the-top. "From Noon Till Three" allows Bronson and his real life
wife and frequent co-star Jill Ireland a rare opportunity to flex their
comedic muscles, which they do impressively.
Bronson plays Graham Dorsey, a member of small time gang of bandits
who are riding into a one-horse town to rob the bank. The film's opening
is quite eerie as the bandits become unnerved when they discover there
isn't a single living soul anywhere in the town. This sets in motion a
"Twilight Zone"-like beginning that is quickly explained as a nightmare
Dorsey is suffering, but is nonetheless quite effective for grabbing
the viewer's attention. When the gang nears the actual town, Dorsey's
horse goes lame and must be shot. He rides double with another bandit
until they reach the opulent mansion house of Amanda (Jill Irleand), an
attractive widow who resides in the countryside with only a maid and
servant as companions. When the bandits arrive on her doorstep, she is
home alone and is understandably filled with anxiety being in the
company of the men, who demand she give them a horse. She lies and says
she doesn't have one- and Dorsey validates her story, opting to stay
behind at the house while the robbery takes place. He finds Amanda very
desirable but none-the-less acts like a gentleman- though as her tough
facade fades, she becomes susceptible to his charm. Dorsey claims he
suffers from incurable impotence, a ploy that works when Amanda finally
volunteers to "cure" him. This results in the pair spending several
heavenly hours together enjoying sexual adventures and falling in love.
When word reaches Amanda that Dorsey's fellow bandits have been
captured, she implores him to try to save them from hanging. Dorsey
pretends to ride to their rescue, but instead bushwhacks a traveling con
man and adopts his identity. The other man is mistaken for Dorsey and
shot dead by a posse. Dorsey is ironically arrested because the man he
is impersonating is also wanted by the law. Got all that? Things get
really complicated when Dorsey spends a year in prison, studying
(ironically) how to be a banker. He intends to return to Amanda and live
their dream of moving to Boston, where he can get a job as a bank
manager. When he returns to the woman he has been obsessing over for the
last year, the reception he receives from her is something less than
welcoming. Seems that since she believed Dorsey was dead, she set about
memorializing him in a memoir titled "From Noon Till Three", a
scandalous record of the hours in which they made love and fell in love.
In the book, Amanda relates tall tales about Dorsey's crime exploits
that he had previously bragged about...and she takes a bit of
intentional creative license by describing him as an elegant, dashing
man when, in fact, he looks like what he is: a saddle tramp. To say much
more would spoil the fun. Suffice it to say that the film really kicks
into gear when Dorsey discovers that Amanda's memoir has become an
international sensation and she is idolized worldwide by both men and
women. She doesn't have much incentive to now admit that Dorsey is not
only alive and well but also falls considerable short of the handsome
hunk the world has come to imagine.
"From Noon Till Three" is stylishly directed by Frank D. Gilroy and its
based upon his novel of the same name. Gilroy had the magic touch in
terms of bringing out the best in both Charles Bronson and Jill Ireland,
both of whom rarely had an opportunity to demonstrate their flair for
light comedy and they are both terrific. Gilroy, who also penned the
screenplay, took advantage of a new era of cynicism in major films and
"From Noon Till Three" proved to be far ahead of its time in predicting
how the general public can be bamboozled into believing urban legends if
they are marketed creatively enough. (Coincidentally, Paddy Chayefsky's
"Network", released the same year, took an equally cynical view of the
current day TV news industry.) The movie is a wealth of small
pleasures and unexpected plot turns and boasts a fine score by Elmer
Bernstein and impressive camerawork by Lucien Ballard, not to mention an
impressive mansion house set by Robert Clatworthy. I don't want to
overstate the merits of the film but I do want to point out that even if
you're not a Bronson fan you should give this one a try.
"From Noon Till Three" is currently streaming on Amazon Prime.
Click here to order Kino Lorber DVD edition from Amazon
Peter Cushing, André
Morell, Yvonne Mitchell, Donald Pleasence in a new restoration of
Nigel Kneale’s 1954
adaptation of the George Orwell classic
Cinema Retro has received the following press release from the BFI:
BFI
Blu-ray/DVD, iTunes and Amazon Prime release on 11 April 2022
George Orwell’s enduring dystopian
masterpiece is brought vividly to life in this celebrated BBC production.
Adapted by Nigel Kneale (The Quatermass Experiment), NINETEEN
EIGHTY-FOUR (directed byRudolf Cartier) broke new ground for
television drama when first broadcast in 1954. On 11 April, tying in with a
Nigel Kneale season at BFI Southbank, the BFI brings this classic production to
Blu-ray and DVD in a Dual Format Edition, and to DTO via iTunes and Amazon
Prime. Experience Orwell’s haunting vision of a society dominated by relentless
tyranny and the subversion of truth – a world in which Big Brother is always
watching you.
Featuring
a stunning central performance from Peter Cushing (The Curse of
Frankenstein, Star Wars) as the doomed Winston Smith, this small-screen
landmark has been newly restored by the BFI using original film materials from
the BBC Archive and the BFI National Archive. Numerous extras include a newly
recorded audio commentary by television historian Jon Dear, host of Nigel
Kneale podcast Bergcast, with Toby Hadoke and Andy Murray, and a newly
filmed conversation between the BFI’s Dick Fiddy and historian Oliver Wake, on
the myths that have grown up around the production in the last 60-odd years.
NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR is released
alongside the BFI Southbank centenary celebration of screenwriter Nigel
Kneale. A season, NIGHTMARES AND DAYDREAMS, runs throughout April in
partnership with Picturehouse to commemorate Kneale’s contribution to British
television. His adult drama and tense thrillers with a sci-fi or horror slant
went on to influence the likes of John Carpenter, Stephen King and Ben
Wheatley. Often enthralling and terrifying, Kneale’s visionary work showing on
the big screen includes the restored version of NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR. The
screening, on Monday 4 April at 6.30pm in NFT1 will be followed by a
panel discussion. Other titles screening in the season include FIRST MEN IN THE
MOON, QUARTERMASS AND THE PIT, THE YEAR OF THE SEX OLYMPICS and THE WOMAN IN
BLACK and there will be a special table reading of OUT OF THE UNKNOWN: THE
CHOPPER, as part of the BFI’s Missing Believed Wiped programme.
Picturehouse Crouch End will be hosting a day-long
event on Saturday 23 April featuring expert panellists and members of cast and
crew looking at Kneale’s film and TV work and his influence and legacy. Events
include a live reading of ‘lost’ 1942 radio play YOU MUST LISTEN, and
screenings of several of Kneale classics, including THE QUATERMASS EXPERIMENT:
CONTACT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, THE STONE TAPE, AGAINST THE CROWD: MURRAIN and
LATE NIGHT STORY: THE PHOTOGRAPH.
Special features
Presented in High Definition and Standard Definition
Newly recorded audio commentary on Nineteen
Eighty-Four by television historian Jon Dear, host of Nigel Kneale
podcast Bergcast, with Toby Hadoke and Andy Murray
Late Night Line-Up (BBC, 1965, 23 mins): members of the cast and crew look
back on the controversies surrounding this adaptation of Orwell’s classic
The Ministry of Truth (2022, 24 mins): in conversation
with the BFI’s Dick Fiddy, television historian Oliver Wake dispels some
of the myths that have grown up around the groundbreaking drama over the
course of the past half century
Nigel Kneale: Into the Unknown (2022, 72 mins): writer, actor and
stand-up comedian Toby Hadoke and Nigel Kneale biographer and programmer
Andy Murray try to unpick who Kneale was, what he did and why his work
still matters today
Gallery of rare images from the BBC Archives
Original script (downloadable PDF)
Newly commissioned sleeve artwork
by Matt Needle
·
** First pressing only** Illustrated booklet with essays by Oliver Wake and
David Ryan; credits and notes on the special features.
Product details
RRP: £19.99 / Cat. no. BFIB1445 / 12
UK / 1954 / black and white / 113 mins
/ English language, with optional subtitles for the Deaf and partial hearing /
original aspect ratio 1.33:1 // BD50: 1080p/50i, 25fps, mono audio
(48kHz/24-bit) / DVD9: PAL, 25fps, Dolby Digital 1.0 mono audio (24kHz/16-bit)
Russian Roulette (originally titled Kill Kosygin!) starts out promisingly enough but ultimately ends up being unsatisfying and misguided. Produced
by Elliott Kastner, who was an old hand at making good, populist
entertainment, the production was shot entirely in Vancouver. George
Segal plays a renegade cop (were there any other kind in the 1970s?) who
has been suspended from the local police force for various infractions.
Suddenly, he is recruited by Canadian secret intelligence to help
thwart a reputed plot to assassinate Soviet Premier Kosygin, who is due
to arrive in a matter of days for a high profile conference. Segal
learns that he is being set up in an elaborate and confusing plot that
involves traitorous KGB agents who want to kill their own premier in
order to prevent him from initiating an era of detente with the West.
Their plan involves kidnapping a local dissident (Val Avery), drugging
him and using him as a human bomb who will be dropped on Kosygin's
limousine from a helicopter! (I'm not making this up.) Along the way,
Segal finds he's being set up as a dupe and is framed for murder. The
entire tired affair ends in a race against time with Segal going
mano-a-mano with a KGB killer on the roof of a landmark hotel that
Kosygin is en route to (the only sequence that affords the slightest
hint of suspense). Absurdly, Kosygin's motorcade is permitted to
continue racing to the hotel despite the fact that hundreds of people
are watching a running gun battle taking place on the roof.
The
film was directed by Lou Lombardo, who made a name for himself as an
editor of great talent after supervising the cutting of The Wild Bunch. As
director, he keeps the action flowing but the plot absurdities soon
distract from some otherwise interesting angles and performances. The
fine supporting cast includes Gordon Jackson, Denholm Elliott, Nigel
Stock and Louise Fletcher, but their characters are rather boring. The
film also throws in Christina Raines for sex appeal but she comes across
as the dullest leading lady in memory, barely registering much emotion
even when finding a dead body in her bathroom. (Although most of us
would find such a development a bit disturbing, Lombardo cuts to a scene
of Segal and Raines enjoying a spot of breakfast tea- while the man's
body remains on the bathroom floor.) Segal is always enjoyable to watch
and his wiseguy persona is in full bloom here, but the production is
amateurish on all levels considering the talent involved. Maybeeveryone
involved just wanted a paid getaway and had a desire to visit
Vancouver. (It should be mentioned that director Lombardo was said to be
battling drinking problems during production and that the finale of the
film - the only truly effective scene- was directed by Anthony Squire,
who did not receive screen credit.)
The film is currently streaming on Shout! Factory TV. The app and subscription for this service are also available through Amazon Prime video.
A highlight of Sunday's BAFTA awards was the performance of Dame Shirley Bassey, who sang "Diamonds are Forever" as part of a tribute to James Bond's 60 years on the big screen.
Actor William Hurt, Oscar winner for the 1985 film "Kiss of the Spider Woman", has died at age 71. Prostate cancer was apparently the cause of death. Hurt came to the fore as a popular leading man in the 1980s with roles in films such as "Altered States", "Broadcast News", "The Accidental Tourist", "Body Heat", "The Big Chill", "Children of a Lesser God" and "Kiss of the Spider Woman" in which he played an imprisoned transvestite. Hurt's trademark was his low-key charm. Some critics griped that he lacked charisma, but his choice of early film roles resulted in his being nominated for Best Actor Oscars in three consecutive years. Equally at home in stage and TV productions, in more recent years Hurt had appeared in a number of superhero blockbusters including "Avengers: Endgame", "The Incredible Hulk", "Captain America: Civil War", "Avengers: Infinity War" and "Black Widow". For more, click here.
One of the most bizarre and original crime movies of its era is director Michael Ritchie's "Prime Cut", released in 1972. Gene Hackman plays a magnate who presides over a mid-western beef manufacturing empire that serves as a cover for his real purpose: kidnapping and trafficking teenage girls into the sex trade. Things heat up when Chicago gangster Lee Marvin and his team are sent by the mob to collect an overdue debt from Hackman. In the process, he encounters a young victim of Hackman's sex slave business, played by Sissy Spacek. The mayhem that follows is violent and brutal and Ritchie places it all in the sun-drenched cornfields that look like the benign setting of an Andrew Wyeth painting. People are beaten, gored, shot, stabbed and occasionally ground into sausages. It's pretty rough going but it's also quite witty and humorous and Marvin and Hackman make terrific antagonists. If you haven't seen it, click here to buy the Kino Lorber Blu-ray from Amazon.
One
of the most celebrated and critically acclaimed rock concert films is Martin
Scorsese’s documentary, The Last Waltz, which was unleashed in the
spring of 1978. The movie documents the final concert performed by The Band,
the legendary session group for Bob Dylan and others that became a recording
and touring entity in their own right in the late 1960s and early 70s.
The
Band, hailing from Canada, got their start as The Hawks, the backup band for
rockabilly singer Ronnie Hawkins. By the mid-sixties, they were working for
Dylan with the name change to The Band, and also started recording on their own
(Music from Big Pink was their debut in 1968). At the time of their
breakup, the group consisted of Robbie Robertson (guitar, vocals), Rick Danko
(bass, guitar, fiddle, vocals), Richard Manuel (keyboards, vocals), Garth
Hudson (keyboards, sax), Levon Helm (drums, guitar, vocals), and unofficial
sixth member John Simon, who was their record producer and occasional musician.
By
late 1976, Robertson had become weary of touring and wanted to do a final
concert (and ultimately leave the group). The rest of The Band went along with
it, even though they didn’t particularly want to end their partnership. Robertson
enlisted the help of concert impresario Bill Graham, and they secured the
Winterland Ballroom in San Francisco for a “celebration” on Thanksgiving Day
(November 25), 1976, that even included a turkey dinner for attendees. Both Bob
Dylan and Ronnie Hawkins were invited to perform, but as the event was being
planned, more guest stars were added, culminating in a who’s who roster of top
musicians, including Eric Clapton, Neil Young, Van Morrison, Neil Diamond, Joni
Mitchell, Ringo Starr, Ronnie Wood, Paul Butterfield, Dr. John, Muddy Waters,
and others. Even more guests were filmed in studio settings later. (Not widely
known is that Stephen Stills was supposed to join the concert, but he arrived
late toward the end of the evening, only to participate in a group jam that was
deleted from the final film. This can be seen as a bonus supplement outtake on
home video versions of the movie.)
A
mere six weeks prior to the concert, it was decided that the event should be
documented on film, and so Robertson, impressed with what he’d seen of Martin
Scorsese’s work and knowing that the man had been assistant director and
co-editor of Woodstock (1970), called the filmmaker. Scorsese, busy with
New York, New York (1977), somehow found the time to fit the shoot into
his schedule. With minimum preparation, Scorsese hired such cinematographers as
Michael Chapman, Vilmos Zsigmond, László
Kovács, and others to strategize and film the
complicated live show in which anything could happen.
They
got the job done, and the result is indeed remarkable.
Scorsese
and Robertson (also acting as co-producer) decided to intersperse the concert
footage with backstage interviews, a tour of The Band’s recording studio and
HQ, and a couple of extra performances shot on a sound stage with Emmylou
Harris and the Staple Singers.
Indeed,
The Last Waltz is a wonderful concert film—the photography and sound is
exceptional and the performances are fun and enjoyable. However, this reviewer
has always had a minor quibble with the movie—and concert films like it—when
the flow of the concert is broken up by inserting backstage interviews. When
compared to something like Stop Making Sense (1984), which is a Talking
Heads concert from start to finish without interruptions, The Last Waltz feels
choppy. Aside from that, The Last Waltz deservedly belongs on the list
of four or five greatest rock concert documentaries.
The
Criterion Collection’s new re-issue comes in two flavors—4K Ultra + Blu-ray
Combo (2 disks), or the single Blu-ray only package. The movie is a new 4K
digital restoration, supervised and approved by Scorsese, and it looks beautiful.
The 5.1 surround DTS-HD Master Audio is supervised and approved by Robertson.
There are two alternate soundtracks—the original 1978 2.0 surround mix, and an
uncompressed stereo mix from 2001.
Two
previously issued audio commentaries accompany the movie. Both feature Scorsese
and Robertson and/or other members of The Band, the production crew, and
performers Dr. John, Ronnie Hawkins, and Mavis Staples.
Most
of the supplements are ported over from the previous 2002 “special edition” DVD,
including the aforementioned “Jam 2” outtake, a TV interview from 1978 with
Scorsese and Robertson and a featurette, “Revisiting The Last Waltz.”
New to the Criterion edition is a recent half-hour conversation between
Scorsese and Rolling Stone writer David Fear as they discuss rock
concert movies in general, Scorsese’s history with rock music, and The Band’s
legacy. The trailer completes the package, along with an essay by critic Amanda
Petrusich in the booklet.
The
Last Waltz is
a must-have for fans of rock concert movies, The Band, Martin Scorsese’s
filmography, and pretty much any of the guest performers who appear in picture
(Bob Dylan, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Neil Diamond, Eric Clapton, etc.). The
film documents what truly was, as Scorsese claims, “the end of an era.”
Elvis in "Charro!", released the same year as "True Grit"- 1969.
BY LEE PFEIFFER
When John Wayne was signed by producer Hal Wallis for the role of cantankerous marshal Rooster Cogburn in the film version of Charles Portis's bestseller "True Grit", there was immediate speculation as to who would be cast as the young Texas Ranger, La Boeuf. Wayne and Wallis agreed that Elvis Presley would be an ideal choice. In fact, Wayne had approached Elvis on several occasions over the years to appear on screen with him only to have the dictatorial Colonel Parker put the kabosh on any such dream teaming. Parker always insisted that Elvis get top billing, even when it was impractical. For example, in the mid-1950s when Elvis had just emerged as a music sensation, he had the opportunity to co-star with Burt Lancaster and Katharine Hepburn in "The Rainmaker". Yet, the Colonel insisted that Elvis get first billing despite the exalted status in the industry of Lancaster and Hepburn. The deal fell through, much to the dismay of Elvis who always wanted to stretch his acting abilities beyond the simplistic musicals that were his trademark on the big screen. Indeed, Parker told Wallis that the only way Elvis would appear in "True Grit" is if he got billing above John Wayne! Obviously, that wasn't going to happen and newly minted superstar Glen Campbell got the role opposite the Duke. He acquitted himself very well despite not having had any previous acting experience. The movie turned out to be a blockbuster that saw Wayne win the Best Actor Oscar and Campbell score a hit on the charts with the title song. Bruised by the collapse of the "True Grit" possibility, Elvis starred in his own western, "Charro!". It was his way of finally exerting independence from the Colonel. In fact, it's the only feature film in which Elvis doesn't sing on screen, though he does warble the title song. "Charro!" wasn't a bad movie, but audiences stayed away and Elvis would soon give up movies forever to concentrate on his concert and recording career, though he did star in a couple of very good feature length documentaries. As for his elusive pairing with John Wayne, the mind still reels at the possibilities that were never fulfilled.
(This article has been corrected from an earlier version that stated "Charro!" was filmed in Europe. Reader Angel Rivera pointed out that it's a misconception that the movie was made in Europe, given the fact that it has the style of a spaghetti western. In fact, the movie was filmed entirely in the USA.)
The legendary James Stewart was still alive when his friend and occasional co-star George Kennedy narrated this personal tribute to him for Turner Classic Movies. It's heartfelt and sentimental. Kennedy points out that he grieves Stewart's advanced age because he knows we'll never see his kind again. He was right, but ironically it can be argued that with Kennedy having passed away, we're unlikely to see his kind again. Two great stars who defined why retro cinema is so addictive.
We went bananas when we saw this. An enterprising video editor named Bradley Haase has revisited the original "Planet of the Apes" and concocted a hilarious music video based on the premise of an Ape Dance Party, complete with vinyl records and glitzy disco decor. It's too bizarre to describe. Just watch it. If you don't share our sense of amusement, then in the words of Charlton Heston's Taylor, "Damn you all to hell!"
These home movie clips shot by a tourist at Universal Studios in 1965 offer a nostalgic glimpse of what the tourist attraction was like in its early days. There are brief scenes of "The Munsters" and a film crew shooting a segment of "McHale's Navy".
It may be understandable to think that the vast majority of major films have been released on home video but, in factthere are countless high profile titles that have yet to appear, or perhaps were once available but have gone out of circulation years ago. The unavailability of certain titles is generally due to either the lack of suitable master prints or rights problems. In either scenario, movie fans are deprived from seeing everything from genuine gems to guilty pleasures. Writing on his blog wwwthemagnificent60s.com, Cinema Retro contributing writer Brian Hannan focuses on one such "orphan" title, the 1968 production "A Place for Lovers". The film garnered few positive reviews and was met with a collective yawn by audiences despite the presence of screen legend Marcello Mastroianni and newly-minted star Faye Dunaway, fresh off her triumph in "Bonnie and Clyde". Adding to the prestige, the film was directed by the legendary Vittorio De Sica. Hannan points out that years ago film critic Harry Medved named the film as one of the 50 worst movies ever made, an opinion he takes issue with. In fact, Hannan argues that the movie has enough redeeming values to qualify for recommended viewing. Click here to read his review of the movie.
(Although "A Place for Lovers" is not available in the U.S. or U.K. on home video, it is presently streaming on YouTube.)
Mill Creek Entertainment is releasing "Magnum P.I: The Complete Series" on Blu-ray. The set contains 30 discs, so if you're a fan, you'd better add another shelf to your video library. Here are the details:
"Buckle up
and take a ride with Magnum, P.I. in all 8 seasons of the iconic series that
are available for the first time on Blu-ray! Explore beautiful and exotic
Hawaii with television's most beloved and charismatic private investigator
(Emmy® Award winner Tom Selleck) as he tackles baffling mysteries and tracks
down the bad guys with the help of T.C. (Roger E. Mosley), Rick (Larry Manetti)
and Higgins (John Hillerman) plus his four-legged pals, Apollo and Zeus.
Packed with
non-stop adventure and featuring iconic guest stars, Magnum P.I. is an
unforgettable thrill-ride. Own the legacy today!"
Fans of Turner Classic Movies know that the channel always provides marvelous little featurettes that showcase famous actors paying tribute to their own screen idols. For example, here is Burt Reynolds' marvelous, heartfelt tribute to Spencer Tracy, who he befriended in 1959 on the studio lot. Reynolds was an up-and-comer starring in the TV series "Riverboat" and he would find time every day to visit the set where Tracy and Fredric March were playing antagonists in Stanley Kramer's classic "Inherit the Wind". Tracy noticed his young admirer and they took daily walks after filming. Reynolds remembers a key piece of advice from his idol: if your acting, don't let the audience catch you at it.
“WATERLOO, MAKING AN EPIC: The
Spectacular Behind-the-Scenes Story of a Movie Colossus”
By Simon Lewis (BearManor Media), 534 pages,
illustrated (B&W), Hardback, Paperback & Ebook, ISBN978-1-62933-832-3
REVIEW BY BRIAN HANNAN
One would think that a film that
flopped as dramatically as Waterloo would scarcely deserve a book as superb as this. In quite extraordinary detail,
author Simon Lewis discusses every aspect of the making of the film, from
initial set-up to release, by way of analysis of dozens of separate scenes
through to rarely discussed elements like the editing and mixing, and even the
myth of the missing longer version and the importance of wooden boxes. It might have helped the movie’s commercial
chances, and not put too much of a dent in the ultimately massive budget of
$26.1 million if producer Dino De Laurentiis has snagged original dream team of
Richard Burton (Napoleon) and Peter O’Toole (Wellington), both of whom carried
much greater box office marquee than Rod Steiger and Christopher Plummer.
Burton was never really a possibility but by 1968 O’Toole was “practically set”
although turning it down because he thought it would flop. John Huston, who had
just completed The Bible (1966) for De Laurentiis, was original choice
for director and got so far as being involved in the screenplay being written
by H.A.L Craig (Anzio, 1968). When he dropped out, Gilles Pontecorvo (The
Battle of Algiers, 1966) was briefly in the frame. However, a six-hour
version of War and Peace (1965) ultimately put Sergei Bondarchuk in the
director’s chair.
Requiring thousands of
properly trained and preferably “celluloid-seasoned” troops to carry out
disciplined manoeuvres rather than extras, De Laurentiis was in negotiation
with Turkey, Hungary, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria before plumping for Russia, whose
production arm, Mosfilm, pumped in $8 million (later rising in line with budget
increases). Paramount and Columbia contributed a combined $7 million with
worldwide rights selling for a total of $25 million. Once filming began, Paramount
chiefs Charles Bludhorn and Robert Evans, watching elements of shooting, were
so taken with what they saw they wished they had invested more. Evans was
reportedly “enthralled by hours of film material.” Craig’s screenplay was
augmented by the director and Vittorio Bonicelli as well as uncredited contributions
by Jean Anouilh (Becket, 1964), Samuel Marx and Edward O. Marsh, not to
mention additions by the two main actors. Steiger pocketed $385,000, Plummer
$300,000, Craig $121,000 but Anouilh only $21,000. Gordon Highlanders pipers
and drummers picked up £7 a day.
Lewis is at his best when
forensically examining particular scenes, for example, the Duchess of Richmond
Ball which used 4,000 candles inserted into candelabras, the slightest draught
causing these to melt and drip wax on performers. A carpet was used to get
camera shots from a very low level.
Steiger played Napoleon almost
as a dead man walking, having got hold of a copy of the French Emperor’s autopsy
which revealed advanced cirrhosis and gonorrhoea. Steiger and Bondarchuk met
the night before to iron out ideas for the following day but Steiger was not
above forcing the director’s hand. In in one instance the actor removed his
trousers to ensure he could only be shot in close-up. Orson Welles matched
Steiger in trickery. Only hired for two days, Welles extended his employment by
insisting on doing his own make-up which of course was never up to scratch and
required amendment. And in terms of movie trickery, Steiger was required to sit
on a wooden box on his horse to ensure he could be kept in focus. Jack Hawkins
dispensed with the horse altogether – he was either atop a box or on top of
stilts, as he was unsteady on an animal. In the absence of CGI of the kind
Ridley Scott could eventually employ for his battle scenes, the real soldiers
were occasionally augmented by mannequins. Five thousand were made, two real
soldiers at either end of a row held eight mannequins in place by the use of a
single wooden plank – “this allowed all regiments to march forward.” Among the
many wonderful candid pictures in this lavishly illustrated tome – 200
photographs, many never seen before - is one of three girls staring at the
mannequins as well as photos of Steiger and Hawkins on their boxes.
The Waterloo battlefield had
one of the biggest sets ever built. A total of 17,000 soldiers, mostly from
Siberia andincluding 2,000 cavalry,
lived in a tented city a mile away. Steiger noted, “It would have taken assistant
directors three days to put untrained men, mere extras, into position. When
they broke for lunch it would be another three days to arrange them again.
These guys are superb.” Real soldiers working with their actual commanders was
the difference between waste and superb. Having a general in charge of the
troops often created issues. Bondarchuk would select the horses he wanted based
on the effect he wished to achieve with the light, demands often obstructed by the
commander if it meant the chosen horses had not been properly fed. “I will
order soldiers – but how do I order animals?” was the dry comment from the army
chief..
Although the battlefield was primarily
authentic – mud for one scene created by
pumping two days’ worth of water into the soil before cavalry churned up the area
– there were occasions when filming conformed to the Hollywood norm. “The use
of fiery explosions had been cinematic shorthand for battle scenes long before Waterloo”
when in reality these would be minimal. “Most ammunition that was fired
comprised large iron balls and so low was its speed it was possible to watch
their progress.”
The famous charge of the Scots Greys was
described thusly in the script: “they came straight into camera – like centaurs
in their magnificence.” The sight of 350 Arabian mounts travelling at breakneck
speed was captured by use of a specially constructed railway powered by a
diesel locomotive. Five cameras were sited in different positions on the train.
The famous slow-motion effect – possibly the most exhilarating moment in the
picture – was achieved by over-cranking the camera at 100 frames per second
which slowed what you saw by a factor of four.
Perhaps the best reveal
regarding movie trickery was the moon above Wellington as he rode past the
carnage. It comprised “special silver paper for front projection – 3M – like
shark skin. You put one light on it and it reflects ten times brighter.” The
moon was shown as one quarter less than full since the effect of a full moon
would be harder to carry off. “Blue ink made some spots as moon craters.” The
fake moon was suspended with one wire on top and two left and right to prevent
it from moving, then one light was projected onto it.
Lewis rebuts the myth of the
missing longer version. He reckons this probably came about because over
300,000 feet of film – 55 hours – was shot and the first rough cut was five
hours long. The final cut was 123 minutes and 42 seconds - not much longer than
if you had worked out the length by counting the pages of the screenplay - and
release cuts varied because, for example, the British censors cut out 28
seconds of horse falls and the ending includes 50 seconds of music over the
credits. It was never shown with the intermission which was de rigeur at
the time for longer roadshows and would have, artificially, inflated the
running time.There was some confusion
over the final print because a novelisation by Frederick E. Smith included some
scenes that didn’t make it into the final print, and Smith’s book, written of
necessity before the film appeared, would have used as its main reference tool
the screenplay. But Lewis spends a whole chapter explaining why a longer cut
never existed.
The world premiere was held on
26 October 1970 in London where the movie released as a roadshow (i.e. separate
performances) was a huge success. It ran for a few weeks short of an entire
year in the London West End, breaking box office records at the Odeon Leicester
Square and the Metropole where it opened on December 3rd, 1970, before
shifting to the Columbia on June 17, 1971, and then a final week at the Odeon
Kensington from September 30 1971. But audience appeal in the United States was
at the other end of the spectrum. It went from a strong opening week of $25,436
at the Criterion in New York to just $1,775 in its fourth week, and nationwide
racked up only $1.4 million in rentals (the studio share of the box office). It
was derided in France in part because the film was about the defeat of a legend
and the French could not come to terms with the idea that it was directed by a
Russian.
Where most “making of” books
concentrate on the stars and the director, Lewis goes into fantastic detail
about all aspects of the production, the chapter on editing and mixing an
education in itself. There’s a chapter on how historically accurate the film
actually was. The author was helped by the discovery of a diary kept during
production by actor Richard Heffer who played the small part Mercer. But Lewis
also managed to make contact with Dino De Laurentiis’s daughters, Raffaella and
Veronica, and around two dozen people connected with the film in some way, and
clearly examined every scrap of information available on the picture. The notes
are another mine of information.
Even if the film is not at the
top of your must-watch list, this book should go to the top of your must-read
list.
(Alan Ladd Jr. has passed away at the age of 84. In his honor, we're republishing Todd Garbarini's interview with him which originally ran in November, 2020.)
BY TODD GARBARINI
If you ask the average movie fan who Alan Ladd, Jr. is, you will
more than likely be greeted with a blank stare. Some might say, “Oh yeah, he
was in Shane!â€, erroneously thinking of his movie star father. If you
asked a movie fan who Laddie is, they would probably think you were referring
to that old TV show about the border collie. The truth is, “Laddie†is an
affectionate industry nickname for Alan Ladd, Jr., a man who grew up in and
made his profession in the movie business and has produced some of the greatest
and most successful films of all-time, including the Oscar-winning films The
Omen (1976), Chariots of Fire (1981) and Braveheart (1995). Arguably
his greatest professional decision was saying “yes†to George Lucas when all of
Tinseltown said “no†to his science fiction tale of a young man looking to
battle the Galactic Empire using a mysterious power known as The Force. The
Oscar-winning Star Wars (1977) paved the way for another film
green-lighted by Laddie, Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979).
A man of few words who prefers to work quietly under the radar and
on his own terms, Laddie is the subject of a new, award-winning documentary, Laddie,
The Man Behind The Movies, directed by his daughter, Amanda Ladd-Jones,
containing interviews with George
Lucas, Ridley Scott, Sigourney Weaver, Ben Affleck, Ron Howard, Morgan Freeman,
Mel Brooks, and Richard Donner to name a few, and has won the Best Documentary
Award at the 2019 Julien Dubuque International Film Festival, as well as
received nominations for Best Documentary and Best Film at both the 2018 Milano
International Film Festival Awards (MIFF Awards) and the 2018 NewFilmmakers Los
Angeles.
I spoke with Laddie about his career and Amanda on how the project
got started and became a reality.
Alan Ladd, Jr.: Rabbi Jacob, wow, I don’t even remember
what that was about!
Amanda Ladd-Jones: I never even heard of that movie! (laughs)
Todd Garbarini: It’s a hilarious slapstick comedy starring a very funny
French film actor, Louis de Funès, who unfortunately
passed away in 1983 at age 59. The film was subtitled, though I don’t recall
being able to read at the time! I was five years old and I just responded to
the onscreen action. The film revolves around all these shenanigans that he
finds himself in. It played here and there on the film repertoire circuit in
the 1980’s in New York, and I managed to see it again in August 1995 at the
Walter Reade Theatre near Lincoln Center.
Alan Ladd, Jr.:I’m glad that you liked it!
Todd Garbarini: Given
that your father, Alan Ladd, was a prominent film actor, do you personally feel
that it was inevitable that you would follow him into the film industry in some
capacity?
Alan
Ladd, Jr.:I guess so, since I was around it, and he sort of led me in
that direction. However, I never received any encouragement from him. I
always felt that I would be involved in movies somehow, but I didn’t know
exactly what it was I was actually going to do. I tried to be an assistant
director, but I couldn’t get into the Directors Guild. I tried to get into
editing, but I couldn’t get into the Editors Guild, either. So, I basically
ended up where I ended up through sheer luck more than anything else. There
weren’t any real options available, so I started off as an agent and then
worked my way up to film producer and then ultimately to studio head (of 20th
Century Fox).
Amanda Ladd-Jones: It’s probably safe to say that the Directors
Guild and the Editors Guild are lamenting the decisions that they made. They
probably could have collected some dues off of you!
Alan Ladd, Jr.:Well, they could have collected the dues,
yes, but I don’t know how the hell else they would have gotten anything else
out of me! (laughs)
Todd Garbarini: You’re described by Wikipedia as being a “film
industry executive and producer.†How do those roles differ?
Alan Ladd, Jr.:Well, an executive and a producer are
essentially the same thing. You basically have to try and find good material
and put it together and ultimately try and make the movie.
Amanda Ladd-Jones: The big difference between the two is that as
an executive, you have a steady paycheck!
Todd Garbarini: What would you say are some of the more difficult
aspects of being a producer, from your experience?
Alan Ladd, Jr.: For me, finding good material is ultimately the
most difficult aspect of the job. Once you do find really good material, then everything
else more or less just falls into place.
Todd Garbarini: In the pre-Internet days of mining and sourcing potential
material for a film, how did you go about finding good material? Did you sort
it out by reading books or reviews of books? Did you sort through
screenplays?
Alan
Ladd, Jr: It was a combination all of that, really. I
began my career as an agent in 1963 and I did that for a long time. It was
something that I enjoyed very much. As an agent, you learn a lot. You learn a
lot about how good deals are made and how bad deals are made. You learn to work
with the talent you represent, and you find out early on that they are just as
insecure as you are. These people may be famous stars, but they had their
insecurities and problems just like anybody else does.
Todd Garbarini: The 1970’s is, for me, the greatest decade in the
history of the American Cinema and William Friedkin’s The French Connection
from 1971 is my favorite movie of all-time. The outpouring of exceptional films
that were produced during this time was unbelievable. Star Wars was the
obvious watershed and May 25, 1977, the day of its release, is also known as
The Day the Movies Died, which I don’t feel is a fair assessment of the film’s
artistic accomplishments and intake at the box office. How did you come to meet
the film’s director, George Lucas?
Alan Ladd, Jr.: Well, Universal sent me a print of a movie he just
finished called American Graffiti. Universal didn't like the movie at
all and they had absolutely no desire to release it. So, they sent me a print
because they were really interested in getting the movie off their hands. They
wanted to sell it. So, I took a look at it at seven o’clock one morning, which
is really too early to be watching anything. I was very impressed with
it right off the bat. I thought the casting was terrific and I really liked the
way that George put the music in. So, I was impressed with the whole thing and
I called his agent and told him that I wanted to buy the film. Of course, once
I said that, Universal suddenly decided that if somebody wanted to actually buy
it that must mean that it must be good! So, they held onto it and decided to
release it themselves. It went on to be a very successful movie and made a lot
of money for Universal. Regardless, I still wanted to meet with George. We went
out for a drink and had a nice conversation. I asked him if he was working on
anything at the moment, and he told me that he had this idea for a movie that
was called Adventures of the Starkiller as taken
from the Journal of the Whills, Saga I: The Star Wars. It went through many variations and had different titles. He later
wrote several different drafts which I heard about, but I never read them. He
wrote one draft that featured a lot of little people. That eventually morphed
into (Ron Howard’s 1988 film) Willow. So, eventually he produced Star
Wars, which is the script of the movie that we now have. At the time, though,
he gave me an earlier draft that ran nearly two hundred pages. I said, “George
this is ridiculous. This is going to be a five-hour movie!†He said, “No, it's
going to be two hours.†I said okay. He obviously knew more than I did! So, we
shot the film and it did come in just a few minutes over two hours. It was
obvious to me that he had written a script that was more for a director than it
was for me. I saw the film as it was being made. Several times, as I flew to
London to watch them shooting it.
Todd Garbarini: How difficult was it to get Star Wars made
at a time when science fiction films just weren’t big box office draws?
Alan Ladd, Jr.: It wasn't very difficult, really. It did go
considerably over budget which was difficult to explain. I mean, how do you
explain Wookies and droids to a board of directors? They don’t have any idea
what the hell you’re talking about. I’m sure it all sounded very crazy to them.
The film kept going over budget and the board kept demanding explanations for
that. At times, it was more difficult to keep the movie going than it was to just
get it going.
Todd Garbarini: That sounds like Jaws and what Steven
Spielberg went through on the set of that film, with Richard Zanuck and David
Brown trying to keep production afloat, no pun intended! What was your
reaction to the initial and explosive successive of Star Wars?
Alan Ladd, Jr.: It was wonderful. I remember thinking at the time,
Wow!
Alan Ladd Jr., one of the few remaining Hollywood studio moguls who could be regarded as a legend, has died at age 84. Ladd's career was characterized by the countless blockbusters he brought to the screen during his long career. Most notably, he backed George Lucas for the original "Star Wars" when the board of 20th Century Fox wanted to walk away from the project. Other classics he oversaw were "Chariots of Fire", "Braveheart", "Blade Runner", "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" and "Young Frankenstein" during his tenure at various studios. When James Bond producer Cubby Broccoli had a falling out with the management of MGM/UA in the late 1980s, he refused to make another 007 film until the studio brass was replaced. When Ladd assumed the top position in the mid-1990s, Broccoli trusted him and together, they revived the series with "GoldenEye". For more about Ladd's remarkable career, click here.
One of our favorite portmanteau-themed horror flicks is "The House That Dripped Blood". Released in 1971 by Amicus,the rival studio to Hammer Films, the movie is constructed of eerie short stories populated by a great cast: Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, John Pertwee, Nyree Dawn Porter and Denholm Elliott. Shout! Factory has a terrific Blu-ray. Click here to order from Amazon.
Read Tim Greaves' in-depth story behind the film in Cinema Retro issue #47.
British readers of a certain age will remember the Big Fry chocolates TV ads from the 1960s. They featured a hunky model named George Lazenby, who would soon move on to a more illustrious role as James Bond. Her are two of these vintage adverts.