BY LEE PFEIFFER

Kino Lorber has released director King Vidor's sultry swamp-based drama "Ruby Gentry" on Blu-ray. The film is the kind of steamy, swamp-based drama that could best be described as "God's Little Acre" by way of Tennessee Williams. The 1952 production would seem to derive from some paperback novel but, in fact, was written directly for the screen. Jennifer Jones plays the titular character, a sultry young woman who had the misfortune of being born on the wrong side of the tracks in the otherwise posh little community of Braddock, North Carolina. Ruby's "career" is working the hard scrabble life of a deckhand on her father's fishing vessel. She's a seasoned hunter and can wield a rifle with precision, necessary ingredients if you grow up on the edge of a swamp. At home, she has to contend with the sexism of low expectations by her blue collar parents and has to endure the psychotic ramblings of her religious fanatic brother, Jewel (James Anderson), who warns her that her pent-up sexual desires will lead her to damnation. When we first see Ruby, those sexual desires are about to be satiated with the return home of her boyfriend Boake Tackman (Charlton Heston), who has just come back from living five years in South America studying methods of cultivating land that has been deemed impossible to irrigate. Ruby doesn't waste any time getting down to business with Boake, who she presumes will marry her and get her away from her wretched lifestyle. After all, he is from the right side of the tracks, the son of a prominent judge. However, Boake has some distressing news to break: he is already engaged to a local, prim-and-proper rich girl, the result of an arranged marriage between the two families. It's clear that Boake's heart (and lust) are all devoted to Ruby, however. Ruby makes it clear that she won't serve the rest of her life as Boak's mistress. She ends up in an improbable marriage to a local rich man, Jim Gentry (Karl Malden), despite their significant age difference. Jim is a decent, devoted fellow- and he's also the richest man in town. Before long, he is sweeping Ruby off to exotic ports of call and exposing her to cultural wonders and sophisticated tastes. When they finally return to Braddock, Ruby has transformed from  tom girl into a high-fashion, Grace Kelly-type. Her joy is short-lived, however, when Jim dies in a tragic accident while the couple is boating. The local population subjects her to a cruel rumor campaign, insinuating that she murdered Jim to get his money. There is also a suspicion that she was motivated by resuming a sexual relationship with Boak, with whom she openly flirted even after getting married.

Ruby proves to be a strong, powerful woman. Instead of moving away or pleading with people to believe her side of the story, she engages in a detailed study of the businesses she has now inherited. Turns out Jim, as a local rich man, had loans out to some of the very businessmen who have been tormenting her. She utilizes every loophole imaginable in the contracts to call in the loans on short notice, thus causing many prominent businesses to fold and forcing people out of jobs. Among her victims is Boak, who has financed his major irrigation business with a loan from Jim Gentry. Her tactics cause panic among the locals and result in a scenario in which she and Boak are hunted in the swamp like human prey.

The most refreshing thing about "Ruby Gentry" is that, despite working under the restrictions of the old Hollywood production code, Ruby never apologies for her blatant love of sex or her cruel tactics used to wreak vengeance on the people who judged her so badly over the course of her life. She is a sympathetic character, but only to a point. Her willingness to punish the innocent as well as the guilty sets her apart from most major female screen protagonists of the era. Likewise, Boak is less than a knight in shining armor. It's clear he loves Ruby but he doesn't possess the moral fortitude to rebel against social conventions so that he can be with her on anything but a surreptitious basis. Jennifer Jones, already a major star for a decade, ignites the screen with the kind of edgy performance that must have raised eyebrows back in the day. Vidor ensures she is clad in tight-fitting shirts and jeans, thus causing every man around her to openly lust for her. It's a terrific performance. Unfortunately, Charlton Heston, a relative newcomer to leading man status at the time, is encouraged by Vidor to occasionally act in an overly-theatrical style. When he embraces Ruby (which is often), it looks like he's posing for a still life painting. Ultimately, Heston would turn some of these mannerisms into assets but here he seems a bit out of place playing a small town jock. The supporting cast is all very good with Karl Malden and James Anderson particularly impressive. Vidor's assured direction, along with an intelligently-written screenplay, make this a thoroughly entertaining drama, engrossing from beginning to end.

The Blu-ray edition of "Ruby Gentry" looks very good indeed, up to Kino Lorber's usual standards. The disc includes a reissue trailer for the film which is strangely re-titled simply "Ruby", along with other trailers pertaining to films starring Jones and Heston that are available from Kino Lorber.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON

UPDATE: MOVIEPASS HAS REVERTED BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL PROGRAM THAT ALLOWS SUBSCRIBERS TO ATTEND ONE MOVIE A DAY. CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS. 

BY LEE PFEIFFER

Moviepass is a subscription program available to movie-goers in the USA that allows members to pay $9.95 per month in return for receiving a card that allows them to see a different movie every day for no charge at over 4,000 theaters nationwide. (The price is less if you get the card via www.costco.com,  assuming you are a Costco member. Costco also includes a year's subscription to the classic movie streaming site www.fandor.com) Over 2 million people subscribe to the program through www.moviepass.com. Some skeptics have stayed away on the basis that the service was too good to be true. They were wrong. Moviepass isn't too good to be true and subscribers have become fervent enthusiasts of the service. There's no catch. From New York to L.A., from Montana to Florida, you could go to a different movie every day of the week. But now the party is at least partially over. Moviepass has been predictably bleeding red ink from its business design, which sees the company paying participating theaters the full price of a customer's ticket. Do the math. The company only gets $9.95 per month from each subscriber but in big cities, Moviepass has to pay out as much as $15 bucks a ticket to theaters every time the customer attends a movie. Moviepass has gambled that they would have enough leverage over theater chains to coerce them into revenue sharing proceeds from concession sales. But that hasn't happened in a big way even though the service can justifiably argue that theaters are selling seats to customers who ordinarily would not have gone to many movies. One of the problems is that theaters are raked over the coals by movie studios that command the lion's share of ticket revenues. It's only when movies enter extended runs that theaters get a meatier share of the ticket sales, thus they depend on sales of over-priced concessions. This is why your local big city theater now resembles a restaurant, offering everything from Mexican food to pizza, along with the ability to dine while watching the film. Theaters are stuck in a dilemma: they can deny Moviepass a percentage of those precious concession revenues but if Moviepass dies, their theaters will have far fewer customers.

Moviepass has announced a "temporary" change to its core program: new subscribers will only be able to see up to four movies a month- and customers can only see the same movie once. Existing customers can still see a different movie every day but are still barred from repeat viewings of the same film. New customers are supposed to take solace from receiving a three month trial to a subscription radio station....but that's caused a backlash because the subscription automatically continues on a pay basis unless the customer pro-actively remembers to stop it. An article in Fortune addresses the challenges to Moviepass and casts doubt on whether existing customers will be able to continue to enjoy their "movie a day" plan when they renew their subscriptions. Moviepass is already losing $20 million a month. On the other hand, even seeing four movies a month would probably satisfy the average subscriber, so it isn't known how many subscribers might defect- and if they do, what will they gain? They will just end up paying much more at theater boxoffices. It seems a happy medium is in order if both Moviepass and major theater chains can come to terms. Moviepass should get some percentage of the revenues they are sending into theaters, especially on slow nights when attendance is sparse. After all, theaters are selling far more buckets of popcorn to customers who would not be there if it weren't for Moviepass. At the same time, the Fortune article addresses the poor customer service at Moviepass, which lacks a phone number customers can call if they experience problems. The company is also rather slow in sending out important notices. When some New York City theaters dropped out of the program months ago, customers weren't notified for days, with the result being that people showed up at the theaters and were simply told their cards were no longer valid. Only after an outcry did Moviepass notify customers. Still, even a streamed-down version of the plan is a value that will continue to tempt avid movie-goers because it beats the alternatives. Click here to read more.

Anderson (left) on the set of Around the World in 80 Days with producer Michael Todd and Frank Sinatra, who filmed a cameo appearance.

Michael Anderson, the Oscar-nominated British film director, has died at age 98. Anderson directed producer Michael Todd's star-packed 1956 screen adaptation of Jules Verne's "Around the World in 80 Days". The film won the Best Picture Oscar and became a boxoffice blockbuster, earning Anderson a Best Director nomination in the process. The previous year, Anderson had directed "The Dam Busters", which became the top-grossing British film of the year. Anderson had the ability to comfortably move between genres with equal skill. Among his other credits: "The Wreck of the Mary Deare", "Shake Hands with the Devil", the 1958 film version of Orwell's "1984", "All the Fine Young Cannibals" (the title of which inspired the name of a short-lived 1980s rock group), "Operation Crossbow", "The Quiller Memorandum", "The Shoes of the Fisherman", "Conduct Unbecoming" and "Orca". In 1976, he directed the hit science fiction film "Logan's Run". He is the father of actor Michael Anderson, Jr.  For more click here.

BY DARREN ALLISON

There’s an awful lot to like about director Robert Altman’s revisionist Western, and conventional it certainly isn’t. Altman himself once described it as an ‘anti-Western’ film because the movie ignores or subverts a number of Western conventions. However, there’s no ignoring its importance, and in 2010, McCabe & Mrs. Miller was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being ‘culturally, historically or aesthetically significant’.

Altman's central characters are far from the stereotypical Western heroes. John McCabe (Warren Beatty) is a small-time pimp and would be entrepreneur, who rides into the small frontier town of Presbyterian Church with a singular aim to get rich. McCabe sets up a seedy brothel, consisting of three women he purchased for $200. British cockney Constance Miller (Julie Christie) arrives in town and convinces him that she could run the brothel more profitably. Unknown to McCabe, she is also addicted to opium.

Their scheme starts to become profitable and the small town begins to become richer because of it. That’s until a pair of ruthless agents Eugene Sears (Michael Murphy) and Ernest Hollander (Antony Holland) from the Harrison Shaughnessy mining company begin to take an interest. They make McCabe an offer of $5,500 which he refuses. Miller warns him of Shaughnessy’s reputation and that he is notorious for his violent actions should they not take the money.

McCabe and Miller are undoubtedly flawed characters which is exactly what makes Altman’s film so engrossing. They are both effectively losers and on a path to nowhere. Beatty’s charismatic performance is arguably among his very best while Christie’s performance saw her nominated for the Academy Award for Best Actress. The cinematography by Vilmos Zsigmond is quite beautiful, as is the use of the three songs composed and performed by Leonard Cohen. ‘I think the reason they worked was because those lyrics were etched in my subconscious, so when I shot the scenes I fitted them to the songs, as if they were written for them’, Altman later said.

Warner’s new Blu-ray / DVD combo comes in a beautifully produced package. The print is as close to pristine as you could expect. It was also great to see the original Kinney / WB shield in place at the opening. I can’t express enough how important this is to film purists. Warner’s have made this something of a welcomed habit, with the original Kinney openings reinstated back to their previous titles such as Dirty Harry (1971) and The Omega Man (1971).

There’s a lovely depth to the picture quality which reflects the damp and murky settings perfectly without ever losing it to diluted or milky backgrounds. Zsigmond’s cinematography captures the green and leafy locations of West Vancouver rather nicely and works especially well on this high definition presentation. Audio is also clear throughout, even in scenes where Altman uses his trademark overlapping dialogue.

The bonus material consists of an original featurette (approx. 09.30 minutes) which provides plenty of insight and behind the scenes footage shot during the production. There is always something charming about these featurettes, often shot on 16mm, in that they really capture the atmosphere and environment of the time. Theirs is also the original trailer which acts as more of a show reel for Leonard Cohen’s music which is overlaid on top of several scenes. The highlight is the commentary track featuring director Robert Altman and producer David Foster. I believe this is the same track (dating from 2002) which was used on the Criterion Collection release and recorded some four years before Altman’s death.

As with all of Warner’s Premium Collection releases, the packaging consists of an attractive slipcase. Inside is a selection of art cards which feature original artwork and selected scenes along with a download token. Warner’s new release marks the debut of McCabe & Mrs. Miller on UK Blu-ray. As a film, it is often considered as one of Altman’s very best and has been cited as one of the most important to emerge from the then blossoming New American Cinema.

BY LEE PFEIFFER

The Warner Archive is mining its cache of old TV movies to release as burn-to-order DVDs. In general, this is a welcome development as it gives new life to sometimes worthy productions that have been virtually unseen for many years. Some of the fare is rather tepid, however, as evidenced by the release of The Girl in the Empty Grave, a 1977 mystery starring Andy Griffith. I'm second to none in my admiration for Griffith's talents as both a comedic and dramatic actor, but here he seems to be slumming and capitalizing too obviously on his Mayberry sheriff image. He plays another small town lawman, Abel Marsh (Griffith had introduced the character in a previous TV movie), who presides over a sleepy, picturesque mountain hamlet in the California high country. (The film was shot near Big Bear Lake at the San Bernadino National Forest). He's surrounded by a bunch of lovable eccentrics right out of the Mayberry playbook, including a rather goofy deputy (James Cromwell, believe it or not, in an early career role.) Like his Andy Taylor alter ego from his famed sitcom, Abel doesn't feel its necessary to wear a gun while dealing with the humdrum routine matters that go on in town. One day, however, his deputy tells him that a strange thing has occurred concerning a young woman who died years ago in a tragic car accident. Seems the deputy saw her drive through town earlier that morning. Abel dismisses the sighting as absurd- until he catches a glimpse of the same girl speeding through town later in the day. This spawns an investigation that has Abel interview the "dead" girl's parents, both of whom reiterate that she did indeed die in the car accident. Things get murkier, however, when the couple end up murdered. Before long, Abel has to break his gun out of mothballs as he becomes involved in deadly cat and mouse games and a potentially deadly car chase. 

The rather lackluster plot seems cobbled together just so everyone could spend a few weeks justifying a stay in some beautiful mountain country. The direction by Lou Antonio is workmanlike but unremarkable and neither he or the screenwriters fully capitalize on Griffith's considerable talents. The film ambles to a confusing and not very satisfying conclusion. The Girl in the Empty Grave reminds us that not ALL old TV movies were as impressive as we remember them being.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON

BY JOHN M. WHALEN

Walter Hill’s “The Long Riders,” (1980) is an account of the last days of the legendary James-Younger outlaw gang. The film starts with a botched bank job, in which one of the gang, Ed Miller (Dennis Quaid), gets nervous and shoots an unarmed customer. There’s more shooting and they manage to get away but everyone agrees Ed’s got to go. It’s the first indication of trouble—the first sign that the gang’s best days may be behind them. The rest of the film follows the trajectory of their decline, as they attract the attention of the Pinkerton Detective Agency, and make a disastrous attempt to rob a bank in Northfield, Minn.

“The Long Riders” is praiseworthy for trying to be something other than just another shoot-em-up western. But it’s a movie with a gimmick—a gimmick that results in a film that is something less than it could have been. The gang in real life consisted of the two James brothers (Frank and Jesse), the three Younger brothers (Cole, Jim, and Bob), and the Miller Brothers (Clell and Ed). Director Hill thought it would be a cool idea to cast real-life brothers in the parts. Stacy and James Keach play the James boys. David, Keith, and Robert Carradine star as the Youngers. Randy and Dennis Quaid play the Millers. It was an inspired concept but it had one major drawback. James Keach was totally miscast as Jesse. His portrayal of the leader of the gang is weak, and totally lacking in charisma. The Jesse portrayed here couldn’t lead a Boy Scout troop to a knot-tying Jamboree.

David Carradine, on the other hand, as Cole Younger, steals the movie. Carradine is not only charismatic in this film, he looks dangerous. In interviews he often claimed that most of his performances during that era were fueled by Grey Goose. You can believe it, especially in a knife-fight scene with James Remar as Sam Starr. Throughout the film his younger siblings provide him with comfortably familiar support that can only come from real brothers. However, Stacy Keach as Frank James seems caught between trying to keep the dull Jesse and the wild Cole Younger from going after each other.

“The Long Riders” focuses on the differences between the Jameses and the Youngers. Jesse and Frank are family-oriented. The Youngers just want to be free. When Jesse plans to get married, Cole tells his brother Jim: “It don’t go with the way he’s livin’.” The differences build until, at the beginning of the Northfield Minnesota Bank robbery scene, when Jesse says they’re just going to go into the bank and take the money, Cole wants to do a little planning and scouting first. Jesse is scornful of the idea. Cole says with some disgust: “I’ve long since given up trying to talk sense to you.”

“The Long Riders” is essentially plotless. As he did later in “Wild Bill” (1995), Hill tells the story in separate disconnected scenes, many of which end simply by fading to black. As a result, the movie lacks tension and the characters fail to really come alive, even though the film spends a lot of time showing the gang’s social activities when not on the job. We see them attending funerals, weddings, hoedowns, and shows, most of which simply stop the action and rob the story of its momentum. The good thing about those scenes, however, is that we get a chance to hear Ry Cooder’s great folk music on the soundtrack, which plays almost constantly throughout the movie. There are plenty of fiddles, Jews harps, and dulcimers on hand and even a guy playing spoons. And it’s always a pleasure hearing Cooder doing his best to sound like Blind Willy Johnson on acoustic slide guitar. But after all the digressions, when the big final set piece in Northfield takes place (filmed in imitation Sam Peckinpah slo-mo style), you’re almost caught by surprise and as a result the violence and bloodshed have little emotional impact. The final gimmick comes in the Jesse James assassination scene in which two more real life brothers (Nicholas and Christopher Guest) play Bob and Charlie Ford.

Kino Lorber’s Studio Classic Blu-ray release is quite a package. There are two discs. Disc one is a brand new 1920x1080p 4k digital restoration of the film presented in 1.85:1 aspect ratio. Special bonus features on Disc One include audio commentary by film historian Howard S. Berger, and two others, as well as trailers for other KL Studio Classic releases. Disc Two contains enough features to keep you on your sofa for hours, including: a one-hour featurette on the making of the film and new interviews with Walter Hill, Keith and Robert Carradine, Stacy and James Keach, Randy Quaid and Nicholas Guest. There is also an interview with Ry Cooder talking about the music he used in the movie and a short featurette comparing Walter Hill’s use of slo-motion compared to the way Sam Peckinpah did it.

If you’re a western fan, and particularly if you dig the idiosyncratic work of Walter Hill you’re going to enjoy “The Long Riders” even with its flaws.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON

John M. Whalen is the author of "Hunting Monsters is My Business: The Mordecai Slate Stories" . Click here to order the book from Amazon)

BY MARK MAWSTON

If you look up the term osmosis in the dictionary you find the following description: “the process of gradual or unconscious assimilation of ideas and knowledge: i.e. “by some strange political osmosis private reputations become public”. I hope this will be the case for the wonderful Leon Vitali after the release of the new documentary “Filmworker” from Tony Zierra and Dogwoof in regards to recognizing the key role he played in bringing together the latter works of the great film director Stanley Kubrick.

The remarkable, untold story of Leon Vitali, who gave up fame and fortune as a much respected actor to serve for over three decades as Stanley Kubrick’s right-hand man, is told in this compelling documentary charting Vitali’s work with the maestro and their unique relationship. To say Vitali was Kubrick’s right hand man doesn’t really do him justice but the fact that Vitali himself would have given his right arm to help his friend and icon in any way rings true. The obvious love that Vitali has for Kubrick, no matter how others perceive his role, is humbling and inspiring. We see Vitali move from his acting role in “Barry Lyndon” to working behind the camera with Kubrick, whose intense eye seemed glued to his viewfinder. When it came to set dressing, lighting, through to casting and final print transfer, Vitali was there.

As with the scene in the recent “Blade Runner 2049 (a film I’m sure Kubrick would have loved) where the hologram Joi melds with another to truly feel an experience, so Vitali melded with Kubrick; working with him so closely and for so long that he knew the exact way Kubrick wanted anything to look, sound or be released. He wrote thousands of pages of notes that the director would read word for word and act upon. This esteem Kubrick held for Vitali says all that needs to be said about his own professionalism and eye for detail- such as spending 24 hours looking at reels of actual film negatives in order to extract the exact single image he knew Kubrick would concur with for posters and stills usage. Vitali gave himself to the process of making ‘A Stanley Kubrick Film’- perfectly illustrated when he says “as soon as I drove through the gates at Stanley’s home I knew I wouldn’t see myself again until I passed through them on the way out”.

It’s very, very rare to find such dedication in any profession but to be the assistant to one of the most demanding directors in history is even more impressive. Kubrick was a man who screamed for perfection and Vitali’s ability to withstand these demands indicates his own staying power was on par with that of the films Kubrick created. The movies Vitali worked on include “The Shining”, “Full Metal Jacket” and “Eyes Wide Shut”, in which he had two roles (the fact that we never really get to see him is a perfect analogy to the reason why the documentary was made).

This intimate documentary should appear on every key Kubrick film that’s released on home video from this point forward but I do urge you to see it on the big screen if you have the opportunity, as this is a film about a larger than life director whose canvas was the cinema screen itself. Just as importantly, it’s about a less celebrated man whose heart is far bigger than his ego,who is happy to represent and recall tales of his friend and mentor based on experiences no one else shared. Vitali’s reverence for Kubrick is inspiring on different levels, the most obvious being that he relates to him on personal terms rather than as a cinematic icon. I would urge anyone with an interest in Kubrick, the film industry or indeed friendship itself, to go and see this film when it’s released in UK cinema’s on 18 May 2018 from Dogwoof,. The month also marks the 50th anniversary of Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey”. This is a perfect companion piece to that masterwork.

BY LEE PFEIFFER

Sony has reissued its 2002 special edition of producer William Castle's horror exploitation film Homicidal a burn-to-order DVD, although there is no mention of the extra bonus feature on the packaging or publicity for the film. (Sony seems determined not to capitalize on special features that are especially marketable to collectors.) Castle, of course, was the proud master of exploitation films and relished his reputation as the King of Schlock. He excelled in making low-budget, "quickie" films that often capitalized on major hit movies of the day. Castle seemed to fancy himself as a low-rent version of Alfred Hitchcock, who was also not shy about promoting his own image in connection with marketing his films and TV series. Castle's films were not meant to be taken seriously by critics but he did have high standards for the genre in which he worked and it's rare to find any of his movies that don't at least merit classification as guilty pleasures. Others, such as Homicidal, actually turned out to be effective chillers in their own right. The movie was Castle's answer to the phenomenal success of Hitchcock's 1960 classic Psycho. Indeed, there are camera angles, musical cues and plot scenarios that practically border on plagiarism of the original film. The story opens on a fascinating note as we watch a statuesque young blonde (Jean Arless) check into a hotel in Ventura, California. She's a strange one from frame one- barely engaging in conversation with anyone else. She suddenly makes the hunky bellboy a bizarre proposition: she will pay him $2,000 cash if he agrees to marry her and then almost immediately have the union annulled. She does not give a reason for this weird offer, but in an age where a hotel room rented for $5 a night, the $2,000 offer is more than he can refuse. En route to the justice of the peace, the young woman, whose name is Emily, says little and doesn't even engage in niceties. She seems intent on having a specific justice of the peace (crotchety old James Westerfield in a marvelous role) perform the ceremony. As with all Castle productions, to describe much more would spoil some key scenes. Suffice it to say that the short-lived marriage results in murder that is so shocking and gory that it is amazing it was not watered down by skittish studio executives. 

What can be said is that Emily is a Swedish immigrant who was brought to America by an equally strange young man named Warren, who resides in an opulent home. Helga's main duty is to care for an elderly woman named Helga (Eugenie Leontovich), another Swede who had been Warren's nursemaid as a child. Helga has suffered a stroke and is confined to a wheelchair, unable to talk or communicate in any meaningful way. Around Warren, Emily plays the doting caregiver, but privately, she delights in tormenting the long-suffering woman, even to the point of making death threats. One of the few outsiders to be allowed into this environment is Miriam Webster (Patricia Breslin), Warren's half-sister. The two have a very close relationship but things are fairly frosty between Miriam and Emily, who seems jealous of the close bond between brother and sister. Emily is also jealous of Miriam's relationship with a local pharmacist, Karl Anderson (Glenn Corbett) and begins to find ways to thwart their social outings. After a time, Miriam and Karl begin to suspect that Emily might well be a notorious murderer the police are searching for. This sets in motion many of the standard actions screen heroines must always engage in. These include not staying in a safe environment and being lured to precisely the location where she knows she will be placed in life-threatening danger. When Emily is about to enter the house of horrors, Castle employs one of his trademark gimmicks by freezing the action and putting a clock on screen that gives squeamish audience members 45 seconds to flee to the lobby where they can redeem a coupon to get their money back. To prevent having to actually provide many refunds, Castle has a caveat to the agreement: all such patrons must stand in full view in a "Coward's Corner" he had provided for theater lobbies!  Once Miriam does enter the house, the film is genuinely creepy and leads to an ending so shocking I never saw it coming and I doubt most viewers will, either. 

You approach Homicidal with the justifiable expectation that it will be filled with laughs, a la Castle's great camp success House on Haunted Hill. However, it proves to be a highly effective thriller with an a rather astonishing performance by Jean Arless as the insane Emily. One minute she's all charm, the next she's running around bug-eyed trying to murder people with knives and poison. There are times she brings to mind Faye Dunaway as Joan Crawford, but in the aggregate it's a mesmerizing screen debut. Bizarrely, "Jean Arless" was a fake name used by actress Joan Marshall because she feared being typecast in horror films. Sadly, she never went far in her career under either name and died relatively young in 1992 at 61 years of age. She gets solid support from Glenn Corbett (who also died young in 1993 at age 59) and Patricia Breslin, who manages to avoid making the requisite role of damsel in distress unintentionally funny. 

The Sony DVD has a top quality transfer and the bonus items are quite interesting. There is a short featurette that presents various horror film authorities extolling the virtues of Castle's work. There is also some wonderfully campy newsreel footage of the world premiere in Youngstown, Ohio that features the omnipresent Castle badgering patrons to tell everyone how great the film is. (One woman says with a straight face that it's better than Psycho.) The cigar-chomping Castle, who comes across as a delightful man, also features in the introductory segment to Homicidal, in an obvious attempt to emulate Hitchcock's penchant for self-promotion.  The special edition also features a short TV spot in which the narrator clearly imitates the voice of old Hitch. 

Homicidal is a highly entertaining film that demonstrates you don't need big stars or a big budget to make an effective thriller. Highly recommended. 

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE

Those were the days! Check out the productions appearing on Broadway during the week of May 21, 1960: The Sound of Music, Toys in the Attic, The Tenth Man, My Fair Lady, Destry Rides Again, Finian's Rainbow, A Raisin the the Sun, Bye Bye Birdie, Henry IV, Gypsy, West Side Story, The Best Man, The Andersonville Trial, The Music Man, The Miracle Worker and many others. Stars appearing simultaneously on the Great White Way included Jackie Gleason, Vivien Leigh, Eddie Albert, Melvin Douglas, Anne Bancroft, Patty Duke, Andy Griffith, Jason Robards, Anthony Perkins, Mary Ure, Jessica Tandy, Ossie Davis and Ruby Dee. Best of all, you didn't have to take out a second mortgage to afford tickets to these productions.

BY DARREN ALLISON

It was age and (bad) timing that prevented me from catching Badlands on its original theatrical release. I finally caught up with it many years later when it was shown as part of the BBC’s popular film season ‘Moviedrome’. Introduced by film director Alex Cox, the yearly summer season consisted of a selection of cult, exploitation, oddities and forgotten film gems. The inclusion of Badlands certainly made an impact which would stay with me long after the final credits had rolled.

Set in 1959, Badlands is based (loosely) on the real-life murder spree of Charles Starkweather and his girlfriend, Caril Ann Fugate. It was written and directed by Terrence Malick and marked his feature film debut. Often considered as a recluse, perhaps because of his refusal to take part in interviews, Malick’s film work has always divided opinion. Malick began working on the screenplay for Badlands in 1970 at the age of 27 and raised half of the budget himself in order to get the film into production.

A great deal of Badlands is told from the perspective of the impressionable 15-year-old Holly Sargis (Sissy Spacek). Holly is a shy, teenage girl living in the South Dakota town of Fort Dupree. She lives with her sign painter father (Warren Oates), although their relationship has been somewhat tested since her mother died of pneumonia. Holly meets the 25-year-old Kit Carruthers (Martin Sheen), a garbage collector with a troubled past and who quietly relishes in his often remarked resemblance to actor James Dean. Kit uses his charismatic charms on Holly, and she begins to fall in love with him. Holly's initial voice over reveals her innocence and her adventure with Kit as a romantic fairy-tale. But the fairy-tale soon turns sour with the gradual unfolding of Kit's increasing antisocial and violent behaviour.

Badlands works on just about every level. The film was picked up by Warner Bros after making an impact at the 1973 New York Film Festival, although previewing the film on a double bill with the Mel Brooks comedy Blazing Saddles (1973) didn’t really do the film any favours. Thankfully, the film finally found its own wings and established a credible and respected life of its own. It works as a great companion piece with Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde (1967). Both are excellent examples of the American biographical crime film. It’sperhaps no surprise then that Malick began his career as a protégé of Arthur Penn, who is thanked in the closing credits.

The Warner Bros. special edition release of Badlands looks exceptionally clean and clear with vivid but natural colours. The dividing line between sandy textured prairies and the vibrant blue skies of Montana are greatly enriched and improved, adding new life to the superb cinematography of Takashi Fujimoto. Audio is also clear throughout with effects such as gunshots providing plenty of additional punch. It’s also great to see the original red Saul Bass-designed Warner communication company logo restored to the film’s opening. It not only sets the tone, but does everything to keep the film in the correct timeline.

In reference to bonus material, this is something of a mixed bag. Whist Warner’s packaging suggests a featurette, which is in the style of the original (and very good) Blue Underground documentary ‘Absence of Malick’ (24.00), it also suggests cast and crew member interviews and the trailer. Firstly I think it should be made clear, that the Blu-ray disc only contains the making of documentary. There are no additional cast and crew interviews and in fact, there is no sign of the trailer. I reverted to the DVD edition in the same package, where again, there is no sign of any additional cast and crew member interviews, but there is a trailer (of course in standard definition). Why the trailer does not appear on the Blu-ray, I have no idea. So in order to see the trailer one would have to switch to the DVD in order to view it, which is neither a good policy nor practical.

The Premium Collection packaging is again very attractive with its outer slipcase using the film poster, the download token and the four art cards consisting of original film artwork and three scenes from the movie. It’s all very nice, but I remain seriously confused at how Warner Bros have produced and authorised the content within this edition. The film, however, remains a classic of the genre and it has never looked better.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER 

BY FRED BLOSSER

Sergio Leone’s “Giù La Testa,” later retitled not once but twice for American release, opened in Italy in October 1971 to great expectations by the director’s fans. According to the preeminent Leone expert Sir Christopher Frayling, in an informative audio commentary included in a new Blu-ray edition of the film from Kino Lorber Studio Classics under its second U.S. title, “A Fistful of Dynamite,” the Italian phrase meant something like “keep your head down.” In other words, in times of social convulsion like the bloody 1913 Mexican revolution portrayed in the movie, save yourself unnecessary grief and keep as low a profile as you can. Toshiro Mifune’s wandering samurai in “Yojimbo” offered similar advice: “A quiet life eating rice is best.” In Leone’s film, James Coburn and Rod Steiger starred as mismatched partners -- a fugitive Irish dynamiter and a volatile Mexican bandit -- who learn that you only bring sorrow and tragedy upon yourself when you leap into the whirlwind of political turmoil. When the picture reached the U.S. through United Artists in July 1972, the title was changed to “Duck, You Sucker,” a rough translation. In a literal sense, it’s the warning that Coburn’s character invariably utters just before he detonates his nitro charges. Leone thought it was a common colloquialism in America. Maybe he was thinking of “fire in the hole.” United Artists gave the release decent publicity, selling it as an action movie in a shorter (by half an hour) cut than the 157-minute Italian print. I remember seeing the ad art of Coburn and Steiger prominently displayed on a billboard in downtown Pittsburgh that summer, just before the picture opened. The ad extolled Leone as “the master of adventure.” Around the same time, United Artists Records released Ennio Morricone’s eclectic soundtrack on vinyl. The New York Times panned the movie, but Time Magazine offered a mostly positive review, one of the earliest to take Leone on his own terms instead of dismissing him as a passing curiosity.

However, audience turnout was sparse, and when the film reached smaller markets like the one where I saw it in early fall 1972, the studio had renamed it “A Fistful of Dynamite,” in an attempt to lure audiences who had flocked to Leone’s “A Fistful of Dollars” and its sequels starring Clint Eastwood. The strategy gave the picture a second chance in movie houses in that era before home video and streaming video when movies had to make money at the box office or not at all. However, it didn’t do much to boost business. In the meantime, another violent drama about a fugitive IRA gunman in revolutionary Mexico, Ralph Nelson’s “The Wrath of God,” had opened in theaters. Nelson’s film had the added commercial advantage of a “Playboy” pictorial. For the record, it didn’t sell many tickets either despite the publicity afforded by Hef’s magazine. Later, TV and VHS prints of Leone’s movie retained “A Fistful of Dynamite” as the title, and their pan-and-scan format ruined Giuseppe Ruzzolini’s beautifully composed Techniscope photography. The first respectful home-video edition finally appeared in 1996 from MGM Home Video on laser disc. Remember that technology from the dawn of home theater, sonny? The 1996 laser disc retained “A Fistful of Dynamite” as the title, but restored the widescreen aspect of the image and much of the footage missing from previous U.S. versions. “Duck, You Sucker” ultimately resurfaced as the chosen title for its premier on U.S. DVD from MGM Home Video in 2007.

On the run from the British government during the Irish Rebellion, explosives expert John Mallory (Coburn) comes to Mexico to work for German mining interests. There, traveling through the desert on a vintage motorbike, he crosses paths with Juan Miranda (Steiger), a sweaty, hot-tempered bandit who leads a gun-toting gang of robbers. The gang consists of Juan’s elderly father and Juan’s six sons “by different mothers.” Miranda sees Mallory’s proficiency with explosives as the key to realizing his long-cherished dream of breaking into the fortress-like Bank of Mesa Verde. The loot will enable him and his family to leave Mexico and reach the U.S., where -- like the worst nightmare of a Trump supporter -- he expects to pursue an even grander career robbing American banks. After Juan deviously maneuvers Mallory into a partnership, the Irishman eludes him but the two reunite in Mesa Verde. There, Mallory has joined a cell of insurrectionists headed by the dapper Dr. Villega (Romolo Valli). Villega plots a series of diversions in Mesa Verde to support two imminent onslaughts by the rebel commanders Villa and Zapata. One diversion will be an explosion at the bank, dovetailing with Miranda’s own obsession of pulling his big heist. Once the building is blasted open, Juan will lead his kids inside and empty the vault. But things take a turn he doesn’t expect, and instead of getting rich from the break-in, he becomes an unwitting hero of the revolution. For the cynical Juan, who has no use for politics and no loyalties beyond his rough affection for his aged father and his sons, it’s a dumbfounding development. Moreover, his new-found notoriety puts him in the crosshairs of a punitive military expedition led by a ruthless officer in an armored transport, Col. Gunther Ruiz (Antoine Saint-John).

In retrospect, it’s easy to see why the film did poorly at the U.S. box office, first under an opaque title and then under, arguably, a misleading one. Leone enjoyed using an elliptical narrative style in which often, as a scene begins or unfolds, the viewer doesn’t quite know where the characters are or the point of what they’re doing. Eventually, with a visual or verbal cue, the meaning becomes clear. Fans enjoy this technique, similar to a stand-up comic preceding a punchline with an elaborate set-up. Leone trusts that you’re smart enough and curious enough to stay with him. But the technique was bound to frustrate 1972 moviegoers who expected a straightforward shoot-’em-up narrative, based on the poster art of Steiger firing a machine gun, Coburn displaying a coat lined with dynamite, and a military convoy being blown up. Some confusion also resulted from the cuts made for the U.S. release. What happened to the paying job that Mallory was hired for, and if he’s finished with rebellions as he had implied in one passing comment, why does he end up collaborating with Dr. Villega’s resistance movement? A scene in the overseas print explained that Juan had lured John’s employer and a military guard to a remote church, and then killed them with a blast of Mallory’s dynamite. Mallory, known to be a wanted Irish rebel, was blamed for the murders; presumably, as the authorities put out their dragnet, he had only one recourse to slip out of Miranda’s devious grip -- go underground, seek refuge with the Mexican revolutionaries, and resume his insurrectionary career.

By Lee Pfeiffer

The consequences of sexual desire in young women is akin to that of contracting the bubonic plague. That seems to be the message of the 1965 film version of A Rage to Live, best on the best-selling novel by John O'Hara. The opening sequences introduce us to Grace Caldwell (Suzanne Pleshette), a gorgeous high school student who lives a seemingly idyllic life in small town America. Grace shares her affluent home with her widowed mother Emily (Carmen Matthews) and her older brother Brock (Linden Chiles), a straight-as-an-arrow type who is attending Yale and who tries to fill the role of father and husband to the best of his ability. Grace is a "good girl" is all respects. She studies hard and looks after her mother, who she clearly adores. However, she does have one disturbing aspect to her personality: she has an active sexual desire in an age where a young woman was supposed to value her virginity above virtually anything else. Grace likes to flirt with her male classmates and there is no shortage of potential lovers. Disturbingly, she realizes that she doesn't have to have any deep emotions for any of them in order to find them sexually attractive. When she gets caught necking with one such boy, Charlie (Mark Goddard), they are discovered by his mother and Grace becomes the center of a local scandal. The notion of such an innocent act leading to such consequences probably seemed over the top even in 1965, but the situation does worsen when Grace does end up bedding several young men, thus living up (or down) to her new-found reputation as a "bad girl". This brings strife to her family and friends and Grace seeks to smooth things over by accompanying her ill mother on a vacation to an island resort. However, temptation rears its ugly head and while Grace sneaks out to have a dalliance with a hunky waiter, mom is stricken by an attack and dies. Consumed by guilt, Grace  is convinced that she is nothing more than a slut, destined to live a life of shame. She gets a second chance when she meets Sidney Tate (Bradford Dillman), a handsome, hard working young man who is instantly attracted to her. Before long, he asks her to marry him, leading Grace to confess that she isn't a virgin. Sidney takes this bit of news with the same gravity he would if she had confessed to being a serial murderer, but he is forgiving of her past and believes her vow to stay loyal. The happy couple soon has a baby and all seems well...until Roger Bannon (Ben Gazzara) enters their lives. Roger had known Grace slightly for years and confesses to her that he has long been obsessed with her. Although devoted to her devout but boring husband, Grace becomes tempted by Roger's gruff, blue collar ways and is turned on by his raw sexuality. Before long, they become lovers-and their relationship sets in motion a series of dire events that lead to a shocking (and ironic) conclusion. 

A Rage to Live seems very dated in its early sequences. Yet, it serves as a disturbing time capsule from an era in which women were supposed to know their place and regard sex as nothing more than a wifely duty, similar to doing housework or changing diapers. The notion that a woman may have sexual desires of her own had profound consequences in polite circles. One of the drawbacks of these opening scenes is that Suzanne Pleshette was in her mid-twenties at the time and, although her performance is excellent, she is simply too old to play a high school girl. Thus, when her mother or brother dictate directives to her, it seems rather absurd to see this clearly mature young woman meekly obeying them. This becomes less of an issue as the story progresses and Pleshette is playing a character her own age. Director Walter Grauman plays up the soap opera elements of the story, all to the accompaniment of a fine score by Nelson Riddle and crisp black and white cinematography by Charles Lawton. As soon as Grace resolves one crisis in her troubled life, another takes its place. Yet, these problems are all of her own making. The concept of the film- a likable woman who cannot control her sexual urges and fantasies- was certainly daring for its day, especially since Grace is presented as a sympathetic figure who dotes on her husband and young child. Yet, she repeatedly risks it all for another turn under the covers. The cautionary aspects of the tale are as old as time: if you play with fire, you'll probably end up getting burned. Yet, Grace is not a villain. Her defense of her unfaithful actions to her husband is the time worn excuse: she loves her spouse and her dalliances are only to fulfill her physical needs. (Seeing how boring Dillman's Sidney is, you can hardly blame her.) 

The film is engrossing throughout, even during those scenes that approach guilty pleasure status. Peter Graves turns up later in the film in a key role as a would-be lover of Grace's who plays an instrumental role in her fate. Carmen Matthews is especially good as Pleshette's long-suffering mother and reliable character actor James Gregory provides a typically deft turn as the family doctor. Gazzara is especially good as the guy from the other side of tracks whose animal magnetism initially attracts Grace but eventually frightens her.

A Rage to Live is by no means an example of classic movie-making but it is certainly worth a look, if only to observe how cinema was maturing rapidly during this period and exploring subjects that would have been taboo only a few years before.

The Warner Archive has released the film as a burn to order DVD. Quality is excellent, though there are no bonus features. The DVD is region free.  

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE

BY LEE PFEIFFER

Fritz Lang first made his mark in Germany during the short-lived Wiemar Republic in between the two world wars. Lang had immigrated from his native Austria to Berlin, where he made quite an impression during the silent era, directing such landmark masterpieces as "M" and "Metropolis". However, the rise of National Socialism repulsed him. He spawned an offer to make propaganda films for the Nazis and discreetly left the country before the worst aspects of Hitler's regime became reality. In Hollywood, Lang found he was welcomed by studios and was consistently employed on films for the major studios. However, Lang was working under constraints that early German cinema did not have, namely, the dreaded Hays Code, under which Hollywood engaged in self-censorship in order to prevent government oversight of film content. Consequently, many of the films directed by Lang in Hollywood were largely routine, run-of-the-mill productions although occasionally, he oversaw a true gem that reminded viewers of his genius. One of Lang's last American films before he returned to Germany was "While the City Sleeps", a tightly-wound 1956 urban thriller that was one of the first major productions to deal overtly with a serial killer. 

The story opens on a harrowing note with a pre-credits scene in which an attractive young woman has her apartment entered by a delivery man who had previously stopped at her apartment. In short order, he subjects her to a horrific death. The murder quickly becomes big news and Amos Kyne (Robert Warwick), the elderly owner of The Sentinel, the city's most influential newspaper, barks orders that the search for the murder has to be played to the hilt in order to increase circulation. However, Kyne soon passes away, leaving control of The Sentinel to his son, Walter (Vincent Price), an inept elitist with a penchant for high living. Walter is well-aware that he is ill-equipped to run a major media organization that also includes a television network. He quickly alienates his most seasoned staffers and devises a Trumpian strategy of dangling a promotion in front of his three top reporters, thus causing the colleagues to turn on each other amid a chaotic environment of backstabbing. Walter has informed the competing journalists that the first man to solve the murder will get the job, then sits back and cruelly enjoys his manipulation of them. The staffers are old hands at getting big stories. Mark Loving (George Sanders) is a snooty newsroom editor who is romancing Mildred Donner (Ida Lupino), the office vamp and resident gossip columnist. Jon Day Griffith (Thomas Mitchell) is a cigar-chomping old time veteran reporter who quickly compromises his pride in the hopes of nailing down the promotion. James Craig is Harry Kritzer, an oily top reporter who is secretly romancing Walter's wife Dorothy (Rhonda Fleming), who enjoys making her husband an unknowing cuckold while at the same time manipulating Harry by threatening to withdraw her sexual favors. The central character in the story, however, is Edward Mobley (Dana Andrews), The Sentinel's top reporter and their celebrity on-air news anchor. Mobley, a chain-smoking cynic, wants no part of Walter's cruel ploy to win a promotion through sacrificing professional integrity. Edward, too, is involved in the hotbed of interoffice romances, and becomes engaged to Loving's secretary Sally (Nancy Liggett).

The interesting script for "While the City Sleeps" meanders but in a positive way. These are all fascinating enough characters to make the sordid aspects of the serial killer plot take second place. Mobley is an especially interesting character and far from the knight in shining armor found in many films of this era. He smokes and drinks too much and even alienates Nancy by almost succumbing to the sexual advances of Mildred. He loathes working for Walter but is too comfortable in his job and celebrity status to leave.  Working with some inside tips from a friendly police detective (Howard Duff), Mobley comes up with a strategy for luring the killer into the open by using Nancy as bait. This kicks the murder plot into overdrive in the final section of the film and adds considerable suspense to the proceedings.

BY DARREN ALLISON

Composer Bernard Herrmann was often described as being ‘temperamental’ and ‘explosive’ by nature. However, very few could ever criticize his approach and dedication in regards to his work. His collaborations with director Alfred Hitchcock are today reflected upon as legendary; a clash of personalities which proved that both fire and gasoline didn’t necessarily have to end in utter devastation.

To tie in with Record Store Day UK 2018, Silva Screen Records have released a strictly limited edition 7” EP showcasing the very best of this turbulent and tremendous partnership. The Double A Side single (SIL71566) features two tracks from Vertigo (Prelude / The Nightmare) with the flipside featuring Overture / Main title from North by Northwest. The music is perfectly executed by the highly respected City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra and conducted by Paul Bateman.

Vertigo crackles with tension as James Stewart’s character Scottie goes through an emotional wringer. Herrmann blew away the lush melodies that dominated music in films of previous decades and delivered harsh, stinging, repetitive themes overlaid on a deceptive symphonic score. The sound is as experimental as the film, which 60 years from release remains one of the milestones of cinematic history. One year on in North by Northwest, Cary Grant is the man in peril. This time it’s not mentally but physically as he is pursued by a spy network and the police. Herrmann ratchets up the tension with an orchestral tour-de-force which highlighted the thrill of the chase. Herrmann described it as, “a kaleidoscopic orchestral fandango designed to kick-off the exciting rout which follows."

Silva Screen has produced just 1200 individually numbered copies of this attractively designed 7” single. Pressed in a transparent Amber coloured vinyl and given the continuously swelling number of Herrmann devotees, I very much doubt that this will remain around for too long. So check in with your local participating Record Store Day UK outlet to avoid any possible disappointment. You’ll find it to be well worth it.

CLICK HERE TO FIND A RETAILER THAT WILL STOCK THIS ITEM ON RECORD DAY UK, 21 APRIL

BY DARREN ALLISON

After some 47 years there is still something about Ron Grainer’s score for The Omega Man (1971) (SILLP1561) that continues to withstand the test of time. Whilst the film might arguably appear to be a little dated these days, Grainer’s music lives on to uphold and support its continuing cult status. It’s perhaps no surprise then that Silva Screen Records have decided to release its first ever double vinyl pressing exclusively in time for Record Store Day UK, which is 21 April 2018.

The Omega Man is an eclectic mix of styles ranging from mellow jazz, traditional lounge, and romantic mood setters to excellent dramatic action themes that feature contemporary, modern instrumentation including synthesisers and haunting water chimes. Everything is here. It remains a defining example of just how good film music used to be, full of strong melody and executed with perfect orchestration. To this day it is arguably regarded as Grainer’s crowning glory, and rightfully so. Grainer was brave enough to mix the traditional elements with the contemporary, gently embedding electronic effects and reverb to produce something highly unique.

Silva Screen's double vinyl album contains the full 18 tracks as previously released on the FSM CD of 1997. The packaging is superb; both records are contained within a super heavyweight gatefold sleeve, with a flat spine that is close to 8mm in width. However, if you are interested in this first ever vinyl edition of the score and particularly by its widely advertised ‘coloured vinyl’, you may want to check first with participating stores, as my copy is unmistakably a traditional black vinyl pressing. In regards to its audio, everything sounds astonishingly good and contains plenty of punch where it counts.

As this is a Record Store Day UK exclusive it is worth checking out in advance (with any participating outlet) if they will be stocking this particular title. Because of the codes of conduct surrounding Record Store Day UK, any remaining stock will be available for sale online from 00.01am on the 28th April 2018.

The Omega Man is limited to just 1000 (individually numbered) copies. Due to the popularity of this glorious score, you might want to begin your research in advance and in order to avoid any possible disappointment. It’s sure to be one of the outstanding titles of the day.

Click here  to find a retail out that will sell this release.

By Hank Reineke

The first thing you note when reading the sleeve notes for 100 Years of Horror (Mill Creek Entertainment) is the three-disc set’s staggering running time: ten hours and fifty-five minutes. It’s a somewhat daunting task to review such a monumentally staged effort as this, one at least partially conceived as a labor-of-love. The series makes a noble effort to trace the history and the development of the horror film from the silent era through the slasher films of the 1980s and a bit beyond, not always neatly or logically compartmentalizing sub-genres as “Dinosaurs,” “Aliens” “Gore,” “Mutants,” Scream Queens” etc. along the way. It’s a bit difficult to precisely date when host and horror film icon Christopher Lee’s commentaries and introductory segments were filmed. The set itself carries a 1996 copyright, but Lee makes an off-hand mention of the “new” Dracula film starring Gary Oldman… which would date the saturnine actor’s participation to 1992 or thereabouts. Later in the set, Lee references Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, which then confusingly forward dates the documentary to 1994.

It’s also unclear where this series was originally destined. With its twenty-five minute running time per episode, it would appear as if this twenty-six part series was produced with the intent of television distribution in mind. 100 Years of Horror is one of the earliest efforts of executive producer Dante J. Pugliese who would carve out a career producing a number of these minimal investment “clip show” style documentaries. This series first appeared as a 5 volume VHS set via Passport International in the latter days of 1995, and has since enjoyed several DVD releases; there were both cut-down versions and a highly-sought-after-by-collectors box set issued in 2006. This new issue by Mill Creek not only brings the set back into print with new packaging, but does so at a very reasonable price point: MSRP: $14.98, and even cheaper from the usual assortment of on-line merchants.

Perhaps acknowledging Christopher Lee’s contribution to the legacy, the series first episode is fittingly dedicated to Dracula and his Disciples. Lee was, inarguably, one of the two most iconic figures to essay the role of Count Dracula. Though Bela Lugosi’s halting speaking manner, grey pallor and widow-peaked hairline remains the more iconic visual portraiture, Lugosi actually only portrayed Count Dracula in a feature-length film twice: in the 1931 original and, for the final time, in Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948). Lee, on the other hand, shot no less than seven Dracula films for Hammer Studios and one for Jess Franco. Though he would log considerably more cinematic hours on screen as the Prince of Darkness, the gentlemanly Lee generously allows here that even some forty years following the actor’s death in 1956, Bela Lugosi was still “inexorably linked” to the public’s persona of Dracula.

Though he would never work with the actor – as he would on two occasions with Lugosi’s occasional foil Boris Karloff - Lee recalled his first attendance at a horror film in a cinema was Lugosi’s Dark Eyes of London (1939). Lugosi would, in some manner of speaking, unwittingly pave the way for Lee’s future assumption in other similarly cloaked roles. As had his predecessor, Lee would portray several other vampire characters on film that were Count Dracula in all but name. Just as Lugosi would exploit his image as Transylvania’s most famous resident in such films as Return of the Vampire and Mark of the Vampire, so would a fanged Christopher Lee with such impersonations as Dracula and Son and Uncle Was a Vampire.

The documentary makes clear that, no matter how celebrated either man’s portrayal was, neither actor held dominion on the character. The film points out that several other actors - Francis Lederer and Lon Chaney Jr. among them – have tackled the role to reasonable degrees of satisfaction. It was also pleasing to see a brief interview segment with one of my favorite Dracula’s, the wizened John Carradine, captured in his eighties here. Carradine triumphantly recounts not only did he appear as Dracula in “three” films for Universal (well, three, if you choose to count his appearance on a 1977 episode of NBC-TV’s McCloud (“McCloud Meets Dracula”). Carradine was also mysteriously prideful of his appearing as a Count Dracula-style character in several obscure films shot in Mexico (Las Vampiras) and the Philippines (the outrageous and exploitative Vampire Hookers). What the Mexican and Filipino efforts might lack in comprehensibility and budget, they’re nonetheless not-to-be-missed totems of low-brow Midnight Movie Madness. For whatever reason, Carradine made no mention of his top-hatted participation the wild and wooly William (“One Shot”) Beaudine western Billy the Kid vs. Dracula (1966), a long-time “guilty pleasure” of mine.

(Barry Monush, author of the new book "Steven Spielberg FAQ" enlightens readers as to how the famed director inspired him to write this overview of the famed director's career.)

BY BARRY MONUSH

As it gets harder these days to find “reliables,” it’s nice to have certain filmmakers still around who have given me more pleasure than pain over the years. And even nicer when you’re given a chance to celebrate them in print. Such is the case with Steven Spielberg.

My publishers, Applause Books, were tossing around possible ideas for further volumes of their FAQ series, and I tossed back at them the suggestion of a Spielberg book. Of course it got an instant response, because absolutely everyone is aware of Steven Spielberg. You needn’t be the sort of film aficionado that follows the scene with fervent interest (i.e. readers of this website) to know he’s out there making movies and has been doing so for some 45 years with a track record of success far exceeding anyone else. When you’re pitching ideas, it helps for your topic to have a high awareness factor in order to get a book on that someone “greenlighted,” but it’s even better when the subject is worthy of the tribute.

To me, the motion picture scene since the 1970s would be inconceivable without the presence of Steven Spielberg. Some would go so far as to say he created the world of motion pictures as we know it today, which shouldn’t necessarily be taken as a high compliment. For everyone who loves the cinematic world of Steven Spielberg, there are plenty who will give you a theatrical grimace at the mere mention of his name. Trust me, I know, I’ve seen it, when people asked me what the subject was for my newest book. They either lit up or cringed. You don’t get to be that well known and that well-to-do financially without making some people a bit resentful or dismissive.

With great fame comes expectations of an unreasonable size. You can’t blow people away with the thrills of Jaws or the sense of wonder inherent in Close Encounters of the Third Kind or E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial and then make a mere “good” movie; you’re expected to score a slam dunk, a home run and a touchdown every time you’re given the ball. As a result, some very good Steven Spielberg films have been shortchanged over the years by those who wanted him to reach Olympian peaks each time they plunked their cash down at the box office. Moviegoers have pigeonholed him according to their own personal tastes and fond memories, and often have stubbornly resisted venturing with him into new territory. Much as “those wonderful people out there in the dark” are loathe to admit it, history has shown that audiences let down filmmakers far more often than filmmakers do the audience. Of course any director worth their salt is going to go in unexpected ways once in a while or try out new genres or techniques, which is what makes movie going something exciting. Believe me, if you had a mild initial response to such movies as Empire of the Sun, Amistad, or Munich, I recommend you see them again. These are all strong, impressive, moving works with something to say about the human condition. If they do not tower as highly or with as much resonance as, say, Schindler’s List, that’s to be forgiven. That’s an awful lofty peak to reach, after all.

I don’t need this constant reassurance of greatness with Spielberg or any filmmaker for that matter. I know he’s good; quite good. Even when I’ve come away disappointed from one of his efforts, I know I wasn’t watching a hack on a downward spiral, but a singular talent whose capabilities were still evident even within the missteps. Such are all the best filmmakers. And Spielberg really is one of the best. It’s been evident from the start; it was even evident in his television work, in the handful of series episodes and movies he made for the small screen before he ventured towards the larger canvas of motion pictures.

I remembered pretty vividly the segment of the Night Gallery pilot he directed long before I even realized who Steven Spielberg was. Blind Joan Crawford’s justifiable punishment for her abominable behavior was dramatized in a lean but eerie fashion: her sight is restored for a brief period only to find herself waking up during a New York blackout. Her accidental stumble through a window was dramatized by dropping a plate of glass and watching it shatter in slow motion. A great touch. Watching the segment again, all these years later, there’s nothing in this credit to suggest that its director had never before taken on a professional directing job prior to this, nor that he had only recently turned 22 years of age. His work was that of a professional with decades of experience behind him.

By Lee Pfeiffer

The Warner Archive has released the 1970 counter-culture drama The Strawberry Statement. The film was released in an era of increasing unrest, sandwiched between the 1968 Chicago riots at the Democratic convention, the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr and Robert F. Kennedy and the shooting of student protesters at Kent State University (which, in a nightmarish example of unintended "good timing" occurred one month after the release of this film.) Although the movie was honored at the Cannes Film Festival, the general consensus was that, like Antonioni's more notorious failure Zabriskie Point, the film was an unfocused and unsuccessful attempt to play upon the unrest among young Americans during this era. Looking at the movie today, that criticism still holds up. The story centers on Simon (Bruce Davison), an apolitical student at a San Francisco university (it was actually filmed at Berkeley) who gradually becomes interested in the protest movement. Students are on strike and are occupying the dean's office (a not uncommon practice of the day) to protest the closing of a community playground for inner city children. The university, which owns the property, intends to put in an ROTC office temporarily, and then lease the land to big business. The students have succeeded in virtually closing down the university and Simon becomes more enamored with their cause. Before long he is occupying the dean's office, too, and begins a romantic relationship with a more radical protester, Linda (Kim Darby). The film meanders between their encounters, life on campus and anti-Establishment rallies. However, a clear depiction of the characters or their motivations is never provided. Simon is charismatic, but rather hollow. Linda is never presented in anything but a superficial manner. We know nothing of her background or motivations. There are no other major characters, though reliable supporting actors like Bud Cort, James Coco and Bob Balaban contribute positively. 

The film's director, Stuart Hagmann, had a brief and rather undistinguished career, primarily highlighted by this MGM production. He relies on fast cuts, inventive camera angles and a score filled with rock and folk music provided by Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young, Buffy Sainte-Marie and Thunderclap Newman to compensate for the weak screenplay that had been based on a recently-published novel. The script by Israel Horovitz does provide some nuance in assessing protest movements. This was filmed during an era in which the military was draft was going full force, even as the Vietnam War was becoming increasingly unpopular. Adding insult to injury, the young people who fought that war weren't allowed to vote at the time because the voting age was 21. (Even today, with a voting age of 18, soldiers who are deemed old enough to drive tanks into combat can't legally enjoy a beer.) Consequently, presidential candidates who had run on a Vietnam withdrawal policy in 1968 (Senators Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy), had enormous support from a base that could not vote for them. The war that had been started by Democrats and escalated by the newly-elected Republican President, Richard Nixon, seemed to be a quagmire that would go on forever. (Curiously, our Afghanistan quagmire was started by a Republican president and escalated by a Democratic president, so not much has changed in terms of the political Establishment.)  Where The Strawberry Statement succeeds is in its depiction of the various motives those who comprise a protest movement might have. Some are true believers, some are idealists, some are just weak-willed followers, and others just want to get laid in the name of upholding democracy. Radical protesters complain about a lack of freedom and rights, even as they ironically decorate their dorm rooms with posters of Che Guevara, a man who sacrificed his life in an attempt to tear down dictatorships even as he courted the totalitarian state of Fidel Castro. There are rather pretentious uses of film clips of key political figures of the day including H. Rap Brown and President Nixon, who is seen serenading White House guests while playing Home on the Range on the piano. There must be significance to this somewhere, but it comes across as bizarre. The film does show how even the most sincere political protest movements, from the Tea Party on the right and the Occupy movement on the left, inevitably become defined by the crazy fringe element that often negates the validity of their message. (In this film, protesters assail police officers, using their "Peace Now" signs as instruments of destruction.) The film succeeds in capturing the craziness of the era in the final, harrowing sequence in which an army of policeman brutally assail students at a sit-in, who are peacefully signing "Give Peace a Chance." Here, director Hagmann finds his stride and provides a truly mesmerizing sequence. However, despite the fine performances of the cast, the film falls short of its overall potential. 

“WHAT FAMILY DOESN’T HAVE ITS UPS AND DOWNS?”

By Raymond Benson

One of the gems of 1968 was The Lion in Winter, a multi-nominee for the Oscars (including Best Picture and Director), and one of the better period costume dramas that seemed to be so popular in the 60s. Capitalizing on the success of Becket and A Man for All Seasons, Winter is based on a stage play by James Goldman, who also wrote the screenplay and won an Oscar for it.

While the picture is a handsome production, its primary asset is the acting. What a cast, and what performances! Katharine Hepburn, as Eleanor of Aquitaine, picked up the Best Actress trophy (although that year there was a tie—she shared the award with Barbra Streisand in Funny Girl). Peter O’Toole stars as Henry II for the second time (he played a younger version of the man in Becket, four years earlier), and received a nomination for Best Actor. For my money, this is the performance out of many nominations for which he should have won—he dominates the movie with a commanding, almost-mad presence. Interestingly, the actor was only 36 when the film was made, and he plays a Henry who is in his fifties. On the other hand, Hepburn was 61 when she made the picture, and she plays a 45-year-old Eleanor. The miracle is that one doesn’t notice either actor’s true age.

Also rounding out the cast are Henry’s three sons, played by a young Anthony Hopkins (as Richard the Lionheart), John Castle (as Geoffrey), and Nigel Terry (as John, who later became King John). While all three are terrific, and it’s especially enlightening to examine Hopkins’ performance and compare it to his later more renowned work, the real revelation in the picture is the appearance of a very young Timothy Dalton as King Philip II of France. Dalton is outstanding in a small but pivotal role upon which the plot hinges.

The year is 1182. Henry II decides to hold a Christmas party at the castle, so he lets his wife Eleanor out of prison (!) so she can attend along with their three surviving sons (the others are long dead) and Henry’s young mistress, Alais (Jane Merrow). Eleanor has long accepted with grace and humor that Henry beds other women and that their marriage is over—although throughout the course of the story it is apparent that there are deep wounds in her heart. All three sons are vying for the throne since Henry, being in his fifties, is on his way to the grave—although one wouldn’t know it from the energy he displays. Henry’s favorite is young John, who is a bit of a bumpkin. Eleanor prefers Richard. Geoffrey prefers himself. Oddly, whoever is chosen gets Alais!

In short, The Lion in Winter is the story of a dysfunctional family. Eleanor wryly delivers the line that is the title of this review at a key moment after the men attempt to kill each other. In fact, the script is full of great lines. Henry: “What shall we hang?—the holly, or each other?” Eleanor: “In a world where carpenters get resurrected, everything is possible.” Eleanor (to one of her sons): “Hush dear, mother’s fighting.”

Kino Lorber’s newly restored 4K Blu-ray looks marvelous, and the sound is excellent. It shows off John Barry’s Oscar-winning score (play it loud!) and includes an audio commentary by the late director Anthony Harvey. There is a supplemental interview with sound recordist Simon Kaye, which is fine, but one wishes there could have been interviews with some of the surviving stars such as Hopkins and Dalton. The theatrical trailer and other Kino Lorber title trailers are also included.

The Lion in Winter is a top-notch exercise in superlative acting and grand writing. It is prestige cinema at its finest. Don’t miss it.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON

(Actress Jane Merrow discusses the film in an exclusive interview in Cinema Retro #41, coming in May.)

Forman directing James Cagney in "Ragtime".

BY LEE PFEIFFER

Milos Forman, the Czech immigrant to Hollywood who would be awarded two Oscars, has died at age 86. Forman was a rising star in Czechoslovakia in the 1960s, directing such lighthearted, quirky films as "Black Peter" and "The Fireman's Ball". Forman's films were breaking new ground at a time when the progressive Czech government was pushing the envelope against Soviet control and enjoying new freedoms. All of that came crashing down in 1968 when the short-lived "Prague Spring" was crushed by the Soviet invasion. Forman immigrated to America and found the opportunity to make films for major studios. However, his first effort, the critically acclaimed 1971 generation gap comedy "Taking Off" failed at the boxoffice. In 1975, Forman was given another chance, this time by producer Michael Douglas to direct the film version of Ken Kesey's "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest". The film swept the major Oscar categories and Forman was honored as Best Director. Forman was painstaking in his choice of film projects, motivated more by passion for the subject than finding a wide audience, although he did direct the film adaptation of the Broadway stage musical "Hair" in 1979. However, the movie came along years too late to click with young viewers. In 1981, Forman adapted E.L. Doctorow's bestseller "Ragtime" to the screen. The massive production was at odds with his tendency to direct smaller, more personal stories. The film won wide acclaim in some quarters but was an expensive failure at the boxoffice. He rebounded, however, in 1984 with the film version of the stage hit "Amadeus", and once again won the Best Director Oscar. Forman worked only sporadically in the following years, directing such diverse fare as "Heartburn", "Valmont", "Man on the Moon" and "The People vs. Larry Flynt". For more click here.

By Don L. Stradley

The cataclysmic prison riot near the end of The Big House (1930) reaches such a fevered pitch that army tanks are called in to combat the inmates.  The tanks roll into the prison yard like armor-plated creatures,   and then, unexpectedly,   start rolling towards the screen, towards the viewer. What did movie audiences think in 1930 as these shiny, black, menacing machines moved towards them?  By the riot's end, a single tank crashes through a wall, its main gun slowly swiveling, as sinister anything in H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds. It’s impressive even now, watching on an Acer laptop in 2014. What was it like in one of the vaunted movie palaces of yesteryear?  Did audiences cheer because the army was going to save the day? Or was there some fear, too, fear that the machines were coming not just for criminals, but for everybody…

The Big House, now available on DVD as part of the Warner Bros Archive Collection, was a spectacular success for MGM, and ushered in the prison movie as a viable genre.  Films had been set in prisons before, but it was The Big House that established the characters and themes that would mark the genre forever (ie. the scared new guy, the crusty lifers, the conniving weasel, the kindly old guard, the dour but ineffectual warden, the inevitable jail break, etc.).  The film was also a marked contrast to the slick films made by MGM at the time, causing Chester B. Bahn of the Syracuse Herald to write that this "stark tragedy" was "so horrible, so devastating, that you don't want to think about it, don't want to talk about it."

Although prison movies weren't churned out the way westerns and horror movies were during the 1930s, the subject undoubtedly had legs.  We still see prison movies today, as well as TV shows (of both the scripted and “non-scripted” variety). But every prison movie or show we see now has something of The Big House in its DNA.  The Big House did it first, and I’m not sure if any modern prison movies have done it any better.  More explicit, perhaps, but not better.

For one thing, The Big House was unabashedly artsy. Directed by George Hill with photography by Harold Wenstrom, the film is framed by rich, deep blacks that gave the atmosphere a harder edge than most black and white films of the day. A more accurate description of the film would be “black & grey,” for there isn’t much white in it.  Grey is the color of the prison uniform, and grey is the color of the detainees’ pasty complexions. The prison is a murky place, and when a con is being marched into the “dungeon” to serve some time in solitary, it’s as if he’s being marched into the very wings of Hell. 

The opening scene follows a truck filled with new prisoners as it approaches the monolithic, unnamed building.  There’s something about the scene that looks like an illustration come to life, especially when the prisoners step out of the truck and appear incredibly tiny as they march into the prison. Kent (Robert Montgomery) is a newbie, sentenced to 10 years for manslaughter after killing a man in a car accident.  He’s thrown into a cramped cell with two legitimately bad men, Butch (Wallace Beery) and Morgan (Chester Morris).  One of the warden’s aids laments that a young kid doesn’t stand a chance in a cell with such hard cases, to which the warden agrees that overcrowding and idleness are the banes of the prison system.   Kent’s journey through prison life, though, is only part of the story.   The film's greatness comes from the interplay between Butch and Morgan, for they are two hardened criminals who lean on each other to get through their dreary days.

Butch is downright sadistic, the sort of brute who harasses people only to back off and say, “I was only kidding.” He’s allegedly murdered several people, including a few of his past girlfriends, but one never knows if he’s serious or not. He also lets his temperament get the best of him, even turning on his buddy Morgan more than once during the film. Morgan, meanwhile, falls for Kent’s sister (Leila Hyams) when he spots her during visiting hours.  

Left to right: Stars Dwayne Johnson, Naomie Harris, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Malin Akerman, Joe Manganiello and director Brad Peyton at the Warner Bros. junket. (Photo: copyright Mark Cerulli. All rights reserved.)

BY MARK CERULLI

Back when he used to wrestle for the WWE, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson would ask, “Can you smell what The Rock is cooking?” Well, his latest big screen blowout, Rampage smells a lot like jet fuel – there are more smashed planes and helicopters in this film than in ten Godzilla movies combined.

Based on the 1980s video game of the same name, the big screen version features not one, not two, but THREE hyper-deadly creatures making a beeline for downtown Chicago. Johnson plays a zoo primatologist who prefers animals to people, reluctantly teaming with a lovely geneticist (Naomie Harris) to stop them. Although Johnson is the movie’s star, he shares the screen with an even bigger hero: a massive gorilla named “George”. “They’re a lot alike,” director Brad Peyton said, “They’re both funny, they’re both alpha males and they’re both the biggest guy in every room.” Rampage is Johnson’s third collaboration with Peyton, who previously directed him in San Andreas and Journey 2: Mysterious Island. Ahead of the film’s debut, Warner Bros staged an elaborate press junket at a Hollywood studio where key cast and crewmembers talked about the film…

“The conceit of this idea is a ridiculous one, “Johnson told the assembled crowd of reporters, “Three gigantic monsters destroying the city of Chicago… we took a lot of swings at it to make it fun and give the story an anchor in heart and soul, which is my relationship with my best friend – this rare, gigantic albino gorilla.”

(Photo: copyright Mark Cerulli. All rights reserved.)

“We wanted to make a monster movie that would stand the test of time,” Johnson continued. “There’s been a lot of great ones – King Kong, Godzilla, even Jurassic Park I’d include – so we wanted to raise the bar, even a little bit and anchor it in a relationship.” Since George, the gorilla, exhibits many human-like qualities and has a deep bond with Johnson’s character, he goes all out to save him from the inevitable military hardware brought out to take the huge ape down. Special note should be made of the remarkable visuals created by New Zealand-based Weta Digital, which has a long history of creating amazing effects in blockbusters like Avatar, Justice League and War For The Planet Of The Apes.

 (Photo courtesy Warner Bros.)

The film gives Naomie Harris – who Cinema Retro readers know as Moneypenny in the Daniel Craig Bonds – a chance to get out of MI6 to dodge falling buildings and gigantic creatures, an experience that was well out of her acting comfort zone: “This was reacting to tennis balls and I was absolutely terrified,” Harris says with a laugh, referring to the weeks of complex green screen work she had to do to dodge said giant monsters. Luckily, her amiable co-star came to the rescue: “I had to lean on Dwayne, he’s the master of this and I was completely lost in the beginning.”

“It’s odd that my comfort zone is destruction,” Johnson added, which got a big laugh. And destruction there is – from a space station spinning high above the earth to Chicago’s Magnificent Mile being torn up, Rampage is a fast-moving visual feast, which the cast doesn’t take too seriously and neither should the audience. Instead Rampage is a ride meant to be enjoyed… As the movie’s director summed up: “What I’ve learned from him (Dwayne) is ‘When you get up to the plate, try and hit a grand slam.’ As a Canadian, I wasn’t trained to think like that, but this gigantic Hawaiian dude really knows how to do this right!”

(Photo courtesy Warner Bros.)

Rampage roars into theaters Friday, April 13^th, from Warner Bros. Pictures. Click here to visit official site.

####

The feud between John Sturges and McQueen was tragic...he had made McQueen a star in The Magnificent Seven and The Great Escape. However, McQueen's long-delayed plans to bring a racing movie to the screen culminated in the ill-conceived Le Mans. The two old friends feuded over the film's concept. After Sturges quit the project, "B" movie director Lee H. Katzen took over. The film was one of the few outright bombs of McQueen's career, consisting mostly of footage of speeding cars and virtually no plot. (Thanks to Cinema Retro contributing writer Steve Saragossi for sharing this rare photo). 

Riding high: at the peak of his career, Reynolds and Clint Eastwood were the top boxoffice stars in the world.

At age 82, Burt Reynolds is beaten but not broken. The one-time superstar had many ups-and-downs in his career and he's now walking with a cane, the result of doing many dangerous stunts that went wrong. But he's still in there kicking. Reynolds, who resides in Florida, mentors acting students and is also starring in a new film, appropriately titled "The Last Movie Star", about a forgotten leading man who is to receive an honor late in life at a Nashville film festival. Reynolds was recently in New York to make an appearance at a retrospective of his films and was interviewed by Kathryn Shattuck of the New York Times. He comes across as candid and very much the same kind of wise guy that he popularized on screen. Click here to read. 

BY DARREN ALLISON

It’s great to see German label All Score Media back on the soundtrack circuit. Their latest vinyl LP release No Place for a Man (ASM 045) is a fictional homage to the Italian Spaghetti Western genre of the ‘60s and ‘70s. Performed by the duo Mondo Sangue (Cristiano Sangueduro and Cristina Casereccia), the score is a passionate and honest tribute to the iconic genre soundtracks of the past. The influences are certainly there, from Ennio Morricone to the late great Franco De Gemini, for whom the album is quietly dedicated. There is a great deal of tradition to be found within the album tracks. One could perhaps argue it is almost stereotypical, but never in the negative sense of the word. The Spaghetti Western score had of course become somewhat ‘formulised’ during its reign, so expect lovely examples of twanging guitars, harmonica, epic choral vocals and mouth harps. There are also a couple of vocal tracks such as ‘Somewhere in the West’ performed by Cristina Casereccia and ‘’No Place for a Man’ has Casereccia duet with Alberto Rocca. All of these tracks work very well and create a comforting sense of familiarity. Listening to the track ‘Il Portoghese’ and its delicate whistling motif transports you straight back to Morricone’s ‘A Fistful of Dynamite” (1971). Overall, fans of the genre should love this piece. There are not too many labels delivering these retrospective, tribute scores, so they really should be held dear. Cineploit are another label who produce period sounding, fictional scores and in many ways offer a sense of continuity, a linkage to the past and everything that was so appealing about it.

All Score Media have produced a delightful sounding and excellent package for this release. The album sleeve is beautifully illustrated by Sue Elderberry. The 180g vinyl LPs are limited to just 666 pieces and are all individually hand numbered. Each LP also comes with an autographed photo card signed by vocal duo Cristina Casereccia and Alberto Rocca and there’s also a download code so as to listen when on the move. There is obviously a great deal of love gone into this release and it clearly shines through. No Place for a Man is an excellent production that should be both respected and applauded.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER

After a costly divorce, Russell Crowe decided to take stock of the vast amounts of memorabilia he had accumulated over the years, including an abundance of costumes and props from his own movies, including a leather jock strap from his 2005 boxing film "Cinderella Man". He decided to part with some of the cherished items at auction in Sydney, where the actor made a surprise personal appearance at the event. In total, the auction raised $3.7 million in revenue, leading the Oscar-winning star to quip that it wasn't a bad hourly rate. Indeed- although it doesn't put much of a dent in the divorce agreement that reputedly saw his wife gain possession of an $11 million mansion and a $20 million payout. That can buy a lot a leather jock straps.... For full coverage and the final prices realized on individual items, click here.

BY LEE PFEIFFER

I've become somewhat jaded and downright cynical when it comes to the tidal wave of musical stage productions based on popular, non-musical motion pictures. So it was with a sense of wariness that I approached the world premiere engagement of "The Sting" at the Papermill Playhouse in Millburn, NJ. After all, the classic, Oscar-winning 1973 film doesn't need musical production numbers to "improve it". There was already a great deal of interest in the production prior to the relatively last-minute announcement last month that the production would star Harry Connick, Jr. That sent already healthy tickets sales into overdrive and you'd be hard-pressed to find seats for the engagement, which runs through April 29. It doesn't take long to set aside one's suspicions that this might be a lightweight rip-off of a great film. As with all Papermill shows, this one first impresses with its creative and often ingenious sets designed by Beowulf Boritt and the magnificent orchestra under the musical direction of Fred Lassen. Not having seen the film version in decades, I can't say precisely how much of the movie's script by David S. Ward makes it into the musical production, but the book by Bob Martin  seemed to include most of the important elements. The plot, set during the Depression,  can be summarized succinctly by simply saying it involves the teaming of a legendary con man, Henry Gondorff (Harry Connick, Jr.) with an aspiring young protege, Johnny Hooker (J. Harrison Ghee) to use the ultimate scam to take down Doyle Lonnegan (Tom Hewitt), a filthy rich, ruthless crime kingpin who has murdered an old friend of Gondorff and Hooker. The elaborate plan requires military-like strategy, a good deal of money and a virtual army of experienced grifters. The pace of the production is suitably brisk, the dialogue punctuated with wisecracks and most of the musical numbers enable the advancement of the story line. The score by Mark Kollman and Greg Kotts (with contributions by Connick) is breezy and fun even if there isn't a single breakthrough number that you'll find yourself humming afterward. The dance numbers are outstanding thanks to the talents of choreographer Warren Carlyle. Connick's legions of loyal fans will be pleased that he gets to perform some solo numbers and he proves to be a very able and charismatic actor, as well. His on-stage partner in crime (Ghee) also delivers the goods with an assured and highly amusing performance. We won't make the case that Connick and Ghee will make you forget the teaming of Paul Newman and Robert Redford but they clearly have broad appeal to the audience, if the reaction at the show I attended is any indication. It must be said that the show benefits from some sensational supporting performances with Tom Hewitt in the villainous role so memorably played on film by Robert Shaw, Kate Shindle as a hooker with a heart of gold, Janet Dascal as a femme fatale and Kevyn Morrow as the ill-fated grifter whose murder sets off the caper especially impressive. Special praise should be lavished on Tony-nominated director John Rando, who has the daunting task of seamlessly overseeing the movements of a very large cast, which includes an abundance of nattily-clad con men and scantily-clad prostitutes, as well as ensuring that the cumbersome, elaborate sets are moved quickly and flawlessly. This production cost a considerable sum and every penny of it is up there on the stage. The goal is very obviously to move the musical a scant few miles to Broadway, as so many other Papermill productions have.

Robert Shaw, Robert Redford and Paul Newman in the Oscar-winning film version.

The production can still use some tweaking. The first act ends with the con men having successfully amassed their "army" of fellow charlatans, thus the audience is eager to get to the actual caper in the second act. However, there are so many musical numbers (all of them admittedly impressive) that it distracts from the sense of anticipation to see the elaborate "sting" enacted. At least one of the numbers can be eliminated because several are superfluous to the main story line. Additionally, although there is an abundance of great Scott Joplin songs, audiences may feel cheated that there are only a few fleeting, occasional strains of the legendary "The Entertainer", so memorably arranged for the film version by Marvin Hamlisch. In a recent interview, Harry Connick Jr explains why he had reservations about using the tune, but that won't negate the feeling of disappointment by viewers. It's like making a James Bond movie and not including the signature theme. Still, these are minor criticisms. "The Sting" musical production has not been created with the intention of winning awards or pleasing critics, who are generally down on these adaptations of hit movies for the stage. Its main purpose is to appeal to mass audiences and if the reaction I witnessed is any indication, the creative team has succeeded admirably. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

BY ADRIAN SMITH 

James Bawden was a TV columnist for the Toronto Star, and Ron Miller was TV editor at the San Jose Mercury News and is a former president of the Television Critics Association. During their respective careers stretching back some fifty years the list of stars they have interviewed reads like a Who’s Who of Hollywood. These two volumes bring together an incredible assortment of interviews from almost the birth of cinema itself, with Buster Keaton, Jackie Coogan and Gloria Swanson representing the silent era. The great leading men are all here, including James Stewart, Henry Fonda, Kirk Douglas, Victor Mature and Cary Grant, and of course classic leading ladies like Bette Davis, Janet Leigh, Fay Wray and Joan Fontaine. Along the way they also met character actors and horror stars like Ernest Borgnine, Victor Buono, John Carradine, and Lon Chaney Jr., and even singing cowboys Gene Autry and Roy Rogers make an appearance. With each book containing over thirty interviews, this is an opportunity to revisit the golden era of Hollywood. Many of the interviews, generally to publicise their latest film, were conducted on sets, in theatre dressing rooms, or if they were lucky, the star’s home, and the authors preface each interview with their own recollection of the moment, giving us a little more insight into how these stars were when the cameras were switched off. Ron Miller has even written an entire chapter titled “My seven minutes alone with Elizabeth Taylor,” recalling the lengths he was required to go to in order to interview with star whilst she was filming the TV miniseries North and South (1985). The effort that went into securing those seven minutes is possibly more entertaining than the interview itself, and secures some sympathy for those dogged TV and film journalists who have to jump through sometimes dozens of hoops before getting their moment.

Miller has helpfully also provided a chapter titled “How to Talk to a Movie Star,” which provides invaluable advice for anyone considering taking this up as a career, including a recollection of the time James Bawden interviewed Julie Harris. “I hate star interviews!” she exclaimed, so Bawden quickly told her that he had never understood Shakespeare until the time he saw her in a production of Romeo and Juliet. “You’ve convinced me!” she replied and spent an hour answering his questions. The lesson? Flattery frequently gets you somewhere.

From nervously interviewing stars like Boris Karloff when barely out of their teens to developing personal friendships with stars such as Bob Hope, Bawden and Miller’s collection is a feast of nostalgia and insight into a never-to-be-repeated era of Hollywood history, and these two books are a must for the bookshelf of any respecting film fan or potential Hollywood journalist. (Both books are published by University Press of Kentucky.)

CLICK HERE TO ORDER "CONVERSATIONS WITH CLASSIC FILMS STARS" FROM AMAZON USA

CLICK HERE TO ORDER "CONVERSATIONS WITH CLASSIC FILMS STARS" FROM AMAZON UK

CLICK HERE TO ORDER "YOU AIN'T HEARD NOTHIN' YET" FROM AMAZON USA

CLICK HERE TO ORDER "YOU AIN'T HEARD NOTHIN' YET" FROM AMAZON USA

Here's the original American theatrical trailer for director Robert Aldrich's classic 1967 WWII adventure "The Dirty Dozen". Interestingly, the narrator provides the actor's personal assessments of the characters they play. For some reason Jim Brown is referred to as "Jimmy Brown" and Donald Sutherland, then a struggling character actor, is only glimpsed and isn't mentioned by name in the credits. He recently told "60 Minutes" that the film helped raise his profile considerably. However, as the trailer was cut long before the film's release, he was still largely unknown at the time. 

The annual Steve McQueen Car and Motorcycle Show will take place this year on June 18 in Chino Hills, California. As always, the proceeds will benefit the charity organization Boys Republic, a camp where Steve McQueen spent some of his troubled youth. The iconic actor never forgot the positive influence that Boys Republic had on him in his early years. Despite its name, the Club also now benefits young girls who have challenges in life. The annual event operates with the permission and participation of the McQueen family and is much-anticipated by classic car lovers. For details, click here.

RETRO-ACTIVE: THE BEST FROM THE CINEMA RETRO ARCHIVE

BY LEE PFEIFFER

Remember that scene in Mel Brooks' The Producers when the first performance of Springtime for Hitler has just been performed for an opening night crowd on Broadway? The camera pans around the silent audience to show people sitting slack-jawed, mouths agape at the travesty they have just witnessed. I had a similar experience watching Sextette for the first time. Mind you, as a long time retro movie analyst, I was well-aware of the film's reputation as a notorious misfire. However, no criticism can quite prepare anyone for the experience of actually watching this bizarre spectacle unfold before your eyes. Scorpion Video has made that possible with a special edition DVD release of the 1978 musical comedy that was to be Mae West's second attempt to make a big screen comeback. (The first, the notorious 1970 bomb Myra Breckenridge, outraged her when she saw the final cut.) Sextette went into production in 1976, produced by "Briggs and Sullivan", a headed-for-oblivion duo whose pretentious billing perhaps unwittingly brings to mind circus masters Barnum and Bailey. The producers had acquired the rights to West's play Sextet, which apparently resulted in legal and censorship problems for the great screen diva way back when it was first presented. By the time it was dusted off for audiences in the 1970s, we were already living in an era in which Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice could comfortably slip between the sheets together, thus rendering the sexual humor in West's farce seem about as daring as a Disney production.

The film, directed by the generally admirable Ken Hughes (Chitty Chitty Bang Bang), presents West as Marlo Manners, a legendary diva of the cinema who still causes hearts to flutter whenever she makes a public appearance. When we first see her (a full 8 minutes into the movie), she is checking into a London hotel to enjoy her honeymoon with her latest (and sixth husband), handsome young Sir Michael Barrington (Timothy Dalton). It isn't long before Barrington realizes that Marlo has a fanatical fan base and a seemingly endless string of former and would-be lovers clamoring for her attention. Among them, some ex-husbands including a crazy movie director (Ringo Starr) and a gangster who was presumed dead (George Hamilton). Then there is a Soviet diplomat (Tony Curtis)  who is the central figure in a world peace conference that coincidentally happens to be taking place in the same hotel. Add to the zany mix her hyper-active business manager (Dom DeLuise), a singing waiter (Alice Cooper!) and a fey dress designer (The Who's Keith Moon) and you probably have to admire whoever managed to get this eclectic group of talented people together, even if they all should have known better. West's old pal George Raft even shows up and rides an elevator with her.  The razor-thin plots involves Marlo trying to consummate her marriage to Barrington, who is a naive virgin who inadvertently implies to Hollywood gossip guru Rona Barrett that he is gay. In fact, just about the only audience that might derive any visual pleasure from the film are gay males, due to the abundance of scantily-clad muscle men who flex their abs every time Marlo walks by. To make matters even more bizarre, the cast occasionally breaks out into songs as though this was some old Busby Berkeley musical. The nadir of this is reached when an understandably embarrassed Dalton is forced to sing the Captain and Tennille's Love Will Keep Us Together to his on-screen bride. (Presumably, Dalton left this achievement off his credentials or he probably wouldn't have ended up playing James Bond.) In the midst of this madness, Marlo also barges in on the peace conference and convinces all the diplomats (including Walter Pidgeon!) to engage in some kumbaya moments of diplomacy.

West was certainly a screen legend in her time and one of the most liberated women in show business. You have to admire her for promoting women's lib and sexual freedom in an era in which most people were tone deaf to such sentiments. However, knowing when to quit was obviously not one of her attributes. As Marlo brings twenty-something men to states of sexual frenzy in Sextette, you keep waiting for at least one joke regarding the fact that the woman was in her 80s when the film was made. Unfortunately, throughout the entire movie, no such realization is apparent. Men salivate over her, as West creaks stiffly from frame to frame looking like the Marie Antoinette figure from Madame Tussaud's wax museum. West had parlayed her limited schtick of tossing off sexually suggestive one-liners into a full time screen career, not so much acting as merely quipping. It may have worked great in her prime opposite Cary Grant and W.C. Fields, but it's a sad spectacle to see Ringo Starr try to control his urges in her presence. The only cast member to emerge unscathed is DeLuise, who gives an energetic and amusing performance that even sees him jumping atop a piano and engaging in an impressive tap dance.

The Scorpion DVD transfer is excellent and includes an extensive and spellbinding interview with Ian Whitcomb, who served as a music consultant on the film. A good friend of Mae West's, he relates affectionate tales of their relationship and provides some uncomfortable details about the filming. (West would periodically seem to lose her powers of concentration and often had to have her lines read to her through an ear piece.) He also reads entries from his diary that were written during production.  There is also a very informative on-screen essay by film critic Dennis Dermody that explores the film's disastrous reception by critics and the public. An original TV spot is also included.

Sextette easily manages to gain that rare status of being so bad it's good. You must add this DVD to your collection.

(Look for an article about the making of the film in Cinema Retro #26)

Click here to order from Amazon

BY LEE PFEIFFER

If you're generally in the mood for light, uplifting movies, chances are you aren't enamored of the boxing genre. To be sure, the wonderful "Rocky" films assured viewers of a happy, upbeat ending, but they were marketed for mass audience appeal. On the other side of the coin, most of the films that explore the ironically nicknamed "Sweet Science" of boxing center on the gritty underbelly of the sport. As far back as Wallace Beery's "The Champ" through "Champion", "Requiem for a Heavyweight", "Fat City" and "Raging Bull", the general theme has been to present the peculiar world of boxing and boxers as one of unrelenting cruelty, exploitation, double-crosses and physical punishment. Small wonder that few such films had viewers emerging from theaters with broad smiles on their faces. Yet, the boxing genre is a reliable staple when it comes to presenting thoroughly engrossing tales and the latest entry, a low-budget British film, "Jawbone" can justifiably take its place among the major achievements in the genre. 

You probably never heard of "Jawbone". which had a very limited theatrical release in the UK and is now making its debut in America through a DVD release from Lionsgate. I had no expectations for the movie but decided to give the review screener a try, as I've always had a weakness for boxing films."Jawbone" grabs you from the very first frames. We see the central character, Jimmy McCabe (Johnny Harris) in the depths of depression, sitting night after night in the dock areas of London and under the city's bridges swilling down hard liquor from a bottle. We learn that he is destitute and about to be evicted from his childhood home which he shared with his beloved mother, who passed away some months before. He's offered housing by the local council but he stubbornly refuses. It's a battle he can't win and he ends up homeless. We learn he was once a boxer of some repute and out of desperation, he returns to the gritty gym where he once trained. The owner, Bill Carney (Ray Winstone), was once Jimmy's mentor, a function he still provides for street kids from the neighborhood he continues to train. Jimmy lost Bill's respect when he began his downward spiral, but he implores his old friend to give him one more chance by allowing him to train at the gym and to lodge there as well. Bill has a heart-to-heart talk with Jimmy and informs him that any return to his bad habits will see him permanently banned from the gym. Grateful, Jimmy joins Alcoholics Anonymous but is so ashamed of his transgressions that he can't accept the outpouring of support from the other members. Still, he resists taking to the bottle and begins an intense period of training. Bill and his partner Eddie ((Michael Smiley) recognize that he still has some of his old abilities and support his efforts at redemption. However, Jimmy desperately needs some money so he seeks out an old acquaintance, Joe Padgett (Ian McShane), a superficially friendly fight promoter who specializes in matches that are so brutal they aren't officially recognized.The smarmy Joe treats the starving Jimmy to a fat steak dinner and advances him a couple of hundred quid- then tells him he can arrange for him to make some sure money by participating in grueling off-the-grid match against a particularly vicious, undefeated opponent. He warns that Jimmy will probably be pulverized but the loser is guaranteed a paltry 2500 pounds, of which Joe will take a 50% slice.

"Jawbone" follows some well-worn story elements of the genre. We see Jimmy rally his strength, train to the point of exhaustion and arrive at the big match. He finds it closer to the experience of being a gladiator in ancient Rome. There are the bare bones symbols of civility: a referee and a busty ring girl who holds up a sign announcing each round. but the only rule is not to hit below the waist. Anything and everything else goes. Jimmy finds himself the underdog amidst a roaring crowd of barbarians who are cheering on the vicious champion. The fight that follows is as terrifically exciting and well-filmed as any you've seen in more commercial boxing movies. But "Jawbone" is about much more than this one exciting sequence. It's about the human condition and the ability- or inability- of one man to conquer his personal demons. The film is superbly acted with writer/star Johnny Harris giving the kind of performance that generally gets BAFTA and Oscar recognition. Similarly, the supporting cast is superb with Winstone and Smiley particularly good and McShane riveting in his small but pivotal role. Much credit goes to director Thomas Napper, a highly regarded second-unit director on numerous blockbuster films, who breaks out as a director of great skill with this film. Although "Jawbone" has many elements of the traditional boxing film, it steadfastly avoids the predictable love story. There isn't a love interest for Jimmy because he can barely keep himself alive. Harris's script resonates with great, believable dialogue and the film is complimented by a fine musical score by Paul Weller, excellent cinematography by Tat Radcliffe and editing by David Charap. Everything about "Jawbone" is impressive, especially the fact that Harris and Napper manage to convey a great deal of emotion into the brief 90 minute running time. There isn't a wasted frame and by the film's emotional climax you realize it didn't need to run a second longer. This is economic filmmaking at its best. The movie is an outstanding achievement for all concerned and one can only gripe that it didn't get the theatrical distribution it so richly deserved. However, the Lionsgate DVD offers a very fine transfer and a very interesting "making of" documentary that describes how the bare bones production came together and ended up looking so good. There is also a gallery of trailers for other Lionsgate releases.

"Jawbone" is one of the best indie films I've seen in quite some time. If you'll excuse an unpardonable pun, it's a knockout.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON

News blurb from Film Daily, November 20, 1958 regarding the beginning of production on "One-Eyed Jacks". Stanley Kubrick was originally signed to be the director but he had a falling out with star Marlon Brando, who was also producing the film. Brando ended up taking over the direction, a bold move for someone with no experience behind the camera. "Jacks" went far over-budget due to Brando's sense of perfectionism and laissez faire attitude regarding studio concerns. The film wasn't ready for release until 1961, following a contentious period during which considerable footage had to be cut in order to produce a final version of the film everyone felt was acceptable. The movie earned high marks from critics and did attract large audiences that should have ensured a significant profit, but due to the fact the film ended up costing over $6 million, it was deemed a money-loser for Paramount. Nevertheless, Brando did create an innovative take on the western genre and a riveting film, as well. However, he never aspired to direct a film again.