Sir
Carol Reed has always been a stylish director, someone who could evoke a striking
mood with atmospheric cinematography and lighting, setting, and the perfect
compositions that placed his actors within the picturesque frames. Reed is
mostly remembered for his masterpiece, The Third Man (1949), an earlier
British noir called Odd Man Out (1947), and for his later Oscar-winning
musical, Oliver! (1968). One of his more overlooked gems is The Man
Between, another polished British noir from 1953 that obviously attempts to
capitalize on what made The Third Man and Odd Man Out memorable.
The
movie is a Cold War thriller set in early 50s Berlin, several years before the
erection of the Wall. Like The Third Man, the story deals with wavering
loyalties to the politics that govern a particular location. Here, the
East-West conflict in Berlin is beginning to broil into a seriously tense
situation. Nevertheless, Reed and his cinematographer, Desmond Dickinson,
transform the intrigue into a gorgeously rendered, haunting treatise of
melancholy that permeates the succession of expressionistic, high contrast
black and white tableaux.
A
young Claire Bloom stars as Susanne, an English tourist who has come to Berlin
to visit her brother, Martin (Geoffrey Toone). Martin is married to Bettina
(Hildegard Knef, credited as Hildegard Neff), who has a mysterious connection
with former German lawyer Ivo (James Mason, displaying a somewhat awkward
German accent, but it’s effective enough). Ivo seems to be in trouble, as a lot
of men in trench coats or uniforms are looking for him. Even though the man is
decidedly bad news, Susanne falls in love with Ivo. Without spoiling the
revelations of the story, suffice it to say that Ivo is involved in nefarious arrangements
with the East Germans, but at the same time yearns to be in the West. Unfortunately,
Susanne gets caught up in the tangled web and finds herself stuck in the
Eastern bloc; hence, a good portion of the film centers on the harrowing
attempts to get her back to the West without the authorities closing in.
While
The Man Between is beautiful to look at and well-acted, the plot is a
bit muddled—we’re not really sure what Ivo is actually doing until late in the
game, and even then it’s not very clear. There are also some believability
issues regarding Susanne’s attraction to Ivo, but I suppose since he’s a young,
handsome James Mason, it’s all good. It really doesn’t matter, for the
moodiness and the melodrama carries one through the picture with grace and a
good deal of suspense, even if we’re not entirely sure what’s going on.
Kino
Lorber’s new 1920x1080p Blu-ray is indeed an exquisite presentation—the image
is sharp and crystal clear. It comes with an audio commentary by film critic
and author Simon Abrams. The supplements are impressive. Of special interest is
the nearly 45-minute retrospective of Carol Reed’s career, featuring several
talking heads, including John Boorman, and film clips. There’s also a long, wonderful
audio interview with James Mason, who is a much funnier man than we’ve often
been led to believe. A short video interview with Claire Bloom is also
enlightening, and various trailers round off the package.
The
Man Between is
a good example of one of the more high-class, bigger-budget productions coming
out of the U.K. in the early 1950s.
The BBC has discovered an archive of photos and documents relating to the early days of the Monty Python comedy troupe which first appeared on the network in 1969. The BBC has overseen the restoration of the rare materials which have now been made available to the public. For more click here.
If you’re a fan of American Werewolf In London, Arrow’s
latest Blu-ray release of the film will leave you salivating as much as the
film’s titular beast. Crammed full of
extras, it’s simply stunning and the key point here is that these are mainly new
features and are as informative and essential as the best-ever “making of documentary,
Beware The Moon by Paul Davis, that appears here, as it did on the film’s
previous releases. This Arrow release is a full Rick Baker-style transformation
from good to great as far as quality and content is concerned.
AWIL is easily one of Arrow’s most impressive releases
and finally does justice to what is a fully fledged cult classic. Not only are
the extras superb (including two feature length documentaries, the pick of
which is the brand new documentary about Universal’s Wolfman mythos by Danial
Griffith) but the transfer of the film itself is outstanding.
Earlier this week I asked Director John Landis what he
thought of the transfer, to which he replied:
“I am delighted with the new Arrow release of An
American Werewolf in London. Picture quality is excellent with strong blacks
and you can choose between the original theatrical mono track or the surround
stereo remix. They packed it with extras and a small poster of Graham
Humphrey's excellent new art for the filmâ€.
Not only is the content superb but the packaging is also
up there and deserves to gain the recognition it deserves when it comes to the
Rondo Awards next year. Along those lines I also took the opportunity to ask
the man responsible for the superb new cover art, legendary poster artist
Graham Humphreys (Evil Dead, Nightmare On Elm Street) about how he approached
this commission, the execution of director Landis so admires:
“A fan of ‘An American Werewolf In London’ since going to
the cinema during its first run, I recall leaving the London West End cinema
and walking into the night, in the very same locations that I’d just witnessed
on screen. It was thrilling! I was living it! This particular painting was a
private commission from a fan of the film, one of a series I’ve been creating
for their private poster gallery of 80s horror classics. A previous
illustration of mine had already adorned the book ‘Beware The Moon’ by Paul Davis,
but with a constricted brief. The new commission provided the opportunity to go
‘the full blood’ with imagery. Starting with my client’s requested elements
list, my composition also included the decomposed Jack and the monstrous
stormtroopers, though these additions proved not to their taste, thus resulting
in a compromise and the addition of the transformation sequence (filling the
otherwise vacant space). So although not satisfying my own preferred direction,
the compromise has proven attractive enough to find its way beyond the private
collection. It’s an honour that it has been recognized and appreciated by the
director himself. At some point in the future I’ll ensure my own version makes
it onto paper.â€
Ken (Dale Midkiff) and Bob (Preston Maybank) land
in a propeller plane and speed off on motorcycles to a large mansion. Ken calls
Julie Clingstone (Debbie Laster) via radio as Bob scales the side of the
building. Julie wants him to give her access to “the mainframe†when suddenly,
somewhere a puppet (yes, a puppet)
begins yelling Danger! Danger!, obviously aware of the imminent
intrusion. Edward Brake (Wellington Meffert) is sleeping in bed in the mansion
while Bob takes off his necklace and lays it on the ledge after reaching the
mansion’s roof. He rotates a parabolic dish and the puppet, operating some sort
of a crude computer and using telepathic powers, makes the necklace turn into a
sphere (think Phantasm). Bob starts
to bleed from the face and falls to his death. The action breaks into the
opening credits to “Nightmare†as sung by Miriam Stockley.
If you’re still reading this, I commend you,
because I would have stopped at the mention of the word “puppetâ€. There are few
films that leave me at a loss for words (Quentin Dupieux’s 2010 film Rubber is hands-down the most
infuriating movie I have ever watched; I might have to re-watch that one as I
must have missed the point completely),
but Henri Sala’s Nightmare Weekend
(1986) is, in the words of the late film critic Gene Siskel in his review of
1978’s Surfer Girls, one of the most
improbably lousy movies I have ever seen. This doesn’t stop one’s viewing of
the film from being a total loss,
however, as Nightmare is if nothing
else that we can be absolutely sure of a time capsule of the 80’s, with
artifacts of the Zeitgeist on full display: girls workout wearing leg warmers,
a guy dances nearly everywhere with a Walkman in his pants, a tough guy and his
Laura Brannigan lookalike chick get it on atop a pinball machine, and computer equipment is
crude, big and bulky. Clocking in at 85
minutes, Nightmare seems longer than
Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather Part
II (forgive me for mentioning them both in the same sentence, I do
apologize). Edward Brake is an entrepreneur/inventor who has created a
computerized “Biometer†which changes naturally aggressive animals into docile
house pets. He ultimately wants it to be used for the betterment of society,
but it’s just not ready for prime time. His partner Julie can’t wait for him
and goes behind his back to team up with a nefarious organization that will pay
her millions for the Biometer. Edward’s daughter Jessica Brake (Debra Hunter) is a Carol Alt
lookalike who, with her friend Annie (Lori Lewis) and another woman, has been
chosen to be part of Julie’s experiment for which they will both be paid 500
dollars each for their involvement. The idea is to see how the Biometer works
on people. The aforementioned puppet, named George, is housed in Jessica’s room
and is operated by a computer named Apache, indubitably the precursor to the Apache HTTP Server (Danger! Danger! Sarcasm!), and is part of
the whole operation. The motley crew, and there are a lot of characters to keep
track of unnecessarily, all find themselves one way or another being affected
by the Biometer.
The
two biggest issues with Nightmare are
the screenplay and the editing. I love bad movies that are entertaining but
unfortunately this isn’t one of them. The
film never seems to make up its mind as to what it wants to be: horror,
soft-core porn, comedy, campy/serious? Scenes and shots are so
short it’s nearly impossible to keep track of the goings-on. It’s also
occasionally insulting to women as they are all pretty much on display simply for
men’s gratification.
Nightmare is a Troma
production which means that it exudes its own special, patented brand of strangeness.
It’s difficult for another film director or producer to attempt to ape the Troma
style as it is a singularly unique, signature and patented style of strangeness.
Shot in July 1983 in Ocala, FL on a budget of ostensibly half a million dollars,
Nightmare defies
description which, in the hands of a seasoned auteur like David Lynch, can be a
good thing. That isn’t the case here. Nightmarefalls into the “so-bad-it’s-badâ€
camp. You feel like you’re watching auditions with an amateur acting troupe,
although amazingly other reviewers have championed the acting in an otherwise
disjointed film. That being said, if you’re a fan of the film, it has been
released as a DVD/Blu-ray combo from Vinegar Syndrome. The image has been scanned in 2K and looks
really nice and is a far cry from the VHS tape from 30 years ago. It also
contains an interview with producer Marc Gottlieb that runs just under 13 minutes.
He’s very engaging and fun to listen to as he describes the making of the film
and how they promoted it at the 1984 Cannes Film Festival. Dean Gates, who did
the makeup effects, speaks for nearly 23 minutes and provides us with an
interesting perspective on the effects that he created in the days before movie
companies made the switch to CGI for most of this type of work.
Vinegar Syndrome has put together a really nice
package for this title. It has a reversible cover and very colorful
artwork.
Nightmare
Weekend is best
viewed on a weekend while severely inebriated!
I must confess from the onset that I have always
considered From Beyond the Grave, directed by Kevin Connor, to be the
least of the Amicus horror anthologies.It’s not a terrible film by any means, but the E.C. Comics-inspired
insanities and dark supernatural energies that powered the franchise for a
decade or so seemed less potent this time around.This final curtain-closing portmanteau from the
folks at Amicus would feature, as usual, a well-established and highly regarded
cast of stars, Peter Cushing, Donald Pleasence, Margaret Leighton, Lesley-Anne
Down and a trio of Ian’s (Bannen, Oglivy, and Carmichael) among them.The talent behind camera was of equal pro
grade, but somehow the celluloid cocktail that resulted was far less kitschy
and exhilarating than its forebears.
An anthology film is only as strong as its collected interior
stories, of course, and the four tales that compromise From Beyond the Grave are, at best, weak tea.Naturally, the same can be said about any
number of standalone episodes from such classic and revered television fare as,
say, The Twilight Zone or The Outer Limits.These series all have their own episodic gem
marks, the handful of entries that everyone recalls and can agree upon as
favorites.Perhaps it was an atmospheric
spine-tingler or perhaps a more thoughtful episode that ends with a novel
twist. The other less-celebrated episodes that buttress these high-water marks are
either – at best – only dimly recalled or simply less regarded.
Amicus was, far and away, the uncontested “studio†of
honor in their presentations of these anthology horror films.The term “studio†is perhaps a bit of a
misnomer as the company had no Bray House or formal studio lot as a permanent
home. Taking a page from the 1945
British classic Dead of Night, transplanted
American producer Milton Subotsky and his mostly stateside partner Max J. Rosenberg
unleashed their first portmanteau horror Dr.
Terror’s House of Horrors in 1965.That film’s success – and its dependable formula – would be tirelessly reworked
a half-dozen times with such subsequent entries as Torture Garden (1967), The
House That Dripped Blood (1971), Asylum
(1972), Tales from the Crypt (1972), and
The Vault of Horror (1973).
In an interview with Gary Smith, the author of Uneasy Dreams: the Golden Age of British
Horror 1956-1976, producer Rosenberg revealed that it was the studio brass
at Warner Bros. who actually approached them one last time to make From Beyond the Grave.When the completed film was finally delivered
to them, Rosenberg recalled “the executives at Warner Bros. hated it†with the
studio declining to even release it.In
a prudent business move to minimize the financial losses of both parties, the
savvy Rosenberg arranged to retrieve for Amicus the sole rights to the film.It was then that Subotsky and Rosenberg were
able to negotiate a mutually less-risky, cost-saving distribution deal with
Warner Bros.
To be fair, I suppose one can sympathize with the
reservations expressed by the Warner executives as From Beyond the Grave (1974) is a somewhat pedestrian entry.The bloom was already off the rose for this
particular sort of production, and the already struggling British film industry
was still in the midst of battling up from the mat.To make matters even more trying, by the mid-1970s,
interest in the two-decade long reign of stylish, stiff-lipped and sometimes
winking British horror films was clearly on the wane.The horror film zeitgeist had moved back to
the U.S. with audiences now grappling with dark devil-worshipping blockbusters
as Rosemary’s Baby and The Exorcist.Not to mention the indie-film slashers who
were waiting in the wings for their own bloody turn.
But there was no crystal ball to see the end was near in
1973, so the machine continued to grind.Amicus was not above pinching talent – especially more recognizable old-school
on-screen talent as Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee – from Hammer Films Inc.The folks at Hammer were Amicus’s most famous
rival in the British horror industry, and non-trainspotting fans could – and
often did - misidentify their films as genuine Hammer productions.While the formidable Christopher Lee was cast
in such Amicus productions as Dr. Terror’s
House of Horrors, The House That
Dripped Blood and the Jekyll and Hyde pastiche I, Monster, it was – unquestionably – his professional contemporary
Peter Cushing who would provide the studio its principal marquee value.
Cushing would appear in no fewer than thirteen Amicus
productions 1965-1976 and he, more than anyone, would become the most public
face of the company’s acting troupe.Likewise, director Freddie Francis who had helmed such horror and
psychological terror films as Paranoiac,
Nightmare, The Evil of Frankenstein and Dracula
Has Risen from the Grave for Hammer between 1963 and 1968, would bring to
Amicus that studio’s recognizable flourish and attitude to his new assignments
for Subotsky and Rosenberg.
The four short stories woven in the creation of From Beyond the Grave were collected
from the ghost and horror tales spun by the British author R. Chetwynd-Hayes:
“The Gate Crasher,†“An Act of Kindness,†“The Elemental†and “The Door.â€I can’t comment on how faithful the film commits
to Chetwynd-Hayes’ original stories as I have not yet had the pleasure of
reading through his collected works.What I can say is that the four tales presented here aren’t particularly
suspenseful or mysterious… though there is, I suppose, enough atmosphere
sprinkled about to keep one interested throughout the film’s ninety plus
minutes.Peter Cushing likely enjoyed
only a day or two of work on the film, his contribution limited to a bit of sketchy
shop-keeping – and episode bridging - at the alley storefront of his macabre
antique parlour Temptations Ltd.The
four tales woven are really minor morality plays that end with unforgiving Old
Testament judgments.Nearly every
duplicitous customer who scams the elderly Cushing gets… well, what they
deserve.
The problem is that the stories chosen for the adapted screenplay
courtesy of Robin Clarke and Raymond Christodoulou are not a particularly
compelling or interesting.For the
earlier Amicus anthologies, Milton Subotsky dutifully combed for ghoulish material
through the grotesquely entertaining stories that appeared in the pages of the
schlocky E.C. Comics.Though Subotsky
was not, even by the account of co-producer Rosenberg, a particularly good
writer, he still managed to successfully capture some of the demented E.C.
Comics spirit in these earliest productions.Freddie Francis, who would go on to direct no fewer than nine films for
Amicus, was impressed by Subotsky’s “passion and perseverance†for the movie
business, but rued matter-of-factly in his own memoir that the producer, ultimately
and alas, “wasn’t very good at making them.â€
Growing
up, I remember listening to the CBS Radio Mystery Theater, hosted by the gifted
actor, E.G. Marshall.But as the
plethora of new media choices came online over the years, I had thought that
kind of pure audio entertainment had gone the way of the RCA Selectavision Video
Disc… The delightful Passport to Oblivion
2-disc set from Spiteful Puppet proved me wrong and is a welcome return to
adventure for the ears and mind.
The
production, based on James Leasor’s 1964 best-seller (filmed as Where the Spies
Are in 1966) stars ex-007 George Lazenby as Dr. Jason Love, a reluctant spy
lured back into service to make a seemingly routine rendezvous for MI6 – a
rendezvous that turns out to be anything BUT routine.Love is no high-flying secret agent, but a
comfortably retired doctor in rural England.
The
story unfolds with a highly skilled cast including Glynis Barber, Terence Stamp
and Nickolas Grace, all performing against a rich audio bed of sound effects,
other voice actors and music cues. There’s even a Bondian-sounding theme song
by the talented British singer Verity White.
Lazenby’s voice is
unmistakable – his Australian accent has aged, with a rich timbre. Having
recently turned 80, he does the show with the confidence of an artist who has
nothing left to prove, taking us through all the twists and turns of Leasor’s elaborate
plot, his famous voice conveying outrage, confusion, humor and his natural
Aussie charm.
By
all reports, Lazenby enjoyed the experience and unlike his one screen
appearance as Bond, he’s keen to do more.Spiteful Puppet has the option to release nine more of Dr. Love’s
adventures in dramatic audio format.For
director/producer Barnaby Eaton-Jones, working with Lazenby was a peak experience
– “It was always a coup to get George on board and the challenge of him
playing a reluctant spy, rather than a super confident double-O-agent, was
something that clearly appealed (to him). When you meet him, you quickly realize
he was essentially playing himself as Bond. He has a swagger and a twinkle and
a devil-may-care attitude that hasn't changed even though he's now hit 80 years
old.â€
During
production, Eaton-Jones observed George displaying the same hot-blooded
instincts he showed while making On Her Majesty’s 50 years ago – “… he was perkiest in the recording studio when Glynis
Barber and Carla Mendonça were present (our two leading females) but, between
takes, he would regale us with the antics of his past.â€
In a world crowded with video games and streaming videos of every
description, Spiteful Puppet’s Passport to Oblivion audio drama is a
welcome return to the entertainment of old – well-crafted, detailed and
absorbing.
Passport
To Oblivion
will be released as a 2-disc audio set in a custom illustrated sleeve on
November 29, 2019 and you can order it by clicking here.
It’s
been 45 years since the release of Thunderbolt and Lightfoot. At the
time it seemed to be one of the better Clint Eastwood vehicles produced by his
company, Malpaso. Alas, the film has aged considerably along with both stars of
the film—Eastwood and Jeff Bridges (who was 24 at the time of its release).
The
picture was written and directed by the late Michael Cimino, who would later go
on to pick up Oscar gold for the The Deer Hunter (1978). Cimino got his
start with Eastwood, having co-written the script for Magnum Force
(1973) and then convinced the star to take on his original screenplay that he
had pitched prior to the making of Magnum. Cimino landed the job to
direct as well, and the planets aligned for the budding young talent.
It's
a Buddy Movie/Heist Flick/Road Picture/Action-Comedy about two common criminals—a
bank robber named Thunderbolt (Eastwood), and a drifter named Lightfoot
(Bridges)—who find each other by happenstance and become friends and partners. Complicating
matters is Thunderbolt’s old gang, headed by the vicious sociopath Red (George
Kennedy), who believes Thunderbolt ran off with the money from a previous
robbery at which many of their cohorts were killed. In truth, Thunderbolt hid
the cash in an old one-room schoolhouse—but when he went to claim the loot, he
found that the city had built a modern school in its place. Lightfoot convinces
Red to team up with him and Thunderbolt to pull off a more complicated heist as
a consolation prize. They are joined by Goody (Eastwood cast stalwart Geoffrey
Lewis) and the plan goes well… until it doesn’t.
Both
Eastwood and Bridges make a great team. Bridges (who received a Supporting
Actor Oscar nomination for his role) is so winning that he steals the movie.
Kennedy is also effective as the volatile heavy. The picture is full of the
kind of action (car chases, shoot-outs, fist fights) typical of Eastwood fare
in the mid-70s, as well as comedy. Unfortunately, a lot of the humor is at the
expense of women. This is sadly a sign of those times. Today, the bits of sexism
and chauvinism sprinkled throughout the picture are cringeworthy.
The
movie also suffers for playing too much to a blue-collar audience, much like
Eastwood’s later comedies, Every Which Way but Loose (1978) and Any
Which Way You Can (1980). There seems to be a sophomoric, redneck
sensibility to the characters and presentation that might have played well in
1974, but it comes off today as crass.
Nevertheless,
Kino Lorber’s new high definition 1920x1080p release looks sharp and colorful
(the location shooting in Montana provides gorgeous vistas). It is accompanied
by an audio commentary by film critic Nick Pinkerton. Supplements include a
near-half-hour featurette on the making of the movie with a rare audio
interview by the reclusive Cimino, the theatrical trailer, and a handful of TV
and radio spots.
For
Eastwood fans, Thunderbolt and Lightfoot is a cult film that does have a
lot going for it, especially the performance by Jeff Bridges, but viewers
should prudently place it within the context of when the picture was made and
released.
A YouTube documentary film about one of
Britain’s foremost movie poster artists Tom Chantrell (1916-2001) has just been
released. The 51-minute film, "Tom Chantrell- The Man Behind the 'Star Wars' Poster (!977)", details Chantrell’s life and career spanning seven
decades. There are interviews with family, friends and poster experts and
Chantrell’s poster imagery is displayed throughout.
Director Simon Henry came to the project
after unexpectedly discovering a photograph of Tom Chantrell holding up the
unfinished “Star Wars†(1977) poster. “The image simply blew me away, seeing
the amazing poster in its uncompleted form being held up by its creator... I
couldn't get the image out of my head and the more I read about Tom's work and
its significance within British film history the more I realised that someone
had to put this under a spotlight. I decided to contact Tom's family. We've
tried to tell Tom's story through the people who knew him best and hope we've
done justice for Britain's most important poster artist, Tom Chantrell.†(Editors note: Chantrell was primarily known for his designs of British quad posters which were generally different from the posters used for the North American market.)
Chantrell was a prolific artist with a liking
for colorful, dynamic almost photo-realist type painted poster illustrations.
However, he was a versatile artist and able to switch styles to caricature,
impressionistic, photographic and mixed-media compositions too. He is described
as the “consummate†commercial artist in his field, being able both to design
and illustrate posters (these functions were often separate in many advertising
agencies). Chantrell could also take care of lettering and would frequently proffer
his own witty tag-lines too.
In the 1930s Chantrell was employed providing
technical drawings and artwork for various commercial publications. WWII then
interrupted Chantrell’s career. As a conscientious objector Chantrell refused
to bear arms but instead found himself in one of the most dangerous occupations
in the entire military service: bomb disposal. Eventually the army recognized
Chantrell’s artistic skills and he was re-deployed. After the war Chantrell
resumed his career as a commercial artist and it was at this point that he
began to specialize in the creation of movie poster artwork.
It is thought that Chantrell produced
approximately 700 pieces of finished poster artwork during his career. Working
for the Allardyce advertising agency, Chantrell concentrated on films for
Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox. Among his standout compositions were Quad
poster designs for “Bus Stop†(1956), (“Cleopatra†(1963), “Bonnie and Clydeâ€
(1967), “Bullitt†(1968) etc. Chantrell also created posters for the popular
British “Carry On†franchise (1963-66) and dominated poster production for
Hammer (1965-74), relishing the “sex and gore†orientation of the studios.
As the advertising industry became more
“corporate†so the strong-minded Chantrell grew increasingly frustrated with
what he saw as “interference†in the poster design process and in 1972 he
turned freelance. With a young family and worried about where work would come
from Chantrell created a handy-sized portfolio of his artwork by cutting up
lots of his original paintings. This was a loss to posterity but has increased
the value of what has survived.
The
filmmaker who made the iconic Clint Eastwood vehicle, Dirty Harry in
1971 also made something of an early test-run three years earlier in the form
of a crime picture called Madigan. Starring Richard Widmark as a tough,
cynical, and world-weary police detective in New York City, Madigan
displays the same look, feel, and grit that the later Eastwood police
procedural exhibits. And, like Harry Callahan, Dan Madigan doesn’t always
follow the rules.
Don
Siegel (credited here as “Donald†Siegel for some odd reason, for he had been
“Don†in earlier films) had been a solid craftsman since the 1950s, responsible
for such works as Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954), the original Invasion
of the Body Snatchers (1956), the admirable remake of The Killers
(1964), and Coogan’s Bluff (1968). Likewise, Madigan is a
well-made thriller with a hard-boiled plot and realistic characters portrayed
by an excellent cast that includes Henry Fonda, Inger Stevens, and James
Whitmore.
The
tale begins when Madigan (Widmark) and his partner Rocco Bonaro (Harry
Guardino) screw up while attempting to bring in hoodlum Barney Benesch (Steve
Inhat) for questioning, unaware that he is wanted for murder in Brooklyn. Benesch
gets the upper hand on the pair and runs away with their guns. Police
commissioner Russell (Fonda) isn’t happy about this, but he has other problems
on his mind. Besides being involved in an adulterous relationship with a mistress (Susan Clark) that’s going
south, Russell’s best friend on the force, Chief Inspector Kane (Whitmore), may
be accepting bribes. Madigan has marital problems, too; his wife, Julia
(Stevens), is fed up with him, for he is married more to the job than to her. As
the two storylines converge, Russell orders Madigan and Bonaro to track down
Benesch by following the leads of several colorful characters, including
“Midget Castiglione†(Michael Dunn). Of course, the investigation culminates in
a climactic shootout with tragic results.
Widmark
is very good as the film’s protagonist, although the actor always seems to play
“Richard Widmark†in whatever movie he’s in (except Kiss of Death, which
made him a star as a psychotic killer). It is Fonda, however, who dominates the
picture. Russell’s plotline is ultimately more interesting than that of
Madigan’s, revealing a troubled, conflicted man who appears to have his mind on
the job but his heart ready to chuck it all.
Kino
Lorber’s new 1920x1080p Blu-ray looks slick and sharp, and it has optional
English subtitles. An interesting audio commentary by film historians Howard S.
Berger, Steve Mitchell, and Nathaniel Thompson accompanies the movie, but there
are no supplements other than the theatrical trailer and some TV spots.
Madigan
became
a short-lived television series in the early 70s with Widmark reprising his
role, but it is the 1968 feature film that packs the punch. A warm-up to Dirty
Harry? Perhaps not intentionally, but Madigan is a strong entry in Don
Siegel’s filmography.
Director Jan Zabeil's 2017 adventure drama "Three Peaks" won acclaim on the film festival circuit and it now comes to DVD in America via Kino Lorber. To say the film isn't for everyone is an understatement but patience is a virtue here as the glacially-paced story finally kicks into gear an hour into its 89 minute running-time. Until then, the movie plays out so slowly that it makes Peter Weir's "Picnic at Hanging Rock" resemble "The Fast and the Furious". The film follows the emotional ups and downs of Lea (Berenice Bejo), a young French mother who is divorced from her unseen American husband. She and her German boyfriend of two years, Aaron (Alexander Fehling) are raising her young son Tristan (Arian Montgomery) and there are concerns about the nature of Aaron's relationship with him. The movie opens with the three main characters arriving for a holiday stay at a small, remote cottage located at the base of the spectacular, snow-capped Dolomite mountains in Italy. Although Lea and Aaron are clearly in a loving relationship, they are haunted by how Tristan regards Aaron, who goes above-and-beyond to ingratiate himself to the boy. However, Lea worries that Aaron is assuming the role of father to Tristan at the expensive of his relationship with his real father. (Since we never see the father, we have to rely on Lea's assurance to Aaron that he is "a good man". ) Tristan himself sees confused. At times he calls Aaron "daddy" and at other times he seems to resent his presence, a feeling echoed when Aaron confesses to Lea that he sometimes feels the same way about Tristan. Director Zabeil is in no hurry to get to any aspect of the film that resonates with any particular sense of drama. Consequently, we observe some occasional bickering and lovemaking between the couple even as we try to empathize with their dilemma. The main problem with the script (written by Zabeil) is that the character of Tristan is inconsistent. At times, he idolizes Aaron as a father figure but inexplicably at other times, he pulls cruel minor pranks on him and demands that Aaron promise to "leave my mommy alone", which would imply he has witnessed some form of abuse when, in fact, he hasn't. The bottom line is that the kid isn't particularly likable and we end up sympathizing with Aaron, who still feels like "the other man", haunted by the spiritual presence of the boy's father.The confusing presentation of the relationships isn't helped by the fact that, for some reason, the main characters alternate speaking in German, French and English.
The movie transitions to the adventure genre when Aaron takes Tristan on a hike in the mountains. Tristan disobeys Aaron and wanders away, immediately getting lost. In his desperate search for the boy, Aaron becomes seriously injured and largely incapacitated. Director Zabeil is given the opportunity to ratchet up the suspense to a full boil but opts instead to keep things merely simmering. There are some unnerving scenes but Zabeil can't quite close the deal by making them dramatic enough to keep the viewer on edge. The film ends on an intriguing note that some might find a bit too ambiguous. The small cast is uniformly excellent (the only other characters are nameless members of a rescue team) and Axel Schneppat's cinematography is suitably stunning. The movie is never boring but it also doesn't pay off in ways we anticipate.
The Kino Lorber DVD presents an excellent transfer. Bonus features are the original trailer and trailers for other art house feature films available from the company.
Trade magazine ad promoting Pollard's nomination for Best Supporting Actor Oscar in "Bonnie and Clyde".
BY LEE PFEIFFER
Actor Michael J. Pollard has passed away from cardiac arrest at age 80. Pollard's unique look and acting style propelled him to fame in the 1960s. Pollard was born in New Jersey and crossed the river to study in the famed Actors Studio. He first appeared on Broadway in the smash hit production of "Bye Bye Birdie" and quickly became a familiar face on popular television programs including "Gunsmoke", "Lost in Space", "The Andy Griffith Show", "Star Trek", "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis", "Alfred Hitchcock Presents", "Route 66", "I Spy", "The Fall Guy", "The Girl from U.N.C.L.E.", "Crime Story", "Superboy" and "Tales from the Crypt". Pollard's trademark onscreen persona was as a lovable but dim-witted, slow moving character. The image paid off handsomely for him when was cast as C.W. Moss in director Arthur Penn's 1967 classic "Bonnie and Clyde". In the key role, Pollard played a loyal accomplice to the infamous gangster couple. Pollard was nominated for numerous major awards for his performance including a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. The success of "Bonnie and Clyde" briefly elevated Pollard to leading man status and he starred in numerous films including "Jigsaw", "Hannibal Brooks", "Little Fauss and Big Halsey" and "Dirty Little Billy" before reverting to supporting player status. Pollard often had key roles in "B" movies such as director Rob Zombie's cult classic "House of 1,000 Corpses" but he sometimes appeared in small parts in major films such as "Dick Tracy", "Melvin and Howard", "Roxanne" and "Tango & Cash". Pollard's potential was undoubtedly compromised by his admitted problems with substance abuse, though by the 1980s he appeared to have successfully kicked his bad habits. Actor Michael J. Fox had paid tribute to Pollard by placing the "J" in his name when he first started out in show business.
While
it’s got its defenders and fans, The Fearless Vampire Killers is not
Roman Polanski at his best. It does, however, have a certain charm if one
places the film within the context of when it was made and released.
Originally
titled Dance of the Vampires, the movie is a comedy horror flick that is
an obvious send-up of the British horror movies made by Hammer Studios that
were hugely popular in the 1960s. It looks like a Hammer picture… the
film stock is the same and the colors have that muted, yet oddly vibrant, appearance—and
of course the blood and bosoms are in full bloom. It was a British production
as well, but the film was made in ski resort locations in Italy, doubling as
“Eastern Europe.â€
Probably
of special interest these days is the presence of Sharon Tate in a lead role,
as well as her soon-to-be husband, the director himself, Roman Polanski, as the
protagonist’s sidekick. Their off-screen budding romance is palpable in the
movie, and, if anything, The Fearless Vampire Killers reflects a moment
in time when there was no controversy in the filmmaker’s life and the future
for him and his bride-to-be appeared to be rosy.
It's
the story of Professor Abronsius (Jack MacGowran), a sort of Van Helsing
figure, and his assistant, Alfred (Polanski), as they hunt for vampires. Tate
is Sarah, the daughter of the tavern innkeeper (Alfie Bass), and Alfred falls
madly in love with her. When she is taken captive by the local vampire head
honcho, Count von Krolock (Ferdy Mayne), Abronsius and Alfred take it upon
themselves to rescue her and destroy the count’s huge coven of undead
followers, who congregate annually for a ball in Krolock’s castle.
The
movie is wacky, full of slapstick, and has little true horror. There’s something
of a Benny Hill sensibility that permeates it; the picture is certainly
atypical of what we think of as a Roman Polanski movie. Polanski himself is
quite good in his role of the 90-pound weakling who summons the bravery to
complete his tasks. Tate is eye candy supreme, and she plays her role
relatively straight. MacGowran, when you can understand his dialogue, is
effectively comical, but it is Polanski who steals the picture.
When
the film was first released in the U.S., the distributors re-cut it and added a
cheap animated sequence before the credits, dubbed MacGowran’s voice with a
silly-sounding one, and added the subtitle: …OR: Pardon Me, but Your Teeth
Are in My Neck. The movie bombed at the time, disappeared, and was relegated
to cult status over the years. Eventually, a restored U.K. version (Polanski’s
preferred cut) resurfaced and was released on home video. The Fearless
Vampire Killers was then re-evaluated, and it is now considered, in some
circles anyway, to be one of the filmmaker’s minor classics.
The
Warner Archive’s new Blu-ray release is, thankfully, the original U.K. cut, and
it looks quite good in its widescreen, colorful splendor. The supplements
include the U.S. animated pre-credits sequence, a vintage featurette on the
making of the picture, and the theatrical trailer. English subtitles can be
turned on, which is highly recommended—the dialogue, with its many accents and
muddied deliveries, can be rather difficult to follow.
The
Fearless Vampire Killers is an oddity, but it’s enjoyable enough to pass the time
and serve as a rare happy bookmark in the life of one of cinema’s most important—yet
troubled—filmmakers.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
In
1951, Ealing Studios in Britain were on a roll. The so-called “Ealing
Comedies,†which became a sub-genre all their own, had become a sensation,
especially when the pictures starred the versatile and charismatic Alec
Guinness. Earlier that same year, The Lavender Hill Mob was one of the
most popular films ever released in the U.K., and it was proving to be a hit in
America as well (and would, the following year, win an Oscar for its writing).
Following
hot on the heels of Lavender Hill was The Man in the White Suit,
which featured Guinness as Sidney Stratton, a brilliant but over-zealous
scientist who will stop at nothing to realize his dream of creating an
impervious textile.
As
discussed in the supplemental documentary, “Revisiting ‘The Man in the White
Suit,’†the picture was made at a time when Britain was on the precipice of
“the future†in terms of technological advancements, but there was in some
quarters a resistance to leaving the conservative past behind. While there are
plenty of laughs in the movie, it is also a cautionary tale about the dangers
of advancing too quickly.
In
the course of the story, the determined Sidney makes many enemies, but a few
friends as well, and eventually he succeeds in creating a starkly white suit
that repels dirt and stains, will not tear, and is slightly radioactive. It
also glows in the dark! The problem, as the men in power come to realize, is
that manufacturing the textile will put everybody else out of business—mill
workers, launderers, clothing makers, and more. Therefore, the decision is made
to suppress the invention—and this causes Sidney to go berserk and escape from
the clutches of both the upper management and the lower workers.
There
are many hilarious sequences, such as when the chemicals keep exploding and
destroying the laboratory, much to the chagrin of the managers. While the brew
is cooking, the test tubes and beakers bubble musically with tones and
beeps—“testubular bells,†so to speak. Very amusing.
Guinness
is terrific, of course, and he is supported by the superb Joan Greenwood, Cecil
Parker, and Michael Gough. One highlight is the appearance of Ernest Thesiger
(of Bride of Frankenstein fame) as one of the wiley, old textile
industry barons.
The
Man in the White Suit was nominated for the Writing—Adapted Screenplay Oscar at
the same ceremony in which The Lavender Hill Mob was nominated (and won)
for Writing—Original Screenplay. Ealing Studios was indeed at the top of their
game in 1951.
Kino
Lorber’s new Blu-ray 1920x1080p restoration looks quite good, a vast
improvement over previous DVD releases. There are optional English subtitles,
as well as a learned audio commentary by film historian Dr. Dean Brandum. Supplements
include the previously mentioned documentary, the theatrical trailer, and
trailers for other Kino Lorber releases.
The
Man in the White Suit is classic British comedy, timeless Alec Guinness, and a swell
time to be had by all in comfortable home theaters!
Director Jean-Jacques Beineix had burst
onto the scene with the superb, quirky, and new New Wave crime picture, Diva
(1981) that embraced not only the French New Wave of the early 1960s, but
the early 1980s pop New Wave of music and visuals that were exploding in all
mediums at that time. Diva was a critical and commercial hit with
Western audiences, although Beineix’s follow-up, Moon in the Gutter
(1983), was not. The filmmaker bounced back, though, with Betty Blue,
which received a deserved Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Film.
Based on a popular French novel by
Philippe Djian, the story concerns a writer named Zorg (Jean-Hugues Anglade)
who works various odd jobs to support himself while he struggles to pen a
novel. He meets and falls in love with the fiery, unpredictable, and incredibly
sexy Betty Blue (Dalle). Throughout the tale, we witness the ups and downs of
their relationship through the couple’s nomadic moving around France, meeting
and befriending colorful characters, getting into fights, and slowly spiraling
toward tragedy. This is because Betty is seriously mentally ill (probably
bi-polar, although that term was not much in use in the 1980s). Betty’s mood
swings can be violent and shocking, and it’s a challenge for Philippe to
continually cover for her, as well as care for the woman and keep her safe.
Both Anglade and Dalle deliver
courageous and dynamic performances, and Jean-François Robin’s cinematography
exhibits vibrant colors and painterly images. This is a gorgeous-looking
picture, made even more attractive by the (often full-frontal nude) physicality
of the two leads. While the picture is an exquisite examination of a passionate
love affair, it’s also a disturbing scrutiny of a mental affliction that few
people understood in those days.
When Betty Blue was first
released, it was a two-hour movie. Beineix released a “director’s extended cutâ€
in 2005 that runs three hours—and that is the version presented in the
Criterion Collection’s new Blu-ray release. It’s curious why Criterion did not
also include the original shorter cut, for I’m not sure the extra hour of
runtime added anything of special value.
The high-definition digital
restoration, approved by Beineix, is terrific, though, and it comes with an
uncompressed monaural soundtrack (and the quirky musical score by Gabriel Yared
is a highlight). There is a new English subtitle translation.
Supplements include an hour-long
documentary on the film from 2013 with Beineix, Dalle, Anglade, associate
producer Claudie Ossard, DP Robin, and composer Yared; a vintage featurette on
the making of the picture that includes an interview with original novelist
Djian; Le chien de Monsieur Michel (“Mr. Michel’s Dogâ€), a short film by
Beineix from 1977; a vintage TV interview with Beineix and Dalle; Dalle’s
screen test; and trailers. The booklet contains an essay by critic Chelsea
Phillips-Carr.
Betty Blue may not be the perfect date movie, but it does serve to
illustrate in believable and visceral tones a passionate but volatile man/woman
relationship that will fascinate any lover of cinema.
Generally speaking, I happen to watch more bad movies
than good ones… and I suppose that any film which includes the breathless line,
“It’s too bad we didn’t bring the dune
buggy!†suggests I’m likely in the midst of another.In truth, I sort of knew this going into Arch
Hall Sr.’s cult classic EEGAH (1962),
a bona fide drive-in circuit masterpiece.This film has long suffered ignobility partly due to the circulation of tattered
prints relegated to the Public Domain.The film’s PD fate partly explains its inclusion in practically every
budget-label 50 or 100 count horror and sci-fi multi-film DVD collection ever
marketed.Happily – if somewhat
curiously - Film Detective has bravely rescued the film – and its fans - from
the gray-market, washed-out, faded and deteriorating prints of which we’ve been
accustomed, sharing with us this brand new 4K transfer to Blu-ray from an
original 35mm camera negative.
The real question I suppose is whether or not EEGAH deserves such white-glove
attention?I will reason that it does,
especially as I have no financial interest or skin in the game.It’s nothing if not a fun film; a completely
nutty and perfect jewel of non-pretentious, time-capsule-exploitative-entertainment.It’s also of some train-spotting, fan-boy interest
as the film features the decidedly fresh-faced, twenty-one year old, 7’ 2â€
actor Richard Kiel (“Jaws†of the James Bond films) as the titular EEGAH.EEGAH is, apparently, a brooding prehistoric
cave dweller who has somehow managed to survive well into the early 1960s, unnoticed,
unwashed and unloved, in the Coachella Valley of Southern Californian
Mountains.
EEGAH’s curious, eon-spanning survival is never explained
to scientific satisfaction in Bob Wehling’s dotty script adapted from Arch Hall
Sr.’s original story. Sweet Roxy Miller’s adventure-writer father Mr. Miller (also
played by Arch Hall Sr.) opines – not unreasonably – that the caveman is likely
the last of his line.But he gives us no
indication of how he’s intellectually arrived at his totally non-scientifically
tested, off-the-cuff conclusion.By his best
ballpark estimate the savage primitive has managed to survive perhaps “fifty to
one hundred years†following the passing of even EEGAH’s most recent forebear.In some manner of speaking EEGAH still lives alongside his now all-but-extinct
extended family in his lonely mountainside cave.Except they now reside there as little more
than well cared for mummified remains.
EEGAH’s survival has seemingly gone on unnoticed until
one dark night on a deserted road when sweet Roxy (Marilyn Manning) nearly plows
into him with her banana yellow sport coupe.While EEGAH grimaces and growls and postures menacingly, it’s apparent
that he’s somewhat smitten with his hit-and-run paramour.The girl manages to escape their impromptu
meet-up and soon relates the details of her strange run in to her disbelieving
boyfriend Tom (Arch Hall, Jr.) and her aforementioned father.Acknowledging the mystery would be best investigated
by a responsible adult, Dad Miller is apparently unable to find one.He chooses to go off on his own, hiring a
helicopter to take him into the deep ravines within Shadow Mountain.Dressed resplendently in white safari shirt,
shorts, and pit helmet, Miller disembarks the copter for an ill-prepared solo expedition.He carries little more than a small tartan
satchel and a Brownie camera to support him on his overnight camping trip.
When he fails to appear at the pre-arranged pick-up site
the following day, heartthrob Tom and Roxy rush to the designated spot in the
hot desert in Tom’s cool dune buggy (“The tires are filled with water,†he
tells his girlfriend, the extra weight giving them better “traction in the
sandâ€).As an aside, actor Hall Jr. recalled
the dune buggy featured in the film was actually the most authentic and menacing
monster of the production.Though it had
once been a 1939 Plymouth Sedan it was now, in the actor’s own parlance “a
deathtrap,†since it had been amateurishly converted into a buggy and welded
back together poorly with no semblance of supportive structure.He recalled a few instances where he was
literally pinned under a wreckage of metal, the crew scrambling to pull him
free from the crushing weight.
The 1970s spawned a peculiar sub-genre of crime movies: the rape revenge sagas. Ostensibly, the films were designed to celebrate female empowerment and denounce sexual exploitation of women. In reality, that was just window dressing for the true purpose of the productions, namely, to exploit women. True, they did demonstrate scenes of violated young ladies exacting some just desserts on male stalkers and abusers, but there was an overall suspicion that the films' intended audience wasn't liberated females but men who enjoyed cinematic depictions of women being abused. A prime example is "Act of Vengeance", a 1974 American International cheapie that was also released under the cruder but more accurate title of "Rape Squad". The movie opens with Linda (Jo Ann Harris), a self-employed 20 year-old, having the misfortune of being stalked by a slimeball named Jack (Peter Brown), who wears a red jump suit and a hockey mask (thus inspiring later, more memorable screen villains.) He brutally rapes Linda while adding an additional humiliating element to the crime: he forces her to sing "Jingle Bells" during the assault. Linda survives the ordeal but finds the police are inefficient in tracking down the villain, understandably because he was masked. Turns out Jack is a serial rapist who has subjected numerous other young women to the same horrific fate. Linda meets and bonds with the other victims (played by Jennifer Lee, Lisa Moore, Connie Strickland and Patricia Estrin) and they decide to take matters into their own hands by personally tracking down their attacker and also attempting to come to the rescue of other women who are in danger of being sexually assaulted. To brush up on their self-defense skills, they are taught martial arts by a pro, Tiny (Lada Edmund, Jr.) and-presto!- the women are turned into female versions of Kato on the spot. The film then follows the women as they thwart the bad guys by subjecting them to humiliating beatings. But their primary mission is to track down their mutual rapist and dish out their own brand of justice.
Director Bob Kelljan was already an old hand at helming exploitation films including the Count Yorga horror flicks and "Scream Blacula Scream". If his desire was to depict the terror of sexual assault, he certainly succeeded. The rape scenes are hard to watch and chilling in their realism, made all the more disturbing by the perversions of Jack. (In addition to making his victims sing "Jingle Bells", he requires them to praise his sexual performance and speaks to them in a calm, friendly voice even as he subjects them to despicable acts.) However, the main attributes of the movies pertain to its goofy aspects. Every one of the victims is a knock-out and, despite knowing that Jack is still stalking them, they persist in parading around braless in the skimpiest outfits imaginable. If that isn't enough to keep male audience members awake, they find time to relax by sharing a hot tub (totally nude, of course!)The finale finds our heroines engaging in cliched behavior from other "women-in-jeopardy" films by being lured to meet Jack in the dead of night in a creepy, abandoned zoo. Now, what could possibly go wrong with that strategy? Naturally, they end up separating and- oh, yes, one of them suffers a broken heel that impairs her ability to run. The only predictable element missing is the presence of Vincent Price.
The performances by the female leads range from passable to laughable. All of the male cast members play characters who are killers, rapists or just plain jerks. (The esteemed comedic actor Stanley Adams inexplicably turns up in a brief, embarrassing turn as a pervert.) In the 1970s, the crime of rape was depicted in major films such as "Death Wish" and "A Clockwork Orange". Those scenes, too, are difficult to endure but at least the films were making a serious comment on the degradation of societal norms. "Act of Vengeance" is disguised as a message movie but exists only to titillate, although it does provide plenty of laughs as well (some of them actually intentional).
Once again Scorpion has given a "B" movie a first-class presentation with an excellent transfer. Extras include a new on-camera interview with actress Jennifer Lee Pryor, who played a member of the Rape Squad. She's quite loquacious and discusses her memories of the film, providing some interesting anecdotes and claims, quite correctly, that the female heroines preceded Charlie's Angels, who were seen as ground-breaking female heroes. The original trailer is also included as well as a gallery of trailers for other Scorpion titles.
(At this time, the Blu-ray does not appear to be available on Amazon. It can be ordered here.)
Universal has released a highly impressive 4K/ Blu-ray/ Digital gift set for "Scarface" starring Al Pacino, packed with cool bonus extras including the Blu-ray debut of the original version starring Paul Muni. Here is the official press announcement:
Scarface “The
World is Yours†Limited Edition Gift Set
The ultimate Scarface experience
includes:
1983
version of Scarface on 4K UHD, remastered Blu-ray and Digital
1932
version of Scarface on Blu-ray for the first time ever (newly restored with 2
versions of the film – Original uncensored version and Alternate version with
different ending)
Collectible
“The World is Yours†statue replica
Available for a limited time only! Loaded with bonus
features including new 35th Anniversary Reunion with Al Pacino and Michelle
Pfeiffer.
Synopsis: In the spring of 1980, the port at Mariel Harbor
was opened, and thousands set sail for the United States. They came in search
of the American Dream. One of them found it on the sun-washed avenues of Miami…
wealth, power and passion beyond his wildest dreams. He was Tony Montana. The world
will remember him by another name… Scarface. Starring Al Pacino as Tony Montana
along with Michelle Pfeiffer, Steven Bauer, Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and
Robert Loggia, Scarface has become a cultural phenomenon brilliantly directed
by Brian De Palma and written by Oliver Stone.
Brian Raftery, writing in the New York Times, has some positive news for those of you of a certain age who bemoan the fact that your favorite movie-themed amusement park rides have gone the way of the Bay City Rollers. The Times examines how some die-hard fans of the rides have allowed their legacies to live on through web sites and YouTube videos, some of which have been viewed tens of millions of times by grateful members of the public who can recall precious moments spent on these "extravaganzas" which were viewed as increasingly quaint in a world that introduces new technologies ever nano second. Yet, through the videos, rides from Universal Studios and Disney live on from "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" to "Jaws", "King Kong", "Jurassic Park", "Twister" and "Earthquake". Click here to read.
Novelist Jay Richard Kennedy was, in his pre-Hollywood youth,
known to friends simply as Samuel Richard Solomonick.Idealistic and having come of age in the midst
of the U.S. depression, this native of Bronx, New York, would be caught up in
the radical politics of the 1930s. In
the years prior to the entry of the U.S. in World War II, Kennedy’s personal
politics were mostly aligned with those of domestic left-wing groups, including
the U.S. Communist Party.This marriage
of shared ideals was primarily due to the CP’s seemingly uncompromising anti-fascist
beliefs.
But Kennedy’s allegiance to the CP and to their professed
socialist ideals came to an abrupt end in 1939 when the Soviet Union’s Joseph
Stalin shocked internationalists and fellow travelers by doing the unthinkable
- co-signing a non-aggression pact with Hitler’s Germany.That agreement, of course, was not
long-lasting, broken when Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941.But Stalin’s pact with the Devil had irreparably
shaken the faith of many left-wing activists who had previously – and naively -
looked to the Soviet Union for political guidance.
Though Kennedy would abandon many tenets of the far left,
he remained an unapologetic political liberal.He was particularly active in the civil rights movements of the 1960s.He worked alongside members of C.O.R.E.
(Congress of Racial Equality) and professed solidarity with the Black Panther
Party.In truth, this activist wasn’t doing
so badly working within the framework of the capitalist system. In April 1966,
the recording industry trade magazine Billboard
would describe the creative Kennedy as a true renaissance man.He was, they explained, been “at various
times a writer for films, radio producer, novelist, talent manager, songwriter,
and music publisher.â€
At age 54, Kennedy’s youthful radicalism, while never
abandoned, was likely tempered when he was tapped by Frank Sinatra to head the record
and music publishing wing of Sinatra Enterprises. Kennedy’s 1965 novel, Favor the Runner, had mixed politics and seamy stories of entertainment
industry practices.The novel was
praised by Sinatra as “the most entertaining and beautifully written novel
about show business to be published in this or any season… a swinging,
shattering, glorious experience.â€
Though the film credits of The Chairman do note that the film was based on a Kennedy’s original
novel, it would appear as though the book was only first published two months
following the movie’s release in June 1969.It was also published in an odd manner, the mass-market Signet paperback
movie-tie-in of August 1969 preceding the later 1970 hardcover by the New
American Library/World Publishing.The
hardcover version of the book was simultaneously published in the UK under the
more intriguing title “The Most Dangerous Man in the World.†(This title was
retained for the UK release of the film.)
As Kennedy had a life-long interest in contemporary
international-politics, it’s not surprising that the ideas behind The Chairman would germinate from his
passion.In 1966 Mao Zedong, the Chairman
of the Communist Party of Party, would architect his infamous “Cultural
Revolution,†fervently calling on students and workers to commit themselves to
continual revolution.It was a
disastrous experiment, an anti-intellectual call to arms.During a four year period, universities were shuttered
and any semblance of a free press crushed, leaving only Mao’s cult-of-personality
and famed “Little Red Book†to light the path to world revolutionary socialism.Professors, intellectuals, workers of mid-to-high
station - even loyal Communist Party members - were publically criticized,
chastised and jailed by Mao’s infamous Red
Guard, derided by the faithful as “Capitalist Roaders.â€
The opening credit sequence of J. Lee Thompson’s The Chairman perfectly captures the
revolutionary zeal of Mao’s Red Guards.Playing beneath composer Jerry Goldsmith’s stirring score is a montage
of folk art and propaganda poster images of China’s peasant class brandishing
their “Little Red Books,†holding them triumphantly aloft in their left-hands
or dutifully studying Mao’s enlightening text.
The film had been in the works for some time.In February 1967, the syndicated gossip
columnist Earl Wilson teased: “Jay Richard Kennedy, Frank Sinatra’s story
sleuth, is winding up the minutes of The
Chairman, about Commie China, which Frank, Yul Brynner, and Spencer
Tracy’ll have fun with in Hong Kong next fall.â€None of this would actually happen, of course, though Frank Sinatra was strongly
rumored to have been considered for the role of the Nobel Prize-winning
scientist John Hathaway early on.The
part eventually went to Gregory Peck.For his troubles, Peck would sign onto a contract that reportedly paid
him $500,000 dollars and 10% of any profits.Peck had been working steadily, though his more recent films had not
been overly successful at the box office.In 1969, the actor would appear in no fewer than four feature-length
films of varying success.Though The Chairman, Peck’s first film with 20th
Century Fox in more than a decade, eventually brought in 2.5 million dollars,
it was not a huge box-office success.The film would only rank as the forty-first highest-grossing film of
1969.
On July 17, 1968, Hollywood gossip columnist Joyce Haber
reported that producer Arthur Jacobs was in London test-screening some of the
“10,000 feet of film†the filmmaker had managed to photograph discreetly
“behind the bamboo curtain for use in The
Chairman.â€Afterwards, the
production crew was to move to Hong Kong for principal photography.Jacob’s first choice to helm the feature was
the British director Peter Yates.Yates
was a natural choice for this espionage film, having previously worked on such ITV
television series as The Saint with
Roger Moore and Danger Man with
Patrick McGoohan.Yates had recently –
and easily - made the transition to feature films, beginning with Robbery (1967) but scoring big-time with
Bullitt (1968) featuring Steve
McQueen.
Jacob’s talks with Yates eventually stalled,perhaps due to the success of the latter film
which might have made the director too hot – or too expensive - a property to
sign on to The Chairman.Jacobs then offered the directorial job to another
Brit, the equally talented J. Lee Thompson.Thompson was a natural choice. He had already worked with Gregory Peck
on The Guns of Navarone (1961, for
which he would receive a “Best Director†nomination by the Academy), Cape Fear (1962), and the all-star cast
assembled in search of Mackenna’s Gold
(1969).
The Chinese have already expressed interest in having Hathaway
lend his scientific expertise to their breakthrough.Though they possess the secret formula, they
have thus far been unable to produce this enzyme in sufficient quantities.As few Americans are welcomed to Peking, the
calculating Shelby wants Hathaway to accept the invitation of the Reds.He’s not to help out as they wish, of course,
but will only be sent east long enough to steal their secret.The scientist refuses until the U.S.
President himself calls, urging Hathaway to accept as the mission has been
deemed as being of “urgent and terrific importance.â€
Hathaway relents and agrees to have a “Q-23 transmitterâ€
surgically inserted as a mastoid sinus canal implant.While Hathaway is told the implant has a
satellite monitored tracking radius of one hundred and ten miles and can even
monitor changes in his physiology, he is not informed the device also houses a
“coil of explosive wire†which the military can remotely detonate should the
mission go wrong.Arriving in China in
the midst of the Cultural Revolution - already warily surveilled by his cautious
and suspicious Chinese hosts - things, quite understandably, go wrong rather
quickly.
While a very entertaining and old fashioned Cold War thriller,
The Chairman does suffers from a bit
of an identity crisis.It’s first
positioned as a serious film involving a chess game of competing ideologies and
geo-political espionage.But it soon loses
such sober prestige when it occasionally dresses as a pastiche of a more
outlandish James Bond adventure.In many
respects the film is less interesting as the controversies that would surround
its production.Principal photography on
The Chairman was scheduled from
August 26th through December 3rd, 1968.Most of the film’s interior scenes were shot without
incident on the soundstages of Pinewood Studios, with the windy and rugged
cliff sides of Scotland doubling as those of western Mongolia.
The real troubles began when, following a series of
location shoots in Taiwan, the cast and crew were due to arrive in Hong Kong on
Saturday, November 30, 1968.The
company’s Hong Kong schedule was unceremoniously scrapped when, on Wednesday
the 27th, the New York Times
reported the “British colonial government, reacting to Communist protests,
announced today that it had forbidden an American film unit to shoot several
sequences here of the movie The Chairman.â€The leftist Wen Wei Pao and other Communist newspapers were at the forefront of
cancellation of the film unit’s business in Hong Kong.The newssheets all published editorials
decrying the project as a “conspiracy of the British and American
imperialists,†an “insult to Chairman Mao,†and a “serious provocation against
the 700 million Chinese people.â€
Interestingly, there was not a lot of support for the production
team in Hong Kong’s non-Communist mainstream press either.Beginning In the spring of 1967, Hong Kong had
been wracked with nearly eight months of serious violence – bombings,
assassinations, and street riots – following a series of hit-and-run
confrontations between police and Communist agitators in the wake of a labor
dispute.The resulting chaos and
property damage had wearied many of the 8.5 million people living in Hong
Kong.They were less interested in
engaging in a free-speech battle, opting instead for an uneasy peace.To complicate matters further, a
British-based journalist for Reuters was concurrently being held under house
arrest in Peking, the capitol of mainland China.The reporter’s detention was seen by most
observers as Peking’s retaliatory tactic for what they accused was Hong Kong’s
“unjustified persecution of Communist reporters.â€
The 1972 Giallo Who
Saw Her Die? (Chi l'ha vista morire?) was Aldo Lado’s second film as
director, his first being Short Night of
Glass Dolls (1971).That film was a
somewhat less-than-traditional Giallo, photographed inexpensively behind the
Iron Curtain in the cities of Zagreb and Prague.Short
Night of Glass Dolls was a complicated film that told its story in backward
fashion, much in the style of the celebrated playwright Harold Pinter.It was also an unusual Giallo in the sense
that its overtly exploitative sex scenes were unevenly mixed with the genre’s
level of on-screen violence than European movie-thriller fans had come to
expect.Lado had entered into the film
business only some five years earlier, serving as the assistant director on a
handful of Sergio Leone-inspired Spaghetti western knock-offs and a couple of action
films, before getting the opportunity to work with the famed director Bernardo
Bertolucci on the auteur’s
Oscar-nominated production of The
Conformist (1970).
In the featurette “I Saw Her Die,†Lado offers a
compartmentalized history of popular Italian cinema.The eighty-four year old asserts that the
first wave propagated three identifiable trends: first the Maciste era (or sword-and-sandal “Peplums†as they are referred Stateside).These films were followed by the era of the Spaghetti
western, with the Giallo serving as this first wave’s bookend.Both Lado and principal screenwriter
Francesco Barilli on Who Saw Her Die?
were children of cinema’s first generation, having been exposed to the same
diet of black and white motion pictures and having read many of the same novels.There was little differentiation between the
classics and the pulp paperback.Lado
was in love of mysteries but preferred the hard-edged novels of Mickey
Spillane’s Mike Hammer to the drawing room nicety whodunits of Agatha Christie.Barilli was a fan of the pulp mysteries and
adventure tales by the likes of Edgar Wallace.Of their filmmaking contemporaries, both men expressed admiration for
Roman Polanski’s stylized work and this is reflected on the film they would
collaborate on.
In Who Saw Her Die?George Lazenby is cast as Franco
Serpieri, an artist who keeps a small sculpting studio based in Venice.He has been experiencing a welcome measure of
recognition due to a recent and critically acclaimed exhibition of his work in
Beirut. His success is partly the result of the machinations of his agent, the
powerful and commanding Serafin (Adolfo Celi, Largo of Thunderball fame).Serpieri’s
young, red-headed and freckle-faced daughter Roberta (Nicolette Elmi) is
visiting with her father from her home in London.
We learn the sculptor is apparently estranged from his daughter’s
mother Elizabeth (the beautiful Swedish actress Anita Strindberg).In a decidedly grim scenario that bristles
even today, the doomed child’s visit is short lived.The girl’s sudden disappearance and subsequent
murder throws Serpieri into depression and a relentless desire to bring the
guilty party to justice.Despite the
film’s morbid subject matter, the storyline soon evolves into a conventional
whodunit of sorts.There are any numbers
of shady characters introduced within the film’s running time: several seemingly
plausible suspects and red-herrings bring attention to themselves with expressionless
eyes or incautious suspicious mannerisms.Most moments are initially perceived as innocent, but now appear unseemly
in light of the tragedy.
Though not for every taste, this is a well-constructed
film and it’s likely George Lazenby’s best film after On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969).Though an Italian production, the
English-speaking Lazenby was brought on at the suggestion of producer Enzo Doria,
primarily due to the actor’s recent attachment with the James Bond
franchise.He was, in Lado’s unapologetic
estimate, “A good name to attract easy money.â€In an eleven-minute featurette featured on Anchor Bay’s DVD issue of Who Saw Her Die? (2002) (not ported over to this new Arrow
edition), Lado would recall, “George Lazenby had already played the role of
James Bond and acquired a certain international fame.This was useful for the producers… He had
deep issues with (Cubby) Broccoli and the entire James Bond organization… In
the end, he didn’t make a lira.He was
going to the casinos, staying in big hotels, and nothing was free.At the end he was shown the bills and
everything had been deducted from his pay… he had made nothing.His only dream was to return to his homeland
of Australia, buy a boat and sail off alone.He was happy that [his work on Who
Saw Her Die?] would earn him the money to buy the boat.â€
Lado’s memory is partly in error here, as Lazenby, an
admitted novice boatman, had already sailed with his wife Chrissie into Italy,
via the island of Malta.The
adventuresome couple eventually arrived, according to Lazenby’s recollection,
in “Fiumicino, at the mouth of the Tiber outside Rome.†The pair had arrived on
a catamaran purchased on the dwindling reserve of earnings from the Bond
film.As late as October 1973, Lazenby
told one journalist that the paycheck cashed from the “little art film†shot in
Italy - along with the remnants of his Bond money - allowed him and his wife to
survive on “five pounds a week.â€He
confessed he had no yet had the opportunity to see the final cut of Who Saw Her Die? but was nonetheless
thankful for the gig as “it helped keep us for fifteen months on the catamaran,
and that kind of life brings sanity.â€
Lazenby’s first post-Bond film Universal Soldier (Cy Endfield, 1971) had been partly financed by
Lazenby and then sold, for percentages, to Britain’s Hemdale Film Corporation.The entertainment company puzzled how to
market this shot-on-a-shoe-string, mercenary-turned-hippie- pacifist
production.Though Universal Soldier was eventually released to theatres in the UK in
February 1971, it was a commercial failure.Hedging its bets, Hemdale chose to absorb their losses by releasing the
film as an under-bill to a more commercial property, the political
suspense-thriller Embassy, based on
the best-selling novel by Stephen Coulter.Directed by the Gordon Hessler, Embassy
would feature an all-star cast that would include Richard Roundtree, Max von
Sydow, Ray Milland, Broderick Crawford, and Chuck Connors.
The film had some defenders.John Russell Taylor, the film critic of the
London Times, wrote that while Universal Soldier was undeniably
“muddled†and “not exactly a missed masterpiece,†the film was stronger than
the more formulaic Embassy as it
“tries to say something about war, arms sales, and the limits of cynicism.†Taylor’s view of the film was far more
generous than David McGillivray of the UK’s Monthly
Film Bulletin.That critic unkindly
wrote off Universal Soldier as little
more than a “shallow piece of social drama,†and mercilessly dissected the
screenplay’s “apparently improvised dialogue.†Especially galling to the MFB
critic was the plot device that allowed for Lazenby’s immoral, cynical
mercenary soldierto undergo a“sudden and dramatic ideological conversion
[…] largely attributed to the influence of one insipid yoga fanatic and a
couple of outbursts from Germaine Greer on the topic of arms to South
Africa.â€
It’s likely neither Lado nor Doria had even screened Universal Soldier, the film having disappeared
from sight almost upon release.On the
set of Who Saw Her Die?, the director
had more a more logistical issue to contend with.Lado, a native Italian whose second language
was French, spoke little English.So, to
communicate with Lazenby, the filmmaker – who maintained that a director’s
responsibility was to “stage†a film as one might a theatrical performance –
would pantomime what he desired the former James Bond to convey as the cameras
rolled.Following production, Lazenby bragged,
“For the Italian film I had needed to learn the language,†but if this was the
case the lessons didn’t go so well.The
actor dialogue’s is dubbed throughout the film in both the Italian and English-language versions of the
film.
The dubbing was becoming something as a trend.Though he had been famously dubbed as “Sir
Hilary Bray†for parts of OHMSS, he
was also - mostly - dubbed in the course of the three Kung Fu films he would
appear in for Raymond Chow’s Golden Harvest Productions following his move to
Hong Kong in 1973.In any event, Lazenby
appears in Who Saw Her Die? much as
he did as the mercenary Ryker in Universal
Soldier, almost unrecognizable as the previously dapper James Bond.For starters, the actor’s hair is shoulder-length
long, and he now sports a thick brown moustache.When Lazenby removes his shirt during one
early scene he appears well beyond thin – he’s alarmingly lanky and skinny.This was likely the result of his and his
wife Chrissie’s conversion to vegetarianism in 1971.
The very addictive web site www.in70mm.com presents a fascinating and exhaustive list of major films that were shot in standard 35mm format but presented (at least sporadically) in blow-up 70mm format. The list might surprise you. In addition to big budget epics, you'll find in the year-by-year listings such seemingly unlikely blow-ups as "Bye Bye Birdie", "The Cardinal", "The Chase", "Hellfighters" and "Shalako". Some of these 70mm presentations were only shown in limited areas. For example, a 70mm print of the 1967 James Bond film "You Only Live Twice" was apparently restricted to Japan. Click here to access the listings.
RETRO-ACTIVE: THE BEST FROM THE CINEMA RETRO ARCHIVES
ONCE UPON A TIME IN
THE EXISTENTIAL WEST
By
Raymond Benson
I
never had a chance to see these two legendary westerns that were made
back-to-back in the mid-1960s, presented by Roger Corman, directed and
co-produced by Monte Hellman, and starring a young Jack Nicholson (among
others), for they were elusive. I’d heard they were quirky, moody, and very
different takes on the western genre, so I was excited to hear that The
Criterion Collection was releasing both pictures as a double-bill on one
Blu-ray disc. Now you, too, can view these strange little movies in all of
their high definition glory.
Hellman
was one of the few directors that producer Corman would let helm pictures for
his studio, which at that time was famous for low-budget horror films,
youth-in-rebellion pictures, and, later, rock ‘n’ roll counterculture flicks.
Jack Nicholson was also involved with Corman since the late fifties, doing much
of his pre-Easy Rider work for the
producer as an actor and sometimes writer. In this case, Nicholson served as
co-producer (with Hellman) on both pictures and wrote the script for Ride in the Whirlwind. At first, Hellman
presented Corman with the script for The
Shooting, written by Carole Eastman (using the pseudonym “Adrien Joyce†and
who would later write the screenplay for Five
Easy Pieces). Corman suggested that Hellman shoot two westerns at the same
time to get more bang for the buck, so to speak. Therefore, Nicholson came up
with Whirlwind and both movies were
shot together in the Utah desert with the same crew and most of the same cast.
The two motion pictures were seen at several film festivals in 1966 and the
distribution rights were bought by the Walter Reade Organization, which
promptly sold them to television. They were broadcast sometime in 1968 and were
then lost in limbo.
Both
The Shooting and Ride in the Whirlwind could be called “existential westerns†because
they are indeed philosophical, atmospheric, and, well, arty. Very arty. Corman
had insisted that Hellman and Nicholson add more action to both scripts—which
they did—but you still can’t say these are in any way typical westerns. At a
time when Sergio Leone was tearing up the genre Italian-style, it’s no wonder
that the two pictures slipped into obscurity.
On
the one hand, both films are interesting simply because it’s fun to see the
young actors that appear in them—Nicholson, Warren Oates, Millie Perkins (the
original Anne Frank from the 1959 The
Diary of Anne Frank, now a grown up and a babe), Harry Dean Stanton (billed
as “Dean Stantonâ€), and a not-so-young Cameron Mitchell. No one in the films,
except maybe Mitchell, looks particularly comfortable on a horse; it’s rather
obvious that these actors are “playing at†being in a western. Other positive
aspects include the cinematography—by Gregory Sandor, for both pictures—and the
strange musical scores—by Richard Markowitz (The Shooting) and Robert Jackson Drasnin (Ride in the Whirlwind).
On
the other hand, as narrative westerns, they don’t measure up. The acting is,
for the most part, pretty bad. Nicholson is the heavy in The Shooting, and he spends most of the time sneering. The
higher-pitched voice of the young Nicholson doesn’t really work for the
character; he is much better in Whirlwind
as one of the good guys. Oates is suitably ornery but not much else. Perkins
seems like a fish out of water in both films. Will Hutchins, who plays Oates’
simple-minded sidekick, straddles a fine line between being quite effective and
incredibly annoying. Mitchell is forgettable. Stanton is—well, Harry Dean
Stanton.
We love the cheesy but fun 1966 Man From U.N.C.L.E. feature film One Spy Too Many, cobbled together from the two-part episodes of The Alexander the Greater Affair with Rip Torn as a villain of Bondian standards. The film featured some extra sexy scenes shot exclusively for the feature film. These feature Yvonne Craig and Donna Michele and feature prominently in the original trailer.
One
of the greatest and most commercially successful fantasy series of the 1960s, The Avengers actually started out in
1961 as a gritty crime drama focused on Doctor Keel, played by Ian Hendry, one
of British television’s biggest stars at that time. In the first episode his
wife is killed by drug dealers, and a mysterious undercover agent named John
Steed, played of course by Patrick Macnee, helps him to avenge her death. The
two end up working together on a number of other crime cases, thus forming the
basis for a series that would ultimately outgrow its noir origins and become an outrageous Technicolor riot of science
fiction, martial arts, sexy fashion and comedy. Once Doctor Keel was out of the
picture, the playful ‘will they? – won’t they?’ (or even ‘have they? – haven’t
they?’) nature of John Steed’s relationship with his female partners – Cathy
Gale (Honor Blackman), Emma Peel (Diana Rigg) and Tara King (Linda Thorson) –provided
a frisson of excitement and the occasional wink towards the adults in the
audience of what was essentially a family show. After coming to an end in 1969,
John Steed was soon back in 1976 with The
New Avengers, as a mentor to his new younger companions Purdey (Joanna
Lumley) and Mike Gambit (Gareth Hunt).
Of
course, where there is success merchandising is never far behind, and The Avengers and The New Avengers was no exception. This new volume by John Buss,
following closely on the heels of his volume on The Man from U.N.C.L.E., features global examples of original
books, toys, magazines, records, clothing and promotional items, many from the
author’s own personal archive. One might expect novelisations and collectible
annuals to have been standard in the 1960s, but Honor Blackman’s Book of Self-Defence, in which she demonstrates a
number of techniques, is perhaps a little more surprising. As was common at the
time, most of the cast at some point released singles or albums, with the only
exception being Diana Rigg, who was far too serious for that kind of thing.
Macnee and Blackman released that notorious novelty record ‘Kinky Boots’
(recorded after a long session in the pub according to Honor Blackman), but
Linda Thorson had some success as well with her single ‘Here I am’, which was
released all over Europe. Blackman also released an entire solo album in 1964,
‘Everything I’ve Got’, capitalising on her popularity from both The Avengers and Goldfinger.
With
well over 100 items discussed in this full-colour volume, John Buss is clearly
Britain’s leading 1960s TV memorabilia collector and historian. This is an
essential purchase for anyone who remembers the thrill of owning an annual,
plastic gun, board game or jigsaw from your favourite show.
“Nightbreed†is a movie I’d wanted to see
for many years. I’m not in a minority. I have the excuse that I missed its
initial limited theatrical run and simply never got round to seeing it. Later,
whenever I went to hire it from the video store on its VHS release , it was
always rented out- no doubt due to its then blossoming cult status. However,
those that did see it initially also
desperately wanted to see it again. By
that I mean that the print that was first shown in theatres and released for
home entertainment wasn’t even close to the vision director and author Clive
Barker had for the project. It was, as many classics have been, butchered as unsympathetically
as the creatures the film celebrated by those “above†who simply didn’t
understand or care. This is touched upon in Arrow’s new press release synopsis
for the film- a cult gem which seems to have morphed as much as the creatures
of it title:
Nightbreed,
from the mind of legendary visionary of the macabre Clive Barker (Hellraiser,
Candyman). A nightmare-induced fantasy
set in a world like nothing you’ve ever experienced before… Nightbreed will
leave you questioning who the real monsters are. The victim of studio interference
and an unrepresentative marketing campaign, Nightbreed has since undergone a
radical reappraisal. Arrow Video is proud to present two versions of this
depraved cult classic and an insane selection of extras that will likely never
be bettered, for the ultimate nightmarish viewing experience.
This release from Arrow is sumptuous and easily the best
version of “Nightbreed†both fans and fascinated seekers such as myself have
yet seen become officially available. The extras, as ever, are excellent and
the transfer is probably (according to those who know) the best the film has
had and may be even better than the prints seen on its initial release. As I’ve
touched on, the film has a huge following and I recently caught up with two of
its most high profile fans, poster artist Graham Humphreys and director John
Stevenson. Although both agree that the infamous Cabal Cut is still the Holy
Grail as far as the films various versions go, this director’s cut is a welcome
treat for fans. I asked them why they thought the movie was still so important
and why fans should seek out this latest Arrow release….
John Stevenson on
Nightbreed
It
wasn’t Clive Barker’s source novel “Cabal’ that got me obsessed with
‘Nightbreedâ€. It wasn’t even the film version, which I saw in the first days of
its release in 1990 in San Francisco. It was the Titan book ‘Clive Barker’s The
Nightbreed Chronicles’ released in 1990 to coincide with the theatrical
release. The book contains beautiful portrait photography by Murray Close of
over 30 of Midian’s denizens (created by Bob Keen, Geoff Portass and their team
at Image Animation) and their wonderfully strange and imaginative back stories,
courtesy of Clive Barker.
Looking
at the book was a much more satisfying experience than watching the frustrating
theatrical release which had cut most of Midian’s monsters, and reduced the
screen time of the few that remained to fleeting seconds. The film also gave no
sense of the fascinating monster society that ‘The Nightbreed Chronicles’
filled in, in Barker’s dark and witty personal histories of his creations.
Writer Jason Hellerman of the No Film School web site presents highlights of an interview with Martin Scorsese conducted by Quentin Tarantino at the Director's Guild of America. Makes for some fascinating reading...Click here for article.
“Barqueroâ€(1970) stars Lee Van Cleef as Travis, an
ex-gunslinger living a quiet life as the owner/operator of a barge that is the
only way to cross the river at a certain spot between Texas and Mexico. When we
first see him he’s in bed with Nola (Marie Gomez), a hot looking Mexican chick
who likes to suck on cigarillos. Everything’s fine until the creepy Fair (John
Davis Chandler) shows up at his doorstep leering down at the naked Nola and
says he and two men with him want to go across the water to Texas. Travis
doesn’t like the way he’s looking at Nola and tells him “A ride across the
river is all your money’s going to buy.†They get across and Fair pulls a gun
on him and tells his amigos to tie him up.
Meanwhile, in a town a few miles to the north Remy
(Warren Oates), leader of an outlaw gang, watches from the bedroom of a
whorehouse as his gang robs the bank and shoots up the entire town. Once
they’re done shooting everything full of holes they ride south, expecting the
barge to be ready to take them to Mexico. Only trouble is Travis has a friend
named Mountain Phil (Forrest Tucker in a show-stealing performance) who is
handy with a knife. He kills the two of the desperadoes and neutralizes Fair
with the help of some “tasty†fire ants. Once freed, Travis quickly rounds up a
bunch of squatters, including Anna (Mariette Hartley) and Nola and takes them
over to the Mexican side. Remy is pretty ticked when he gets to the river and
sees there’s no barge ready to help them flee to Mexico. It’s pretty much a
standoff for the next hour of the film as both sides try to get the upper hand.
Producer Aubrey Schenck intended to make “Barquero†a
combination of the spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone and the bloody westerns
of Sam Peckinpah. He hired Van Cleef, who was a star of two Leone westerns Oates, a member of Peckinpah’s
regular stock company, for the lead roles. He had a script by George Schenck
and William Marks that had a fairly strong premise. The idea was to set up the
clash between Van Cleef and Oates and let it explode.
It succeeds as far as it goes, but could have been much
better. Schenck originally hired TV director Robert Sparr to helm “Barqueroâ€
but Sparr was killed in a helicopter crash scouting location in Colorado and
the job went to veteran director Gordon Douglas (“Them!†“Rio Conchosâ€). You
can see the Leone influence, especially when Remy starts cracking up and begins
smoking some loco weed, reminiscent of Indio (Gian Marie Volante) in “For a Few
Dollars More.†The bank robbery scene that opens the film is imitation
Peckinpah, complete with an astronomical bullet count. But it’s obvious Douglas,
capable though he was, lacked the crazed inspiration of either Peckinpah or
Leone. You would really need an inspired mad man to make “Barquero†work and Douglas
just wasn’t crazy enough. “Barquero†is
something of a misfire rather than the cult classic it could have been. Nevertheless,
it’s a treat to see two of the baddest badasses together for the one and only
time in their careers, and if you take it for what it is, it’s a wild ride.
Kino Lorber’s Blu-Ray presents “Barquero†in its 1.85:1
theatrical aspect ratio. The picture is crisp and clear, with good color. Some
film elements are more worn that others, but overall it’s in good shape. The
only extra is trailer. Kino Lorber
deserves to be commended for the way it’s releasing these terrific
looking-Blu-Ray transfers of hard-to-find-movies like “Barquero,†especially at
a time when most of the market is heading away from actual physical discs to
on-line streaming. I hope they keep them coming.
Cinema
Retro Movie Classics Special Edition #8: The Wild Bunch
112
Pages/perfect bound spine.£10.95 /
$15.95.
ISSN
1751-4606
NOW SHIPPING WORLDWIDE!
This
year's Movie Classics Special Edition celebrates the 50th anniversary of Sam Peckinpah's
masterpiece The Wild Bunch (1969).
This is an in-depth 124-page special, with a foreword by Sir Christopher Frayling and
contributions by Peckinpah experts Mike Siegel, Jeff Slater and Nick Redman,
features dozens of many never-seen-before photographs both in front and behind
the camera. Interviews with Ernest Borgnine, L.Q. Jones, Lilia Castillo, Gordon
T. Dawson, Chalo Gonzalez and Bo Hopkins give an amazing in-sight as to how
this film was made, and we feature articles on the deleted scenes (with
photos), the locations - then and now, the music and a complete look at how the
film was made. Another amazing special on a timeless classic that only Cinema
Retro knows how to deliver.
Note: This issue is not part of the subscription plan. Saddle up and order now! This is a limited edition!
ORDER BELOW.
PLEASE NOTE: DUE TO INCREASED PRICES ON INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING FOR THIS CLASS OF MAIL BY THE UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, WE HAVE HAD TO ADJUST OUR SHIPPING CHARGES ACCORDINGLY. ALL PRICES BELOW INCLUDE AIR MAIL POSTAGE.
It
was a surprise to discover this engaging, tightly-written and directed
thriller—released in 1950!—about a possible nuclear nightmare taking
place in London. In fact, the film was awarded the Oscar for Best Story (back
when that category still existed). The writers were Paul Dehn (who would years
later co-pen the script for Goldfinger and, after that, The Spy Who
Came in from the Cold) and James Bernard (primarily known as a film score
composer, best remembered for his work for Hammer horror pictures).
The
Boulting Brothers (identical twins!) were a sort of British Coen Brothers at the
time, having made numerous quality movies from the late 1930s to the 1970s,
usually directing separately. Seven Days to Noon is the only picture on
which both brothers are credited as directors.
While
the tale is fiction (and based on a novel), it plays as if it’s a true story. A
brilliant nuclear physicist, Professor Willingdon (Barry Jones) has written a
letter to the Prime Minister, saying that he’s stolen one of the suitcase-sized
nuclear bombs from the British weapons development facility, and he will
detonate it on the following Sunday at noon (seven days from the beginning of
the picture) if Britain does not announce the cessation of atomic weapons
creation. Willingdon goes into hiding to wait out the days, staying in shabby rooms-to-let
near the center of London. One of his landladies is the colorful (and morally
dubious) Goldie (Olive Sloane). Scotland Yard Superintendent Folland (Andre
Morrell) teams up with one of Willingdon’s colleagues, Lane (Hugh Cross), who
happens to be sweet on the professor’s daughter, Ann (Sheila Manahan), to try
and figure out Willingdon’s whereabouts.
The
picture goes into fine detail on how such a scenario might play out in the
city. For the first couple of days, the public is kept in the dark; but as the
deadline draws near, an evacuation must occur. A fifteen-mile radius is
determined to be the danger zone, and the filmmakers illustrate what a problem
this would entail.
The
result is a suspenseful, beat-the-clock doomsday picture that foreshadows by
almost fifteen years other similar cautionary movies like Dr. Strangelove or
Fail-Safe. The film moves quickly through its near-ninety-minute
runtime, generating tension and chills galore.
Kino
Lorber’s new Blu-ray restoration is a solid black and white, suitably grainy
presentation in 1920x1080p with optional English subtitles. Alas, there are no
supplements save for a theatrical trailer and some for other Kino releases.
Seven
Days to Noon is
terrific stuff, a shining feather in the cap of the British film industry.
In
1988, filmmaker Martin Scorsese unleashed the mesmerizing—and undeservedly controversial—The
Last Temptation of Christ. It revealed a side of the director that one
would call “spiritual,†which to many was something of a surprise. After all,
this was the guy who had given us Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, and Raging
Bull.
Nine
years later, Scorsese presented yet another entry into what now could be called
his “Spiritualism Trilogy,†i.e., three movies that deal with crises of faith.
This one was Kundun, the epic biopic about the life of the Dalai Lama.
(The third piece in the trilogy, Silence, appeared nineteen years after
that, in 2016.)
It
was the late screenwriter Melissa Mathison (E.T., The Black Stallion)
who apparently got Scorsese interested in doing a picture about the Dalai Lama,
whom the other lamas addressed as “Kundun.†Mathison had become friendly with
the real exiled Dalai Lama and he had given his blessing for her to write a
screenplay about his life.
The
result was a fairly expensive ($28 million budget) period/costume piece with no
recognizable/bankable stars about a figure who had little connection with Western
audiences. The motion picture—as lush, beautiful, and well-intentioned that it
is—failed at the box office and was contentious to boot. Kundun was
banned in China, of course, and in fact, the Chinese government punitively banned
all Disney films (the distributor) for some time until the studio
apologized and worked to mend the relationship.
The
story begins in 1937, when a young, precocious child born to poor farmers in
Tibet is single-handedly chosen to become the next Dalai Lama after the death
of the previous one. He is taken from his family to groom and educate. Then, in
the late 40s, Communist China invades Tibet, there is a power struggle, and the
Dalai Lama is forced to flee his country in 1959. He currently resides in exile
in India.
Scorsese’s
film is indeed gorgeous. Roger Deakins received one of his numerous Academy
Award nominations for the cinematography. The picture was also nominated for
Art Direction, Costume Design, and for Philip Glass’s haunting Original Score. The
picture itself is meticulously paced, meditative, and, some might say, dull.
Granted, while it’s not the type of crime picture Scorsese is known for, Kundun
is anything but boring. Let’s just say that it came and went vastly
underappreciated.
Kino
Lorber’s new Special Edition 2-disk Blu-ray release gives us an excellent
1920x1080p restoration that beats any previous home video release. The
accompanying audio commentary by film historian and critic Peter Tonguette is
quite informative, as it also deals with Scorsese’s experiments in spiritualism
in the cinema.
An
entire second disk is devoted to supplements, although they are all vintage
pieces produced around the time of the movie’s release. In Search of Kundun
is a long and detailed account about the making of the film. There is also a lengthy
interview with that documentary’s director, Michael Henry Wilson, on how he got
involved with Kundun. Surprisingly extended outtakes from the
documentary are presented as separate interviews with Scorsese, Philip Glass,
and Melissa Mathison. There is an additional hour-long documentary, Compassion
in Exile, about the real Dalai Lama. Finally, there is a substantial
collection of EPK featurettes with the cast and crew that the studio produced
to promote the film, and the theatrical trailer. The limited edition booklet
essay is by filmmaker Zade Constantine.
Kundun
may
be considered an oddity in Martin Scorsese’s oeuvre, but when one
studies the filmmaker’s thematic through lines in all his works, his
choice to make it is not so mysterious. Kino’s new release is noteworthy and
certainly attractive to Scorsese’s serious fans and to anyone interested in the
life of one of the most respected religious leaders on the planet.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, when Leech sets McKay up to
be humiliated by riding a killer bronc, and McKay declines the invitation, once
again Patricia is disappointed. Everybody goes through that initiation, she
tells him. McKay rides off and goes to visit Julie Maragon (Jean Simmons), who
owns a valuable piece of land, and doesn’t come back until next day. Leech
tells the major McKay was lost—“the lostest man I ever saw,†thus causing McKay to call him out as a liar.
Now in these parts when a man calls you a liar you either go for your gun or
start swinging a fist or two. But instead McKay tells him he doesn’t intend to
let him draw him into a confrontation with horses, guns, or fists. Well, that
tears it. Pat can’t have any respect for a man who won’t stand up for himself.
McKay thinks it’s time to go back to town and rethink this marriage business.
All this takes place against the backdrop of a larger
conflict between the major and his next door neighbor, Rufus Hannassey (Burl
Ives) and his three sons, including the wild and vicious Buck (Chuck Connors).
They’ve been squabbling over the Big Muddy and water rights for years. Terrell
has the upper hand. He’s got the larger spread, more men and money, while the
Hannasseys live in relative squalor on an arid piece of dirt with little water.
The major uses the Hannassey boys’ hazing of McKay as a pretext to ride out to
their spread and teach them a lesson, which includes shooting holes in the
Hannassey’s water tower and later driving Hannassey’s cattle away from the
water of the Big Muddy.
“The Big Country†is based on a novel by pulp writer
Donald Hamilton, best-known for the Matt Helm books that were turned into Dean
Martin comedy/action flicks. (One of them, “The Wrecking Crew†with Sharon Tate
is featured in Quentin Tarantino’s “Once
Upon a Time in Hollywood.â€)_ But Wyler hired Quaker author Jessamyn West (“Friendly
Persuasionâ€) to write an adaptation that put pacifism front and center as the
central theme of the film. In 1958 the Cold War was in progress and the threat
of nuclear annihilation had everybody nervous. (It’s still a threat, but now we
have Netflix and binge-watching to keep us from thinking about it.) With “The
Big Country†Wyler tried to preach that there is a better way to solve disputes
other than by giving in to violence which can only end by wiping out
civilization. (“The Big Country†is the opposite of a Sam Peckinpah western,
where violence and destruction are portrayed as inevitable and ultimately cathartic.)
It’s an odd movie, in which most of the scenes are filled with tension and the
threat of violence, but fail to have a satisfactorily pay off. For example,
McKay walks away from the killer bronc, but later rides the horse when no one
is around to witness it except Ramon (Alfonso Bedoya), one of the Mexican ranch
hands. And when McKay decides to leave the ranch he wakes Leech up in the
middle of the night and fights him when no one is awake to see it. He makes the
point that he isn’t a coward, but doesn’t feel the need to prove it to anybody.
A Cinema Retro Exclusive: director John Stevenson ("Kung Fu Panda", "Sherlock Gnomes") provides an exclusive interview with Midge Costin, director of the acclaimed new film "Making Waves: The Art of Cinematic Sound".
Working on the sound was the most fun part of the two
animated feature films I have directed. One of the nicest gifts you get as a director,
after working on your film for years, is being able to see your film fresh
again once the sound designers and composer have added a whole new dimension to
the story. So I was very excited to see Midge Costin's new documentary "Making
Waves: The Art Of Cinematic Sound" and have a chance to talk to her about this
vital, but often overlooked aspect of movie making. (John Stevenson)
JS: I loved your
film and was surprised at how visual it was for a subject that is primarily
auditory. It must have been a labor of love.
MC: It took 9 years to
make! My editor, David J. Turner was a student of mine and he was so good. He
had already come into film school having made films and he was also a composer.
He was so good at both sound and picture and he was so sensitive. We shot most
of the interviews from 2013 to 2016. In the first year I just sat with him,
which I know people don’t do anymore as directors, and we sat and went through
the dailies and talked and he took it all in. He’s a young guy (now in his mid
30’s) and he was with me the whole time. He was brilliant.
JS: IMDB Lists
“Quiet Cool†from 1986 as your only picture editing credit, but did you edit
picture on any other films?
MC: I did apprentice editing on
something called GYMKATA (1985) and then QUIET COOL and a couple of other
things, then I went to Alaska right after film school. I actually did some
editing on some documentaries up there.What happened was, the last thing I thought I would do coming
out of film school was sound. I would get in a panic doing sound because
I thought it was technical, and I wasn’t relating it to story and character and
all of that. So I edited the picture with a friend of mine who ended up going into
sound and we edited his student film together.So I came out and did apprentice, assistant editing and all that. And I
had my thesis film left which was a short documentary and Dan calls me up and
says “Midge, none of the Union guys will touch this 16mm film, but if you come
I will teach you sound effects and I will cut the dialogueâ€. So, as I tell my
students, I lowered myself and took a sound job because I needed the money to
finish my thesis film. And on that very first film I realized ‘Oh crap, I am
responsible for setting mood and tone and establishing plot points and
character, and how do I do that?â€And so
I started and then it's like one show led to the next because I knew so many
people from film school. Once you do anything in sound everybody is like ’Oh,
can you help me?’ So I just started getting sound jobs, and then here it is,
the 80s and going into the 90s and sound is now in 5.1 and because I cut sound
effects (I was one of the few women that was cutting effects, which made it kind
of fun) and then I found myself on these big action adventure movies. My first Union Show
was DAYS OF THUNDER and I had to do the sound effect for the engine of the car
for the bad guy who was racing against Tom Cruise, and I did all the aerial
shots showing the Nascar racetrack. When I was a little I wanted to be a race car
driver (laughs). One thing just led to another and it was so exciting.
JS: You have 23
sound editing credits (according to IMDB) and those include doing Foley,
dialogue, sound effects, so out of all of those films which ones did you like
the most? MC: My favorite, because it comes down
to story and character was CRIMSON TIDE. I just love Gene Hackman and Denzel
Washington and their relationship and also the story. It is a good story about
the military, and are they pro war or anti-war? And I found that fascinating.
But the other thing is, you are in a submarine, so you are in a tin can and you
are telling a story on a set, and you have to take out the footsteps in the
dialogue track because they are stepping on plywood! But the whole tension of when
they get hit and they are going down, down, down, and they are going to be
crushed, it is your responsibility to bring the emotion and the reality,
because they are all just listening! It is all being told through their ears,
the story is being told aurally.
And also in that movie each different department (radio, sonar, weapons systems,
etc.) have a different coloured lighting, so we do the same thing, every single
space has a different background ambience to it, but I just loved working on that.
Another fun one was ARMAGEDDON. I know Stanley Kubrick is
probably rolling over in his grave because there is no sound in space and I'm
putting in all these incredible sounds. Even a fire happens and I am like "Oh,
really?" But when Bruce Willis and Steve
Buscemi come out of that shuttle for the first time, the meteor was the
antagonist and so what I wanted to do is make it sound like its going to devour
them. So I get earthquake rumbles and low tones that always go to our gut and
bring up fear and cue us that something is going to happen. And then have the rock as if it was almost like munching on somebody like
really chewing, going to eat them, devour them. But we are always thinking too "What’s the low frequency sound, what’s the mid, what’s the high?" And for the high
on that, I used this wind through a wire that really kind of makes the hair on
the back of your neck stand up, so that was fun.
My least favorite thing
is when you don’t have time and they get to sound at the last minute and they
don’t really care about sound. But when you have someone like Tony Scott who
cared about sound you would get it early enough, maybe even at the script stage
so you can be feeding the edit room, then those things are great. Michael Bay,
in some of his earlier films, did not seem as interested in sound. I was working
with George Waters, who was the supervisor, and he was getting him to pay
attention to sound, enlightening him and now Michael Bay really cares about
sound and realizes how important it is.
JS: So out of all of
those 23 films you worked on as a sound editor which director did you enjoy working
with the most and who used sound the most creatively?
MC: Tony Scott really
cared and was a really great collaborator and he looked on sound as one of his
key positions. But I know some big
directors even now who are not paying attention to sound. They do it late, and
they are changing picture to the last second and you just don’t have time to do
a good job. So it is all about respect. I was really sorry not to be able to
get the Cohen brothers for my film, they don’t really do too many interviews,
but they have sound specified in their scripts. So think about that, you can
read a script and possibly make suggestions.
I ended up on these big action adventure movies but the truth is
I realized one day late in the 90’s that I don’t even like those films, to tell
you the truth.I realized, a couple of
years ago, that I go to a movie to hear someone tell me what they think the
meaning of life is, and you don’t get that from those films! The whole
rollercoaster thing, I don’t really understand. I love rollercoasters, so I
would rather go on a real rollercoaster than watch some of these action
adventure movies. They are so overly violent, I found them sexist and racist,
so I started teaching and I thought I can pass on these skills that I have so
that they can make really good movies. One of my students was Ryan Coogler, who
did sound, because he didn’t know it very well. So that is kind of a fun thing.
JS: So a personal
question as a sound editor: which film sound design is the one that has
impressed you the most in the history of movies?
MC: I was just
thinking about that. One of the ones that stood out for me when I saw it and
thought about sound was David Lynch’s ERASERHEAD. Now when I listen to it I
think it is over the top, of course the whole film is, but still that had a big
impact on me. But I would say APOCALYPSE NOW and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK, for
those big films. But I also really like smaller films. One of the reasons
ORDINARY PEOPLE is in my film is because silence can be really powerful. And I
also think about that with Hitchcock films. And Orson Welles, his films are so
subtle. And those films are as good as anything being made now. A lot of times
I will get questions from these 18 year-old boys about "What kind of microphone
did you use, or what kind of editing system?" And it is not about the
technology, that’s what I am trying to make sure people know, it is about the
directors. The directors who are pushing. Now it is so much easier digitally
than when we were doing it analog, but we are doing the same thing, and it was
kind of fun to learn when you could not even see anything. We would be staring
off into space. Now you can see the waveforms.
JS: So you have all these wonderful
directors-Steven Spielberg, David Lynch, George Lucas, Ang Lee Christopher
Nolan, and more and more. How easy was it to get all those directors for the
film, and how easy was it to get this plethora of clips from films going back
to the beginning of cinema? It must have been a huge job.
MC: Well, the
directors I got through the sound people mostly and then Spielberg and Lucas
are active at USC, and I have an endowed chair that was given by both of them.
So they're aware and they said yes, but we almost didn’t get Spielberg because
he was doing back to back films, and he had no time. We were literally about
to go to Tribeca and he was able to do the interview at the last minute.So it was always because they have so much respect for their sound people that
we got them. So that wasn't too bad. With Peter Weir, David Lynch and Ang Lee, it’s
like their spirituality is their film making. Ang Lee talked about being in the
Foley room on THE ICESTORM and making the sound of the ice with broken glass. He
was so engaged. He was in the edit room for BILLY LYNNâ€S LONG HALF TIME
WALKand he came and hung out with us
while we were setting up. Whereas some other people just came to do their piece.
I remember Robert Redford came in and said “I only have 20 minutes†(everybody
would say “I only have 20 minutesâ€) and then he gave us at least an hour,
because I think they really respect sound. And going into the second part of
your question, I had listened to their body of work and had very specific
questions because all those clips, we had to set them up. I had to know what
clips we could use so that I could ask them to talk about them. And if they
didn’t say the name of the film, we would ask and get them to say it (almost
like ADR) because I was asking them about specific films, and very specific
scenes because we had to know what we could use. So we learned (myself, my
editors, my producing partners and anyone involved in the film )
‘fair use’ and understand how it was used so we didn’t end up having the lawyers
cut our film for us (laughs).
JS: It must have
taken a long time to clear all those rights?
MC: It did, but we
were constantly giving them cuts in the last two years so that they could say
this is working and this is not. One of the things that we did it is that we
built scenes that we knew we wanted, like for SAVING PRIVATE RYAN and A RIVER
RUNS THROUGH IT, a quieter film, so we would build these scenes and that was
hard, because I didn’t want to go over 90 minutes, I knew it should be a 90
minute film, so I never made like a 5-hour version.
JS: Thank you! Films
are too long!
MC: I totally agree.
So we never even had a two-hour version.
JS: I have seen your film twice now, and if you can, I think it is very
important to see it in a cinema with a good Surround Sound system, because you
demonstrate various surround sound formats both visually and aurally. So what
is going to happen for home video where most people will hear it out of a
single sound bar in the front?
MC: You know, I just
got off the phone with someone who said (and this is the second person who has
said this to me in 24 hours) that it works somehow on a computer. And I’m like,
really? Because if you do something that is mono it splits 50/50 but if you do
left and right, it has a whole different feel, so it must translate somehow. I
have got to listen to it now! I understand most people will see it at home and
not in theaters, but it was important to me to find a distributor who would
give it a theatrical release. Some people bemoan the fact that people aren’t
going to theaters and all that stuff, but sound is even more important as
screens get smaller because that is the emotion, the emotion is coming through
sound. And also headphone technology is getting better with VR.
JS: I used to love CinemaScope films where they would pan the sound as
characters moved across the screen. With 5.1 mixes the dialogue got anchored to
the center of the screen, but now with Dolby Atmos mixes panning sound seems to
be back (I am thinking of the immersive soundtrack for Alfonso Curon’s ROMA if
you saw it in 70mm). Do you like panning sound to increase the spatiality, or
do you find it distracting?
MC: I just did a panel
at the Mill Valley Film Festival with Iaon Allen from Dolby and Ben Burtt. I
worked on a show where they did pan the sound, it was HOCUS POCUS with Bette
Midler and was kind of fun, but here is what the problem is. If the left,
center, right speakers are different when you pan from one to the other then
they will sound different as you move from speaker to speaker, and this is what
Iaon was saying. So they stopped. The other thing is, it takes so long to do
that and then you go to so many theaters and the sound is screwed up. I remember going to see THE LAST EMPEROR and this is what
happened, it is the perspective thing. I am looking at the emperor, and now I
am looking at the audience, and things swap. And it calls attention to itself.
So if you do a P.O.V., it changes, and then it’s like “Why is the sound over
there?†It calls attention to why the sound is coming from that side of the
screen and the audience gets pulled out of the movie. So it is so awkward doing
that, that it got anchored. But I loved ROMA! I thought it was brilliant. I insisted on
including it in the film because even Ben Burtt was saying "There is nothing
that’s happened in the last 30 years or so that’s new", but I was like "No, I
think ROMA is changing it" because I would be telling students, "Don’t put
stuff in the surrounds, you’re going to make the audience look behind them". But
when I am in that car and they are driving to the beach and the kid's voices are
behind me, I am totally in that scene. I loved that. I loved that he got more
aggressive with his sound design. That’s what we need.
JS: We went from
mono, to stereo, to quadraphonic, to 5.1, 7.1 and now Dolby Atmos. Where can we
go next?
MC: Well, possibly
there may be in-seat audio, kind of like a ride. You can almost see them doing
the LFE low frequency, the boom channel, under seats or speakers by your ears.
I don’t think they have figured out how to use VR well yet, but when that comes
in I think that we will have more channels. I don’t know where it’s going
besides that, but maybe it’s almost like a ride to bring people in.
JS: When you got into movies your
original interest was story. After a while working as a sound editor you
realized you could use sound to shape narrative, reveal character, and express
emotion. What advice do you have for aspiring filmmakers about how to use sound
creatively to tell their stories?
MC: What I would say is to break down a script. Think about what can
your character hear. What is the environment? And how are they being affected
by sound? So start there, at the script stage. I always break down each scene but think thematically. What can sound bring? Just like you are thinking about
camera, lighting, costume, production design, or any other area of film making. Ask how sound could help tell this story. And I always think of the background
and the ambience, how does the environment affect your character? What is the
mood in the film you want to create? What are the sound themes thematically? A
lot of times plot points might not have sound, so what can you take from the
environment?
So I have people ask me
how is sound telling the story. One scene I always like to show my beginning
students is from NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. It is a very simple scene where Josh
Brolin first finds the money. So he is in this kind of prairie desert and he’s
looking, looking, and there is a wind and then he looks at his watch. And he is
looking to see if the guy under the tree with the money is really dead. And so
he puts up his watch as if we are going to have to cut time, as if we are going
to have to see the watch again to show that 45 minutes or an hour has passed.
Then we cut to the same perspective almost, but the sound of the wind has
changed and we know time has changed, it is not continuous, and we never had to
look at the watch again. Now he walks up onto the rocks and we see his heavy-duty
boots, which says something about his character. This is our man. We hear flies;
the guy with the money is dead. Then here comes the big plot point, the money,
follow the money. So he opens the case. Was there any music? No.There is no
music cue. There would normally be a big music cue, a brassy Dun-Dun-Duuuun! to
say ‘There is the money!". So I always say "Did anything tell you that was the
money?" No one can remember, so we play it again. There has always been a
slight wind sound effect throughout the scene, but now there is a big wind gust
as the money is revealed. It doesn’t register as a big wind gust but you feel
it in your gut.
And then I will show scenes from CRIMSON TIDE when Gene Hackman
is giving his speech to his crew about the submarine being the most powerful
destructive force in the ocean, and it is raining. And I put big thunderclaps
on top of his speech. If I had told them before I wanted to do that, they would
have said "No, you don’t put thunder over his speech. Put it between his
dialogueâ€, and they would also have said "She is the biggest hack". They watched
it afterwards and laughed, because it seemed so ridiculous. But audiences did
not notice I put all the thunder claps over the biggest statements he is
making.
We don’t get credit for what we do because it is happening
emotionally but not intellectually. But we are all filmmakers and that is why
it was fun to make this film, and yes to make it visual because we are making
movies, which are visual and aural.
JS: Well, I loved
your movie and thank you so much for talking with me.
The Image Book(Le Livre d'image) is the latest offering by octogenarian auteur Jean-Luc Godard. It is a
cinematic essay likened by some reviewers to be a sequel of sorts to his
encyclopedic Histoire(s) du cinema (1989-1998). However, the cinematic essay
or cine-essay is the mode of discourse Godard began to employ half a century
ago, at the end of his avant-garde period, starting with Le
Gai savoir[1] (1969). His goal in doing so was to
dispense with the classic bourgeois narrative and employ extra-diegetic devices
such as film clips, intertitles, musical scores, photos, etc., even his own voice-over
commentary to address the audience. When The Image Book premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 2018
it was awarded an honorary Palme d'Or by Jury President Cate Blanchett
for Godard’s effort “to define and redefine what cinema can beâ€.
Kino Lorber has released the film on DVD and Blu-ray. Bonus features
include interviews with researcher Nicole Brenez and producer Fabrice Aragno.
The conversation with Brenez at the 2019 International Film Festival Rotterdam
is conducted in heavily accented English and quickly becomes tedious. The
interview with Aragno in which he responds to clearly formulated questions in
much less heavily accented English is much more fluid. The accompanying essay
booklet features James Quandt's "Facing the Void: Jean-Luc Godard's Book
of Images" which provides some useful context for interpreting the film
but does presuppose some knowledge of Godard's recent output. And if one is
uninitiated then The Image
Bookis a great introduction to the late work
of one of the greatest and most seminal filmmakers alive today.