I turned age three one month prior to the January 1965
U.S. release of Roger Corman’s The Tomb
of Ligeia (American-International, 1964).The film had been first released in England in November 1964 - which was
only fair - since both The Tomb of Ligeia
and its predecessor The Masque of the Red
Death (also 1964) had been shot at Shepperton Studios and in the
neighboring English countryside. I’m guessing that I only became acquainted
with Corman’s octet of Poe adaptations when the films were televised on New
York City’s 4:30 Movie in the
mid-1970s.
I didn’t know quite what to make of the AIP Poe films at
first.These were horror films without
monsters and, at age fifteen, I had no particular interest in - or
understanding of - “psychological horror†pictures… I wanted rubber-suit
monsters sporting grotesque make-up appliances and causing small-town mayhem.I wasn’t yet old enough to understand the paralyzing
torment and terrors suffered by those with tortured souls.That is until I reached my mid-20s and
discovered, unhappily, I myself was afflicted with one.
The
Tomb of Ligeia was the eighth and last film that would
comprise Corman’s famed “Poe cycle,†a series (of sorts) that launched with the
moody House of Usher (1960).In his entertaining memoir, How I Made a Hundred Movies in Hollywood and
Never Lost a Dime (Random House, 1990), the filmmaker shared with candor
that while he was pleased he had made “several very good-looking,
psychologically effective horror pictures†from 1960 through 1964, he admitted
that by cycle’s end, “I was repeating myself, taking ideas, images, themes, and
techniques from my earlier work.â€
I would say in defense there was no discernible slippage
of quality present in The Tomb of Ligeia.Both Robert Townes literate screenplay and
Corman’s direction are well crafted. In fact, I’ve long considered Corman’s House of Usher, The Premature Burial, The
Masque of the Red Death and The Tomb
of Ligeia as art-house horror films of a sort.The gold standard.
Or, perhaps, The Gold
Bug standard, if one is to remain true to the Poe terminologies.According to reports of January of 1964,
Poe’s The Gold Bug was actually scheduled
as A.I.P.’s immediate follow-up to The
Masque of the Red Death.In his biography
of Peter Lorre, author Stephen D. Youngkin suggests that previous Corman scribe
Charles B. Griffith (Bucket of Blood,
Little Shop of Horrors) had worked on
script for The Gold Bug, a romp that
was to re-team Price, Basil Rathbone and Lorre, recent stars of AIP’s The Comedy of Terrors (1963).Griffith’s version of The Gold Bug was reportedly sketched as a horror-comedy in the vein
of that earlier film.His script was -
presumably - scrubbed when Lorre passed away in March of 1964.
In any event, I now consider several films in the Poe
cycle among my favorite horror efforts.Thanks to 35mm revival screenings in the 1980s at New York City’s
repertory theaters and at retro all-night drive-in monster movie weekends, I’ve
been able to enjoy these classics in genuine Colorscope as originally designed.I’ve also had the wonderful opportunity to
enjoy a pair of relatively recent screenings of The Tomb of Ligeia in the company of two of the film’s high-profile
participants.In August of 2015 Roger
Corman and actress Elizabeth Shepherd (Lady
Rowena Trevanion) participated in a screening and Q & A at the
Anthology Film Archives on Manhattan’s Lower East Side.In 2019 I caught still another 35mm
screening, this time with Elizabeth Shepherd attending alone and sharing more expansive
memories of working with both Corman and her notable co-star and boogeyman
Vincent Price.So it’s impossible for me
to separate my admiration for The Tomb of
Ligeia from such personal memories.
One of the nicest aspects of this Kino Lorber Studio
Classics Blu-ray edition of The Tomb of
Ligeia is that if you weren’t geographically fortunate enough to attend any
of these retrospective 35mm screening events, you now have the opportunity to
listen to Corman and Shepherd share their on-the-set memories on two of this
package’s generous trio of audio commentaries.The third commentary is provided by film historian Tim Lucas who
provides all the nuts and bolts factoids we cinema history train spotters require.With three distinct voices sharing the
commentary tracks, there’s a lot of material and viewpoints and memories to
wade through.
As was so often the case, Corman’s cinematic adaptations
of Poe were not terribly faithful to the original source materials.Instead we are treated to more visual
reimagining’s of the gloomy author’s classic short stories. Corman and a team
of screenwriters (including Richard Matheson and Charles Beaumont, both of Twilight Zone fame) had constructed new tales
only partly drawn from Poe’s characters and grotesque plot lines.
As Poe’s horrors were psychologically driven and introspective
in presentation, it was necessary for Corman and his team to inject more cinematic
visual tropes.This was accomplished by
introducing completely new scenarios and mixing in original and intriguing subplots.In Corman’s “serious†offerings of the Poe
cycle, the birthing author’s gloomy atmospheres, the dreary broodings on
mortality, the wearisome toll of mental anguish (and subsequent psychic breakdowns)
all remain faithful in tone to the spirit of his visions.
The screenplay of The
Tomb of Ligeia was scribed by the actor-writer Robert Towne.Towne already boasted a screenwriting credit
on The Last Man on Earth (1960) as
well as playing multiple on-screen roles in Corman’s Creature from the Haunted Sea (1961). Towne, who would go on to be feted with no
fewer than four Oscar nominations for his writing (most notably for Chinatwon), serves up a literate
screenplay that comes complete with the moody, erudite - and occasionally
archaic dialogue - that one comes to expect from this series.His work on the script stands alongside the
best Poe adaptations of Matheson and Beaumont.
The film version of The
Tomb of Ligeia concerns the curious and eccentric manner of which Vernon
Fell ((Vincent Price) conducts himself following the passing of his wife
Ligeia.Fell is obsessed, nay
terrorized, by the notion that his late wife is not quite dead in the usual sense of the word.He’s convinced that his wife’s disturbed
spirit – she was, after all, an unrepentant atheist who dabbled in spiritualism
– is now reincarnated in the form of a menacing black cat that prowls along the
premises of the dilapidated ruins of an abbey he calls home.The somber and haunted Fell finds new romance
with Lady Rowena (Shepherd), an already betrothed woman who happens upon his
property when she’s thrown from her horse during a spirited fox hunt.Rowena eventually marries Fell only to find
herself guarding against her new husband’s odd behaviors - and a malevolent black
cat who appears to willfully cause her torment.
Towne’s story takes many liberties with Poe’s original
short story, simply titled Ligeia, and
first published in Baltimore’s American
Museum periodical in September 1838.The most significant of these changes is that there’s no black cat
present in Poe’s version - and Rowena dies nine pages into the twelve-page tale.But since Poe tends to tell his tales as either
a detached narrator or in a “first person†internal dialogue of madness,
Corman’s cinematic vehicle needed a flesh and blood protagonist – even if the one
chosen for the film is adorned only in a coat of black fur – to make any menace
visually tangible.There’s a not too
subtle revelation of necrophilia and a more overt sequence of mesmerism
sprinkled in as well.It was obvious
that Towne, much like his predecessors, were mining a wide swath of Poe’s oeuvre
in a desire to enliven and expand the author’s short story for a film of
feature-length running time.
A
Dino De Laurentiis production starring Charles Bronson, John Sturges’ “The
Valdez Horses†opened in Italy in 1973 and kicked around markets in Europe and
the Far East over the next two years under various alternative titles.In 1975, it finally limped onto a handful of
U.S. screens as “Chino.â€By then,
Bronson was already a cultural sensation here in the wake of “Death Wish,†but
“Chino†didn’t have much of a push from its American distributor, and it didn’t
last long in the movie houses.The
Bronson vehicle that made a splash in 1975 was Walter Hill’s “Hard Times,â€
featuring the star as a hardscrabble street fighter during the Great
Depression.If you’re of a certain age,
you probably remember “Chino,†if at all, as a VHS release from the Neon Video
budget label in the 1980s, gathering dust at your local Blockbuster or
Suncoast.
In
the film, young Jamie (Vincent Van Patten), traveling alone across the wide
open spaces, is stranded miles from the nearest town as night begins to
fall.Is he a runaway or an orphan?That’s never clarified, an element that may
bother those who tend to pick at loose ends, although it doesn’t greatly matter
in terms of the story.Seeing a lonely
ranch house in the distance, the boy meets Chino Valdez (Charles Bronson), a
half-Indian stockman who tames horses and lives by himself.The taciturn Chino gives Jamie shelter for
the night, in return for the kid pitching in with the chores.Next morning, in a scene nicely underplayed
by Bronson and Van Patten, Chino offers the boy a job as his hired hand, and
Jamie eagerly accepts.The work includes
mentoring on how to tame and ride mustangs.When Jamie asks if taming means “busting†a wild horse, Chino
emphatically says no: “ . . . that takes all the spunk out of a
horse.It breaks him. And I'm not gonna
bust a Valdez horse.â€It’s the first of
several scenes in which, not very subtly, Chino is likened to his wild
stallions.
Chino’s neighbor is Maral (Marcel Bozzuffi), a wealthy rancher
whose sister Catherine (Jill Ireland) comes from the East to visit.In case any sticklers in the audience wonder
why Maral has a French accent and Catherine a British one, the real answer is
simple.If you wanted Charles Bronson
for a picture in those days, his wife Jill Ireland was part of the deal.In context of the story, it’s because the
siblings had different mothers, as quickly noted in passing.Trouble develops when Chino and Catherine
fall in love with each other and decide to marry with the help of a friendly
padre.Learning of the plan, Maral
confronts Catherine in the chapel as she waits in her wedding gown for Chino to
arrive.If his sister marries the
rough-hewn, penniless horseman, “I will kill him,†Maral tells her.It’s a complication straight out of the 1950s
B-Westerns.Except there, the hero and
the overbearing cattle baron would have settled their differences with a
friendly fist fight, and wedding bells would ring.This being a 1970s Western, and a Charles
Bronson vehicle to boot, it isn’t too much of a spoiler to suggest that things
won’t go that smoothly for Chino.
Even Bronson fans are likely to concede that “The Valdez Horsesâ€
is a mess dramatically speaking, although an interesting mess for those of us
who fondly remember how the international co-productions in the 1970s, like
this one, were often patched together.Quiet, family-friendly scenes of Chino and Jamie bonding as surrogate
father and son are punctuated by a saloon brawl in which Chino bashes a bully
in the crotch with a whiskey bottle, a protracted showdown with a high body
count, a whipping, and a scene in which the Spanish actress Diana Lorys, in
brown makeup as a Cheyenne woman, bares her breasts.In audio commentary for a new Blu-ray edition
from Kino Lorber Studio Classics, film historian and Bronson specialist Paul
Talbot notes that Sturges filmed on Spaghetti Western locations in Almeria,
Spain, in 1972 with an Italian and Spanish crew and supporting cast.Although the Europeans’ relaxed approach
jarred with his studio-honed sensibilities for running a tight set, Sturges
gamely wrapped on schedule.But once
they previewed the finished product, De Laurentiis‘ investors decided that the
director’s low-key, 1960s-style Western would disappoint Bronson fans.So Italian filmmaker-for-hire Duilio Coletti
was brought in to film additional scenes, accounting for the more exploitative
content.Even so, “Chino†squeaked by in
the U.S. with a PG rating, bare breasts and all.Some of us will be less embarrassed by Diana
Lorys‘ nudity than by the inane romantic scenes between Bronson and
Ireland.For what it’s worth, the script
was credited to veteran novelist and screenwriter Clair Huffaker from a book by
Lee Hoffman. Stephen Geller and Elmore Leonard also made unofficial
contributions along the way, according to Paul Talbot’s research.
The Kino Lorber Blu-ray includes two versions of the movie, a
1.85:1 print from the U.S. release and a windowboxed 1.37:1 version with French
opening titles.In color and clarity,
the 1.37:1 version is superior to the other, but the nostalgically minded may
prefer the 1.85:1, blemishes and all, as the one they watched on VHS back in
the day.In a new interview, Vincent Van
Patten fondly remembers Bronson, Sturges, and the shoot in Almeria.Between scenes, the young actor asked the
fifty-year-old Bronson how he maintained his “ripped†physique, on display
twice in the movie.“Push ups,†Bronson
answered.“Push ups?†Van Patten
said.“Push ups,†Bronson repeated.Van Patten’s affectionate Bronson impression
is spot-on.From Talbot’s minute
reconstruction of the picture’s bumpy history and Van Patten’s affable
memories, you’ll conclude that a docudrama about the making of “The Valdez
Horses†would be more engaging than the movie itself.
Other extras on the Blu-ray include a silent 8-millimeter home
movie shot by Van Patten and his brother Jimmy in Almeria, the American TV spot
for “Chino,†alternate title openings, trailers for other Bronson movies on
Blu-ray from Kino Lorber, and a reversible cover sleeve with poster art for
“The Valdez Horses†on one side and “Chino†on the other.
Universal presents this free streamer of director Anthony Harvey's delightful and zany 1971 comedy "They Might Be Giants" with George C. Scott as a delusional man who thinks he is Sherlock Holmes and Joanne Woodward as his psychiatrist, who is appropriately named Watson.
I'm all for ambiguity in feature films and television series. The resistance to tie every plot point up in a neat little bow is an admirable trait among filmmakers and sometimes the tactic results in some tantalizing end products. Prime examples: Patrick McGoohan's classic 1960s TV series "The Prisoner", the meaning of which is still be debated by fans of the show, and director Michelangelo Antonioni's controversial 1966 thriller "Blow-Up" which might require numerous viewings before you figure out the point of the film's final scene. What I have little tolerance for is ambiguity as a cover for sheer pretentiousness. Cult director Abel Ferrara's little-seen 2019 feature film "Siberia" oozes sheer pretentiousness. It's so bizarre that Ferrara had so raise the production budget on Kickstarter through contributions from his enthusiastic fan base. Although the movie was shown at various film festivals, IMDB reports that it's international gross to date is $23,626. You read that right, folks...there isn't a zero missing. Ferrara teamed with his frequent collaborator Willem Dafoe to bring "Siberia" to the screen, which only indicates that Dafoe is a truly loyal friend or a blatant masochist.
Dafoe plays Clint, the owner (or caretaker) of a remote outpost on the frozen tundra. Although the location is never specified, perhaps it is Siberia, hence the title. It also isn't clear what the purpose of the outpost is or what Clint's duties are aside from serving drinks at the building's makeshift bar. One night, an elderly woman and a much younger woman come in to swig down some shots at the bar. They are speaking a strange language that may or may not be Inuit. In any event, Clint appears to be unable to communicate with them verbally. Suddenly, the younger woman rises up, unwraps her fur parka and reveals she is not only totally naked but about eight or nine months pregnant. Clint is aroused and begins to explore her body while the older woman looks on, bemused. The scene then switches to the couple in bed making love. This plot thread is soon dropped and- to cut to the chase- Clint finds himself on a bizarre psychological journey that sees him entering an underground lair filled with bizarre and ominous people including a naked female dwarf in a wheelchair, an apparition of his beloved father with whom he communicates, and some ghastly visions as well. Are these dreams or is Clint actually experiencing a supernatural occurrence? We then find him being transported by dog sled across the tundra before he suddenly appears in the African desert among tribesmen, for no apparent reason. The strange journey also has ominous overtones as he passes the remains of what appears to have been a concentration camp. It stirs horrific memories of authoritarian figures indulging in mass executions of naked men and a young boy who manages to escape the carnage. Was this something Clint had experienced and is it a personal recollection? Who knows...The action then shifts to a bucolic setting in the countryside in another unspecified location where Clint asks a practitioner of the black arts to teach him its secrets. The man declines. We then see another scenario emerge in which Clint meets his mother, who seems to have some sexual desire for him. Things are rounded off by him encountering his ex-wife and her child (is it also his child?) Waiting for answers to clarify these mysteries is a bit like waiting for Godot in that they never arrive. Dafoe gives a daring, intense performance, but to what end? The ambiguity here seems to be provided simply to convince viewers that Ferrara had some deep meaning to the goings-on. However, I'm reminded of an old cartoon in which some pseudo-intellectuals are analyzing the precise meaning of a modern art painting. When they leave, the curator discovers it has been hanging upside down and adjusts it accordingly, thus rendering the viewers' conclusions meaningless. The same can be said about "Siberia". I doubt that even Ferrara knows what it all means. He probably just tossed it out there in the hope his fans would think he was presenting something profound.
The Lionsgate Blu-ray (with digital copy) looks very good indeed and does justice to Stefano Falivene's impressive cinematography, one of the few admirable aspects of the production. The only bonus extra is a trailer. It's a pity Ferrara didn't provide a commentary track. We might have been able to discover what inspired him to bring this this pretentious and preposterous mess to the screen.
There were several delays in the start of the production
of Flight to Mars.In mid-January of 1951, the Hollywood trades reported
that Monogram production was scheduled to commence on 12 February.When that date passed without cameras
rolling, the production start date was pushed forward, amended to 23
March.When March passed by, a third
date was announced (5 April), only to be pushed forward again to 30 April.When these dates passed by as well reports
came in that production of Flight to Mars
was to officially commence on 12 May, 1951 with Walter Mirisch producing.
There was no announcement as of 5 May of who might be
helming Monogram Picture’s very ambitious project. But, at long last, on 19 May 1951, the film
was put on Hollywood’s current in-production schedule with the notice that Lesley
Selander had signed on to direct with Harry Neumann serving as Director of
Photography. Selander was an odd choice to
direct.He was a well-regarded and
dependable figure at Monogram, but his stock-in-trade was knocking out scores
of inexpensive westerns with breakneck rapidity.
The Monogram Pictures Corporation was now under the
umbrella of Allied Artists.The
President of Allied, Steve Broidy, had been promising as early as October of 1951
that both studios would lens no fewer than forty-five feature films in 1951-52,
a half-dozen of those efforts being “high budget†films produced under the
Allied banner.Monogram, as was its
reputation, would knock off its usual run of low-budget westerns, detective
films, Bowery Boys comedies and “fantasy†films – the latter being a generous euphemism
for their string of bargain basement horrors with a dash of science-fiction.
In truth, even Monogram’s threadbare production values
were on the rise, Broidy promising that several of the studio’s planned
features would be shot in Cinecolor, a two-color film process that brought out
a striking and vibrant – if occasionally unnatural in appearance - pallet of
saturated hues.If nothing else, Flight to Mars would appear a relatively
bright and lavish production by Monogram standards.The film’s production’s designs were actually
pretty well-done all things considered.The space-traveling animation, mattes and Mars “location†shooting
effects (California and Nevada’s Death Valley was used as backdrop of the dying
planet) were, at best, disappointing as little would be splashed on-screen in
any memorable fashion.On the other
hand, there was no shortage of skimpily-dressed women milling about.
One gossip North Hollywood gossip columnist teased that
Mirisch and Selander – abetted by the film’s wardrobe department - seemed to have
come to agreement on the “astounding fact that women on Mars do not wear
skirts.â€It is true that all of the
women featured on screen were not-so-immodestly dressed.Such space-age fashion, the columnist
determined, might prove testing to the “squinting eyes†and morality standards set
forth by the industry’s Johnson Office.Another news sheet from this same period described the costuming of the
film’s female players as “nothing but hip-length tunics and the scantiest of
scanties.â€Piling on, still another news
item described the female Martian outfits as rating “hotter than even an
H-bomb, making Bikini-wearers looking over-dressed!â€
Such prurient ballyhoo, of course, would understandably arouse
– in a matter of speaking – interest to male filmgoers of Saturday matinees. Upon
the film’s release, even the critic of the Los
Angeles Times conceded should reality mirror the Martian “femme beauty†as
seen on-screen in the course of Flight to
Mars, “there’s going to be an awful scramble even among scientists to find
a way to the distant planet.â€
The publicity machine went to work in earnest in July of
1951, noting that while production on Flight
to Mars had recently wrapped (shooting lasted only four to six weeks,
depending on the report), actress Marguerite Chapman had become so intrigued by
art director David Milton’s stage dressing, she commissioned him to re-do her
Beverly Hills apartment in a “Martian manner.â€Though Chapman would receive top billing, she was merely part of a genuine
ensemble cast that would include Cameron Mitchell, Arthur Franz, Virginia
Huston and John Litel.Since none of the
above players were box-office names of any particular renown, there wasn’t a
terrible amount of fanfare accompanying the film’s release in November of
1951.The cast was described a
non-distinguished manner in the press as “a rather unknown but able cast of
Thespians.â€
The scenario of the film itself (“The Most Fantastic Expedition Ever Conceived by Man!â€) was not
terribly original.A meteor shower
diverts a group of space-travelers from their mission and forces them to crash
land on Mars.There they meet a group of
white, Anglo-Saxon looking, English-speaking Martians who currently survive
underground thanks to a mineral called Corium.They seem friendly enough at first, even offering to help the Earthlings
rebuild their space craft for a trip home.What they’re not letting on is that their supply of life-supplying
Corium is fast dwindling and thus threatening their existence.So they plan on hijacking the repaired space
craft to launch an invasion of Earth.
The scenario is actually less exciting as it might sound.The premise is OK, but this is a studio-soundstage
bound production with lots of people talking about things and not enough of
action or on-screen intrigue or cool space-matte paintings to balance such
loquaciousness.Still, there was some
enthusiasm amongst studio accountants in 1951 that Flight to Mars might fare pretty well at the box office.So much so that on the very week of the
film’s release, producer Mirisch announced he had once again engaged Flight to Mars screenwriter “Arthur
Straus†[sic] to adapt an original story conjured up by Kenneth Charles.
It’s unclear - but certainly possible - that screenwriter
Arthur Strawn was not so much
misidentified in the news item as he was purposely
misidentified.Strawn, the child of
emigres from Romania, had been blacklisted by the right-wing Red Channels publication in 1950,
suspected of Communist sympathies. His
writing of the screenplay and his association with the film Hiawatha had postponed that particular
film of getting into production.Monogram president Broidy thought it best to shelve the Hiawatha project due to the screenplay’s
alleged Moscow-aligned pacifist taint.
Strawn’s political affiliations shouldn’t have mattered, of
course.But sci-fi cinema historians
have long debated if the creative genesis of Flight to Mars was, at least in part, a thematic mimic of Yakov
Protazanov’s 1924 space-traveling silent-era Soviet flicker Aelita (aka Queen of Mars), a film based on Alexei Tolstoy’s 1923 novel Aelita: the Decline of Mars).Flight
to Mars seems to share a few
tenuous ties to this early Soviet film.The most damning and oft invoked of these is the purloining of the name
“Aelita†for Marguerite Chapman’s female lead character.Sci-fi film fans who wish to decide for
themselves how many ideas were lifted, can view the original Soviet film on any
of a number of DVD or DVD-R issues… or simply visit youtube for a peek if only
passingly curious.
In any case, Mirisch’s proposed follow-up to Flight to Mars, Voyage to Venus, was to bring a crew of space-travelers to the
planet second from the sun.That this second
film was never put into production is a shame and a great loss: if for no other
reason that moving the cast to a planet even closer to the sun’s heat would have
likely caused the Venusian women to wear even less clothing…
This Blu-ray of Film Detective’s Flight to Mars, licensed from Wade Williams, has been sourced from
original 35mm elements of the Cinecolor separation negatives and restored with
assistance of the Paramount Pictures archives.The Blu-ray features several bonus supplements.These include two “exclusive†documentaries,
both directed by Daniel Griffith: the
first is Walter Mirisch: from Bomba to
Body Snatchers, a thirteen-minute feature where film historian C. Courtney
Joyner examines the stewardship of Mirisch and Broidy as transformative to the
rise of Monogram and Allied as an industry player.The second is Interstellar Travelogues: Cinema’s First Space Race where famed
space-art illustrator Vincent Di Fate narrates a ten-minute feature on the
earliest bits of cinematic interest in space travel from the influences of early
German rocketry to the novels of Robert Heinlein.
The set also rounds out nicely with a commentary track by
Justin Humphreys, the film historian and author of the recently published The Dr. Phibes Companion: The Morbidly Romantic History of the Classic
Vincent Price Horror Film Series.There’s also a twelve-page booklet that
features the essay Mars at the Movies,
written by journalist/author Don Stradley.While Stradley briefly touches on some aspects of the production of Flight to Mars, the essay mostly offers
a brief history of the role the red planet has figured into film history.In all, a very impressive release that will delight
fans of the genre.
Mill
Creek Entertainment has released a Blu-ray edition of Universal Pictures’ Safe
House from 2012.This spy thriller
features a first-rate cast including Denzel Washington, Ryan Reynolds, Vera
Farmiga, Brendan Gleeson, Ruben Blades and Sam Shepard.
Directed
by Sweden’s Daniel Espinoza, the story concerns the capture and escape of a
former CIA operative who possesses damning evidence that his superiors are
spilling secrets to anyone with a large bank account.The script is by David Guggenheim and may
remind viewers of Matt Damon’s Bourne films.
Ryan
Reynolds plays Matt Weston, a young CIA agent stuck on housekeeping duty at an
empty safe house in Capetown, South Africa. He's restless and eager for a more important
post in a less isolated location. The
house doesn't see much action, nor does Weston apart from conjugal visits from
his gorgeous girlfriend played by Nora Arnezeder. That is, until the CIA brings in Tobin Frost (Denzel
Washington), a rogue agent wanted for selling state secrets to the highest
bidder.
Right
off the bat we learn that Frost is highly skilled at manipulating those around
him as his captors are intimidated by his history with the agency.He is calm and recognizes that the agents
escorting him to the safe house are following all the standard procedures.In one tense scene Frost is tortured by
waterboarding as the agents need to know what information he has shared with
the enemy.
It
soon becomes apparent that Frost’s contacts on the other side are not too happy
with him either as a squad of assassins arrives at the supposedly secure
location. Weston and Frost manage to escape before the gunmen swarm the
building. It's now Weston's
responsibility to bring his charge back to the American embassy in one piece. Not an easy task for a rookie, considering
Frost's attempts to ditch his captor and their pursuers' attempts to kill them
before they reach safety.
The
remainder of the film is one gigantic chase throughout Capetown as it revealed there
is a mole within the agency feeding details to the other side.Car chases, gun battles and hand-to-hand
fights abound as Weston begins to doubt Frost’s guilt.At one point, Frost tries to confuse his
captor by saying “They’re going to put their arm around you and tell you things
like ‘You did a decent job, son.We’ll
take it from here.’That’s when you know
you’re screwed.â€After hearing that line
you know one of the bosses will actually say it.
The
double agent within the CIA is soon revealed and a smashing fight scene along
with a couple of surprising plot twists bring the story to a satisfying
conclusion.
Denzel
Washington demonstrates why he is a two-time Academy Award winner with his
performance in this film.He’s cagey and
understated in his portrayal of Frost and viewers are never quite sure if he’s
a traitor or not.With this role and his
appearances in the two Equalizer movies, Washington is fast becoming another
action star in the manner of Keanu Reeves’ assassin in the John Wick adventures.
Ryan
Reynolds takes a straight-laced approach as Weston, the bored safe house
monitor suddenly thrust into the center of an international espionage
incident.He relies on his training and
instructions from his handler played by Brendan Gleeson.Weston begins to question his superiors as
Frost gets inside his head sowing doubts.
Sam
Shepard and Vera Farmiga are serviceable as CIA leaders back at Quantico
Headquarters although there is not enough development to make them truly
interesting characters.Ruben Blades has
a small, but memorable role as a document forger that Frost contacts in an
attempt to leave South Africa.Nora
Arnezeder is criminally underutilized as Weston’s physician girlfriend.Her role requires her to be annoyed most of
the time.
The
thugs chasing Tobin are stereotypical Middle Eastern villains who are highly
skilled at killing several hapless CIA agents.The script focuses on Frost and Weston and their mano y mano encounters
as both adversaries and allies.This is
the crux of the story and director Espinoza keeps it moving at a breakneck
pace.The violence is bone crushing, but
not overly bloody.
Editor
Richard Pearson deserves much credit for keeping the action at a warp speed
level throughout the entire film.Most
of the time I find these quick cut thrillers annoying and hard to watch.Michael Bay’s frenetic movies come to mind
when everything looks a trailer for a second rate action flick.Pearce keeps the pace without giving viewers
a migraine, and he is helped by cinematographer Oliver Wood who doesn’t allow
the individual cuts to go all shaky cam on us.Wood also uses tight framing to provide a feeling of desolation in many
of the location shots even though the story is mostly set in a major city.
Composer
Ramin Djawadi provides a wonderful score for the film that utilizes styles and
instrumentation reflecting the film’s setting in South Africa.Music is sometimes not noticed in action and
chase scenes until those brief moments when there are no sound effects from the
cars and guns.There would be awkward
breaks without the music to fill in the blanks.
Safe
House is a terrific film for the stunts and shootout sequences which more than
compensate for the lack of character development.You may not always know what is going on, but
your interest is definitely captured by the cat and mouse game between the two
main characters.The bigger the screen
and the louder the sound, the more you will enjoy this movie.
The
Blu-ray disc issued by Mill Creek Entertainment deserves kudos for the
presentation of the film.The video
quality is terrific with just enough of a gritty quality to put an edge on all
scenes.The 5.1 sound mix is loud and heavy
on the bass.Explosions will jump out at
those viewers using higher end surround systems.Fans of Blu-ray extras will be disappointed,
however, as there are none with the exception of optional English
subtitles.However, the film itself
looks fantastic and, as drive-in critic Joe Bob Briggs might say, things blow
up real good.
Cinema Retro has received the following press release:
Originally released in 1921 at the height of the nation’s appetite
for motion pictures, the epic romantic drama THE SHEIK became a
massive sensation, breaking box office records and earning over $1 million
during its first year of release. 100 years later, Paramount Pictures
celebrates this towering classic of the silent film era with a brand-new
Blu-ray release, arriving as part of the Paramount Presents line on October 19,
2021.
Based on the best-selling novel of the same name, THE SHEIK
was directed by George Melford and stars the legendary Rudolph Valentino as the
title character. The role helped propel Valentino into stardom and sealed
his status as a Hollywood heartthrob—and the original “Latin Loverâ€â€”at the age
of 26.
THE SHEIK restoration employed modern technology so
viewers can experience the original beauty of this monumental silent
film. Since
original negatives for silent films rarely exist, Paramount searched the world
for the best elements and used a print and an intermediate element called a
fine grain. One source of the film yielded better results for image
quality, another for intertitles. One of the elements was
“stretch-printed†and had to be adjusted digitally during the restoration
process. In the silent era there was no standard frame rate, so stretch
printing was done to show silent films at 24 frames per second. In
addition, tints and tones were digitally applied, guided by an original
continuity script from the Paramount archive. The result is the best
picture quality THE SHEIK has had since it was originally shown
in theaters 100 years ago.
While THE SHEIK was wildly successful, it did
provoke controversy, much as the source material had upon its original
publication in 1919. Many of the themes and controversial elements of the
film are still being grappled with today, a subject that is explored in a new
featurette on the Blu-ray with film historian and professor Leslie Midkiff
DeBauche entitled “Desert Heat: 100 Years with The
Sheik.†The disc also includes a music score
by Roger Bellon and access to a Digital copy of the film.
As with all films released in the
Paramount Presents line, THE SHEIK is presented with collectible
packaging featuring a foldout image of the film’s theatrical poster and an
interior spread with key movie moments.
Synopsis
Rudolph Valentino is Ahmed Ben
Hassan, a charming Arabian sheik who becomes infatuated with the adventurous,
modern-thinking Englishwoman Lady Diana Mayo, played by Agnes Ayres. When
the sheik abducts Lady Diana, the two clash, but ultimately profess their love
for one another in this quintessential “desert romance†that effectively
capitalized on the popularity of the genre.
About Paramount
Presents
This collectible line spans
celebrated classics to film-lover favorites, each from the studio’s renowned
library. Every Paramount Presents release features never-before-seen
bonus content and exclusive collectible packaging. Additional titles
available in the Paramount Presents collection on Blu-ray include: Fatal
Attraction, King Creole, To Catch a Thief, Flashdance,
Days of Thunder, Pretty In Pink, Airplane!, Ghost,
Roman Holiday, The Haunting, The Golden Child, Trading Places, The Court
Jester, Love Story, Elizabethtown, The Greatest Show on Earth, Mommie Dearest,Last Train From Gun Hill, 48 HRS., Another 48 HRS., Almost Famous, A Place
in the Sun, Nashville, Bugsy Malone, and Breakdown.
Joseph
L. Mankiewicz’s “There Was a Crooked Man . . .†debuted in theaters on
Christmas Day 1970, a disruptive year for Hollywood as the moviegoing audience
continued to fracture along the Vietnam War divide.Studios were desperate to retain their core
demographic of older, conservative viewers while courting younger, affluent
ticket-buyers who wanted stronger fare.“There Was a Crooked Man . . .†tried to offer a little something for
everybody.For the older guys at the VFW
Hall, it was a Western starring Henry Fonda and Kirk Douglas, supported largely
by a cast of other well-established, middle-aged actors.For the “Easy Rider†crowd, there was plenty
of nudity, cussing, and innuendo about weed that you’d never encounter on
“Gunsmoke†or “Bonanza.â€In Mankiewicz’s
cynical, R-rated Western, now available from the Warner Archive Collection,
outlaw Paris Pitman Jr. (Kirk Douglas) and his partners rob a wealthy banker,
Wayne Lomax, of $500,000 at gunpoint in an 1880s version of a home
invasion.Lomax is played by Arthur
O’Connell, the first of several actors cast against type in the script by David
Newman and Robert Benton (their follow-up to “Bonnie & Clydeâ€).Instead of meeting misfortune with the folksy
resignation we expect from an Arthur O’Connell character, Wayne Lomax reacts with
a racist, profane tirade in front of his wife, his young son and daughter, and
his African-American cook and butler: “A man works like a [insert the
“nâ€-invective] all of his life to get ahead, and some bastard takes it from
him.â€
Fleeing
with the loot, Pitman and his gang exchange shots with Lomax and his
family.Even the kids join in from the
porch with their rifles.Pitman’s
partners are killed, including one whom he himself shoots in the back.The last thief standing, he hides the loot in
a rattlesnake den, and celebrates at a brothel.Lomax coincidentally visits the same establishment for some cheer after
being cleaned out.In Mankiewicz’s
second “What the --!†scene for O’Connell, the sympathetic madam offers Lomax a
free look through a peephole into an adjoining room to watch another customer
have sex with two women.Eagerly
agreeing, Lomax is startled to recognize the other customer as Pitman, and the
outlaw is arrested and sentenced to the penitentiary, a remote fortress
surrounded by miles of desert.There,
the warden (Martin Gabel) lives in comfort while his charges are crammed into
filthy cells.He first tries
intimidation, then bribery, to learn where Pitman has hidden the stolen
money.Neither gambit works.After he’s killed in a riot, his idealistic
replacement, Woodward Lopeman (Henry Fonda), arrives.
Lopeman
sets about to clean up the prison literally and figuratively.He abolishes corruption among the guards,
eliminates cruel punishment on the rock pile, institutes regular bathing, hires
a prison doctor, and begins to construct a dining hall where the convicts will
be fed decent food instead of swill.Unimpressed with the newcomer’s progressivism and confident that no man
is above temptation, Pitman offers Lopeman a cut of his stolen money if he’ll
let him escape.The warden refuses, just
as the loquacious robber refuses when Lopeman asks him to give a speech
praising the reforms when political leaders visit for the dedication of the dining
hall.Pitman has emerged as the leader
of his motley collective of inmates, much like Ken Kesey’s Randall P. McMurphy,
whom Douglas portrayed on Broadway in 1963 in “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s
Nest.â€Douglas had tried for years to
interest Hollywood in “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,†before handing the
rights over to his son Michael in 1970 once he decided he was too old to
reprise the part.In a sense, therole of Paris Pitman Jr. was the big-screen
version of Kesey’s character (Jack Nicholson, in the 1975 picture eventually
produced by Michael Douglas) that Kirk Douglas never got to play.
Determined
to break out of the prison, Pitman devises an elaborate escape plan and enlists
his cellmates to help.One of them is
easily convinced, a young man sentenced to hang for murder (Michael Blodgett,
whose other movie in 1970 was “Beyond the Valley of the Dollsâ€). The others are
reluctant, having less to lose by serving out their time.“There ain’t no way out,†claims the elderly
Missouri Kid (Burgess Meredith), who endures confinement by smoking the
cannabis that he grows in his corner of the cell.But Pitman wins him and the others over with
a deal they can’t resist: if they assist, he’ll share his stolen money with
them after they’re all free.Or will he?
Crime Story is a film that tries
to sell an improbable story.Though
there are some good performances here, enjoyment of the film hinges on the
viewer's ability to suspend disbelief.
We first meet our anti-hero, Ben
Myers, via voiceover. Richard Dreyfuss's voice is easily recognizable,as is the
scene. He's been shot and wounded and is being questioned by paramedics on the
ride to the hospital. Briefly, we're treated to what must be his life, and
mistakes, passing before his eyes. Claiming to be "based on actual
events," we are now informed that we are going to a point in time "12
hours earlier."
Ben Myers is a 71 year-old man.
We get this information from the paramedics in the first scene. When we first
see Ben, we also see that he is obese. He and his second wife, Nan, live in a
lovely home. Nan suffers from dementia and seems unable to communicate
verbally. Ben Myers is a former mob boss and enforcer who was once the most
powerful man in town. Ben has a daughter named Nickel Wallace (Mira Sorvino),
who, as Ben puts it, became a cop to catch him. They have long been estranged,
from when Nickel was four years old and he left her mom. Although technically a
homicide detective, Nickel is now assigned as a liaison to Congressman Billings
(D.W. Moffett) who, unbeknownst to her, happens to owe his political career to
Ben.
Ben heads out, leaving Nan alone
in the home, to meet his daughter at the bar he currently owns. When he returns
home from the contentious confrontation, he finds his home has been ransacked
and robbed. Nan is unhurt but everything of value has been stolen. An
examination of a video taken by the hidden cam in the living room clock shows
Ben the faces of the three men who robbed him.
Now here where it gets
improbable. Within the space of a few hours, he tracks down the van that left
was parked outside when he left his home, attacks and disables a man twice his
size, gets the address of one of the thieves, and defeats him in a wrestling
match for a gun and...
The concept of "suspension
of belief" is necessary for fans of sci-fi, fantasy and comic books. For
example, we believe a person can fly. We believe that super spies get whatever
woman they want."Suspension of
disbelief," not so easy to lose. That being said the film does have a lot
going for it.
Crime Story has almost as many
twists as a Chubby Checker dance party. And when they're revealed they make
sense. It also has a few poignant scenes that will tug at your heartstrings.
Dreyfuss and Sorvino are terrific in their roles. Megan McFarland as the
voiceless Nan works magic. Pruitt Taylor Vince also works his usual supporting
role magic as Tommy, Ben's long time, and long-suffering assistant/henchman/bar
manager.
In select theaters, on digital
and on demand as of Aug. 13th, don't expect this to become a classic, go-to
mobster film but Adam Lipsius' Crime Story is worth a viewing.
Cinema Retro has received the following press release:
New York, NY -- August 3, 2021 -- Kino Lorber proudly announces the Blu-ray and DVD release of the
critically-acclaimed documentary APOCALYPSE
'45, a stirring account of the final year of World War II. Directed by
celebrated documentarian Erik Nelson (The
Cold Blue), APOCALYPSE '45
includes stunning restorations of never-before-seen archival footage (culled
from over 700 reels in the National Archives) in vivid color and surround
sound, and the voices of 24 men who lived through these experiences, immersing
viewers in the events of the Pacific Theater with an immediacy and presence
that brings history to life and serves as a tribute to the last of the Greatest
Generation.
Presented
in the extended director's cut, APOCALYPSE
'45 comes to Blu-ray and DVD on September 7, 2021, with a SRP of $29.95 for
the Blu-ray, and $19.95 for the DVD. Bonus features include Ford at Pearl, a new featurette
containing long-lost color footage directed by Oscar®-winning filmmaker John Ford at
Pearl Harbor in 1942 (23 minutes), plus two fully restored Oscar®-nominated documentaries from
1945, To the Shores of Iwo Jima (Newly Restored 6.5K Color Film, 5.1/Stereo Audio Mix, 20
Minutes), and The Last Bomb (1945,
Newly Restored 6.5K Color Film, 5.1 Stereo/Stereo Audio Mix, 36 Minutes). Also
included are a restoration demonstration, and the trailer.
Erik
Nelson pioneered the genre he describes as "Big Screen History" with
his groundbreaking 2018 documentary The
Cold Blue, which featured newly-restored footage shot by Oscar®-winner William Wyler during
his time with the 8th Air Force in World War II. The Cold Blue became the first in this genre of documentary films
that would soon be followed by Peter Jackson's They Shall Not Grow Old and Todd Miller's Apollo 11.
With
unprecedented access to footage shot at the time of the events, restored with
state-of-the-art technology, APOCALYPSE
'45 brings audiences closer than ever before to this defining chapter of
American history, as told (and seen) by the men who were there.
Cinema Retro has received the following press release:
Eight Feature Films Plus Hours of Special Features Arrive August
10, 2021, in Time for this Year’s Only Friday the 13th
Take a ride down memory lane with everyone’s favorite psychotic
killer Jason Voorhees in the new FRIDAY THE 13th 8-MOVIE
COLLECTION on Blu-ray, arriving August 10, 2021 from Paramount Home
Entertainment.
Get ready for the only Friday the 13th of the year on
August 13th with this to-die-for collection, which includes newly
remastered versions of the first four films in one of the most influential and
successful horror franchises in cinematic history. This must-have
set for fans of heart-stopping horror is gushing over with hours of previously
released special features including slashed scenes, making of featurettes,
killer commentaries and much, much more. The set also includes access to
digital copies of all eight movies, including the “uncut†edition of the
original Friday the 13th.
Return to the terror of Camp Crystal Lake and re-experience all
the screams, scares, and creative kills. From the too-often ignored
warnings of Camp Crustal Lake’s “death curse,†through an ever-increasing
body-count that culminates on the streets of New York City, the hockey-masked
mayhem is unleashed and unstoppable.
The eight films in the collection are: Friday The 13th, Friday
The 13th Part 2, Friday The 13th Part 3, Friday The 13th Part IV:
The Final Chapter, Friday The 13th Part V: A New Beginning, Friday The 13th
Part VI: Jason Lives, Friday The 13th Part VII: The New Blood, and Friday
The 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan.
In
“Union Pacific†(1939), an epic Western produced and directed by Cecil B.
DeMille for Paramount Pictures in flavorful black-and-white, Union Army veteran
Jeff Butler (Joel McCrea) is hired as a troubleshooter by the fledgling Union
Pacific Railroad just after the end of the Civil War.In the 2021 corporate world, his job description
probably would say “Head of Security.â€Butler is an engineer by profession, but he’s traded his slide rule (or
whatever engineers used in those days) for a pair of six-shooters.The Union Pacific is laying track westward
from Nebraska to connect in Utah with the Central Pacific, as the latter
proceeds eastward from California.Jeff’s duty is to make sure the Union Pacific stays on schedule, and
that means no malingering or sabotage by the track crew.If the Union Pacific falls behind, the Central
Pacific becomes top dog.
Jeff’s
main problem is shady gambler Sid Campeau (Brian Donlevy), whose portable
saloon travels westward with the train.At each “end of track,†Campeau sets up his bar and poker tables, ready
to move on to the next stop as the rails advance.Unknown to anybody but Campeau and his
associates, the cardsharp has been hired by financier Asa Barrows (Henry
Kolker) to delay progress by getting the workmen drunk, distracted,
disgruntled, and if necessary, dead.Barrows is the lead investor in the Union Pacific, but he schemes to
make even more money by undermining the project behind the scenes.Once the railroad irretrievably falls behind
schedule thanks to Campeau’s mischief, he’ll short-sell his stock before the
news goes out, put the money into the Central Pacific, and reap a windfall when
the rival company’s assets soar.And you
thought that today’s Wall Street cutthroats were unscrupulous.
Piling
on the complications for Jeff, Campeau’s right-hand man is Dick Allen (Robert
Preston), an old buddy from the war.At
first, the two pals are glad to meet up again with the sort of dialogue that
wouldn’t be out of place in a modern bro-mance movie: “Why, I haven’t seen you
since Philadelphia,†Allen says.“No, it
was Washington,†Jeff corrects him.“You
passed out in Philadelphia.â€Dick soon
starts to live up to his name, when he and Campeau do their best to make each
“end of track†a permanent end of track.
It
doesn’t help that Dick is sweet on Mollie Monahan (Barbara Stanwyck), the
daughter of the railroad’s senior conductor and its traveling
postmistress.Despite his sleazy
behavior otherwise, he seems serious about truly being in love and wanting to
marry her.But Mollie and Jeff begin to
fall for each other.
To
some degree, “Union Pacific†was a roll of the dice for DeMille and Paramount
when it began pre-production.DeMille’s
last movie, “The Buccaneer†(1938), had barely scraped by with audiences, and
the director himself was in severe post-operative pain from prostate
surgery.For the studio, the $1.2
million budget (over $100 million in today’s dollars) represented a great leap
of faith, especially for a Western.But
it proved to be a worthwhile investment.“Union Pacific†emerged as a box-office hit, earning healthy returns
even after going over schedule and over budget because the exacting DeMille
refused to cut corners.C.B. “had a
horror of cheating the picture, or the audience,†author Scott Eyman noted in
“Empire of Dreams: The Epic Life of Cecil B. DeMille†(2010).Along with the releases of “Stagecoach,â€
“Dodge City,†“Destry Rides Again,†“Jesse James,†and “Frontier Marshal†that
same year, “Union Pacific†helped reinvigorated Westerns as A-list productions.This success laid the foundation for the
genre’s commercial and critical supremacy in the next two decades.The film must have been great, free publicity
for the actual Union Pacific, comparable to all the free hoopla that Richard
Branson and Jeff Bezos enjoyed this summer from the adulatory media coverage of
their spaceship junkets.
There
was one bump along the way for DeMille, when he approached his friend Gary
Cooper for the Jeff Butler role.Cooper
had headlined DeMille’s popular 1936 Western, “The Plainsman.â€In that era when John Wayne was still
struggling to rise from an undistinguished B-movie career (John Ford would
throw him a lifeline with “Stagecoachâ€), Cooper was the go-to star for
Westerns.But Coop was already
contracted for another picture, and McCrea was the happy fallback as the quiet,
capable hero.It was a role that McCrea
more or less would reprise in forty more productions over the next thirty
years.Unlike today’s emotionally fragile
and immature movie heroes, Jeff Butler never once complains about a miserable
childhood or wonders whether he’s cut out for all this.
Zephina
Media and Metropolis Post have released a Blu-ray edition of 1974’s Buster and
Bille, a teenage romantic drama starring Jan-Michael Vincent, Joan Goodfellow,
Pamela Sue Martin and, in his first film role, Robert Englund.
The
story is set in Georgia during 1948, where Buster is the local school athletic
hero who is known for pulling pranks such driving his truck in front of the
school bus and temporarily blinding the driver in a cloud of dust.Cocky and handsome, Buster is the leader of a
group of cool kids and misfits that includes an albino, Whitey (Robert Englund)
who has the shocking habit of dying his hair black.He’s engaged to a pretty classmate named
Margie (Pamela Sue Martin) who has decided they should not have sex until their
wedding night.The rest of Buster’s pals
make a nasty habit of coaxing Billie (Joan Goodfellow), a shy backwoods girl,
into their truck for sex whenever they’re feeling hard up.Buster, frustrated with Margie, decides to
ask Billie out, hoping for the same action his buddies brag about on Monday
mornings.
After
spending an evening with Billie, Buster begins to see there is more to this
girl than just an easy date.Buster
feels empathy at first, and then begins to fall in love with Billie as she
starts to talk and express her feelings.Not sure about his relationship with Margie and their upcoming marriage,
Buster calls it quits, which shocks his friends, parents and most of the
population of their small town.
Buster
takes Billie to a dance where all their classmates can see that these two are
truly in love.This angers the group of
boys who have been abusing Billie and they soon plot to get even.An ugly scene of rape and shocking violence
follows after the boys force Billie into their truck on a dark, rainy
afternoon.Afterwards they drive off leaving
her by the side of the road.Buster
becomes aware of what has happened and races into town to confront the boys at
a local pool hall where he exacts a harsh revenge.
Jan-Michael
Vincent is believable as the high school boy who learns there is more to a
relationship than just sex.He sees the
good in both Billie and Whitey.It is
revealed early on that Whitey was the victim of cruel jokes concerning his
medical condition, but once he became friends with Buster, the taunting
suddenly stopped.
Much
was made at the time of release of the full-frontal nudity Vincent displays in
one scene.In reality, it occurs during
a swimming scene with Billie where we do get a shot of Buster in the
altogether.This all happens in a flash,
no pun intended.
Joan
Goodfellow is excellent as the withdrawn Billie, a victim of some unrevealed
ugliness within her family.She shines
once Buster begins to draw her out and gets her to communicate her feelings.Billie is clearly in love with Buster and
begins to develop a sense of self-worth under his protection.
Horror
fans will, of course, recognize Robert Englund as the future razor-wielding
Freddy Kruger from A Nightmare on Elm Street.As Whitey, Englund is convincing as the naïve boy who doesn’t know how
to act around girls.He participates in
the attack upon Billie even though he knows it is wrong, and becomes tormented
afterwards.
Director
Daniel Petrie gives his characters a natural feel and they are believable as
typical high school students.The
bullies are not horrible kids, they just react inappropriately to situations
that allow them to feel better about their own insecurities.They commit a terrible crime, however, when
those feelings become mixed with alcohol and revenge.
The
script by Rob Turbeville gives us characters from the South speaking with a
dialect typical of the region.However,
the students, parents, police and other residents are refreshingly not depicted
as the hicks we see in so many movies set in this geographical region.
Buster
and Billie is another of those “product of their time†movies in that many
viewers may find it uncomfortable to watch.I myself found myself cringing during the rape scene due to its sheet
brutality.While attacking Billie, one
of the boys keeps telling her “I love you.â€This poignanlty illustrates the disrespect and hatred towards women and
minorities present in the 1940s, when the story was set and which sadly remains
part of our society in some segments 80 years later.
Mario
Tosi’s cinematography is gorgeous, taking advantage of the fact that much of
this film takes place in the countryside and features the colors of fall.Al De Lory provides a light score that
doesn’t sound too stereotypically Southern.No banjos or slide guitars take over the movie at any time.Hoyt Axton performs the title song and twice
during the film we hear Arlo Guthrie singing Shackles and Chains on a radio in
the background.
According
to information provided by the distributor, Buster and Billie was only released
once on VHS and has been unavailable for years.It was reported that Columbia Pictures had somehow lost the master print
and the only available copies were the old consumer tapes that were sold by
secondary retailers.In 2019 Sony
Pictures finally did locate the master elements and a restoration was completed
the next year.
Apparently
Sony was not interested in releasing this new edition of Buster and Billie so
it fell to an independent company, Zephina Media, to do the honors.The result is a beautiful transfer in the
original 1.85 aspect ratio that is free from any pops, scratches or other
imperfections.The mono sound is clear
and the dialogue is very easy to hear.
This
film appears to have a considerable fan base as this Blu-ray is the result of
their many requests made to Sony.The
disc does not contain any extras and, in fact, has no menu page.Some collectors may be upset by this
omission, but my opinion has always been we should be happy someone finally
released Buster and Billie in a high quality format.