Director Jan Zabeil's 2017 adventure drama "Three Peaks" won acclaim on the film festival circuit and it now comes to DVD in America via Kino Lorber. To say the film isn't for everyone is an understatement but patience is a virtue here as the glacially-paced story finally kicks into gear an hour into its 89 minute running-time. Until then, the movie plays out so slowly that it makes Peter Weir's "Picnic at Hanging Rock" resemble "The Fast and the Furious". The film follows the emotional ups and downs of Lea (Berenice Bejo), a young French mother who is divorced from her unseen American husband. She and her German boyfriend of two years, Aaron (Alexander Fehling) are raising her young son Tristan (Arian Montgomery) and there are concerns about the nature of Aaron's relationship with him. The movie opens with the three main characters arriving for a holiday stay at a small, remote cottage located at the base of the spectacular, snow-capped Dolomite mountains in Italy. Although Lea and Aaron are clearly in a loving relationship, they are haunted by how Tristan regards Aaron, who goes above-and-beyond to ingratiate himself to the boy. However, Lea worries that Aaron is assuming the role of father to Tristan at the expensive of his relationship with his real father. (Since we never see the father, we have to rely on Lea's assurance to Aaron that he is "a good man". ) Tristan himself sees confused. At times he calls Aaron "daddy" and at other times he seems to resent his presence, a feeling echoed when Aaron confesses to Lea that he sometimes feels the same way about Tristan. Director Zabeil is in no hurry to get to any aspect of the film that resonates with any particular sense of drama. Consequently, we observe some occasional bickering and lovemaking between the couple even as we try to empathize with their dilemma. The main problem with the script (written by Zabeil) is that the character of Tristan is inconsistent. At times, he idolizes Aaron as a father figure but inexplicably at other times, he pulls cruel minor pranks on him and demands that Aaron promise to "leave my mommy alone", which would imply he has witnessed some form of abuse when, in fact, he hasn't. The bottom line is that the kid isn't particularly likable and we end up sympathizing with Aaron, who still feels like "the other man", haunted by the spiritual presence of the boy's father.The confusing presentation of the relationships isn't helped by the fact that, for some reason, the main characters alternate speaking in German, French and English.
The movie transitions to the adventure genre when Aaron takes Tristan on a hike in the mountains. Tristan disobeys Aaron and wanders away, immediately getting lost. In his desperate search for the boy, Aaron becomes seriously injured and largely incapacitated. Director Zabeil is given the opportunity to ratchet up the suspense to a full boil but opts instead to keep things merely simmering. There are some unnerving scenes but Zabeil can't quite close the deal by making them dramatic enough to keep the viewer on edge. The film ends on an intriguing note that some might find a bit too ambiguous. The small cast is uniformly excellent (the only other characters are nameless members of a rescue team) and Axel Schneppat's cinematography is suitably stunning. The movie is never boring but it also doesn't pay off in ways we anticipate.
The Kino Lorber DVD presents an excellent transfer. Bonus features are the original trailer and trailers for other art house feature films available from the company.
Trade magazine ad promoting Pollard's nomination for Best Supporting Actor Oscar in "Bonnie and Clyde".
BY LEE PFEIFFER
Actor Michael J. Pollard has passed away from cardiac arrest at age 80. Pollard's unique look and acting style propelled him to fame in the 1960s. Pollard was born in New Jersey and crossed the river to study in the famed Actors Studio. He first appeared on Broadway in the smash hit production of "Bye Bye Birdie" and quickly became a familiar face on popular television programs including "Gunsmoke", "Lost in Space", "The Andy Griffith Show", "Star Trek", "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis", "Alfred Hitchcock Presents", "Route 66", "I Spy", "The Fall Guy", "The Girl from U.N.C.L.E.", "Crime Story", "Superboy" and "Tales from the Crypt". Pollard's trademark onscreen persona was as a lovable but dim-witted, slow moving character. The image paid off handsomely for him when was cast as C.W. Moss in director Arthur Penn's 1967 classic "Bonnie and Clyde". In the key role, Pollard played a loyal accomplice to the infamous gangster couple. Pollard was nominated for numerous major awards for his performance including a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. The success of "Bonnie and Clyde" briefly elevated Pollard to leading man status and he starred in numerous films including "Jigsaw", "Hannibal Brooks", "Little Fauss and Big Halsey" and "Dirty Little Billy" before reverting to supporting player status. Pollard often had key roles in "B" movies such as director Rob Zombie's cult classic "House of 1,000 Corpses" but he sometimes appeared in small parts in major films such as "Dick Tracy", "Melvin and Howard", "Roxanne" and "Tango & Cash". Pollard's potential was undoubtedly compromised by his admitted problems with substance abuse, though by the 1980s he appeared to have successfully kicked his bad habits. Actor Michael J. Fox had paid tribute to Pollard by placing the "J" in his name when he first started out in show business.
While
it’s got its defenders and fans, The Fearless Vampire Killers is not
Roman Polanski at his best. It does, however, have a certain charm if one
places the film within the context of when it was made and released.
Originally
titled Dance of the Vampires, the movie is a comedy horror flick that is
an obvious send-up of the British horror movies made by Hammer Studios that
were hugely popular in the 1960s. It looks like a Hammer picture… the
film stock is the same and the colors have that muted, yet oddly vibrant, appearance—and
of course the blood and bosoms are in full bloom. It was a British production
as well, but the film was made in ski resort locations in Italy, doubling as
“Eastern Europe.â€
Probably
of special interest these days is the presence of Sharon Tate in a lead role,
as well as her soon-to-be husband, the director himself, Roman Polanski, as the
protagonist’s sidekick. Their off-screen budding romance is palpable in the
movie, and, if anything, The Fearless Vampire Killers reflects a moment
in time when there was no controversy in the filmmaker’s life and the future
for him and his bride-to-be appeared to be rosy.
It's
the story of Professor Abronsius (Jack MacGowran), a sort of Van Helsing
figure, and his assistant, Alfred (Polanski), as they hunt for vampires. Tate
is Sarah, the daughter of the tavern innkeeper (Alfie Bass), and Alfred falls
madly in love with her. When she is taken captive by the local vampire head
honcho, Count von Krolock (Ferdy Mayne), Abronsius and Alfred take it upon
themselves to rescue her and destroy the count’s huge coven of undead
followers, who congregate annually for a ball in Krolock’s castle.
The
movie is wacky, full of slapstick, and has little true horror. There’s something
of a Benny Hill sensibility that permeates it; the picture is certainly
atypical of what we think of as a Roman Polanski movie. Polanski himself is
quite good in his role of the 90-pound weakling who summons the bravery to
complete his tasks. Tate is eye candy supreme, and she plays her role
relatively straight. MacGowran, when you can understand his dialogue, is
effectively comical, but it is Polanski who steals the picture.
When
the film was first released in the U.S., the distributors re-cut it and added a
cheap animated sequence before the credits, dubbed MacGowran’s voice with a
silly-sounding one, and added the subtitle: …OR: Pardon Me, but Your Teeth
Are in My Neck. The movie bombed at the time, disappeared, and was relegated
to cult status over the years. Eventually, a restored U.K. version (Polanski’s
preferred cut) resurfaced and was released on home video. The Fearless
Vampire Killers was then re-evaluated, and it is now considered, in some
circles anyway, to be one of the filmmaker’s minor classics.
The
Warner Archive’s new Blu-ray release is, thankfully, the original U.K. cut, and
it looks quite good in its widescreen, colorful splendor. The supplements
include the U.S. animated pre-credits sequence, a vintage featurette on the
making of the picture, and the theatrical trailer. English subtitles can be
turned on, which is highly recommended—the dialogue, with its many accents and
muddied deliveries, can be rather difficult to follow.
The
Fearless Vampire Killers is an oddity, but it’s enjoyable enough to pass the time
and serve as a rare happy bookmark in the life of one of cinema’s most important—yet
troubled—filmmakers.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
In
1951, Ealing Studios in Britain were on a roll. The so-called “Ealing
Comedies,†which became a sub-genre all their own, had become a sensation,
especially when the pictures starred the versatile and charismatic Alec
Guinness. Earlier that same year, The Lavender Hill Mob was one of the
most popular films ever released in the U.K., and it was proving to be a hit in
America as well (and would, the following year, win an Oscar for its writing).
Following
hot on the heels of Lavender Hill was The Man in the White Suit,
which featured Guinness as Sidney Stratton, a brilliant but over-zealous
scientist who will stop at nothing to realize his dream of creating an
impervious textile.
As
discussed in the supplemental documentary, “Revisiting ‘The Man in the White
Suit,’†the picture was made at a time when Britain was on the precipice of
“the future†in terms of technological advancements, but there was in some
quarters a resistance to leaving the conservative past behind. While there are
plenty of laughs in the movie, it is also a cautionary tale about the dangers
of advancing too quickly.
In
the course of the story, the determined Sidney makes many enemies, but a few
friends as well, and eventually he succeeds in creating a starkly white suit
that repels dirt and stains, will not tear, and is slightly radioactive. It
also glows in the dark! The problem, as the men in power come to realize, is
that manufacturing the textile will put everybody else out of business—mill
workers, launderers, clothing makers, and more. Therefore, the decision is made
to suppress the invention—and this causes Sidney to go berserk and escape from
the clutches of both the upper management and the lower workers.
There
are many hilarious sequences, such as when the chemicals keep exploding and
destroying the laboratory, much to the chagrin of the managers. While the brew
is cooking, the test tubes and beakers bubble musically with tones and
beeps—“testubular bells,†so to speak. Very amusing.
Guinness
is terrific, of course, and he is supported by the superb Joan Greenwood, Cecil
Parker, and Michael Gough. One highlight is the appearance of Ernest Thesiger
(of Bride of Frankenstein fame) as one of the wiley, old textile
industry barons.
The
Man in the White Suit was nominated for the Writing—Adapted Screenplay Oscar at
the same ceremony in which The Lavender Hill Mob was nominated (and won)
for Writing—Original Screenplay. Ealing Studios was indeed at the top of their
game in 1951.
Kino
Lorber’s new Blu-ray 1920x1080p restoration looks quite good, a vast
improvement over previous DVD releases. There are optional English subtitles,
as well as a learned audio commentary by film historian Dr. Dean Brandum. Supplements
include the previously mentioned documentary, the theatrical trailer, and
trailers for other Kino Lorber releases.
The
Man in the White Suit is classic British comedy, timeless Alec Guinness, and a swell
time to be had by all in comfortable home theaters!
Director Jean-Jacques Beineix had burst
onto the scene with the superb, quirky, and new New Wave crime picture, Diva
(1981) that embraced not only the French New Wave of the early 1960s, but
the early 1980s pop New Wave of music and visuals that were exploding in all
mediums at that time. Diva was a critical and commercial hit with
Western audiences, although Beineix’s follow-up, Moon in the Gutter
(1983), was not. The filmmaker bounced back, though, with Betty Blue,
which received a deserved Oscar nomination for Best Foreign Film.
Based on a popular French novel by
Philippe Djian, the story concerns a writer named Zorg (Jean-Hugues Anglade)
who works various odd jobs to support himself while he struggles to pen a
novel. He meets and falls in love with the fiery, unpredictable, and incredibly
sexy Betty Blue (Dalle). Throughout the tale, we witness the ups and downs of
their relationship through the couple’s nomadic moving around France, meeting
and befriending colorful characters, getting into fights, and slowly spiraling
toward tragedy. This is because Betty is seriously mentally ill (probably
bi-polar, although that term was not much in use in the 1980s). Betty’s mood
swings can be violent and shocking, and it’s a challenge for Philippe to
continually cover for her, as well as care for the woman and keep her safe.
Both Anglade and Dalle deliver
courageous and dynamic performances, and Jean-François Robin’s cinematography
exhibits vibrant colors and painterly images. This is a gorgeous-looking
picture, made even more attractive by the (often full-frontal nude) physicality
of the two leads. While the picture is an exquisite examination of a passionate
love affair, it’s also a disturbing scrutiny of a mental affliction that few
people understood in those days.
When Betty Blue was first
released, it was a two-hour movie. Beineix released a “director’s extended cutâ€
in 2005 that runs three hours—and that is the version presented in the
Criterion Collection’s new Blu-ray release. It’s curious why Criterion did not
also include the original shorter cut, for I’m not sure the extra hour of
runtime added anything of special value.
The high-definition digital
restoration, approved by Beineix, is terrific, though, and it comes with an
uncompressed monaural soundtrack (and the quirky musical score by Gabriel Yared
is a highlight). There is a new English subtitle translation.
Supplements include an hour-long
documentary on the film from 2013 with Beineix, Dalle, Anglade, associate
producer Claudie Ossard, DP Robin, and composer Yared; a vintage featurette on
the making of the picture that includes an interview with original novelist
Djian; Le chien de Monsieur Michel (“Mr. Michel’s Dogâ€), a short film by
Beineix from 1977; a vintage TV interview with Beineix and Dalle; Dalle’s
screen test; and trailers. The booklet contains an essay by critic Chelsea
Phillips-Carr.
Betty Blue may not be the perfect date movie, but it does serve to
illustrate in believable and visceral tones a passionate but volatile man/woman
relationship that will fascinate any lover of cinema.
Generally speaking, I happen to watch more bad movies
than good ones… and I suppose that any film which includes the breathless line,
“It’s too bad we didn’t bring the dune
buggy!†suggests I’m likely in the midst of another.In truth, I sort of knew this going into Arch
Hall Sr.’s cult classic EEGAH (1962),
a bona fide drive-in circuit masterpiece.This film has long suffered ignobility partly due to the circulation of tattered
prints relegated to the Public Domain.The film’s PD fate partly explains its inclusion in practically every
budget-label 50 or 100 count horror and sci-fi multi-film DVD collection ever
marketed.Happily – if somewhat
curiously - Film Detective has bravely rescued the film – and its fans - from
the gray-market, washed-out, faded and deteriorating prints of which we’ve been
accustomed, sharing with us this brand new 4K transfer to Blu-ray from an
original 35mm camera negative.
The real question I suppose is whether or not EEGAH deserves such white-glove
attention?I will reason that it does,
especially as I have no financial interest or skin in the game.It’s nothing if not a fun film; a completely
nutty and perfect jewel of non-pretentious, time-capsule-exploitative-entertainment.It’s also of some train-spotting, fan-boy interest
as the film features the decidedly fresh-faced, twenty-one year old, 7’ 2â€
actor Richard Kiel (“Jaws†of the James Bond films) as the titular EEGAH.EEGAH is, apparently, a brooding prehistoric
cave dweller who has somehow managed to survive well into the early 1960s, unnoticed,
unwashed and unloved, in the Coachella Valley of Southern Californian
Mountains.
EEGAH’s curious, eon-spanning survival is never explained
to scientific satisfaction in Bob Wehling’s dotty script adapted from Arch Hall
Sr.’s original story. Sweet Roxy Miller’s adventure-writer father Mr. Miller (also
played by Arch Hall Sr.) opines – not unreasonably – that the caveman is likely
the last of his line.But he gives us no
indication of how he’s intellectually arrived at his totally non-scientifically
tested, off-the-cuff conclusion.By his best
ballpark estimate the savage primitive has managed to survive perhaps “fifty to
one hundred years†following the passing of even EEGAH’s most recent forebear.In some manner of speaking EEGAH still lives alongside his now all-but-extinct
extended family in his lonely mountainside cave.Except they now reside there as little more
than well cared for mummified remains.
EEGAH’s survival has seemingly gone on unnoticed until
one dark night on a deserted road when sweet Roxy (Marilyn Manning) nearly plows
into him with her banana yellow sport coupe.While EEGAH grimaces and growls and postures menacingly, it’s apparent
that he’s somewhat smitten with his hit-and-run paramour.The girl manages to escape their impromptu
meet-up and soon relates the details of her strange run in to her disbelieving
boyfriend Tom (Arch Hall, Jr.) and her aforementioned father.Acknowledging the mystery would be best investigated
by a responsible adult, Dad Miller is apparently unable to find one.He chooses to go off on his own, hiring a
helicopter to take him into the deep ravines within Shadow Mountain.Dressed resplendently in white safari shirt,
shorts, and pit helmet, Miller disembarks the copter for an ill-prepared solo expedition.He carries little more than a small tartan
satchel and a Brownie camera to support him on his overnight camping trip.
When he fails to appear at the pre-arranged pick-up site
the following day, heartthrob Tom and Roxy rush to the designated spot in the
hot desert in Tom’s cool dune buggy (“The tires are filled with water,†he
tells his girlfriend, the extra weight giving them better “traction in the
sandâ€).As an aside, actor Hall Jr. recalled
the dune buggy featured in the film was actually the most authentic and menacing
monster of the production.Though it had
once been a 1939 Plymouth Sedan it was now, in the actor’s own parlance “a
deathtrap,†since it had been amateurishly converted into a buggy and welded
back together poorly with no semblance of supportive structure.He recalled a few instances where he was
literally pinned under a wreckage of metal, the crew scrambling to pull him
free from the crushing weight.
The 1970s spawned a peculiar sub-genre of crime movies: the rape revenge sagas. Ostensibly, the films were designed to celebrate female empowerment and denounce sexual exploitation of women. In reality, that was just window dressing for the true purpose of the productions, namely, to exploit women. True, they did demonstrate scenes of violated young ladies exacting some just desserts on male stalkers and abusers, but there was an overall suspicion that the films' intended audience wasn't liberated females but men who enjoyed cinematic depictions of women being abused. A prime example is "Act of Vengeance", a 1974 American International cheapie that was also released under the cruder but more accurate title of "Rape Squad". The movie opens with Linda (Jo Ann Harris), a self-employed 20 year-old, having the misfortune of being stalked by a slimeball named Jack (Peter Brown), who wears a red jump suit and a hockey mask (thus inspiring later, more memorable screen villains.) He brutally rapes Linda while adding an additional humiliating element to the crime: he forces her to sing "Jingle Bells" during the assault. Linda survives the ordeal but finds the police are inefficient in tracking down the villain, understandably because he was masked. Turns out Jack is a serial rapist who has subjected numerous other young women to the same horrific fate. Linda meets and bonds with the other victims (played by Jennifer Lee, Lisa Moore, Connie Strickland and Patricia Estrin) and they decide to take matters into their own hands by personally tracking down their attacker and also attempting to come to the rescue of other women who are in danger of being sexually assaulted. To brush up on their self-defense skills, they are taught martial arts by a pro, Tiny (Lada Edmund, Jr.) and-presto!- the women are turned into female versions of Kato on the spot. The film then follows the women as they thwart the bad guys by subjecting them to humiliating beatings. But their primary mission is to track down their mutual rapist and dish out their own brand of justice.
Director Bob Kelljan was already an old hand at helming exploitation films including the Count Yorga horror flicks and "Scream Blacula Scream". If his desire was to depict the terror of sexual assault, he certainly succeeded. The rape scenes are hard to watch and chilling in their realism, made all the more disturbing by the perversions of Jack. (In addition to making his victims sing "Jingle Bells", he requires them to praise his sexual performance and speaks to them in a calm, friendly voice even as he subjects them to despicable acts.) However, the main attributes of the movies pertain to its goofy aspects. Every one of the victims is a knock-out and, despite knowing that Jack is still stalking them, they persist in parading around braless in the skimpiest outfits imaginable. If that isn't enough to keep male audience members awake, they find time to relax by sharing a hot tub (totally nude, of course!)The finale finds our heroines engaging in cliched behavior from other "women-in-jeopardy" films by being lured to meet Jack in the dead of night in a creepy, abandoned zoo. Now, what could possibly go wrong with that strategy? Naturally, they end up separating and- oh, yes, one of them suffers a broken heel that impairs her ability to run. The only predictable element missing is the presence of Vincent Price.
The performances by the female leads range from passable to laughable. All of the male cast members play characters who are killers, rapists or just plain jerks. (The esteemed comedic actor Stanley Adams inexplicably turns up in a brief, embarrassing turn as a pervert.) In the 1970s, the crime of rape was depicted in major films such as "Death Wish" and "A Clockwork Orange". Those scenes, too, are difficult to endure but at least the films were making a serious comment on the degradation of societal norms. "Act of Vengeance" is disguised as a message movie but exists only to titillate, although it does provide plenty of laughs as well (some of them actually intentional).
Once again Scorpion has given a "B" movie a first-class presentation with an excellent transfer. Extras include a new on-camera interview with actress Jennifer Lee Pryor, who played a member of the Rape Squad. She's quite loquacious and discusses her memories of the film, providing some interesting anecdotes and claims, quite correctly, that the female heroines preceded Charlie's Angels, who were seen as ground-breaking female heroes. The original trailer is also included as well as a gallery of trailers for other Scorpion titles.
(At this time, the Blu-ray does not appear to be available on Amazon. It can be ordered here.)
Novelist Jay Richard Kennedy was, in his pre-Hollywood youth,
known to friends simply as Samuel Richard Solomonick.Idealistic and having come of age in the midst
of the U.S. depression, this native of Bronx, New York, would be caught up in
the radical politics of the 1930s. In
the years prior to the entry of the U.S. in World War II, Kennedy’s personal
politics were mostly aligned with those of domestic left-wing groups, including
the U.S. Communist Party.This marriage
of shared ideals was primarily due to the CP’s seemingly uncompromising anti-fascist
beliefs.
But Kennedy’s allegiance to the CP and to their professed
socialist ideals came to an abrupt end in 1939 when the Soviet Union’s Joseph
Stalin shocked internationalists and fellow travelers by doing the unthinkable
- co-signing a non-aggression pact with Hitler’s Germany.That agreement, of course, was not
long-lasting, broken when Germany invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941.But Stalin’s pact with the Devil had irreparably
shaken the faith of many left-wing activists who had previously – and naively -
looked to the Soviet Union for political guidance.
Though Kennedy would abandon many tenets of the far left,
he remained an unapologetic political liberal.He was particularly active in the civil rights movements of the 1960s.He worked alongside members of C.O.R.E.
(Congress of Racial Equality) and professed solidarity with the Black Panther
Party.In truth, this activist wasn’t doing
so badly working within the framework of the capitalist system. In April 1966,
the recording industry trade magazine Billboard
would describe the creative Kennedy as a true renaissance man.He was, they explained, been “at various
times a writer for films, radio producer, novelist, talent manager, songwriter,
and music publisher.â€
At age 54, Kennedy’s youthful radicalism, while never
abandoned, was likely tempered when he was tapped by Frank Sinatra to head the record
and music publishing wing of Sinatra Enterprises. Kennedy’s 1965 novel, Favor the Runner, had mixed politics and seamy stories of entertainment
industry practices.The novel was
praised by Sinatra as “the most entertaining and beautifully written novel
about show business to be published in this or any season… a swinging,
shattering, glorious experience.â€
Though the film credits of The Chairman do note that the film was based on a Kennedy’s original
novel, it would appear as though the book was only first published two months
following the movie’s release in June 1969.It was also published in an odd manner, the mass-market Signet paperback
movie-tie-in of August 1969 preceding the later 1970 hardcover by the New
American Library/World Publishing.The
hardcover version of the book was simultaneously published in the UK under the
more intriguing title “The Most Dangerous Man in the World.†(This title was
retained for the UK release of the film.)
As Kennedy had a life-long interest in contemporary
international-politics, it’s not surprising that the ideas behind The Chairman would germinate from his
passion.In 1966 Mao Zedong, the Chairman
of the Communist Party of Party, would architect his infamous “Cultural
Revolution,†fervently calling on students and workers to commit themselves to
continual revolution.It was a
disastrous experiment, an anti-intellectual call to arms.During a four year period, universities were shuttered
and any semblance of a free press crushed, leaving only Mao’s cult-of-personality
and famed “Little Red Book†to light the path to world revolutionary socialism.Professors, intellectuals, workers of mid-to-high
station - even loyal Communist Party members - were publically criticized,
chastised and jailed by Mao’s infamous Red
Guard, derided by the faithful as “Capitalist Roaders.â€
The opening credit sequence of J. Lee Thompson’s The Chairman perfectly captures the
revolutionary zeal of Mao’s Red Guards.Playing beneath composer Jerry Goldsmith’s stirring score is a montage
of folk art and propaganda poster images of China’s peasant class brandishing
their “Little Red Books,†holding them triumphantly aloft in their left-hands
or dutifully studying Mao’s enlightening text.
The film had been in the works for some time.In February 1967, the syndicated gossip
columnist Earl Wilson teased: “Jay Richard Kennedy, Frank Sinatra’s story
sleuth, is winding up the minutes of The
Chairman, about Commie China, which Frank, Yul Brynner, and Spencer
Tracy’ll have fun with in Hong Kong next fall.â€None of this would actually happen, of course, though Frank Sinatra was strongly
rumored to have been considered for the role of the Nobel Prize-winning
scientist John Hathaway early on.The
part eventually went to Gregory Peck.For his troubles, Peck would sign onto a contract that reportedly paid
him $500,000 dollars and 10% of any profits.Peck had been working steadily, though his more recent films had not
been overly successful at the box office.In 1969, the actor would appear in no fewer than four feature-length
films of varying success.Though The Chairman, Peck’s first film with 20th
Century Fox in more than a decade, eventually brought in 2.5 million dollars,
it was not a huge box-office success.The film would only rank as the forty-first highest-grossing film of
1969.
On July 17, 1968, Hollywood gossip columnist Joyce Haber
reported that producer Arthur Jacobs was in London test-screening some of the
“10,000 feet of film†the filmmaker had managed to photograph discreetly
“behind the bamboo curtain for use in The
Chairman.â€Afterwards, the
production crew was to move to Hong Kong for principal photography.Jacob’s first choice to helm the feature was
the British director Peter Yates.Yates
was a natural choice for this espionage film, having previously worked on such ITV
television series as The Saint with
Roger Moore and Danger Man with
Patrick McGoohan.Yates had recently –
and easily - made the transition to feature films, beginning with Robbery (1967) but scoring big-time with
Bullitt (1968) featuring Steve
McQueen.
Jacob’s talks with Yates eventually stalled,perhaps due to the success of the latter film
which might have made the director too hot – or too expensive - a property to
sign on to The Chairman.Jacobs then offered the directorial job to another
Brit, the equally talented J. Lee Thompson.Thompson was a natural choice. He had already worked with Gregory Peck
on The Guns of Navarone (1961, for
which he would receive a “Best Director†nomination by the Academy), Cape Fear (1962), and the all-star cast
assembled in search of Mackenna’s Gold
(1969).
The Chinese have already expressed interest in having Hathaway
lend his scientific expertise to their breakthrough.Though they possess the secret formula, they
have thus far been unable to produce this enzyme in sufficient quantities.As few Americans are welcomed to Peking, the
calculating Shelby wants Hathaway to accept the invitation of the Reds.He’s not to help out as they wish, of course,
but will only be sent east long enough to steal their secret.The scientist refuses until the U.S.
President himself calls, urging Hathaway to accept as the mission has been
deemed as being of “urgent and terrific importance.â€
Hathaway relents and agrees to have a “Q-23 transmitterâ€
surgically inserted as a mastoid sinus canal implant.While Hathaway is told the implant has a
satellite monitored tracking radius of one hundred and ten miles and can even
monitor changes in his physiology, he is not informed the device also houses a
“coil of explosive wire†which the military can remotely detonate should the
mission go wrong.Arriving in China in
the midst of the Cultural Revolution - already warily surveilled by his cautious
and suspicious Chinese hosts - things, quite understandably, go wrong rather
quickly.
While a very entertaining and old fashioned Cold War thriller,
The Chairman does suffers from a bit
of an identity crisis.It’s first
positioned as a serious film involving a chess game of competing ideologies and
geo-political espionage.But it soon loses
such sober prestige when it occasionally dresses as a pastiche of a more
outlandish James Bond adventure.In many
respects the film is less interesting as the controversies that would surround
its production.Principal photography on
The Chairman was scheduled from
August 26th through December 3rd, 1968.Most of the film’s interior scenes were shot without
incident on the soundstages of Pinewood Studios, with the windy and rugged
cliff sides of Scotland doubling as those of western Mongolia.
The real troubles began when, following a series of
location shoots in Taiwan, the cast and crew were due to arrive in Hong Kong on
Saturday, November 30, 1968.The
company’s Hong Kong schedule was unceremoniously scrapped when, on Wednesday
the 27th, the New York Times
reported the “British colonial government, reacting to Communist protests,
announced today that it had forbidden an American film unit to shoot several
sequences here of the movie The Chairman.â€The leftist Wen Wei Pao and other Communist newspapers were at the forefront of
cancellation of the film unit’s business in Hong Kong.The newssheets all published editorials
decrying the project as a “conspiracy of the British and American
imperialists,†an “insult to Chairman Mao,†and a “serious provocation against
the 700 million Chinese people.â€
Interestingly, there was not a lot of support for the production
team in Hong Kong’s non-Communist mainstream press either.Beginning In the spring of 1967, Hong Kong had
been wracked with nearly eight months of serious violence – bombings,
assassinations, and street riots – following a series of hit-and-run
confrontations between police and Communist agitators in the wake of a labor
dispute.The resulting chaos and
property damage had wearied many of the 8.5 million people living in Hong
Kong.They were less interested in
engaging in a free-speech battle, opting instead for an uneasy peace.To complicate matters further, a
British-based journalist for Reuters was concurrently being held under house
arrest in Peking, the capitol of mainland China.The reporter’s detention was seen by most
observers as Peking’s retaliatory tactic for what they accused was Hong Kong’s
“unjustified persecution of Communist reporters.â€
The 1972 Giallo Who
Saw Her Die? (Chi l'ha vista morire?) was Aldo Lado’s second film as
director, his first being Short Night of
Glass Dolls (1971).That film was a
somewhat less-than-traditional Giallo, photographed inexpensively behind the
Iron Curtain in the cities of Zagreb and Prague.Short
Night of Glass Dolls was a complicated film that told its story in backward
fashion, much in the style of the celebrated playwright Harold Pinter.It was also an unusual Giallo in the sense
that its overtly exploitative sex scenes were unevenly mixed with the genre’s
level of on-screen violence than European movie-thriller fans had come to
expect.Lado had entered into the film
business only some five years earlier, serving as the assistant director on a
handful of Sergio Leone-inspired Spaghetti western knock-offs and a couple of action
films, before getting the opportunity to work with the famed director Bernardo
Bertolucci on the auteur’s
Oscar-nominated production of The
Conformist (1970).
In the featurette “I Saw Her Die,†Lado offers a
compartmentalized history of popular Italian cinema.The eighty-four year old asserts that the
first wave propagated three identifiable trends: first the Maciste era (or sword-and-sandal “Peplums†as they are referred Stateside).These films were followed by the era of the Spaghetti
western, with the Giallo serving as this first wave’s bookend.Both Lado and principal screenwriter
Francesco Barilli on Who Saw Her Die?
were children of cinema’s first generation, having been exposed to the same
diet of black and white motion pictures and having read many of the same novels.There was little differentiation between the
classics and the pulp paperback.Lado
was in love of mysteries but preferred the hard-edged novels of Mickey
Spillane’s Mike Hammer to the drawing room nicety whodunits of Agatha Christie.Barilli was a fan of the pulp mysteries and
adventure tales by the likes of Edgar Wallace.Of their filmmaking contemporaries, both men expressed admiration for
Roman Polanski’s stylized work and this is reflected on the film they would
collaborate on.
In Who Saw Her Die?George Lazenby is cast as Franco
Serpieri, an artist who keeps a small sculpting studio based in Venice.He has been experiencing a welcome measure of
recognition due to a recent and critically acclaimed exhibition of his work in
Beirut. His success is partly the result of the machinations of his agent, the
powerful and commanding Serafin (Adolfo Celi, Largo of Thunderball fame).Serpieri’s
young, red-headed and freckle-faced daughter Roberta (Nicolette Elmi) is
visiting with her father from her home in London.
We learn the sculptor is apparently estranged from his daughter’s
mother Elizabeth (the beautiful Swedish actress Anita Strindberg).In a decidedly grim scenario that bristles
even today, the doomed child’s visit is short lived.The girl’s sudden disappearance and subsequent
murder throws Serpieri into depression and a relentless desire to bring the
guilty party to justice.Despite the
film’s morbid subject matter, the storyline soon evolves into a conventional
whodunit of sorts.There are any numbers
of shady characters introduced within the film’s running time: several seemingly
plausible suspects and red-herrings bring attention to themselves with expressionless
eyes or incautious suspicious mannerisms.Most moments are initially perceived as innocent, but now appear unseemly
in light of the tragedy.
Though not for every taste, this is a well-constructed
film and it’s likely George Lazenby’s best film after On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969).Though an Italian production, the
English-speaking Lazenby was brought on at the suggestion of producer Enzo Doria,
primarily due to the actor’s recent attachment with the James Bond
franchise.He was, in Lado’s unapologetic
estimate, “A good name to attract easy money.â€In an eleven-minute featurette featured on Anchor Bay’s DVD issue of Who Saw Her Die? (2002) (not ported over to this new Arrow
edition), Lado would recall, “George Lazenby had already played the role of
James Bond and acquired a certain international fame.This was useful for the producers… He had
deep issues with (Cubby) Broccoli and the entire James Bond organization… In
the end, he didn’t make a lira.He was
going to the casinos, staying in big hotels, and nothing was free.At the end he was shown the bills and
everything had been deducted from his pay… he had made nothing.His only dream was to return to his homeland
of Australia, buy a boat and sail off alone.He was happy that [his work on Who
Saw Her Die?] would earn him the money to buy the boat.â€
Lado’s memory is partly in error here, as Lazenby, an
admitted novice boatman, had already sailed with his wife Chrissie into Italy,
via the island of Malta.The
adventuresome couple eventually arrived, according to Lazenby’s recollection,
in “Fiumicino, at the mouth of the Tiber outside Rome.†The pair had arrived on
a catamaran purchased on the dwindling reserve of earnings from the Bond
film.As late as October 1973, Lazenby
told one journalist that the paycheck cashed from the “little art film†shot in
Italy - along with the remnants of his Bond money - allowed him and his wife to
survive on “five pounds a week.â€He
confessed he had no yet had the opportunity to see the final cut of Who Saw Her Die? but was nonetheless
thankful for the gig as “it helped keep us for fifteen months on the catamaran,
and that kind of life brings sanity.â€
Lazenby’s first post-Bond film Universal Soldier (Cy Endfield, 1971) had been partly financed by
Lazenby and then sold, for percentages, to Britain’s Hemdale Film Corporation.The entertainment company puzzled how to
market this shot-on-a-shoe-string, mercenary-turned-hippie- pacifist
production.Though Universal Soldier was eventually released to theatres in the UK in
February 1971, it was a commercial failure.Hedging its bets, Hemdale chose to absorb their losses by releasing the
film as an under-bill to a more commercial property, the political
suspense-thriller Embassy, based on
the best-selling novel by Stephen Coulter.Directed by the Gordon Hessler, Embassy
would feature an all-star cast that would include Richard Roundtree, Max von
Sydow, Ray Milland, Broderick Crawford, and Chuck Connors.
The film had some defenders.John Russell Taylor, the film critic of the
London Times, wrote that while Universal Soldier was undeniably
“muddled†and “not exactly a missed masterpiece,†the film was stronger than
the more formulaic Embassy as it
“tries to say something about war, arms sales, and the limits of cynicism.†Taylor’s view of the film was far more
generous than David McGillivray of the UK’s Monthly
Film Bulletin.That critic unkindly
wrote off Universal Soldier as little
more than a “shallow piece of social drama,†and mercilessly dissected the
screenplay’s “apparently improvised dialogue.†Especially galling to the MFB
critic was the plot device that allowed for Lazenby’s immoral, cynical
mercenary soldierto undergo a“sudden and dramatic ideological conversion
[…] largely attributed to the influence of one insipid yoga fanatic and a
couple of outbursts from Germaine Greer on the topic of arms to South
Africa.â€
It’s likely neither Lado nor Doria had even screened Universal Soldier, the film having disappeared
from sight almost upon release.On the
set of Who Saw Her Die?, the director
had more a more logistical issue to contend with.Lado, a native Italian whose second language
was French, spoke little English.So, to
communicate with Lazenby, the filmmaker – who maintained that a director’s
responsibility was to “stage†a film as one might a theatrical performance –
would pantomime what he desired the former James Bond to convey as the cameras
rolled.Following production, Lazenby bragged,
“For the Italian film I had needed to learn the language,†but if this was the
case the lessons didn’t go so well.The
actor dialogue’s is dubbed throughout the film in both the Italian and English-language versions of the
film.
The dubbing was becoming something as a trend.Though he had been famously dubbed as “Sir
Hilary Bray†for parts of OHMSS, he
was also - mostly - dubbed in the course of the three Kung Fu films he would
appear in for Raymond Chow’s Golden Harvest Productions following his move to
Hong Kong in 1973.In any event, Lazenby
appears in Who Saw Her Die? much as
he did as the mercenary Ryker in Universal
Soldier, almost unrecognizable as the previously dapper James Bond.For starters, the actor’s hair is shoulder-length
long, and he now sports a thick brown moustache.When Lazenby removes his shirt during one
early scene he appears well beyond thin – he’s alarmingly lanky and skinny.This was likely the result of his and his
wife Chrissie’s conversion to vegetarianism in 1971.
The very addictive web site www.in70mm.com presents a fascinating and exhaustive list of major films that were shot in standard 35mm format but presented (at least sporadically) in blow-up 70mm format. The list might surprise you. In addition to big budget epics, you'll find in the year-by-year listings such seemingly unlikely blow-ups as "Bye Bye Birdie", "The Cardinal", "The Chase", "Hellfighters" and "Shalako". Some of these 70mm presentations were only shown in limited areas. For example, a 70mm print of the 1967 James Bond film "You Only Live Twice" was apparently restricted to Japan. Click here to access the listings.
RETRO-ACTIVE: THE BEST FROM THE CINEMA RETRO ARCHIVES
ONCE UPON A TIME IN
THE EXISTENTIAL WEST
By
Raymond Benson
I
never had a chance to see these two legendary westerns that were made
back-to-back in the mid-1960s, presented by Roger Corman, directed and
co-produced by Monte Hellman, and starring a young Jack Nicholson (among
others), for they were elusive. I’d heard they were quirky, moody, and very
different takes on the western genre, so I was excited to hear that The
Criterion Collection was releasing both pictures as a double-bill on one
Blu-ray disc. Now you, too, can view these strange little movies in all of
their high definition glory.
Hellman
was one of the few directors that producer Corman would let helm pictures for
his studio, which at that time was famous for low-budget horror films,
youth-in-rebellion pictures, and, later, rock ‘n’ roll counterculture flicks.
Jack Nicholson was also involved with Corman since the late fifties, doing much
of his pre-Easy Rider work for the
producer as an actor and sometimes writer. In this case, Nicholson served as
co-producer (with Hellman) on both pictures and wrote the script for Ride in the Whirlwind. At first, Hellman
presented Corman with the script for The
Shooting, written by Carole Eastman (using the pseudonym “Adrien Joyce†and
who would later write the screenplay for Five
Easy Pieces). Corman suggested that Hellman shoot two westerns at the same
time to get more bang for the buck, so to speak. Therefore, Nicholson came up
with Whirlwind and both movies were
shot together in the Utah desert with the same crew and most of the same cast.
The two motion pictures were seen at several film festivals in 1966 and the
distribution rights were bought by the Walter Reade Organization, which
promptly sold them to television. They were broadcast sometime in 1968 and were
then lost in limbo.
Both
The Shooting and Ride in the Whirlwind could be called “existential westerns†because
they are indeed philosophical, atmospheric, and, well, arty. Very arty. Corman
had insisted that Hellman and Nicholson add more action to both scripts—which
they did—but you still can’t say these are in any way typical westerns. At a
time when Sergio Leone was tearing up the genre Italian-style, it’s no wonder
that the two pictures slipped into obscurity.
On
the one hand, both films are interesting simply because it’s fun to see the
young actors that appear in them—Nicholson, Warren Oates, Millie Perkins (the
original Anne Frank from the 1959 The
Diary of Anne Frank, now a grown up and a babe), Harry Dean Stanton (billed
as “Dean Stantonâ€), and a not-so-young Cameron Mitchell. No one in the films,
except maybe Mitchell, looks particularly comfortable on a horse; it’s rather
obvious that these actors are “playing at†being in a western. Other positive
aspects include the cinematography—by Gregory Sandor, for both pictures—and the
strange musical scores—by Richard Markowitz (The Shooting) and Robert Jackson Drasnin (Ride in the Whirlwind).
On
the other hand, as narrative westerns, they don’t measure up. The acting is,
for the most part, pretty bad. Nicholson is the heavy in The Shooting, and he spends most of the time sneering. The
higher-pitched voice of the young Nicholson doesn’t really work for the
character; he is much better in Whirlwind
as one of the good guys. Oates is suitably ornery but not much else. Perkins
seems like a fish out of water in both films. Will Hutchins, who plays Oates’
simple-minded sidekick, straddles a fine line between being quite effective and
incredibly annoying. Mitchell is forgettable. Stanton is—well, Harry Dean
Stanton.
One
of the greatest and most commercially successful fantasy series of the 1960s, The Avengers actually started out in
1961 as a gritty crime drama focused on Doctor Keel, played by Ian Hendry, one
of British television’s biggest stars at that time. In the first episode his
wife is killed by drug dealers, and a mysterious undercover agent named John
Steed, played of course by Patrick Macnee, helps him to avenge her death. The
two end up working together on a number of other crime cases, thus forming the
basis for a series that would ultimately outgrow its noir origins and become an outrageous Technicolor riot of science
fiction, martial arts, sexy fashion and comedy. Once Doctor Keel was out of the
picture, the playful ‘will they? – won’t they?’ (or even ‘have they? – haven’t
they?’) nature of John Steed’s relationship with his female partners – Cathy
Gale (Honor Blackman), Emma Peel (Diana Rigg) and Tara King (Linda Thorson) –provided
a frisson of excitement and the occasional wink towards the adults in the
audience of what was essentially a family show. After coming to an end in 1969,
John Steed was soon back in 1976 with The
New Avengers, as a mentor to his new younger companions Purdey (Joanna
Lumley) and Mike Gambit (Gareth Hunt).
Of
course, where there is success merchandising is never far behind, and The Avengers and The New Avengers was no exception. This new volume by John Buss,
following closely on the heels of his volume on The Man from U.N.C.L.E., features global examples of original
books, toys, magazines, records, clothing and promotional items, many from the
author’s own personal archive. One might expect novelisations and collectible
annuals to have been standard in the 1960s, but Honor Blackman’s Book of Self-Defence, in which she demonstrates a
number of techniques, is perhaps a little more surprising. As was common at the
time, most of the cast at some point released singles or albums, with the only
exception being Diana Rigg, who was far too serious for that kind of thing.
Macnee and Blackman released that notorious novelty record ‘Kinky Boots’
(recorded after a long session in the pub according to Honor Blackman), but
Linda Thorson had some success as well with her single ‘Here I am’, which was
released all over Europe. Blackman also released an entire solo album in 1964,
‘Everything I’ve Got’, capitalising on her popularity from both The Avengers and Goldfinger.
With
well over 100 items discussed in this full-colour volume, John Buss is clearly
Britain’s leading 1960s TV memorabilia collector and historian. This is an
essential purchase for anyone who remembers the thrill of owning an annual,
plastic gun, board game or jigsaw from your favourite show.
“Nightbreed†is a movie I’d wanted to see
for many years. I’m not in a minority. I have the excuse that I missed its
initial limited theatrical run and simply never got round to seeing it. Later,
whenever I went to hire it from the video store on its VHS release , it was
always rented out- no doubt due to its then blossoming cult status. However,
those that did see it initially also
desperately wanted to see it again. By
that I mean that the print that was first shown in theatres and released for
home entertainment wasn’t even close to the vision director and author Clive
Barker had for the project. It was, as many classics have been, butchered as unsympathetically
as the creatures the film celebrated by those “above†who simply didn’t
understand or care. This is touched upon in Arrow’s new press release synopsis
for the film- a cult gem which seems to have morphed as much as the creatures
of it title:
Nightbreed,
from the mind of legendary visionary of the macabre Clive Barker (Hellraiser,
Candyman). A nightmare-induced fantasy
set in a world like nothing you’ve ever experienced before… Nightbreed will
leave you questioning who the real monsters are. The victim of studio interference
and an unrepresentative marketing campaign, Nightbreed has since undergone a
radical reappraisal. Arrow Video is proud to present two versions of this
depraved cult classic and an insane selection of extras that will likely never
be bettered, for the ultimate nightmarish viewing experience.
This release from Arrow is sumptuous and easily the best
version of “Nightbreed†both fans and fascinated seekers such as myself have
yet seen become officially available. The extras, as ever, are excellent and
the transfer is probably (according to those who know) the best the film has
had and may be even better than the prints seen on its initial release. As I’ve
touched on, the film has a huge following and I recently caught up with two of
its most high profile fans, poster artist Graham Humphreys and director John
Stevenson. Although both agree that the infamous Cabal Cut is still the Holy
Grail as far as the films various versions go, this director’s cut is a welcome
treat for fans. I asked them why they thought the movie was still so important
and why fans should seek out this latest Arrow release….
John Stevenson on
Nightbreed
It
wasn’t Clive Barker’s source novel “Cabal’ that got me obsessed with
‘Nightbreedâ€. It wasn’t even the film version, which I saw in the first days of
its release in 1990 in San Francisco. It was the Titan book ‘Clive Barker’s The
Nightbreed Chronicles’ released in 1990 to coincide with the theatrical
release. The book contains beautiful portrait photography by Murray Close of
over 30 of Midian’s denizens (created by Bob Keen, Geoff Portass and their team
at Image Animation) and their wonderfully strange and imaginative back stories,
courtesy of Clive Barker.
Looking
at the book was a much more satisfying experience than watching the frustrating
theatrical release which had cut most of Midian’s monsters, and reduced the
screen time of the few that remained to fleeting seconds. The film also gave no
sense of the fascinating monster society that ‘The Nightbreed Chronicles’
filled in, in Barker’s dark and witty personal histories of his creations.
It
was a surprise to discover this engaging, tightly-written and directed
thriller—released in 1950!—about a possible nuclear nightmare taking
place in London. In fact, the film was awarded the Oscar for Best Story (back
when that category still existed). The writers were Paul Dehn (who would years
later co-pen the script for Goldfinger and, after that, The Spy Who
Came in from the Cold) and James Bernard (primarily known as a film score
composer, best remembered for his work for Hammer horror pictures).
The
Boulting Brothers (identical twins!) were a sort of British Coen Brothers at the
time, having made numerous quality movies from the late 1930s to the 1970s,
usually directing separately. Seven Days to Noon is the only picture on
which both brothers are credited as directors.
While
the tale is fiction (and based on a novel), it plays as if it’s a true story. A
brilliant nuclear physicist, Professor Willingdon (Barry Jones) has written a
letter to the Prime Minister, saying that he’s stolen one of the suitcase-sized
nuclear bombs from the British weapons development facility, and he will
detonate it on the following Sunday at noon (seven days from the beginning of
the picture) if Britain does not announce the cessation of atomic weapons
creation. Willingdon goes into hiding to wait out the days, staying in shabby rooms-to-let
near the center of London. One of his landladies is the colorful (and morally
dubious) Goldie (Olive Sloane). Scotland Yard Superintendent Folland (Andre
Morrell) teams up with one of Willingdon’s colleagues, Lane (Hugh Cross), who
happens to be sweet on the professor’s daughter, Ann (Sheila Manahan), to try
and figure out Willingdon’s whereabouts.
The
picture goes into fine detail on how such a scenario might play out in the
city. For the first couple of days, the public is kept in the dark; but as the
deadline draws near, an evacuation must occur. A fifteen-mile radius is
determined to be the danger zone, and the filmmakers illustrate what a problem
this would entail.
The
result is a suspenseful, beat-the-clock doomsday picture that foreshadows by
almost fifteen years other similar cautionary movies like Dr. Strangelove or
Fail-Safe. The film moves quickly through its near-ninety-minute
runtime, generating tension and chills galore.
Kino
Lorber’s new Blu-ray restoration is a solid black and white, suitably grainy
presentation in 1920x1080p with optional English subtitles. Alas, there are no
supplements save for a theatrical trailer and some for other Kino releases.
Seven
Days to Noon is
terrific stuff, a shining feather in the cap of the British film industry.
In
1988, filmmaker Martin Scorsese unleashed the mesmerizing—and undeservedly controversial—The
Last Temptation of Christ. It revealed a side of the director that one
would call “spiritual,†which to many was something of a surprise. After all,
this was the guy who had given us Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, and Raging
Bull.
Nine
years later, Scorsese presented yet another entry into what now could be called
his “Spiritualism Trilogy,†i.e., three movies that deal with crises of faith.
This one was Kundun, the epic biopic about the life of the Dalai Lama.
(The third piece in the trilogy, Silence, appeared nineteen years after
that, in 2016.)
It
was the late screenwriter Melissa Mathison (E.T., The Black Stallion)
who apparently got Scorsese interested in doing a picture about the Dalai Lama,
whom the other lamas addressed as “Kundun.†Mathison had become friendly with
the real exiled Dalai Lama and he had given his blessing for her to write a
screenplay about his life.
The
result was a fairly expensive ($28 million budget) period/costume piece with no
recognizable/bankable stars about a figure who had little connection with Western
audiences. The motion picture—as lush, beautiful, and well-intentioned that it
is—failed at the box office and was contentious to boot. Kundun was
banned in China, of course, and in fact, the Chinese government punitively banned
all Disney films (the distributor) for some time until the studio
apologized and worked to mend the relationship.
The
story begins in 1937, when a young, precocious child born to poor farmers in
Tibet is single-handedly chosen to become the next Dalai Lama after the death
of the previous one. He is taken from his family to groom and educate. Then, in
the late 40s, Communist China invades Tibet, there is a power struggle, and the
Dalai Lama is forced to flee his country in 1959. He currently resides in exile
in India.
Scorsese’s
film is indeed gorgeous. Roger Deakins received one of his numerous Academy
Award nominations for the cinematography. The picture was also nominated for
Art Direction, Costume Design, and for Philip Glass’s haunting Original Score. The
picture itself is meticulously paced, meditative, and, some might say, dull.
Granted, while it’s not the type of crime picture Scorsese is known for, Kundun
is anything but boring. Let’s just say that it came and went vastly
underappreciated.
Kino
Lorber’s new Special Edition 2-disk Blu-ray release gives us an excellent
1920x1080p restoration that beats any previous home video release. The
accompanying audio commentary by film historian and critic Peter Tonguette is
quite informative, as it also deals with Scorsese’s experiments in spiritualism
in the cinema.
An
entire second disk is devoted to supplements, although they are all vintage
pieces produced around the time of the movie’s release. In Search of Kundun
is a long and detailed account about the making of the film. There is also a lengthy
interview with that documentary’s director, Michael Henry Wilson, on how he got
involved with Kundun. Surprisingly extended outtakes from the
documentary are presented as separate interviews with Scorsese, Philip Glass,
and Melissa Mathison. There is an additional hour-long documentary, Compassion
in Exile, about the real Dalai Lama. Finally, there is a substantial
collection of EPK featurettes with the cast and crew that the studio produced
to promote the film, and the theatrical trailer. The limited edition booklet
essay is by filmmaker Zade Constantine.
Kundun
may
be considered an oddity in Martin Scorsese’s oeuvre, but when one
studies the filmmaker’s thematic through lines in all his works, his
choice to make it is not so mysterious. Kino’s new release is noteworthy and
certainly attractive to Scorsese’s serious fans and to anyone interested in the
life of one of the most respected religious leaders on the planet.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, when Leech sets McKay up to
be humiliated by riding a killer bronc, and McKay declines the invitation, once
again Patricia is disappointed. Everybody goes through that initiation, she
tells him. McKay rides off and goes to visit Julie Maragon (Jean Simmons), who
owns a valuable piece of land, and doesn’t come back until next day. Leech
tells the major McKay was lost—“the lostest man I ever saw,†thus causing McKay to call him out as a liar.
Now in these parts when a man calls you a liar you either go for your gun or
start swinging a fist or two. But instead McKay tells him he doesn’t intend to
let him draw him into a confrontation with horses, guns, or fists. Well, that
tears it. Pat can’t have any respect for a man who won’t stand up for himself.
McKay thinks it’s time to go back to town and rethink this marriage business.
All this takes place against the backdrop of a larger
conflict between the major and his next door neighbor, Rufus Hannassey (Burl
Ives) and his three sons, including the wild and vicious Buck (Chuck Connors).
They’ve been squabbling over the Big Muddy and water rights for years. Terrell
has the upper hand. He’s got the larger spread, more men and money, while the
Hannasseys live in relative squalor on an arid piece of dirt with little water.
The major uses the Hannassey boys’ hazing of McKay as a pretext to ride out to
their spread and teach them a lesson, which includes shooting holes in the
Hannassey’s water tower and later driving Hannassey’s cattle away from the
water of the Big Muddy.
“The Big Country†is based on a novel by pulp writer
Donald Hamilton, best-known for the Matt Helm books that were turned into Dean
Martin comedy/action flicks. (One of them, “The Wrecking Crew†with Sharon Tate
is featured in Quentin Tarantino’s “Once
Upon a Time in Hollywood.â€)_ But Wyler hired Quaker author Jessamyn West (“Friendly
Persuasionâ€) to write an adaptation that put pacifism front and center as the
central theme of the film. In 1958 the Cold War was in progress and the threat
of nuclear annihilation had everybody nervous. (It’s still a threat, but now we
have Netflix and binge-watching to keep us from thinking about it.) With “The
Big Country†Wyler tried to preach that there is a better way to solve disputes
other than by giving in to violence which can only end by wiping out
civilization. (“The Big Country†is the opposite of a Sam Peckinpah western,
where violence and destruction are portrayed as inevitable and ultimately cathartic.)
It’s an odd movie, in which most of the scenes are filled with tension and the
threat of violence, but fail to have a satisfactorily pay off. For example,
McKay walks away from the killer bronc, but later rides the horse when no one
is around to witness it except Ramon (Alfonso Bedoya), one of the Mexican ranch
hands. And when McKay decides to leave the ranch he wakes Leech up in the
middle of the night and fights him when no one is awake to see it. He makes the
point that he isn’t a coward, but doesn’t feel the need to prove it to anybody.
A Cinema Retro Exclusive: director John Stevenson ("Kung Fu Panda", "Sherlock Gnomes") provides an exclusive interview with Midge Costin, director of the acclaimed new film "Making Waves: The Art of Cinematic Sound".
Working on the sound was the most fun part of the two
animated feature films I have directed. One of the nicest gifts you get as a director,
after working on your film for years, is being able to see your film fresh
again once the sound designers and composer have added a whole new dimension to
the story. So I was very excited to see Midge Costin's new documentary "Making
Waves: The Art Of Cinematic Sound" and have a chance to talk to her about this
vital, but often overlooked aspect of movie making. (John Stevenson)
JS: I loved your
film and was surprised at how visual it was for a subject that is primarily
auditory. It must have been a labor of love.
MC: It took 9 years to
make! My editor, David J. Turner was a student of mine and he was so good. He
had already come into film school having made films and he was also a composer.
He was so good at both sound and picture and he was so sensitive. We shot most
of the interviews from 2013 to 2016. In the first year I just sat with him,
which I know people don’t do anymore as directors, and we sat and went through
the dailies and talked and he took it all in. He’s a young guy (now in his mid
30’s) and he was with me the whole time. He was brilliant.
JS: IMDB Lists
“Quiet Cool†from 1986 as your only picture editing credit, but did you edit
picture on any other films?
MC: I did apprentice editing on
something called GYMKATA (1985) and then QUIET COOL and a couple of other
things, then I went to Alaska right after film school. I actually did some
editing on some documentaries up there.What happened was, the last thing I thought I would do coming
out of film school was sound. I would get in a panic doing sound because
I thought it was technical, and I wasn’t relating it to story and character and
all of that. So I edited the picture with a friend of mine who ended up going into
sound and we edited his student film together.So I came out and did apprentice, assistant editing and all that. And I
had my thesis film left which was a short documentary and Dan calls me up and
says “Midge, none of the Union guys will touch this 16mm film, but if you come
I will teach you sound effects and I will cut the dialogueâ€. So, as I tell my
students, I lowered myself and took a sound job because I needed the money to
finish my thesis film. And on that very first film I realized ‘Oh crap, I am
responsible for setting mood and tone and establishing plot points and
character, and how do I do that?â€And so
I started and then it's like one show led to the next because I knew so many
people from film school. Once you do anything in sound everybody is like ’Oh,
can you help me?’ So I just started getting sound jobs, and then here it is,
the 80s and going into the 90s and sound is now in 5.1 and because I cut sound
effects (I was one of the few women that was cutting effects, which made it kind
of fun) and then I found myself on these big action adventure movies. My first Union Show
was DAYS OF THUNDER and I had to do the sound effect for the engine of the car
for the bad guy who was racing against Tom Cruise, and I did all the aerial
shots showing the Nascar racetrack. When I was a little I wanted to be a race car
driver (laughs). One thing just led to another and it was so exciting.
JS: You have 23
sound editing credits (according to IMDB) and those include doing Foley,
dialogue, sound effects, so out of all of those films which ones did you like
the most? MC: My favorite, because it comes down
to story and character was CRIMSON TIDE. I just love Gene Hackman and Denzel
Washington and their relationship and also the story. It is a good story about
the military, and are they pro war or anti-war? And I found that fascinating.
But the other thing is, you are in a submarine, so you are in a tin can and you
are telling a story on a set, and you have to take out the footsteps in the
dialogue track because they are stepping on plywood! But the whole tension of when
they get hit and they are going down, down, down, and they are going to be
crushed, it is your responsibility to bring the emotion and the reality,
because they are all just listening! It is all being told through their ears,
the story is being told aurally.
And also in that movie each different department (radio, sonar, weapons systems,
etc.) have a different coloured lighting, so we do the same thing, every single
space has a different background ambience to it, but I just loved working on that.
Another fun one was ARMAGEDDON. I know Stanley Kubrick is
probably rolling over in his grave because there is no sound in space and I'm
putting in all these incredible sounds. Even a fire happens and I am like "Oh,
really?" But when Bruce Willis and Steve
Buscemi come out of that shuttle for the first time, the meteor was the
antagonist and so what I wanted to do is make it sound like its going to devour
them. So I get earthquake rumbles and low tones that always go to our gut and
bring up fear and cue us that something is going to happen. And then have the rock as if it was almost like munching on somebody like
really chewing, going to eat them, devour them. But we are always thinking too "What’s the low frequency sound, what’s the mid, what’s the high?" And for the high
on that, I used this wind through a wire that really kind of makes the hair on
the back of your neck stand up, so that was fun.
My least favorite thing
is when you don’t have time and they get to sound at the last minute and they
don’t really care about sound. But when you have someone like Tony Scott who
cared about sound you would get it early enough, maybe even at the script stage
so you can be feeding the edit room, then those things are great. Michael Bay,
in some of his earlier films, did not seem as interested in sound. I was working
with George Waters, who was the supervisor, and he was getting him to pay
attention to sound, enlightening him and now Michael Bay really cares about
sound and realizes how important it is.
JS: So out of all of
those 23 films you worked on as a sound editor which director did you enjoy working
with the most and who used sound the most creatively?
MC: Tony Scott really
cared and was a really great collaborator and he looked on sound as one of his
key positions. But I know some big
directors even now who are not paying attention to sound. They do it late, and
they are changing picture to the last second and you just don’t have time to do
a good job. So it is all about respect. I was really sorry not to be able to
get the Cohen brothers for my film, they don’t really do too many interviews,
but they have sound specified in their scripts. So think about that, you can
read a script and possibly make suggestions.
I ended up on these big action adventure movies but the truth is
I realized one day late in the 90’s that I don’t even like those films, to tell
you the truth.I realized, a couple of
years ago, that I go to a movie to hear someone tell me what they think the
meaning of life is, and you don’t get that from those films! The whole
rollercoaster thing, I don’t really understand. I love rollercoasters, so I
would rather go on a real rollercoaster than watch some of these action
adventure movies. They are so overly violent, I found them sexist and racist,
so I started teaching and I thought I can pass on these skills that I have so
that they can make really good movies. One of my students was Ryan Coogler, who
did sound, because he didn’t know it very well. So that is kind of a fun thing.
JS: So a personal
question as a sound editor: which film sound design is the one that has
impressed you the most in the history of movies?
MC: I was just
thinking about that. One of the ones that stood out for me when I saw it and
thought about sound was David Lynch’s ERASERHEAD. Now when I listen to it I
think it is over the top, of course the whole film is, but still that had a big
impact on me. But I would say APOCALYPSE NOW and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK, for
those big films. But I also really like smaller films. One of the reasons
ORDINARY PEOPLE is in my film is because silence can be really powerful. And I
also think about that with Hitchcock films. And Orson Welles, his films are so
subtle. And those films are as good as anything being made now. A lot of times
I will get questions from these 18 year-old boys about "What kind of microphone
did you use, or what kind of editing system?" And it is not about the
technology, that’s what I am trying to make sure people know, it is about the
directors. The directors who are pushing. Now it is so much easier digitally
than when we were doing it analog, but we are doing the same thing, and it was
kind of fun to learn when you could not even see anything. We would be staring
off into space. Now you can see the waveforms.
JS: So you have all these wonderful
directors-Steven Spielberg, David Lynch, George Lucas, Ang Lee Christopher
Nolan, and more and more. How easy was it to get all those directors for the
film, and how easy was it to get this plethora of clips from films going back
to the beginning of cinema? It must have been a huge job.
MC: Well, the
directors I got through the sound people mostly and then Spielberg and Lucas
are active at USC, and I have an endowed chair that was given by both of them.
So they're aware and they said yes, but we almost didn’t get Spielberg because
he was doing back to back films, and he had no time. We were literally about
to go to Tribeca and he was able to do the interview at the last minute.So it was always because they have so much respect for their sound people that
we got them. So that wasn't too bad. With Peter Weir, David Lynch and Ang Lee, it’s
like their spirituality is their film making. Ang Lee talked about being in the
Foley room on THE ICESTORM and making the sound of the ice with broken glass. He
was so engaged. He was in the edit room for BILLY LYNNâ€S LONG HALF TIME
WALKand he came and hung out with us
while we were setting up. Whereas some other people just came to do their piece.
I remember Robert Redford came in and said “I only have 20 minutes†(everybody
would say “I only have 20 minutesâ€) and then he gave us at least an hour,
because I think they really respect sound. And going into the second part of
your question, I had listened to their body of work and had very specific
questions because all those clips, we had to set them up. I had to know what
clips we could use so that I could ask them to talk about them. And if they
didn’t say the name of the film, we would ask and get them to say it (almost
like ADR) because I was asking them about specific films, and very specific
scenes because we had to know what we could use. So we learned (myself, my
editors, my producing partners and anyone involved in the film )
‘fair use’ and understand how it was used so we didn’t end up having the lawyers
cut our film for us (laughs).
JS: It must have
taken a long time to clear all those rights?
MC: It did, but we
were constantly giving them cuts in the last two years so that they could say
this is working and this is not. One of the things that we did it is that we
built scenes that we knew we wanted, like for SAVING PRIVATE RYAN and A RIVER
RUNS THROUGH IT, a quieter film, so we would build these scenes and that was
hard, because I didn’t want to go over 90 minutes, I knew it should be a 90
minute film, so I never made like a 5-hour version.
JS: Thank you! Films
are too long!
MC: I totally agree.
So we never even had a two-hour version.
JS: I have seen your film twice now, and if you can, I think it is very
important to see it in a cinema with a good Surround Sound system, because you
demonstrate various surround sound formats both visually and aurally. So what
is going to happen for home video where most people will hear it out of a
single sound bar in the front?
MC: You know, I just
got off the phone with someone who said (and this is the second person who has
said this to me in 24 hours) that it works somehow on a computer. And I’m like,
really? Because if you do something that is mono it splits 50/50 but if you do
left and right, it has a whole different feel, so it must translate somehow. I
have got to listen to it now! I understand most people will see it at home and
not in theaters, but it was important to me to find a distributor who would
give it a theatrical release. Some people bemoan the fact that people aren’t
going to theaters and all that stuff, but sound is even more important as
screens get smaller because that is the emotion, the emotion is coming through
sound. And also headphone technology is getting better with VR.
JS: I used to love CinemaScope films where they would pan the sound as
characters moved across the screen. With 5.1 mixes the dialogue got anchored to
the center of the screen, but now with Dolby Atmos mixes panning sound seems to
be back (I am thinking of the immersive soundtrack for Alfonso Curon’s ROMA if
you saw it in 70mm). Do you like panning sound to increase the spatiality, or
do you find it distracting?
MC: I just did a panel
at the Mill Valley Film Festival with Iaon Allen from Dolby and Ben Burtt. I
worked on a show where they did pan the sound, it was HOCUS POCUS with Bette
Midler and was kind of fun, but here is what the problem is. If the left,
center, right speakers are different when you pan from one to the other then
they will sound different as you move from speaker to speaker, and this is what
Iaon was saying. So they stopped. The other thing is, it takes so long to do
that and then you go to so many theaters and the sound is screwed up. I remember going to see THE LAST EMPEROR and this is what
happened, it is the perspective thing. I am looking at the emperor, and now I
am looking at the audience, and things swap. And it calls attention to itself.
So if you do a P.O.V., it changes, and then it’s like “Why is the sound over
there?†It calls attention to why the sound is coming from that side of the
screen and the audience gets pulled out of the movie. So it is so awkward doing
that, that it got anchored. But I loved ROMA! I thought it was brilliant. I insisted on
including it in the film because even Ben Burtt was saying "There is nothing
that’s happened in the last 30 years or so that’s new", but I was like "No, I
think ROMA is changing it" because I would be telling students, "Don’t put
stuff in the surrounds, you’re going to make the audience look behind them". But
when I am in that car and they are driving to the beach and the kid's voices are
behind me, I am totally in that scene. I loved that. I loved that he got more
aggressive with his sound design. That’s what we need.
JS: We went from
mono, to stereo, to quadraphonic, to 5.1, 7.1 and now Dolby Atmos. Where can we
go next?
MC: Well, possibly
there may be in-seat audio, kind of like a ride. You can almost see them doing
the LFE low frequency, the boom channel, under seats or speakers by your ears.
I don’t think they have figured out how to use VR well yet, but when that comes
in I think that we will have more channels. I don’t know where it’s going
besides that, but maybe it’s almost like a ride to bring people in.
JS: When you got into movies your
original interest was story. After a while working as a sound editor you
realized you could use sound to shape narrative, reveal character, and express
emotion. What advice do you have for aspiring filmmakers about how to use sound
creatively to tell their stories?
MC: What I would say is to break down a script. Think about what can
your character hear. What is the environment? And how are they being affected
by sound? So start there, at the script stage. I always break down each scene but think thematically. What can sound bring? Just like you are thinking about
camera, lighting, costume, production design, or any other area of film making. Ask how sound could help tell this story. And I always think of the background
and the ambience, how does the environment affect your character? What is the
mood in the film you want to create? What are the sound themes thematically? A
lot of times plot points might not have sound, so what can you take from the
environment?
So I have people ask me
how is sound telling the story. One scene I always like to show my beginning
students is from NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. It is a very simple scene where Josh
Brolin first finds the money. So he is in this kind of prairie desert and he’s
looking, looking, and there is a wind and then he looks at his watch. And he is
looking to see if the guy under the tree with the money is really dead. And so
he puts up his watch as if we are going to have to cut time, as if we are going
to have to see the watch again to show that 45 minutes or an hour has passed.
Then we cut to the same perspective almost, but the sound of the wind has
changed and we know time has changed, it is not continuous, and we never had to
look at the watch again. Now he walks up onto the rocks and we see his heavy-duty
boots, which says something about his character. This is our man. We hear flies;
the guy with the money is dead. Then here comes the big plot point, the money,
follow the money. So he opens the case. Was there any music? No.There is no
music cue. There would normally be a big music cue, a brassy Dun-Dun-Duuuun! to
say ‘There is the money!". So I always say "Did anything tell you that was the
money?" No one can remember, so we play it again. There has always been a
slight wind sound effect throughout the scene, but now there is a big wind gust
as the money is revealed. It doesn’t register as a big wind gust but you feel
it in your gut.
And then I will show scenes from CRIMSON TIDE when Gene Hackman
is giving his speech to his crew about the submarine being the most powerful
destructive force in the ocean, and it is raining. And I put big thunderclaps
on top of his speech. If I had told them before I wanted to do that, they would
have said "No, you don’t put thunder over his speech. Put it between his
dialogueâ€, and they would also have said "She is the biggest hack". They watched
it afterwards and laughed, because it seemed so ridiculous. But audiences did
not notice I put all the thunder claps over the biggest statements he is
making.
We don’t get credit for what we do because it is happening
emotionally but not intellectually. But we are all filmmakers and that is why
it was fun to make this film, and yes to make it visual because we are making
movies, which are visual and aural.
JS: Well, I loved
your movie and thank you so much for talking with me.
The Image Book(Le Livre d'image) is the latest offering by octogenarian auteur Jean-Luc Godard. It is a
cinematic essay likened by some reviewers to be a sequel of sorts to his
encyclopedic Histoire(s) du cinema (1989-1998). However, the cinematic essay
or cine-essay is the mode of discourse Godard began to employ half a century
ago, at the end of his avant-garde period, starting with Le
Gai savoir[1] (1969). His goal in doing so was to
dispense with the classic bourgeois narrative and employ extra-diegetic devices
such as film clips, intertitles, musical scores, photos, etc., even his own voice-over
commentary to address the audience. When The Image Book premiered at the Cannes Film Festival in 2018
it was awarded an honorary Palme d'Or by Jury President Cate Blanchett
for Godard’s effort “to define and redefine what cinema can beâ€.
Kino Lorber has released the film on DVD and Blu-ray. Bonus features
include interviews with researcher Nicole Brenez and producer Fabrice Aragno.
The conversation with Brenez at the 2019 International Film Festival Rotterdam
is conducted in heavily accented English and quickly becomes tedious. The
interview with Aragno in which he responds to clearly formulated questions in
much less heavily accented English is much more fluid. The accompanying essay
booklet features James Quandt's "Facing the Void: Jean-Luc Godard's Book
of Images" which provides some useful context for interpreting the film
but does presuppose some knowledge of Godard's recent output. And if one is
uninitiated then The Image
Bookis a great introduction to the late work
of one of the greatest and most seminal filmmakers alive today.
Writing in The Hollywood Reporter, Richard Newby pays appropriate tribute to Werner Herzog's 1979 remake of Murnau's 1922 silent horror film classic "Nosferatu". Murnau's adaptation of Bram Stoker's "Dracula" featured a terrifying performance by mysterious actor Max Schreck, while Herzog's film employed equally eccentric actor Klaus Kinski, who also gave a superb performance. Click here to read.
(Click here to read review of Shout! Factory Blu-ray special edition)
In 1981, ITV screened a celebration of the premiere of For
Your Eyes Only from the Odeon Leicester Square. I vividly recall my exclamation
of surprise at spotting a familiar face in a shot of the crowded foyer –
“That’s Harry Saltzman!†Yet as the programme continued and no mention was made
of his presence I began to doubt myself. After all, he and his Bond movie
co-producer Albert “Cubby†Broccoli had fallen out some years earlier, so it
would be unlikely he’d be there; I must have been mistaken. It was some time
later that I learned it had indeed been Harry, invited by Cubby upon the
suggestion by one of the film’s stars, Chaim Topol, that he extend an olive
branch to his old partner. It would be fair to say that the working
relationship between the two men was a tempestuous one. Theirs was a
partnership born out of necessity: Harry had purchased the film rights to Ian
Fleming’s James Bond novels but couldn’t raise finance for them – “I’ve got a
gold mine but I can’t dig it upâ€, he’s said to have opined – and the
enterprising Cubby desperately wanted to get his hands on those rights.
“When Harry Met Cubbyâ€, the new book from film historian
Robert Sellers, tells the enthralling story of their business marriage, a chalk
and cheese alliance that birthed a cinematic series still thriving 57 years
later. Assembling anecdotes from a variety of sources, much of the text will be
familiar to diehards, but there’s sufficient new material – some of it drawn
from the author’s own interviews – to gift it freshness, and for a wider
readership the level of unrest that went on behind the scenes will be a
revelation.
The book opens with substantial chapters detailing each
man’s individual background – both endured a tough upbringing – and their
hard-earned rise within a dog-eat-dog industry. The fast-paced chapters that
follow examine the production of each of their films: the nine Bonds they made
together (1962’s Dr No through to 1974’s The Man with the Golden Gun) and their
single collaborative non-Bond (the Bob Hope romp Call Me Bwana). Also covered
are the solo projects. For Harry there were several, among them the Harry
Palmer trilogy and Battle of Britain, while for Cubby it was just one, Chitty
Chitty Bang Bang. Of particular interest to me was the chapter on the Val
Guest-directed oddity Toomorrow. It was one of Harry’s most significant
misfires, and all but unseen for 40 years, the troubled production bore dismal
results in almost every respect, yet I confess when I saw it I actually found
it quirkily entertaining.
The fissures in the cement began to appear surprisingly
early on, worsening as the two men dealt differently with the rollercoaster
success of Bond. While Cubby was content to keep a keen focus on the golden
goose – a focus which gave the 007 films longevity far beyond what many
believed would be a short sell-by date – Harry had a restless nature and an
insatiable urge to expand into other areas. It would ultimately be his undoing.
Cubby was a hugely admired figure, both within the film
industry at large and among his employees. On the whole he was diplomatic,
good-natured and approachable. In complete contrast, Harry was foul-tempered
and impulsive and displayed an alarming lack of good judgement; he thought the
title song for Goldfinger was awful, he nixed a chance to make a film starring
new pop sensation The Beatles, and further along the line he turned down the
opportunity to produce Woman in Black for the West End stage, believing it to
be a dud. These are but a few examples of his folly. Although Sellers’ book is
far kinder to Cubby than it is to Harry – probably deservedly so – the author
gratifyingly reveals the other side of the latter; a devoted, loving husband
and given to spontaneous acts of the most wonderful generosity.
Nevertheless, as one reads through the book it becomes increasingly clear why
one man was so loved and the other was not. Memories of Cubby are mostly
affectionate, those of Harry are largely disdainful. Actor Earl Cameron, who
appeared in Thunderball, summed it up succinctly. Of those occasions the
producers visited the set he remarked: “If they said, Cubby’s coming tomorrow,
it was – oh great. If they said, Harry’s coming tomorrow, it was – oh shit.
That was the attitude of the crew. They didn’t like him at all.â€
It’s a miracle really that the men with the golden touch
remained partners for as long as they did, and that their house of cards only
came tumbling down due to the disastrous financial corner into which Harry
finally painted himself. Following details of their acrimonious parting of ways
at the end of 1975, a final short chapter is devoted to the two men’s
post-partnership projects. For Cubby, that was the unbridled continued success
of James Bond. For Harry, between then and his passing in 1994, it was
tantamount to almost nothing. For Harry the grass was always greener on the
other side of the street and although his downfall was entirely of his own
making, as one reaches the end of Sellers’ indispensable book, one can’t help
but feel sad about the way it all ended for him. How different an experience
for everyone involved in those films it might have been had the relationship
between the two titans of film entertainment been more amicable, and their dealings
with those they relied upon more equitable. I was privileged to meet
Cubby once. We exchanged just a few words, but I’ll not forget how warmly he
shook my hand – me, a nobody. Although it’s probable Harry would have been less
gracious, I do so wish I’d met him too.
Complete with an eight-page insert of black and white
photos, “When Harry Met Cubby†is an essential read, particularly for fans of
007. I read it through in one virtually uninterrupted sitting; it’s something I
seldom ever do, but it’s so wholly engrossing I literally couldn’t put it down.
Without hesitation, I’d cite it as my favourite non-fiction read of 2019 thus
far.
Not coming to a theater near you: the original "Planet of the Apes".
BY LEE PFEIFFER
It's no secret to retro movie lovers that Disney has long denied theatrical screenings of most of their older films. The theory is that some classic gems will generate more interest (and revenue) if they are periodically reissued with great fanfare to commemorate a movie's anniversary. That mostly pertains to a handful of animated movies but doesn't explain why the studio's vast catalog of live-action films are routinely denied exhibition on the big screen. Now the situation appears to be exponentially worse with Disney's acquisition of Fox and its classic movie catalog. In an extensive piece on the web site Vulture, writer Matt Zoller Seitz presents a grim situation facing art house and revival cinemas: Disney is cherry-picking where and how some of the most beloved Fox classics of all time will be screened. The scattershot strategy defies easy explanation but the theory is that theaters that show first run movies will not be allowed to show retro Fox movies in the same venue. Disney has remained mum on the issue but theater owners are quite concerned because the interest in seeing older films on the big screen is quite extensive and such revivals are crucial to many smaller theater's survival. What is Disney's overall motive? It is theorized that the studio wants to maximize as many screens as possible in first-run theaters in order to minimize exhibition space for films of rival studios. There are exceptions. Theaters and film festivals that play exclusively older fare will apparently still be able to access the Fox catalog. However, many theaters can only continue to exist by playing a mixture of contemporary and classic fare. Disney now owns most of the major blockbuster film franchises (agent 007 remains a notable holdout) and last year the studio's films accounted for a staggering 40% of the North American boxoffice. Suppressing screenings of cinematic classics will only increase concerns that the house of Mickey Mouse is misusing its power and the unintended consequences might include threatening the survival of some theaters.
Twilight Time has released the 1959 Fox Western "Warlock" on Blu-ray as in a limited edition of 3,000 units. To call the film a superior Western might be a bit misleading, given the fact that so many great films of this genre were released in 1950s. "Warlock" isn't a classic but it tries hard to be (perhaps a bit too hard.) What can be said is that it is a consistently interesting film with a complex script detailing the dilemmas of some very complex characters. The movie opens in the titular town, a speck on the map in the desert landscape that the official marshal for the area only rarely makes an appearance, thus forcing the townspeople to hire their own lawmen despite the fact that they lack legal status. When the movie opens, we find the town being routinely terrorized by a group of sadistic and wild cowboys led by Abe McQuown (Tom Drake). To show they are impervious to the law, they run the new marshal out of town in a particularly cruel and humiliating manner. (As with many films of this type, the townsmen are cowardly milquetoasts and even the deputy refuses to aid the marshal.) The town council decides to pay ten times the previous marshal's salary to hire Clay Blaisedell (Henry Fonda), a notorious and fearless gunman who has a reputation for restoring law and order to troubled towns. Blaisedell arrives with his constant companion, fellow gunman Tom Morgan (Anthony Quinn) and lays down the terms of his employment. In addition to his salary, Blaisedell demands complete autonomy over his methods for ridding Warlock of McQuown and his band of thugs. Additionally, he gets permission to open a gambling and prostitution sideline in the local saloon that he and Morgan will control. Out of desperation, the town council agrees.
The story focuses on a third major character in this scenario: Johnny Gannon (Richard Widmark), a disillusioned member of McQuown's gang who is becoming incensed at the senseless cruelty they practice. He stays with the gang only to keep an eye on his 19 year-old brother, Billy (Frank Gorshin), who is prone acting foolishly and impulsively. As Blaisedell and Morgan take draconian steps to confront McQuown and his men, the results become immediately apparent. However, the townspeople become leery of Blaisedell's dictatorial powers and hire Johnny Gannon to be the new marshal. Gannon has left McQuown's gang and is courageously promising to confront his former friends and ensure they leave the territory. This sets in motion competition with Blaisedell, who Gannon informs can no longer act as an unofficial arm of the law. Adding to this tension are a number of other factors that make "Warlock" play out at times like a soap opera. Blaisedell becomes engaged to local good girl Jessie Marlowe (Dolores Michaels), who is insistent that he reform his ways and adopt a respectful profession. This angers Morgan, who resents her interference. Meanwhile, Morgan is haunted the arrival in town of his ex-flame, the appropriately named prostitute Lily Dollar (Dorothy Malone), who is carrying a long-time grudge and threatens to undermine Morgan's reputation by revealing some devastating secrets about him.
There's a lot going on in "Warlock", both the town and the film, and at times the intelligent screenplay by Robert Alan Aurthur (based on the novel by Oakley Hall) seems over-stuffed with dramatic relationships and situations. At its heart, the film is about divided loyalties. Blaisedell wants to honor his promise to marry Jessie but he resents hurting Morgan in the process. Johnny Gannon is part of a gang he hesitates to leave because he feels loyal to his brother Billy and wants to act as his protector. The townspeople are grateful to Blaisedell for helping to restore peace to Warlock but they feel obliged to hire Gannon as the new lawman. I don't usually analyze films from a Freudian viewpoint because sometimes a cigar is just a cigar but one would have to willfully blind to ignore the homoerotic elements in the relationship between Blaisedell and Morgan. They are more like a married couple than old buddies. Indeed, when Blaisedell announces his engagement to Jessie, Morgan reacts like a spurned lover and has a breakdown of sorts that leads to a dramatic incident of violence. As for Blaisdell, he seems rather passive about the coming wedding, acting very much like a man who feels marriage is a mandatory part of a straight man's life, so he'd better get hitched in order to reassure himself of his masculinity. It's also worth noting that both Blaisdell and Morgan pay a lot of attention to their wardrobes and dress like dandies, which would be in line with Hollywood's perception of homosexual men in the era in which the film was made. In any event, this not-so-subtle element of the plot adds a fascinating angle to the production. The performances are uniformly excellent under the direction of Edward Dmytryk, the former blacklisted filmmaker who revived his career by naming names- which might add yet another level of Freudian analysis to a plot that centers on guilt-ridden, emotionally conflicted protagonists.
The Twilight Time region-free Blu-ray does justice to the fine cinematography of Joseph MacDonald, which makes the most of the vistas that were meant for CinemaScope. Bonus extras are limited to the original trailer, isolated score track and brief newsreel bit featuring Fonda at a charity event. There are also the usual insightful liner notes by Julie Kirgo. "Warlock" gets a bit bogged down in its own excesses (the 121 minute running time begins to make the film sag toward the end), but it is intelligent, compelling and engaging throughout. Recommended.
On
second thought, don’t rewind this tape. Destroy it! Don’t let anyone in your
family watch it!
The
phenomenon known as “J-Horror,†or Japanese Horror, had been brewing for
decades (Kwaidan, anyone?), but it was Hideo Nakata’s Ringu (“Ringâ€)
in 1998 that jumpstarted the movement. Motion pictures of the ilk are usually
derived from ghost stories, Japanese folklore, and revenge tales, mixed with a
modern horror-film sensibility, a dash of gruesomeness, and often a creepy
dripping-wet ghost-girl (a yūrei)with long
black hair covering her face coming to get you in your dreams or out of, say, a
television set, in your waking hours.
Ringu
spawned
a franchise in and of itself, with eight films in total, two television series,
six manga adaptations, five international film remakes, and two video games.
It’s
only fair to acknowledge author Koji Suzuki’s 1991 novel and its subsequent
sequels to form the initial trilogy, and then three later books in the
universe. There was also an earlier made for television feature, Ring:
Kanzenban, in 1995 that did little to advance the property. Only after the
massive success of the first theatrically released feature did the thing take
off. The original Ringu and its first sequel, Rasen, mostly follow
the books, whereas the rest of the movies went in another direction.
Most
people in the West probably know the franchise from Gore Verbinski’s Hollywood
remake, The Ring, starring Naomi Watts(2002, and it’s a good one).
Nevertheless, the Japanese originals are worth investigating, especially for
viewers who are horror film buffs. Arrow Video has released a Blu-ray box set
of the first four pictures in the series to satisfy this audience, and the
product is a delight.
Disk
One: Ringu, directed by Hideo Nakata. It’s the story of a videotape that
kills people who watch it. As soon as someone views the tape, the phone rings. A
voice remarks, “Seven days.†Then, seven days later, the ghost of a young
woman, Sadako Yamamura, who was thrown by her own father into a well to die thirty
years earlier, appears and kills the viewer. There’s a way out, though… but
that won’t be revealed here.
While
the use of a VHS videotape as the object of menace is today dated and quaint,
the ideas behind the story are still potent. This is an unsettling little
movie. It of course didn’t have the kind of budget that the American remake
had, but that could be why the picture is so effective. Nakata’s direction is
pitch-perfect, with no cheap jump-scares or gratuitous gore. Ringu works
by way of the suspense and sense of surreal macabre that it generates.
Arrow
presents the feature in a brand new 4K restoration from the original camera
negative (approved by DP Junichiro Hayashi), and the 1080p high definition looks
marvelous. The soundtrack is a lossless Japanese DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 and
PCM 2.0, with optional English subtitles. It’s accompanied by a new audio
commentary by film historian David Kalat.
The
supplements are plentiful—“The Ringu Legacy†is a series of interviews from
critics and filmmakers on the Ringu series; “A Vicious Circle†is all
about the career of director Nakata; “Circumnavigating Ringu†is an interesting
video essay by author and critic Alexandra Heller-Nicholas on the evolution of
the series; a stand-alone clip of Sadako’s video; and theatrical trailers. A
reversible sleeve with commissioned artwork and the theatrical poster adorns
the jewel case.
Disk
Two: Ringu 2, directed by Hideo Nakata,and Rasen,
directed by George Iida. The first sequel to Ringu was Rasen (“Spiralâ€),
a true adaptation of Suzuki’s second book in the series. Oddly, it was released
in theaters simultaneously with Ringu in order to push the films into
franchise mode. While Rasen is a fine film, it bombed, while Ringu became
an international hit. Rasen was relegated to forgotten status and was
for some time suppressed as the sequel to Ringu. Its story continues
with the investigation into the history of the videotape and Sadako’s tragic
life, and the picture features some of the same actors from Ringu. It’s
not bad, but it’s true that it doesn’t have the impact of the first movie.
To
rebound, the studio immediately commissioned Nakata and much of the team from Ringu
to quickly make a “proper†sequel, which was called Ringu 2 and
released in 1999. Like Rasen, it begins at the end of Ringu, but
then explores new mythology behind the story. There are characters and actors
held over, but new ones are introduced as well. Ringu 2 is quite good
(better than Rasen, to be sure), but attempting to top Ringu is a
tall order. Nevertheless, the eerie factor is up to 11, and there is some
striking imagery throughout.
In
Michael Cimino’s “Year of the Dragon†(1985), now available in a handsome
Blu-ray edition from the Warner Archive Collection, gang war threatens to erupt
in New York’s Chinatown when the city’s elderly Triad kingpin is spectacularly
murdered by a young Chinese thug.Police
Captain Stanley White (Mickey Rourke) is brought in to crack down before more
blood is spilled, as long as he doesn’t crack down too hard.As far as the NYPD and the neighborhood
elders are concerned, things are fine the way they are in Chinatown under the
Triad.All that’s needed is to bring the
suddenly upstart youth gangs under control.But Stanley knows that the only way to really clean up Chinatown is to
wipe out the underlying corruption of the Triad itself.To that end, he plunges into his assignment
with a zeal that even Dirty Harry Callahan might find excessive.Stanley figures out that that the kingpin’s
murder wasn’t a spontaneous act by a hopped-up teenager, but the opening move
in a long game by Joey Tai (John Lone), the dead man’s urbane son-in-law, to
seize control of the Triad’s billion-dollar drug trafficking business.Stanley harasses Joey, wiretaps his
headquarters using a Catholic convent down the street as home base, inserts a
rookie Chinese-American police officer undercover into the kitchen staff of
Joey’s trendy restaurant, and pushes back when the department tries to move him
off the case.Recognizing the power of
the media while sneering at journalists as “vampires,†he cynically enlists an
ambitious young female TV reporter to further his strategy.Stanley gives Tracy (Ariane) a scoop every
time he digs up more evidence on Joey, she gives him the lead on the six
o’clock news hour.When their business
relationship becomes sexual as well, the situation strains Stanley’s already
fragile marriage with his neglected wife Connie (Caroline Kava).
Michael
Cimino’s moviemaking career had more ups and downs than this year’s Dow Jones,
plummeting from the high of “The Deer Hunter†in 1978 to the critical and
commercial fiasco of “Heaven’s Gate†in 1980.While “Year of the Dragon†didn’t represent a total rebound from the
latter debacle, it put Cimino behind the camera again in the first of three
respectably budgeted movies for the Dino De Laurentiis company.The partnership continued with “The Sicilianâ€
(1987) and “The Desperate Hours†(1990), even though “Year of the Dragon,â€
based on a novel by Robert Daley, underperformed at the U.S. box office.It made only $18 million in ticket sales
against its $24 million cost, and received a nomination for a Golden Raspberry
Award as Worst Movie of the Year.Strictly
speaking on the picture’s dramatic merit, this less than respectful reception
is understandable.The script by Cimino
and Oliver Stone overlooks or blithely dismisses some key points of basic
logic.The racist, sexist, and
insubordinate White is known to hate Asians, and he’s already rubbed the brass
the wrong way in his career. “Nobody likes you, Stanley,†his colleague Lou
Bukowski (Ray Barry) tells him, as if the NYPD assesses job performance by the
criteria of a high school popularity contest.So why is this loose cannon unleashed on a politically and racially
sensitive murder case?Some of the
confusion suggests that Cimino may have written or filmed expository scenes
that never made it into the final product, as when suddenly, late in the film,
we learn that Lou isn’t just another of Stanley’s NYPD colleagues.He, Stanley, and Connie grew up together as
friends in the same Polish-American neighborhood.He doesn’t resent Stanley just because he’s a
by-the-book bureaucrat and Stanley is a rebellious maverick.He resents that Stanley turned his back on
the old crowd when he changed his Polish name to “White,†and that he makes
Connie miserable.
British kids had some cool collectibles that fans never got in the States: hardcover adventure books based on their favorite TV series and movies. These hardback "annuals" were all the rage in the 1950s and 1960s. The books featured original stories and artwork and some, such as The Man From U.N.C.L.E. , reproduced the Gold Key comic books that were sold in America. More elaborate annuals such as those based on the James Bond films offered full color photos as well. Illustrated here: two vintage adventure books based on Rawhide starring Eric Fleming and a young up-and-comer named Clint Eastwood.
Once upon a time, there was what is now considered to be
a Golden Age of film criticism. Serving in that capacity was a well-regarded
career and the standards were generally high. In the pre-internet age, when
newspapers and magazines were in their heyday, readers voraciously followed the
most influential film critics, whose endorsements of a film could elevate its
popularity. Conversely, of course, a negative review might spell death at the
boxoffice. Some of the more prominent critics were regarded as snooty and too
upper crust to connect with the average reader. The ascension of critics Roger
Ebert and Gene Siskel through their highly influential “At the Moviesâ€
syndicated TV series changed all of that. They were film scholars, to be sure,
but they reviewed movies in a populist manner, often defending films that most
critics chose to ignore or denounce. With the advent of the internet, today
anyone can proclaim themselves to be a film critic. You just need a blog and-
Presto!- you are a film critic. Of course, today’s definition of the profession
encompasses the good, the bad and the ugly. Simply having an enthusiasm for
movies doesn’t make one prolific in analyzing them.
One of the best of the “old world†film critics was
British writer Philip French, who began writing film reviews in the early 1950s
and went on to be a long-time contributor to The Times and The Observer. He
passed away in 2015, still practicing his profession. French’s family has
compiled a book of some of his most relevant and important reviews and
published them under the title of “Notes from the Dream House: Selected Film
Reviews 1963-2013â€.The book, published
by Carcanet Press, sets the right tone beginning with the cover, an illustration by
Charles Addams of the "Uncle Fester" character laughing at a movie that has everyone else in
the audience sobbing. Like most of the major critics who came of age when
French did, he displays an encyclopedic knowledge of the films and talents he
passes judgment on. He also falls into
the same trap as many of his peers by assuming the reader is well-versed in
sometimes obscure names and film titles. However, he never comes across as
pretentious and his prose is often wistful and amusing. It is interesting to
read his observations about films that became famous or infamous and French
also revisits certain movies for re-evaluation many years after their initial
release. We find he championed obscure titles such as “Two Land Blacktop†and
dared to defend such boxoffice disasters as Michael Cimino’s “Heaven’s Gate†and Hugh Hudson’s “Revolultionâ€
(good for him!). He appreciates
Attenborough’s “A Bridge Too Far†while most critics were immune to its many
qualities. He devotes a very long review to extolling the merits of the 1999
Bond adventure “The World is Not Enoughâ€. He also doesn’t have any sacred cows:
despite being an admirer of Kubrick, he rightly points out that “The Shiningâ€
is “a polished, low-key horror picture of a rather conventional kind… we never
became involved either intellectually or viscerally with the characters…Our
pants flutter occasionally, but the film comes nowhere near scaring them off
us.†In a 1982 re-evaluation of Leone’s “Once Upon a Time in the Westâ€, he
makes a mea culpa and admits that,
upon seeing the film in its initial release in 1969, he did not recognize its
greatness. He decried Robert Downey Jr.’s interpretation of Sherlock Holmes as
a contemporary action hero and was an early admirer of John Boorman’s “Point
Blankâ€, which some critics simply denounced because of its violent content.
Breezing through the book is a delight. You can randomly
drop in anywhere and read the reviews that appeal to you. But it should be
noted that French’s observations are worth reading even if they pertain to film
titles that don’t particularly interest you. His wry wit and poignant analysis
make this book a “must†for retro movie lovers.
Although
Buster Keaton had starred in two feature films (and directed one of them), it
wasn’t until the release of Our Hospitality in late 1923 that he
established himself as a major force of cinema to rival the likes of Chaplin.
Of course, he had already starred in and directed numerous shorts, all of which
served to build his reputation—but it is this beautifully-rendered silent
classic that is considered the auteur’s first masterpiece.
The
story takes place in the early 1800s and draws upon a rural family feud like the
Hatfields and McCoys—in this case the McKays and Canfields. When patriarch John
McKay is killed by James Canfield (and vice versa), Mrs. McKay flees with
little baby Willie McKay (played by Buster’s real-life infant son, Buster
Keaton Jr.). Twenty years later, Willie inherits the old family estate in the
south and returns to claim it, only vaguely aware of the feud that has existed
for decades. On the way he meets Virginia (played by Keaton’s wife at the time,
Natalie Talmadge), who happens to be a Canfield. Upon arrival at home, Willie
continues to court Virginia, but her brothers won’t have it. The rest of the
picture is a cats-and-mouse game of Willie avoiding being killed and at the
same time wooing the woman he wants to marry.
There
are many striking aspects about the picture. Keaton’s paid great attention to
detail in the design and location shooting. Apparently, he took great pains to
create realistic locomotives and tracks that depicted early train development
in America (although he played with time period accuracy for the sake of more
interesting visuals). The final act contains some spectacular and hair-raising
stunt work by the star, including an incident of falling into rapids and almost
drowning on camera. Mostly, though, the story is well-constructed, the
characters have more depth than in the other silent comedies of the day, and,
in the end, Our Hospitality is one of Keaton’s most satisfying movies.
Interestingly,
it’s the only Keaton film to feature three generations of Keatons—Buster
himself, his previously-mentioned son, and his father, Joe Keaton, as a train
engineer.
Kino
Classics presents a beautiful grey and sepia-toned 1920x1080p restoration with
a 2.0 stereo soundtrack and a score composed and conducted by Robert Israel. A
fascinating audio commentary by film historians Farran Smith Nehme and Imogen
Sara Smith accompanies the feature. Supplements include a rare 1947 short, Un
duel à mort (A Duel to the Death) starring Keaton; The
Iron Mule, a short from 1925 that Keaton produced (uncredited) and features
some of his locomotive creations; a featurette on the background of Our
Hospitality with Serge Bromberg; and an excellent featurette on the scoring
of the film, narrated by Robert Israel. The booklet contains an essay by
Jeffrey Vance.
Our
Hospitality
is yet another superb release from Kino Classics, a highlight in the fabulous
filmography of the inimitable Buster Keaton.
John
Carpenter’s Halloween was supposed to
be a one-off… a small, disposable horror movie that would give some young
filmmakers a break and its backers a nice hit of cash should it succeed.But a one-off it was not.Instead it became an American classic, which
until a few years ago, was the most successful indie movie of all time.It’s a story that cried out for a book – and
now there is one: Halloween: The Changing Shape Of An Iconic Series by
Ernie Magnotta.
This
deeply researched, 378 page oversize paperback illustrates Magnotta’s
enthusiasm for the films and the genre on every page.He goes through the franchise, film by film,
examining the plots, the key sequences, the cinematography, the music and, of
course, the characters and the actors who portray them. Even the changing face of Michael’s iconic
mask is examined and discussed. Like all fans, Magnotta has strong opinions and
isn’t afraid to share them.For example,
he picks apart the rather confusing ending of Halloween 6, which this writer saw in the theaters and couldn’t
quite get, either. He also looks at the
various plot holes and inconsistencies that crop up over the long course of the
series, which have caused die-hard Halloween
fans no small amount of agida over the years. That said, the book is not a
hatchet job by any means.It praises the
great work done by directors, actors and cinematographers as well as the many inventive
scares – crucial elements that helped make this one of horror’s most successful
and beloved franchises.
The
book contains over 200 color photos, as well as a number of posters and rare
lobby cards. Magnotta also thoughtfully includes film reviews of each title,
giving the reader a taste of how each movie was received during its initial
release.With the, er, monster success of Blumhouse’s 2018 Halloween reboot, this franchise is far
from dead – and Ernie Magnotta’s book is the perfect guide.
DIRECTOR JOHN STEVENSON (""KUNG FU PANDA", "SHERLOCK GNOMES") PAYS TRIBUTE TO A SPECIAL EFFECTS GENIUS
Stop motion animation is still the most magical of special
effects techniques to me, because instinctively you know that real light is
falling on a real object that is seemingly moving of its own volition. Computer
Generated Imagery may be able to create more complex and fluid motion, but we
instinctively know that what we are looking at does not exist in our world.
There is still an arcane power in watching something you know you can touch
move on its own. So films featuring stop motion animation were my great passion
as a child.
Stop motion animation was the Rolls Royce of special effects
techniques in the 1960s and early 1970s. If you were a young fantasy addict a new
Ray Harryhausen film at the local ABC cinema was the equivalent of a new MCU
film dropping today. Because Ray Harryhausen lived in London he sometimes
appeared on British television with his models ( programmes such as “Screen
Test†with Michael Rodd in 1970) where he would explain the principals of stop
motion animation, which gave me a basic understanding of the technique at a
young age. Stop motion animation could also be found in children’s television
shows like “The Pogles†and “The Magic Roundaboutâ€, commercials and even on
“The Old Grey Whistle Test†where clips from Ladislas Starevitch’s films would
sometimes accompany music tracks (courtesy of Phillip Jenkinson).It was a golden age if you were a fan of the
technique, and Ray Harryhausen became my idol, representing everything that was
magical about the movies for me. But I had yet to discover Karel Zeman.
I first encountered Karel Zeman’s work on a British
children’s T.V show about movie special effects that showed extracts from a
15-minute Czech film called “The Magic World Of Karel Zeman†made in 1962. At
the time I had no idea what I was looking at. The only part I remember clearly
was a scene that showed some children climbing on the back of a dead
Stegosaurus, then the camera tracked around to reveal that the Stegosaurus was
a painting on a sheet of board close to the camera while the children stood on
a wooden frame a long way in the distance. This was supposedly how they shot
the scene from “Journey To The Beginning Of Time†(Many years later when I
finally got to see the film I was amazed to discover that the film employed a life
size prop, not a painting. I wondered if Karel Zeman was playing a joke by
deliberately misleading the audience?) As a child I was fascinated by this
short clip of film and wanted to know more about the movie and the person who
made it, but Karel Zeman was elusive and it was difficult to find any
information on him in the pre-internet 1960’s. It would be another thirty years
before I was able to see his film.
Karel
Zeman was Czech and began his film career in advertising and first worked in
animation making an advertisement for soap. In 1943 he accepted a job offer at
Zlin animation studio and in 1945 became director of the stop motion animation
production group and made his first short film “A Christmas Dream†(“Vanocni
Senâ€) which combined animated puppets and live action. Zeman then created a
series of puppet shorts featuring a character called Mr. Prokouk, which were
very popular. In 1948 he made the beautiful short film “Inspirationâ€(“Inspiraceâ€)
using animated glass figures, and two years later directed the half hour film
“King Lavra†(“Kra Lavraâ€) which went on to win a National Award. Karel Zeman’s
first feature film “The Treasure Of Bird Island†(“Poklad Ptaciho Ostrovaâ€) was
completed in 1952 and used innovative techniques to evoke Persian art. Then in
1955 he made the first of his six feature films to use his unique combination
of live action and animation techniques that would secure his place in movie
history, the remarkable “Cesta Do Pravekuâ€, or “Journey To the Beginning Of
Timeâ€.
JTTBOT
tells the story of four children who venture back in time to discover the origins
of life on Earth. On the way they encounter creatures from the Quaternary, the
Tertiary, the Mezazoic, and Paleozoic eras. Uniquely and charmingly, no time is
spent on a logical explanation for their trip. There are no fantastical devices
here-no time machines, no boring into the center of the Earth, no discovery of
lost plateaus or uncharted, mist shrouded islands. The boys want to go, so they
go. They take a small boat and enter a mysterious cave tunnel and emerge in
prehistory travelling further back in time as they follow the river to its
source.
Apart
from Karel Zeman’s most obvious accomplishments in creating myriad special
effects sequences, his skill as a director is evident in his handling of the
child actors, most of whom were not professionals. He elicits natural, unforced
performances from his cast with none of the sentimentality or grating archness
found in many American and British films featuring child actors from the same
period. Zeman’s use of the camera is also very effective with many tracking
shots taken on location or on studio sets closely following the children before
an encounter with a prehistoric creature. These shots with the camera following
just behind the children’s shoulders or tracking back in front of their faces
puts the audience directly inside their experience and makes the build up to
the reveal of the various creatures much more powerful. Compare these
pre-effects sequences with similar scenes in American dinosaur films from the
same period such as “Unknown Island†(1948) or “The Lost Continent†(1951) to
see that Zeman’s direction is much more effective. Perhaps his least
appreciated talent is as a writer. Apart from a few places where the film
becomes too studiedly educational, most of the dialogue between the children
flows naturally and believably. His abilities as a scriptwriter would become
more apparent in his later works.
But
the main reason anybody sees a film like this is to see the recreation of
prehistoric life and it is here that Karel Zeman differentiates himself from
Willis O’Brien and Ray Harryhausen. These movie giants concentrated on one
technique, stop motion animation combined with live action via miniature rear
projection or travelling mattes, to create their illusions. They occasionally used
giant props (King Kong’s hand or the Pteranodon’s feet from “1,000,000 Years
B.C.â€) to interact with the human actors, but all the creatures were primarily
brought to life by stop motion animation (sometimes augmented by a mechanical
head for close up’s like the King Kong bust, or the Ceratosaurs from “The
Animal Worldâ€).
Karel
Zeman is different from every other movie magician by fearlessly utilizing
every FX and animation technique available to him at the time and often switching
technique multiple times within a single scene. Examples are the mammoth, which
is sometimes a stop motion creation and sometimes a mechanical puppet shot in
camera on location with the children. The Phorusrhacos is a stop motion puppet,
a hand puppet for close ups, and a paper cut-out for the running shots. The Brontosaurus
is a combination of a mechanical head atop a painted flat body for the shots on
land, and a hand puppet for the shots in water. The Uintatherium is combination
of stop motion and close up’s using a mechanical head. Zeman is also fearless
about using completely different techniques not commonly used in visual effects
films, such as creating a herd of bounding antelope, giraffes and a Smilodon
purely through paper cut out animation. An Edmontosaurus (called a Trachodon in
the film) and an amphibian (possibly an Eryops) are brought to life as hand
puppets. This willingness to use any technique to create the creatures means
that the menagerie in “Journey To The Beginning Of Time†is much larger than in
Willis O’Brien’s “King Kong†(9 stop motion creatures, King Kong, Brontosaurus,
Stegosaurus, two legged lizard, Tyrannosaurus (probably), Elasmosaurus,
Pteranodon, prehistoric vulture (possibly Merriam’s Teratorn), various birds)
or Ray Harryhausen’s “1,000,000 Years B.C. (13 creatures including a photographically
enlarged iguana, tarantula, and grasshopper, Allosaurus, Archelon,
Brontosaurus, Ceratosaurus, Pteranodon and its two chicks, Rhamphorhynchus,
Triceratops, and a live warthog). In “Journey To The Beginning Of Time†we see
30 creatures (Mammuthus primigenius, Coelodonta, Deinotherium, Honanotherium,
Smilodon, Moropus, Uintatherium, Phorusrhacos, Helladotherium, Pteranodons,
Styracosaurus, Stegosaurus, Brontosaurus, Edmontosaurus, Ceratosaurus,
Meganeura, Eryops, Trilobite, plus a giant boa constrictor, a swimming
amphibian, a sea snake, flamingoes, antelopes, giraffes, crocodiles, a leopard,
vultures, turtles, various animated birds and a large, real carp). Zeman also
outdoes Harryhausen and O’Brien by having multiples of the same animal in shot
instead of the one representative of each species that show up for their one
sequence in “King Kongâ€, “Son Of Kongâ€, “I,000,000 Years B.C.†or “The Valley
Of Gwangiâ€, usually to menace the heroes or get into a fight.JTTBOT has a flock of flamingoes, a flock of
Pteranodons, herds of antelope, gazelle and giraffe, a congregation of
crocodiles, two grazing Helladotherium and two battling Coelodonta. These brief
scenes of herds of wildlife eating or galloping add immeasurably to the believability of
Zeman’s prehistoric world and make it seem like life continues once the camera
has moved on, rather than the line of solitary creatures waiting for their turn
to be menacing in the O’Brien or Harryhausen films.
There’s a long-standing Hollywood tradition of blending filmdom’s
most bankable but seemingly disparate genres – horror and comedy – but a
successful marriage of the two is a tricky business at best.The gold standard films of these hybrid would
be, generationally, Abbott & Costello
Meet Frankenstein (1948), Young
Frankenstein (1974) or, I suppose, Ghostbusters
(1984) should one choose to go “modern-contemporary.â€Parodies of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde would serve as a virtual cottage industry of horror-comedy fusion,
these pastiches encompassing the silent era, animated shorts, features, and
even pornographic films.Having already
challenged the Frankenstein monster, Abbott and Costello would eventually take
on other classic movie monsters, including Boris Karloff’s Mr. Hyde in an
entertaining 1953 Universal Studios production.I like that one a lot.
Charles B. Griffith’s Dr.
Heckyl & Mr. Hype (Cannon Group, 1980) is one of the odder
entries.It’s difficult to exactly pinpoint
this production’s various misfires, but Dr.
Heckyl & Mr. Hype ultimately displays more madness than madcap charm.This brand new release on Blu-ray by Scorpion
Releasing promotes the film as nothing less than a “Long Sought after Cult
Classic,†and I guess it might be… but only if screened before an audience of
undemanding and sleepy stoners attending a midnight movie. It’s a shame really as
there’s a cadre of proven talent both behind and in front of the cameras.Director Charles B. Griffith cut his teeth in
the movie business contributing playfully winking screenplays to low budget
exploitation films for industry maverick Roger Corman.Some of the quickly tossed-off monochrome films
he helped construct – most notably Bucket
of Blood (1959) and Little Shoppe of
Horrors (1960) – would go on to achieve acclaim as true pop culture
classics.
It’s of interest that simultaneous to the 1960 release of
Corman and Griffith’s Little Shoppe of
Horrors to the U.S. drive-in circuit, a little know twenty-two year old
British actor named Oliver Reed would appear, un-credited, in the Hammer
Studios horror film The Two Faces of Dr.
Jekyll (Terence Fisher, 1960).That
Griffith and Reed work together some twenty-years on Dr. Heckyl & Mr. Hype would suggest – on some cosmic level, I
suppose - a neat closing of the circle.But it’s sadly more akin to the tightening of a noose.
Griffith gets sole credit for the film’s screenplay –
although a sub-title acknowledges his “Apologies to Robert Louis Stevenson,â€
the author of the classic 1886 novella “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll &
Mr. Hyde.â€Griffith’s script, for all
its faults, does offer an interesting twist on the classic tale… even if that
twist is only a variation of Jerry Lewis’s The
Nutty Professor (1963).Oliver
Reed’s Dr. Henry Heckyl is, unlike the prosperous physician of Stevenson’s
creation, an eccentric podiatrist, one of three doctors (“Heckyl, Hinkle and
Hooâ€) operating out of San Texaco’s quirky Robert A. Coogan Memorial Clinic.
What’s different here is Dr. Heckyl, as he himself admits
forthrightly, possesses a “Face that Spoils a Sunny Day.â€Though nattily dressed, he is dreadful in
appearance.His skin is of a green-gray
pallor and spotted with skin lesions, festering sores and ulcerations. His nose
is bulbous and serrated.His teeth are
brown, razor-sharp and crooked, and a bird’s nest of a fright wig sits upon his
hideous noggin.One of his eyes is
completely red, the other completely green.He walks stoop-shouldered and slumbering through his sunny suburban neighborhood,
frightening – or, at the very least - making everyone around him uncomfortable in
his approach.Some look away from him in
sympathy, some in obvious distaste.
The
Annihilators is a
Spring 1985-lensed action film with lots of action and zero excitement. Coming
on the heels of Ted Kotcheff’s masterful 1982 Vietnam-themed film version of
David Morrell’s 1972 novel, First Blood, which itself spawned several
lifeless sequels including the latest and critically reviled Rambo: Last
Blood a mere 37 years after the superior original. (One cannot help but
think of the Rocky XXXVIII poster seen in 1982’s Airplane II: The
Sequel, and even that film was inferior to its own original). The
admittedly low-budget and bargain-basement Annihilators uses a familiar
theme to string together several long-winded and ultimately soporific action set
pieces that consist primarily of master shots with very little intercutting and
close-ups, but not before we get a credit sequence which sets the appearance of
onscreen names to the sound of machine gun fire. Clever! The 1980s were a time
of teen sex comedies, Freddy Krueger nightmares, and action films. The superior
examples of the latter, Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior (1981), Raiders of
the Lost Ark (1981), and Escape From New York (1981) all paved the
way for the less-than-stellar Invasion U.S.A. (1985) and The Delta
Force (1986).
The
Annihilators concerns
townsfolk and proprietors who find themselves at the mercy of gangs and
hoodlums, specifically The Scorpions, The Turks, and The Rollers. These gangs compete
with each other by coercing the store owners into paying them protection money.
If they’re late or light in the envelope, discipline is doled out with a knife
or a bat. A wheelchair-bound Vietnam veteran, already done an injustice by
returning to a society that has no use for him following fighting in an
unwinnable and unpopular war, is killed when coming to another’s rescue. The
leader of The Rollers is Roy Boy Jagger (Paul Koslo) and I must say that I love
that name. It reminds me of Ernest T. Baxter from “The Andy Griffith Showâ€,
however Mr. Koslo infuses the former with exponentially more schoolyard bully menace
than Howard Morris ever did with the latter in the town of Mayberry. Jagger instigates
a rape and kills a female victim in an egregious scene that was initially
censored by international film boards and should have remained that way.
The
brotherhood that the vets have is a tight and lifelong bond because they have
seen things that the average American cannot fathom. We know this because the
film begins with an intro that takes place in the early 1970s that shamelessly
uses stock footage shot during the Vietnam War interspersed with obvious staged
scenes with actors. If you’re a member of the sleaze-film cognoscenti think
of Antonio Margheriti’s Cannibal Apocalypse (1980) and you know exactly
what I mean. Even the artificial explosions are unimpressive. The effort to
infuse this sequence with camaraderie is admirable though ultimately lacking
and is at times silly, especially when the rugged and late actor Christopher
Stone, in a follow-up role to his work in The Howling (1981) and Cujo
(1983), appears here as Bill, the assigned platoon leader who fires off rounds
of ammo while sporting a very obvious 1985 hairstyle. Flash forward to that
very year and it’s Bill who is called to town along with his confederates, two
of whom are Garrett Floyd (Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs) and Ray Track (Gerrit Graham),
to avenge their fallen brother following his funeral. They form factions and
teach the laypeople how to fight. At the center of all of this is Lieutenant Hawkins (Jim Antonio) who
has been brought in to keep the gangs in check. Naturally, it’s a losing
battle, especially since the gunfire that erupts in the streets between the
townsfolk and the thugs go on for minutes at a time with the cops riding in
miraculously at the last minute. The unspoken rule of the police department
seems to be to let these people fight it out in the streets and deal with it
all later and take the credit. The whole affair looks more like an extended episode
of The A-Team than a feature film. Even the truant kids look less like delinquents
and more like a group that was told to run around the corner and act bad while knocking
over some trash cans.
Actor Robert Forster has passed away from brain cancer at age 78. Forster enjoyed a long career that included many major feature films as well appearances on popular television shows. He made his feature film debut in director John Huston's 1967 pyscho-sexual drama "Reflections in a Golden Eye". In the film, Forster played a hunky U.S. Army private with a penchant for taking nude nighttime horseback rides, a scenario that obsesses a secretly gay officer played by Marlon Brando. He would soon land a plum supporting role opposite Gregory Peck in the 1969 western thriller "The Stalking Moon". That same year, Forster had a rare leading role in director Haskell Wexler's controversial and acclaimed counter-culture drama "Medium Cool" that chronicled the riots at the `1968 Democratic convention in Chicago. Stardom didn't follow, however, and Forster soon found himself laboring in supporting roles in mostly forgettable films. He would later admit that by the mid-1990s his career was virtually over. That's when Quentin Tarantino, a long-time admirer of his work, cast him in his 1997 film "Jackie Brown". The role of Max Cherry would earn Forster a Best Supporting Actor Oscar nomination and revitalize his career. From that point on, Forster worked consistently in films and television including key roles in David Lynch's reboot of "Twin Peaks" and "Breaking Bad". His latest project, the feature film "El Camino: Breaking Bad", has just been released. For more on his life and career, click here.
By the time Burt Reynolds finally starred in the 1972 classic "Deliverance", he had been paying his dues in Hollywood for many years with varying degrees of success on television. His feature films, however, were strictly "B" grade. Saul David, who produced a 1970 film starring Reynolds titled "Skullduggery", bemoaned at the time that he should have been a major movie star but bad luck seemed to always interfere. Reynolds wisely cultivated an image as a hip, towel-snapping wiseguy through appearing on seemingly every American game and chat show. His appearances on "The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson" merited "must-see TV" status. Ironically, "Deliverance" entirely abandoned this popular image of Reynolds and afforded him a dramatic role that he fulfilled with excellent results. But the success of the film made Reynolds anxious to prove he could sustain his boxoffice clout without the help of a strong co-star, in the case of of "Deliverance", Jon Voight. Reynolds chose wisely for his follow-up feature. "White Lightning" was developed under the working title "McClusky". The role of a hunky, charismatic southern good ol' boy fit Reynolds like a glove because it allowed him to incorporate his penchant for performing stunts with his flippant, wise-cracking TV persona.
Filmed in Arkansas, the movie finds Reynolds as "Gator" McClusky, a man doing prison time for running illegal moonshine. Gator still has another year to spend on the prison farm when he gets word that his younger brother has been murdered. (We see the scene play out over the opening credits in which two young men are brutally drowned in a swamp by the local sheriff, J.C. Connors (Ned Beatty) and his deputy.) Enraged and spoiling for revenge, Gator accepts a deal to work undercover for federal agents to expose Connors as the local Huey Long-type power broker in Bogan County. Indeed, the seemingly affable, understated Connors runs the entire county like a personal fiefdom, using extortion, shakedowns and outright murder to ensure his stature. He also gets a piece of the action from the very moonshiners he's supposed to prosecute. Gator feels uncomfortable working as a snitch but it's the only way to find out why his brother was killed and to bring Connors to justice. Using his considerable charm and his background as a guy from a small rural community, he finds himself quickly working for a moonshine ring headed by Big Bear (R.G. Armstrong), who is brutal in retribution against anyone who crosses him. Gator is assigned to deliver moonshine with a partner, Roy Boone (Bo Hopkins). They spend a lot of time together and become fast friends, even though Roy's hot-to-trot girlfriend Lou (Jennifer Billingsley) succeeds in seducing Gator, thus endangering his mission when Roy gets wind of the deception. When Gator learns the reason why his brother and his friend were murdered, he becomes even more vengeful, leading to a spectacular car chase involving Connors and his corrupt deputies.
"White Lightning" was directed by Joseph Sargent, who was primarily known for his work in television. He fulfills the requirements of the film quite well, though the spectacular car chases and jaw-dropping action scenes were largely the work of legendary stutman/coordinator Hal Needham, who would go on to work on many films with Reynolds. The film is consistently lively but it also has moments of poignancy and drama. The supporting cast is terrific with Ned Beatty of "Deliverance" reuniting with Reynolds with good results. Beatty underplays the sense of menace attributable to his character. He also plays up his status as a pillar of the community, tossing off barbs about how hippies and big city liberals threaten "our values" and-worst of all- encourage "our coloreds to vote!". Meanwhile, he is heading up a vast criminal enterprise. Jennifer Billingsley is wonderful as the lovable air-headed seductress who will jump into bed with a man if there's a prospect of getting a new dress out of the bargain. There are also fine turns by Bo Hopkins, R.G. Armstrong and Diane Ladd (whose name in the opening and closing credits is misspelled as "Lad". Ouch!) The movie turned out to be a big hit for United Artists, aided in part by striking ad campaigns with the same weapon-as-phallic symbol design employed for Richard Roundtree's "Shaft's Big Score" the previous year coupled with another poster showing Reynolds behind the wheel of a speeding car. Sex and speed became hallmarks for promoting a Reynolds action movie.
Kino Lorber has reissued their 2019 Blu-ray edition, which is first-rate in all aspects, with a fine transfer and a 2014 interview with Burt Reynolds, who looks back fondly on the importance the movie had on proving he could be top-billed in a hit movie. The film initiated his association with rural-based comedies and action films and three years later, a successful sequel ("Gator") would be released. Reynolds also drops the interesting fact that this was to be Steven Spielberg's first feature film. However, Reynolds says the young TV director got cold feet about his ability to film on so many difficult locations, given that his background was largely working in studios. Reynolds praises his co-star Ned Beatty and reminds everyone that "White Lightning" was only his second film, having made his screen debut in "Deliverance". He is also very complimentary towards Jennifer Billingsley and regrets that she never became a big star. Reynolds also discusses Hal Needham's zealousness for performing dangerous stunts and relates how one key scene in which a car shoots out over water to land on a moving barge almost went disastrously wrong. He says the film has a realistic atmosphere because of the screenplay by William W. Norton, who adapted many aspects of his own hard scrabble life. The only negative note Reynolds sounds is about Diane Ladd, who he cryptically says he did not like working with, although he doesn't go into detail as to why.The set includes a new feature not available on the previous Blu-ray release: a commentary track by film historian collaborators Steve Mitchell and Nathaniel Thompson. As far as commentary tracks are concerned, the duo are always terrific and this outing is no exception. Their easy-going, laid-back and humorous style is appropriate for the tone of the film. They go into great detail about aspects of the and cast. I hadn't realized until listening to the track how on-the-mark they are in assessing Ned Beatty as an actor whose physical appearance varied dramatically depending upon the type of story he was cast in. Indeed, they are correct. The evil good ol' boy corrupt sheriff of "White Lightning" is light years away from the fish-out-water rape victim of "Deliverance" or the demagogic TV executive of "Network". The track is good enough to merit upgrading to this version of the Blu-ray even if you have the previous release.
The Blu-ray also includes the original trailer, which was very effective in playing up Reynolds' emerging star power. Highly recommended.
The 1960s spawned a number of thrillers that were blatantly intended to emulate the style and content of Alfred Hitchcock's films. The best of the lot was Stanley Donen's "Charade" (1963) which can be described as the best Hitchcock movie that Hitchcock didn't direct. There were others of varying degrees of quality, all of which boasted one-word titles in the manner of many Hitchcock classics. Among them: "Arabaesque", "Masquerade" and "Mirage". Most, but not all, were breezy, lighthearted adventures that pitted a glamorous couple against exotic bad guys in equally exotic locations. Fitting snugly into this sub-genre was "Blindfold", a 1966 romp that paired Rock Hudson and Claudia Cardinale. The movie begins in Manhattan and focuses on Hudson as Dr. Bartholomew Snow, a revered psychiatrist to the rich who is also one of the city's most eligible bachelors, probably because he looks a lot like Rock Hudson. Snow has a comfortable life running a successful practice. His sole employee is his devoted secretary Smitty (an amusing Anne Seymour), an older woman who speaks to him more like a son than an employer. Smitty keeps a file on Snow's failed romantic relationships and constantly needles him about being a serial proposer. However, he always gets cold feet before he walks down the aisle and early in the film, we see him call off yet another engagement with a frustrated (but unseen) lover. One afternoon while enjoying a horseback ride in Central Park, Snow is approached by one General Prat (Jack Warden), who is affiliated with a top secret U.S. intelligence agency. He explains to Snow that one of his former patients, an esteemed government scientist named Arthur Vincenti (Alejandro Rey) has become the target of a crime syndicate that is looking to kidnap him and deliver him to a foreign power (presumably the Soviets) so that he can be forced to divulge important information. Pratt explains that Vincenti is under guard at a secret location that can't be divulged. He also tells Snow that Vincenti is in an emotionally fragile state and is babbling incoherently. He hopes that by seeing Snow once again, he will allow the doctor to treat him. Snow reluctantly agrees to help only to find that he can't be told where Vicenti is being held. To get there, he is taken on a plane to a remote area, then blindfolded and driven to the hideaway. Snow makes the trip on numerous occasions but finds that Vincenti is not responsive to his treatments.
Back in Manhattan, Snow is accosted by a beautiful, irate young woman, Vicky (Cardinale), who is Vicenti's sister. She believes that her brother has been kidnapped and that Snow is partly to blame. You can pretty much take it from there, as these types of films go. The two squabble and yell at each other and then become romantically involved. Before long, they learn that both Arthur and the General have been kidnapped. In order to save them, Snow must use his memory and sense perception to try to recreate the journey to the lost hideaway he had visited many times. This is only one of the more far-fetched elements of the script and it isn't very convincingly brought off. However, "Blindfold" is a lot of fun thanks to the charisma of Hudson and Cardinale, who have real chemistry together. Director Philip Dunne keeps the pace brisk but goes off course with a fight set inside a Central Park boat house that is played with enough slapstick to mirror an episode of "Batman". Still, the film gets better as it proceeds and the finale, which finds Hudson and Cardinale trying to penetrate a dangerous swamp to thwart the villains, is very well done. Dunne, who co-wrote the screenplay with W.H. Menger based on Lucille Fletcher's novel, blends action and comedy rather successfully and the film is aided by a fine turn by Guy Stockwell as a villain with a stutter. There are also funny supporting turns by Brad Dexter and Vito Scotti. Jack Warden, as usual, is in top form as the cigar-chomping general.
"Blindfold" doesn't approach "Charade" in terms of style or wit but it's never dull and one can do worse than to spend 102 minutes in the company of Rock Hudson and Claudia Cardinale. The film has been released by Kino Lorber on Blu-ray. The transfer looks terrific but the only extras are the original trailer and trailers for other thrillers available from the company.
It was perhaps inevitable that the
well-respected Austrian label Cinepolit would make the leap into distributing
Euro Cult movies, such is their love for all things exploitative and the fast-paced
‘70s scene. And true to their reputation of high quality records and CDs, Cineploit
have cut no corners in producing their first four highly impressive Blu-ray media
book releases.
La
Polizia Ha Le Mani Legate (aka Killer Cop, 1975)
(CP01) is certainly a fine way to launch Cineploit’s new catalogue of film
releases. It’s a movie that comes from the very heart of the Italian
poliziottesco genre. As Director, Luciano Ercoli had also made several giallo
movies, and produced some Spaghetti Westerns. La Polizia Ha Le Mani Legate
draws largely on the real life Piazza Fontana bombing which happened in Milan (where
the film was shot) in 1969. As to be expected, there is plenty of over-acting
from the Italian cast (Claudo Cassinelli, Franco Fabrizi), whilst Arthur
Kennedy tries to maintain a calmer exterior. The action scenes are good, but it
is also clear (especially in the bomb sequence) that the budget was largely
restricted. The English audio track does throw up some funny translations and
there’s plenty of those Seventies, slappy sound effects when the fists begin to
fly! Naturally, whatever audio track you select (there is also an Italian and
German track) there is always composer Stelvio Cipriani’s great score which
helps it along its 97 minutes. The picture and audio quality are very good, yet,
it still maintains that unique grindhouse ‘70s look: clean and sharp, with
muted urban colours – just as it should be.
In fact, Stelvio Cipriani is featured heavily
among the disc’s bonus features. For starters, we are treated to a 51 minute
interview with the composer (Italian audio with a choice of subtitles).
Cineploit have rather teasingly added ‘Part 1’ to the title of this interview,
so hopefully there will be more to come. There is also a 13 minute interview with
actress Valeria D'Obici (Falena) who also offers some interesting insights and
there is a poster and photo gallery. However, perhaps best of all, Cineploit
have also included composer Cipriani’s full soundtrack in a completely separate
chapter. For me, this concept works far better than an isolated (and sometimes
disjointed) track. Here you get a separate menu with basically the entire 10
tracks from the soundtrack album. The music is clean and delivered in clear 2
channel stereo with the option to select individual tracks or a ‘play all’
option. What a great way to include a soundtrack album as a bonus feature.
Of course, this is just the disc contents.
Aside from this, the overall packaging is superb. Cineploit have never skimped
on their commitment to quality. Their Blu-ray book covers are beautifully
produced using their regular addition of UV spotting (a stand out, high gloss
section). The book case contains an average of 26 pages; packed with
information (this particular edition is all German text), posters, stills and Italian
fotobusta reproductions. If that is not enough, Cineploit have also included a
double sided (2 different designs) fold out poster measuring approx. 11â€x15†and
on gloss paper.
Overall, it’s a great package and one hell of
a way of launching your Blu-ray catalogue.
Non
Contate Su Di Noi (Don't count on us, 1978) (CP02)
marks the worldwide premiere of an unseen and lost film. Set in 1970s Rome, a young musician meets by
chance a beautiful girl in the middle of heroin withdrawal. He falls in love
and tries to help her, discovering a shocking underworld of drugs, junkies and
pushers. Sergio Nutis’s drug drama from the late Seventies is a shattering but
also prosaic contemporary document of the drug scene in Rome. Predominately
placed in the intellectual student scene, heroine dominates their daily routine.
The film was shot using amateurs, most of who were connected to and heavily
involved with the drug scene. The result is a completely authentic experience.
The film was shot on original locations and provides a raw historical and
social document of the circumstances at that particular time. Never before
available on home video, this drugsploitation film is one of the first attempts
to portray the heroin scene of the 1970s, pathing the way for movies such as Christiane
F (1981), El Pico (1982) and Amore Tossico (1983). The film also features a memorable
folk rock score by Maurizio Rota (leader of the band Alberomotore) and features
songs by some of the most interesting names from the Italian indie music scene
of the 1970s, including Alan Sorrenti and Canzoniere del Lazio.
Sadly, the movie’s destiny was rather short-lived.
After a short run in a handful of Rome’s cinemas, and initial screenings at two
festivals in Italy and Switzerland, the planned distribution company fell into
bankruptcy and as a result, the film faded in obscurity. Thankfully, the movie’s
brand-new 2K restoration by Cineteca Nazionale has made this underground
classic available for all to enjoy.
The film is presented in its original Italian
Dolby Digital 2.0 Mono audio with the option of German and English subtitles.
The disc also contains an interview with producer & actor Manfredi Marzano
(11 min), an interview with friend of Sergio Nuti, Marco Tullio Giordano (7 min)
and a deleted (censored) scene which basically saw actress Francesca Ferrari
dropping to her knees during the shower sequence. There is also a photo gallery
included. Cineploit’s overall packaging is again very impressive. The Blu-ray hardcover
media book with partial UV Spot contains 24 pages including an essay (in German
and English) by Udo Rotenberg (host of Deep Red Radio) and promotional material
and stills from the movie. Sadly, there is no poster reproduction included with
this release, which is probably due to the film’s very limited distribution.
As best as I can determine, Curse III: Blood Sacrifice was never screened theatrically, at
least not in the U.S. or England.It
seems to have been unceremoniously trafficked directly to home video in
1990.The owners of the film chose to best
capitalize on their investment by gamely resorting to placing full page
advertisements in home-video industry trade publications, an attempt to get VHS
retailers and rental stores to add the movie to their inventories.They boldly claimed in their promotional that
the film was a genuine “Horror/Thriller in the tradition of The Serpent and the Rainbow,†a
reference to Wes Craven’s and Universal Studio’s more celebrated voodoo film of
1988.And while Curse III bore no thematic – or even tangential - relationship to
the earlier “Curse†films (The Curse
(1987) and Curse II: The Bite (1989),
the ad boasted to retailers they had sold over “60,000†copies of this
semi-franchise’s first two films… so why not give this newest film – one featuring
the great Christopher Lee (described in their broadside as the “Master of
Suspense and Horrorâ€) - a fair shot?
Scorpion Releasing’s new Blu Ray of Curse III: Blood Sacrifice is, technically, not the film’s first
digital release.The film first appeared
on laser disc in 1990, courtesy of RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, and this
was soon followed by a more consumer-friendly VHS release originally retailing
for $59.95.It disappeared from shelves
soon thereafter, though it was infrequently broadcast in the US under the
film’s original title Panga and released
in the Beta format in the UK under the amended title of Witchcraft.The film would thereafter
languish in semi-obscurity until 2015 when MGM re-issued the film on a blandly
packaged DVD as part of the studio’s Limited Edition Series.
Curse
III
would not only serve as the vehicle marking Barton’s directorial debut, but
also his first as co-screenwriter (having worked alongside South African
scenarist John Hunt).Their screenplay
was based on a story supplied by the Johannesburg-based actor and occasional
writer Richard Haddon Haines.If the
script’s storyline and characterizations are a bit thin, the film still manages
to move along at a pace brisk enough to satisfy the more forgiving horror film
devotees.
Carroll as the glamorous Dominique Deveraux in "Dynasty".
BY LEE PFEIFFER
Actress Diahann Carroll has passed away at age 84 from breast cancer. Carroll was the consummate performer, making her mark on stage, in recordings and In television and feature films. The Bronx native had a modest start in life before winning a television talent contest that ultimately led her to being cast in director Otto Preminger's film "Carmen Jones" in 1954. The mercurial Preminger was pleased with her work and cast her again in his 1959 big screen production of "Porgy and Bess", though Carroll's singing voice was dubbed in the film, an ironic decision considering she was known for her ability to impress audiences with her crooning. Carroll caught the attention of legendary composer Richard Rodgers, who wrote the Broadway production "No Strings" for her. The 1962 production saw Carroll winning a Tony award.
Carroll with Marc Copage in the landmark 1968 sitcom "Julia".
Carroll's most notable career achievement occurred when she was cast in the title role of the NBC sitcom "Julia" in 1968. She portrayed a widowed mother of a young son who was working as a nurse to a lovable but grumpy doctor played by Lloyd Nolan. The show aired during one of the most turbulent eras of the 20th century when racial tensions were high in America. Bill Cosby had broken the glass ceiling for black leading men with his Emmy-winning role in "I Spy" but Carroll's character was also a breakthrough, representing the first time television had depicted an African-American woman in a leading role as a sophisticated adult. She was smart, witty, hard-working and had plenty of sex appeal. The show was criticized for being too meek in regard to dealing with the racial issues of the day but there is no doubt that "Julia"'s status as a hit sitcom (it ran three seasons) went a long way to changing perceptions in white America about the characterization of black women. Carroll was nominated for an Emmy for the role and also won a Golden Globe. She periodically appeared in feature films including "Paris Blues", Preminger's "Hurry Sundown", "The Split" and the romantic comedy "Claudine", for which she received an Oscar nomination. She lobbied for and got a key role in the weekly prime time series "Dynasty" in the 1980s, fulfilling her dream of playing a glamorous "bad girl". For more on her life and career, click here for NY Times obituary.
Apparently,
the classic silent features of Buster Keaton are now in public domain, which
explains why more than one DVD/Blu-ray company can do individual restorations
and put them out for consumer consumption. For example, both Kino Video and
Cohen Film Collection have released “new restoration†Blu-ray packages of
Keaton’s films. Cohen sent Cinema Retro some review copies of theirs, so
this review reflects this group’s presentations of these wonderful films that
showcase a genius at large.
In
all three volumes, the titles underwent 4K restorations and look marvelous,
with audio options of 5.1 DTS-HD Master Audio and 5.1 Dolby Digital. The
packaging on Volumes 2 and 3 indicate that the restorations were done by
Cineteca di Bologna at L’Immagine Ritrovata Laboratory in association with
Cohen Film Collection—one can assume that Volume 1 is the same.
VOLUME
1 contains The General (1926) and Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928), two
of Keaton’s most celebrated works. Note that The General’s release date
is often cited as 1927, when it was actually released in the U.S. Technically,
though, its premiere was in Japan (!), of all places, in December 1926.
IMDb designates the film’s release as 1926, while many American publications
will say 1927.
The
General (directed
by Keaton and Clyde Bruckman), despite featuring a Civil War-era story in which
the Confederates are the “good guys,†is an unequivocal comic masterpiece,
often named Keaton’s best picture. Keaton is a train engineer named Johnnie,
who is in love with Annabelle (Marion Mack) and a locomotive called the
General. Much of the tale involves Johnnie hustling to get his locomotive back,
as it has been snatched by the Union. Full of action and inventive comedy bits,
The General might be Keaton’s most technically ambitious picture, and
certainly his most expensive ($750,000, which was a huge sum back then).
Surprisingly, the film was not a hit at the time of release, and it set back
Keaton’s stock in the industry. It was only after years of film buff analysis
that The General was rediscovered and awarded the reputation it holds
today.
Steamboat
Bill, Jr.
(directed by Charles Reisner) contains many of the fabulous stunts for which
Keaton is known, such as when a house facade falls over and barely misses him
since he was standing precisely where an open window was positioned. Keaton is
William Canfield Jr., and his father “Steamboat Bill,†owns a luxury steamboat
that is in competition with Jr.’s girlfriend’s father’s ship. The movie is a
game of one-upmanship between the rivals, with the usual mis-matched romance
and action hijinks. Some may consider this sacrilege, but I prefer Steamboat
Bill, Jr. over The General!
Both
films feature orchestral scores by Carl Davis. Supplements are two shorts
seemingly excerpted from Peter Bogdanovich’s 2018 documentary, The Great
Buster—“Reflections on The General†and “Buster Keaton: The
Luminaryâ€, plus trailers for both films. Oddly, the illustrated inner booklet
contains the credits for Steamboat Bill, Jr. but leaves out The
General.
Sunday, 29 September saw the BFI in London celebrating "Bond Day", the annual worldwide homage to agent 007. This year marks the 50th anniversary of "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" as well as the 40th anniversary of "Moonraker" and the 20th for "The World is Not Enough". I'd been with Cinema Retro's cover guy for our latest issue, actor John Richardson, and we’d been looking at shots from when he’d auditioned for the role of
Bond in "OHMSS" back in 1969. As John himself said “I wasn’t right for the role.
I wasn’t the right build and the guy who did do it was far more suited to the
role than meâ€. That “other fella†that John was referring to was George Lazenby
who attended a post-screening Q&A of "OHMSS" with David Walliams. This event
was worth the ticket price alone as it resulted in what the BFI called “The bluest
interview†on its stage ever. The reason it was unforgettable were the stories
that George shared from the filming of his first and only appearance as 007
(bar "Return of The Man from U.N.C.L.E." and a couple of ads and guest spots in which he played a thinly-veiled 007-like character). Probably
the most memorable was when George told of his first day on set when the crew
had taped a German Sausage to his inside leg under his kilt in order to get a
reaction from the girl who put her hand there up there in the film to write her
room number on his inner thigh. George and the crew were expecting screams of
fright but actress Angela Scoular was merely nonplussed and just asked “Aren’t
you wearing underwear� I think this says more for her long-time boyfriend
Lesley Phillips than anything else!
George also discussed his time with Bruce
Lee, as it was George who Bruce was dining with on the night he died. In a
scene very similar to the one in Quentin Tarantino’s recent "Once Upon a Time In
Hollywood", George regaled us with stories of his time with Bruce. He said the
reason they became friends is that Bruce, just like in the Tarantino film, was always surrounded
by groups of people and was discussing how long it would take to dispatch those standing
around him at the time. He went round each person, from actors to stunt men to
bodyguards with answers like “10 seconds, 30 seconds, one minute†until he got
to George. He looked at Lazenby and said “I’m not sure how long it would take
me to get you down, George. How long do you think� George said he just looked
at Bruce and said “As long as it takes you to catch meâ€.From that moment he and Bruce were friends. This
memorable screening was followed by "Moonraker", which was just as well-received.
The Q&A after this screening (which was a rare big screen showcase for
Derek Meddings amazing special effects) included Martine Beswick, Carole Ashby, composer
David Arnold, David Walliams and director John Glen. Again, some of the stories
were quite ear-opening yet just as informative (and as blue!) as George’s had
been. Humor has always been an important component of Bond, and I’m hoping there will be some of it on display in Daniel Craig’s last outing "No
Time to Die" which wrapped that day too, making September 29th, 2019 a Bond-tastic one
for all fans of Agent 007.
(Photos copyright Mark Mawston. All rights reserved.)
It was the era of The Graduate and Midnight
Cowboy. Family films were being replaced by more subversive, sophisticated
movies. This did not mean audiences had entirely lost interest in wholesome
entertainment. Nor did the stars themselves, especially those from past
decades. One of them was Lucille Ball.
Although television took up much of her
career, she appeared in four motion pictures during the 1960s. Perhaps the most
successful of them was Yours, Mine and
Ours, released in April of 1968. The project had been in development for
several years. It was originally titled The
Beardsley Story and then His, Hers
and Theirs. The script was based on the book “Who Gets the Drumstick?†by
Helen Eileen Beardsley, who chronicled her own real life experiences. Desilu had always
been slated to produce the movie, since it was Ball's company.
When casting choices were being made,
Lucille wanted her children to be in the film. They auditioned, each making a
screen test. Unfortunately, the director, Melville Shavelson, did not think
neither Lucie or Desi Jt. was right. They would get their chance to act
alongside their mother in her next series, Here's
Lucy.
With Ball as Helen North Beardsley, it
was decided that Henry Honda would play opposite her. This marked the second
time they worked together. In 1942, Lucille and Henry starred in The Big Street. With the major stars in place, it was
time to focus on the supporting roles. Van Johnson would play Darrell, Frank’s
navy buddy. Tim Matheson was cast as Mike, the eldest son of Fonda’s character.
Louise, another child of Frank’s, was portrayed by Morgan Brittany.
As Helen and Frank, the chemistry
between Ball and Fonda sparkled. Because of their previous working
relationship, Lucille and Henry were comfortable around each other. Even when
not filming, they openly displayed affection. Jane Fonda always said her father
loved Lucy.
The plot starts out simply. Helen and
Frank are widowed. Both lonely and dealing with the challenges of raising large
families, they are set up by Darrell. Although they really like each other, the
couple wonders if the difficulty of reading eighteen kids is too much. Their
feelings for one another prevail, and they eventually marry. Before long, the
Beardsleys find themselves expecting their first child together. At the same
time, they are trying to unite the feuding, bitter children.
Production didn’t always run smoothly.
Lucille, who was used to assuming executive duties, took control of the set,
sometimes to the consternation of director Melville Shavelson. Then, there was
the uncertainty of the star herself. There were times when Lucille questioned
her ability to transform herself into Helen. One particular scene was
especially difficult for her. It involved her going to Frank's house to meet
his children for the first time. Still mourning the loss of their mother, the
kids feel as though Helen is attempting to replace her. As a way of showing
their disdain for Helen, the kids pour excessive amounts of alcohol into her
drink. Helen becomes so intoxicated that she breaks into fits of laughter and
then tears. Lucy did not think she could convincingly act so hysterically but in the end,
came through with flying colors. Imagine one of the world's greatest stars experiencing
doubts about switching back and forth between emotions.
One would have thought the scenes
centering around Helen's pregnancy would have caused her anxiety. They must
have meant something to Lucille, for she had longed to have more children.
Several years earlier, when she was in the process of making recordings for her
unfinished memoir, she mentioned her disappointment at no longer being able
to have a baby. At fifty-seven, she looked younger than her age suggested.
Regardless of Lucille's reproductive inability, she cradled the infant in the
final minutes of the movie just like he had been one of her own.
If there were any tensions on the set,
neither Henry nor Lucille allowed them to interfere with their performances.
They sought advice from each other. She found relaxation in needlework. During
his time away from the studio, Henry painted.
I first saw Yours, Mine and Ours in 1996. It had a profound impact on me. That
was my introduction to the later work of Lucille Ball. Coincidentally, it was
the first movie I ever watched that I would go on to consider a classic. A
remake was filmed in 2004. It pales in contrast to the original. No one can
play Helen and Frank the way Lucille and Henry did. That is why the 1968
version of Yours, Mine and Ours still
remains- in the opinion of this writer- one of the funniest, most heartwarming
movies ever made.
(Barbara Irvin has been featured in
numerous publications, including The
Beverly Hills Courier and Classic
Images. This is her second article for Cinema
Retro.)
(For Cinema Retro's previously published review of the Blu-ray release, click here)
Francis Ford Coppola was used to bucking the studio honchos in terms of fighting to bring his vision of a film to the big screen. There were epic battles behind the scenes on "The Godfather" but his experiences on the ill-fated production of "The Cotton Club" in 1984 broke down his will to resist. The movie, which was set in the legendary Harlem nightclub in the heyday of great artists such as Duke Ellington and Louis Armstrong, went far over-budget. There were constantly legal squabbles, shady characters that would have been at home in the film itself, a real-life murder and racist pressure from the studio to cut out footage of the African-American stars, Gregory and Maurice Hines, the famous brothers who gained reach fame with their tandem dance numbers. By the time the film opened, the knives were out for it. The movie became an expensive bomb and Coppola always felt a sense of guilt that he had compromised his own production and the contributions of the Hines brothers. He financed a complete re-edit of the film, adding back key scenes and musical production numbers so that the movie finally resembles the film he originally envisioned. It will premiere at the New York Film Festival on October 5 under the title "The Cotton Club Encore". Word-of-mouth is excellent and Coppola, who likes to amend some of his key films from an artistic standpoint, may finally see the acclaim for the production that he once envisioned. Click here to read more in Vanity Fair.
In the 1970s and 1980s director Brian De Palma had some high profile hits with Hitchcockian thrillers such as "Sisters", "Obsession", "Dressed to Kill", "Blow Out" and "Body Double". De Palma's defenders extolled the virtues of these films as clever homages to Hitchcock while detractors accused De Palma of using The Master's formulas to make a fast buck. In 1982 director Robert Benton jumped on the same bandwagon with his own Hitchcockian project, "Still of the Night", which was shot under the title "Stab" before the marketing campaign had been re-evaluated. A few years earlier Benton had triumphed at the Oscars with "Kramer vs. Kramer", taking home the Best Director Oscar. That film also provided an important career boost for Meryl Streep, who also won an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. The two were reunited for this project which stands out on both of their credentials as an odd choice. Chances are that when you think of Streep's exalted status in the film community today, the thriller genre is unlikely to come to mind. (Though she did also appear in "The River Wild" and the remake of "The Manchurian Candidate".) Benton, who had directed relatively few films to date, was more accustomed to the genre and perhaps his involvement with this flawed production can be explained by the fact that the basis for the story (which he collaborated on with David Newman) was a real life experience that found him obsessed with a woman who simultaneously excited and frightened him. Certainly it's a sold premise for a thriller and through much of the movie Benton provides a compelling scenario complimented by two excellent actors: Streep and Roy Scheider. The film falls apart in the final act when it begins to resemble less of a homage to Hitchcock than an homage to De Palma's homages to Hitchcock- with a dose of "Play Misty for Me" thrown in (i.e knife wielding killer attacks protagonist on a balcony that overlooks the churning sea.) It's not that "Still of the Night" is bad (though Streep has gone on record as saying it is), it's simply that it hardly seems like it would ever have been compelling enough to attract two recent Oscar winners.
The film opens in the office of New York City psychiatrist Sam Rice (Scheider). Like most cinematic headshrinkers, he appears to need psychiatric care more than his patients do. He's going through the miseries of a divorce and seems bored and depressed. The only significant female relationship he has is with his mother (Jessica Tandy, who perhaps not coincidentally starred in Hitchcock's "The Birds".) Sam's mundane daily routine takes a dramatic turn when he discovers that a long-time patient, businessman George Bynum (Josef Sommer) has been found stabbed to death in his car on a Manhattan street. From this point some key elements of the story are told in flashback sequences. Sam remembers Bynum as a sexual predator who had been having an affair with one of his staff workers. Then he meets Brooke Reynolds (Streep), a gorgeous thirty-something blonde who seems both alluring and vulnerable. Bynum confesses that he is obsessed with her and cut off his previous affair in order to engage in one with Brooke. Shortly after Bynum's death, Sam is shocked when Brooke appears at his office, nervous, unsettled and chain-smoking. (Yes, you could smoke in an office in those days.) In the awkward conversation that follows she says the purpose of her visit is to return a wristwatch that Bynum had accidentally left at her apartment. She doesn't want to return it herself for fear of alerting Bynum's widow about the affair he was having with her. From minute one Sam is smitten and intrigued by this quirky, jittery- and stunningly beautiful- young woman. He also realizes that her cover story about the watch is thin. She actually wanted to meet him. Shortly thereafter Sam is visited by Detective Joe Vitucci (Joe Grifasi, channeling every personality cliche you can think of when it comes to a New York City cop). He asks Sam if he can shed any light on who might be Bynum's killer. Sam informs him that anything he had discussed with Bynum would be protected under doctor/client privilege...but he also finds himself unable to inform Vitucci about Bynum's affair with Brooke. He realizes he is now obsessed with her, just as Bynum was. He strongly suspects that Brooke is Bynum's murderer but can't get her out of his mind. Like Bynum, he's simultaneously sexually stimulated and terrified of her. Nevertheless, he begins finding excuses to see her and his presence seems to have a calming effect on Brooke. The friendship goes to another stage when she responds to his kiss but Sam is too lacking in self-confidence to actually seduce her. Meanwhile he begins to experience some eerie occurrences. He believes someone is stalking him in the basement of his apartment building. As he follows the mysterious Brooke on a nighttime walk through Central Park (a chilling scenario for anyone in those days), he finds himself alone and so unnerved that when a man jumps out of the shadows to mug him, he is actually relieved to have another human being on the scene. Director Benton knows that a sure-fire way to ratchet up suspense is to put the protagonist in a creepy dark house or in an equally unnerving location. However he goes to the well with this plot device a little too often. For a man who lives in the heart of Manhattan, Sam seems to wind up repeatedly in eerie, isolated places. However, some of the sequences are genuinely suspenseful as in the scene in which Sam is in the laundry room of his apartment building, deep in the bowels of the basement. No one is around. There is total isolation when suddenly the lights in an adjoining room inexplicably go out. You can share his sense of increasing panic as he knows someone is stalking him...but who and why? Refrehingly, Scheider portrays Sam as an everyday guy, not a tough-as-nails hero. He's vulnerable both physically and emotionally throughout.
The film's primary asset is its two stars, both of whom give intense and very convincing performances. There are also the usual plot twists and red herrings one would expect to find in a movie of this genre and Benton for the most part manages to wring some genuine suspense out of it even when he resorts to old gimmicks that include a dream sequence in which Bynum is menaced by an eerie little girl (are there any other kinds of little girls in dream sequences?) It's straight out of "The Shining" but then again just about everything in "Still of the Night" seems recycled, even though it manages to be engrossing right up until the climax when Benton the screenwriter resorts to every time-worn cliche imaginable: an old dark house, a sacrificial lamb character, a vulnerable hero, a knife-wielding maniac...you get the picture. About all that is missing is John Carradine as a mad scientist. The weak ending feels like it was tossed together at the last minute and doesn't retain the suspense or logic that Benton has managed to build heretofore. Nonetheless, "Still of the Night" is still worth a look if only for the performances and those few genuinely spooky sequences.
The Blu-ray edition from Kino Lorber includes the original trailer and trailers for two other Roy Scheider films, "Last Embrace" and "52 Pick-Up."
Okay, that's as close as we can get to invoking the memory of one of the most famous TV themes songs of all time, from the long-running crime show "Dragnet". By the mid-1950s, the program was a national sensation. In 1954, the success of the series inspired star and producer Jack Webb to exploit the show's popularity by bringing it to the big screen. TV-to-cinema adaptations would become commonplace in the years to come with shows such as Walt Disney's Davy Crockett and "The Man From U.N.C.L.E." converting episodes into feature films. However, in the case of the 1954 movie version of "Dragnet", Webb oversaw a completely new production shot in full color. In an era in which all TV programming was telecast in B&W, it was a real treat to see "Dragnet" in color on the big screen. Webb, who also directed the film, stuck to the basics and didn't stray far from the formula that had served him so well. The movie features the same trademark, clipped dialogue. Seemingly no one completes an entire sentence and virtually everyone smokes like a chimney. (Aside from Howard Hawks' "Hatari!", I have never seen so much smoking in one film.) Webb retains his bizarre mannerisms that made him a television icon: he speaks with machine gun fire-like rapidity and walks like he has a diving board under his suit jacket. Both his manner of movement and speech seem to emulate a robot, but you can't deny that the gimmick works: you can't take your eyes off him and he dominates every scene he is in (which is virtually all of them).
The movie opens with an effective sequence in which two hoods are walking through an empty field when a third hood comes out of nowhere and murders one of the men with a shotgun in a sequence that must have been considered rather brutal for the time. The murderer and the other man flee the scene and before you know it, Webb's Sgt. Joe Friday is on the scene with his Sancho Panza, Officer Frank Smith (Ben Alexander). They try to pick up leads but, frankly, within minutes I became rather confused about the relationship of three suspects they focus in on. Most of the labored script has Friday and Smith doggedly trying to build a case against the three hoods but the D.A. says the evidence is too circumstantial. They utilize a "hi tech" secret tape recorder in order to eavesdrop on the suspects. The scene is unintentionally amusing because the "micro recorder" is about the size of a lap top computer. They also enlist the assistance of a sexy police woman (Ann Robinson) who goes undercover to imply she'll go under the covers with one of the suspects. This notion of presenting a female police officer as brave, competent and equal to men is the one progressive factor in the dated screenplay. Friday's disdain for the niceties of the law is apparent. He doesn't consider the constitution to be a vital element of our society, but rather a necessary evil. Whenever he doesn't get his way, there is some eye-rolling, sighs and cynical comments. (In his review of the film, New York Times critic Bosley Crowther specifically noted Friday's obvious "distaste for the Fifth Amendment" and concluded he "is not a nice policeman to anticipate as a hero on the screen.") Most of the pedantic action consists of Friday and Smith tailing a suspect and harassing him day and night in a clear case of police brutality. But, hey, this was an era in which Sen. Joe McCarthy was considered a national hero for rooting out all the commies under all those beds, so Friday's tactics fit in well with the spirit of the day. The movie drags to a conclusion so limp and unsatisfying that I thought there was still another fifteen minutes of running time left. Nevertheless, taken as a museum piece, "Dragnet" is fun to watch, thanks to Webb's undeniable screen presence. The supporting cast includes Virginia Gregg as a dame from the other side of the tracks and Richard Boone as Webb's superior officer. (Young Dennis Weaver has a minor role, as well.) There is precious little humor in the film aside from some small talk between Webb and Alexander. Webb would considerably improve on this aspect of "Dragnet" when he brought the series back in 1967 with Harry Morgan well-cast as his humorous co-star.
The film has been released as part of Universal's burn-to-order program. The transfer is very good with exceptionally impressive color qualities. The movie would make a great double-feature with the 1987 comedy version of "Dragnet" featuring Dan Aykroyd's remarkable impersonation of Jack Webb.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
By 1969, Raquel Welch was at the peak of her cinematic career. Still a bit rough-around-the-edges as an actress, she nevertheless possessed a charming on-screen personality. Not surprisingly, that wasn't the aspect that movie studios chose to showcase when marketing her films. A prime example is Flareup, a 1969 thriller that heavily stressed images and clips of Welch gyrating in a sexy outfit as a go-go dancer. The fact that she is dressed in depressingly demure outfits except for this brief sequence represents something less than truth-in-advertising. Welch is Michele, a vivacious, independent minded Las Vegas strip club dancer whose best friend is murdered by her psychotic ex-husband Alan (Luke Askew). He gets away with the murder and kills another of his wife's friends, who he believes conspired to cause convince his ex to divorce him. Last on the list is Michele, who he relentless hunts. Although charismatic, Michele shows a distinct lack of common sense when it comes to self-protection. For reasons never explained, she turns down police protection and is immediately stalked by Alan. He trails her to Los Angeles, where her poor judgment flares up again (pardon the pun) when he pursues her in a high speed car chase. In the kind of logic made for "women-in-jeopardy" movies, Michele sails through the crowded streets of L.A. where she could seek help from hundreds of passersby, only to wind up in a remote and deserted section of Griffith Park where her would-be killer pursues her through a zoo. She later continues to show similar good sense by escaping from a guarded hospital room only to walk straight into the killer's next trap.
Flareup epitomizes the guilty pleasure movie, from the faux Bond-like opening credits to some laughably bad acting. The film is directed in a clunky, erratic style by James Neilson, who doesn't miss an opportunity to use a zoom lens or a cliched situation. He does succeed, however, in making the most of impressive on-location shooting in both Vegas and L.A, which at least gives the movie a feeling of authenticity. Neilson also shoots topless go go girls at L.A's famed Losers Lounge,where "King Leer" himself, Russ Meyer, is said to have scouted for well-endowed "talent" for his own movies. James Stacy is the parking lot attendant who starts a love affair with Michele and, refreshingly, this is one movie that doesn't have the male play hero to rescue his girlfriend. Michele maybe lacking in good judgment but is brave and resourceful enough to take on the killer herself. The movie does have some genuine suspense and one particularly chilling sequence in which an elderly motorist realizes that the hitchhiker he has picked up is actually a cold blooded murderer. Here, director Neilson finally distinguishes himself in an extensive sequence that is quite haunting.
The movie is good, passable fun and brings back some fond memories of the swinging Sixties. The region-free DVD from the Warner Archive contains an original trailer that emphasizes that Welch is now playing "herself", not a Mexican bandito or a cavegirl, a sly knock on her earlier films. The trailer, which is sexist enough to cause Gloria Steinem heart palpitations also presents Stacy with prominent billing- and spells his name wrong!
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
There was a lot more to the gentle giant Ted Cassidy than you may have known. He soared to fame in the mid-1960s with his immortal portrayal of Lurch on "The Addams Family" classic sitcom. However, as this short film informs us, Cassidy had also been quite the academic and was an over-achiever in school. His acting career extended far beyond "The Addams Family". He guest-starred on many classic television shows and went on to become a familiar face in feature films as well. Sadly, he passed away in 1979 at only 46 years of age, but he remains beloved by his baby boomer fans.
Writer-director
Michael Reeves passed away on February 11th 1969, aged just 25. He had helmed a
mere three films in his short lifetime – all of them in various fields of
exploitation cinema – the third and last of them, Witchfinder General, now widely acknowledged as a classic of 1960s
British cinema. (The film was featured in ‘Cinema Retro’ Vol 2 No 5.)
As I was
watching The Magnificent Obsession of
Michael Reeves, the new documentary from filmmaker Dima Ballin, I found
myself wondering, 50 years on from his death, just how far reaching among movie
buffs at large Reeves and his films are. Although I can comprehend that mention
of his name might draw a blank with many, it seems inconceivable to me that the
title Witchfinder General would do so
too. So I put it to the test. My daughter, who’s in her mid-20s and shares my
passion for film – less mainstream fare in particular – said she’d heard of
neither Reeves nor Witchfinder General.
Although I couldn’t recall it being one I’d shown her myself, I was
nevertheless surprised, it really wasn’t the response I’d expected. And if she – whose father (for better or worse)
fed her a diet of classic screen terrors throughout her teenage years – was
blithely unaware of the man and that revered film in particular, then the
situation may be worse than I thought.
For her
and anyone else who’s not heard of Reeves, Ballin’s film is essential viewing.
For if the worth of any documentary about a filmmaker is gauged by its ability
to fill the viewer with a desire to seek out the films discussed within, then The Magnificent Obsession of Michael Reeves
is 24-carat gold. It provides a fascinating insight into both the man and his
movies, with stories told not only by some of his admirers but by those who
knew and worked with him too. Among the latter are actor Ian Ogilvy (who had
starring roles in all three of Reeves’s films) and screenwriter Tom Baker.
Michael
Reeves came from a privileged background insomuch as his mother was
sufficiently well-heeled as to be able to bankroll his desire to make movies.
Yet he was also something of a tragic figure, insular and blighted by mental
health problems. Although his personal life is discussed in the documentary, the
main focus is his films: Discussed at some length are Revenge of the Blood Beast (1966, aka The She Beast, starring Barbara Steele), The Sorcerers (1967, starring Boris Karloff and Catherine Lacey)
and, of course, Witchfinder General
(1968, aka The Conqueror Worm,
starring Vincent Price). Just look at those names. His career may have been
brief, but it can’t be said Reeves didn’t get to work with some of the greats.
Ian Ogilvy
– Reeves’s close friend from a young age, even appearing some of his early home
movies (of which tantalising glimpses are included here) – is particularly generous
with his recollections, sharing many little nuggets I’d not heard before. For
example, it is Reeves himself body-doubling Ogilvy in the car that’s about to
explode at the climax of The Sorcerers,
the actor having point blank refused to get in under concerns for his personal
safety.
Witchfinder General was Reeves’s masterpiece, yet
his lack of rapport with Vincent Price during shooting is well known. It didn’t
help that the fledgling director constantly had to request that his seasoned
leading man dial down his overly theatrical performance. How lovely then to
learn that after seeing the finished film Price wrote to Reeves stating that
his direction had been spot on and how he hoped they might work together again
one day. Apparently Reeves carried that letter around with him always.
For fans
of the director and his films, I can’t recommend this documentary highly
enough. As for the less familiar, there’s a saying along the lines that you
live on after your death until the last person who remembers you is gone. With
that in mind, I just hope Dima Ballin’s outstanding film will also serve to
introduce Michael Reeves to a new audience, a young audience that will help keep his memory alive for another 50
years. And many beyond.
Right,
I’ve got to go and dig out my disc of Witchfinder
General. I have a daughter to educate.
"The Wilby Conspiracy" is primarily notable for the teaming of two big screen legends: Sidney Poitier and Michael Caine. The 1975 film itself aspires to be a bold indictment of South Africa's cruel apartheid regime which saw black residents of the country terrorized and humiliated by the white minority. Most movies wouldn't go near the topic in the mid-1970s so the script, based on Peter Driscoll's novel, is to be commended for being ahead of the game in terms of raising awareness of the practices that would ultimately bring down the corrupt regime and see the seemingly impossible achievement of having one-time political prisoner Nelson Mandela elected as president. Yet, screenwriters Rod Amateau and Harold Nebenzal were obviously tasked with primarily delivering an action adventure "buddy" pic that starts off resembling Poiter's 1950s classic "The Defiant Ones" (the protagonists are even handcuffed together for a time.) Adding another note of nostalgia is that the film reunited Poitier with director Ralph Nelson, with whom he collaborated on "Lilies of the Field" and "Duel at Diablo".
The film opens with a courtroom scene in which a prisoner, Shack Twala (Poitier) is awaiting what is believed to be a predetermined sentence for political "crimes" that will see him sent back to prison. Twala is a prominent black activist who has gained international attention for his objections to social injustice. Much to the surprise of Twala and his lawyer, Rina Van Niekerk (Prunella Gee), Twala is absolved of the crime and is released as a free man. The good feelings don't last long, however. During the drive home, their car is stopped by police officers who harass Twala, who becomes enraged and fights back with the help of Rina's boyfriend, Jim Keogh (Caine), a mining executive who is largely apolitical. Now wanted by the law, the two men drop off Rina and flee to Johannesburg, a 900 mile journey. There, Twala hopes to unite with a fellow political activist who might be able to sneak them across the border into Botswana. They have plenty of close calls and are aggressively pursued by Major Horn (Nicol Williamson), a dreaded higher up in the nation's nefarious security forces that routinely employed torture. They also learn that there was an ulterior motive in the court case that saw the government drop charges against Twala. The plot gets increasingly burdened with secondary characters and the search for a large cache of stolen diamonds that went missing many years ago. Twala wants to recover them and deliver them to a man named Wilby (Joe de Graft), the head of the black resistance movement who resides freely in Botswana. The plan is to use the diamonds to finance Wilby's attempts to publicize and shame the apartheid regime. Along the way there are double crosses and people who turn out to be dubious allies to the men who are on the lam. Most amusing is Saeed Jaffrey as a timid dentist who nevertheless risks his life for the activists cause. He also employs a fellow conspirator, Persis (Persis Khambatta), who seems to have been primarily written into the film in order to shoehorn in a rather absurd and unconvincing sex scene between her and Twala. Caine is in top form as the meek man who turns into an action hero literally overnight and he has the movie's best one-liners. Poitier, while not wasted, is under-utilized and lacks any scenes of great dramatic power. Prunella Gee provides a fine, spirited performance but the scene stealer is Nicol Williamson, who presents a fascinating villain who is charismatic, yet cruel and totally dedicated to enshrining white supremacy in South Africa by whatever means he needs to employ. (Like his real life counterparts, he naturally considers himself to be a patriot.)
The film abounds with impressive action scenes though a couple come close to "jumping the shark" in terms of credibility. (Ironically, the most suspense was generated off screen when an errant camera crashed through a speeding car with Poitier and Caine in the front seats, almost killing them both.) The movie also has an adequate score by Lalo Schifrin, though the decision to open this action opus with a romantic love song over the credits is bewildering. Because South Africa was obviously not available as a film location, Kenya substituted nicely and director Nelson makes the most of the expansive landscapes. Interiors were shot at Pinewood Studios outside of London. There are quite a few "behind-the-cameras" talents from the James Bond films: Associate Producer Stanley Sopel, Sound Recordist Gordon K. McCallum, legendary stunt coordinator Bob Simmons, First Assistant Editor John Grover and and Stills Photographer George Whitear. Another trivia note: the film was produced by actor/director Helmut Dantine, who has a small role in the movie. So there's a lot of talent both on and off-screen and while the movie is certainly not a classic, it can be recommended as a fun and sometimes poignant action flick.
Kino Lorber has released a Blu-ray edition of "The Wilby Conspiracy". The transfer is generally fine but not overwhelmingly impressive. The only bonus feature is a trailer gallery of other Caine and Poitier films available from KL.
In the summer of 1977, New York City experienced a massive blackout that led to an explosion of crime as looters, muggers and other miscreants took to the streets to take advantage of the fact that the police were immediately over-stretched. I was traveling in Austria at the time while in college and in those pre-internet days had to watch appalling images of the chaos on television without knowing the full context of what was happening. It was a black eye for Gotham, the city that weathered the 1965 blackout in a civilized way. It wasn't long before a film capitalized on the incident, as evidenced by the Canadian production of "Blackout" which was released the following year. The modestly-budgeted film, directed by Eddy Matalon, uses some second unit footage of New York City to somewhat effectively mask the fact that most of the movie was shot in Montreal. The movie opens with a powerful storm bearing down on the city. Ultimately, there is a total blackout. It isn't long before crime starts to soar. Because of the limited budget, Matalon is forced to confine most of the action to an apartment building where various tenants are terrorized by an escaped group of murderous thugs led by the psychopath Christie (Robert Carradine). There is some suspense as the goons go through the building selecting their next victims, who include the standard characters who tended to pop up in disaster films. (i.e sexy single woman, a seriously ill man who attached to a respirator, a stereotypical elderly Jewish couple and a young mother who is going into labor at the height of the crisis. There's even a wedding celebration that is invaded by the gang.) Among the recognizable victims are Belinda Montgomery, Jean-Pierre Aumont, June Allyson and Ray Milland. James Mitchum (billed here as "Jim") plays a harried New York City cop who stumbles onto the crime spree and who attempts to thwart the villains while at the same time looking after the victims in the pitch black apartments and hallways. Refreshingly, he's not a Dirty Harry superhero type. He makes misjudgments, gets captured twice and fires loads of shots without hitting his prey. For the most part, the performances are fine. Mitchum makes for a low-key good guy while Carradine provides a frightening portrait of a charismatic, soft-spoken killer. (Ten years earlier, Bruce Dern would have nabbed the part.) Milland also registers as a stuffy millionaire who doesn't flinch even in the face of death and June Allyson is sympathetic as a woman begging for her bedridden husband's life to be spared. "Blackout" is competently made when one considers the budget limitations but unlike similarly-themed disaster flicks, it isn't fun to watch. The screenplay is a smorgasbord of terrible, vicious things happening to sympathetic people. The only respite is a climactic car chase between Mitchum and Carradine that is set in a parking garage and is relatively well-staged.
Code Red has released "Blackout" as a special edition Blu-ray that has apparently restored some footage excised at one point from the theatrical cut. The film apparently has a cult following that will appreciate this even though the transfer leaves something to be desired with some action hard to discern because it's like staring into an ink well. The bonus extras include an enjoyable on camera interview with Robert Carradine and a feature length commentary with Belinda J. Montgomery. There is also a gallery of trailers and TV spots for this film and other Code Red releases. The company should be commended for presenting the film but they need to tighten quality control in regard to packaging. On the reverse of the sleeve, Jim Mitchum is listed as "Jim Mitchell" and the running time is incorrectly listed as 88 minutes. (I timed it at 92 minutes.) Also the company doesn't credit the film historians on the sleeve who conducted the commentary track with Montgomery. That's not an error but it is also not very thoughtful. Overall, a good presentation in terms of special features of a film that most retro movie lovers won't be familiar with.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER (Not available on Amazon at this time.)
Cinema
Retro has always prided itself on exploring the most diverse range of
soundtrack genres. Not only do we cover the classics, but also the more obscure
such as Production and Library music but also specialist labels such as All
Score Media and Cineploit – a label which offers new soundtrack scores produced
in a retro style and as homage to cult films of the past. At their heart, they
are all projects devised to keep cult film music of the past very much alive
and to the fore in the present day.
Rashomon
– Ashcan copy – Filmmusic Vol. III (Cine 21) Release date 25th October 2019
Originally issued in 2011, Ashcan Copy is the third instalment in Rashomon's Film Music series of LPs. Cineploit
Records is proud to present this re-release, and to introduce the record to a
wider audience than the 150 lucky souls who snagged a copy of the ultra-limited
initial release on Hlava Records. Active since 2009, Rashomon is the solo
project of Matt Thompson, also of Cineploit mainstays Zoltan. This is his
second release on the label under the Rashomon name, following 2014's LP/DVD
extravaganza The Cameraman's Revenge:
Film Music Vol. 4 – the final release in the Film Music series to date. The previous edition to this, 2009's The Finishing Line: Film Music Vol. 2,
had focused on recreating the psychological mind-state of the wilder end of
1970s British public information films. By way of change Ashcan Copy is presented as an album
of soundtrack cues from films that were, for one reason or another, never
released. The films, hailing from Italy, Japan and the U.S. (among others)
supposedly date from the 1950s to the 1970s and were (according to the
extensive sleeve notes) exactingly sourced from film archives across Europe.
In reality, all the music is self-composed. The eight
tracks include elements of noise, folk, psychedelia, prog and noir-jazz within
their elaborate constructions, created with panoply of instrumentation
including the atmospheric sounding Mellotron, zither, home-made percussion,
Fender Rhodes, harmonium, Mini-Moog and more. Delicate and sensuous, heavy and
oppressive – the record negotiates these musical contradictions while retaining
a single-minded pursuit of strangeness and surprise.
Having finally found its spiritual place on soundtrack
specialist label Cineploit, Ashcan
Copy has finally come home. The album’s fabric is woven seamlessly
throughout Cineploit’s core, signature sound. Running around 40 minutes, Ashcan
Copy will take you on a dark, brooding journey - but it’s simply the nature of
the beast. In context, the music would never sound out of place if set against
some psychedelic piece of Giallo or (as in the album’s opening track) ‘Double
Kill’ in a gritty slice of 70s Poliziotteschi . Cineploit excel in this
particular area of subgenre film music. Freakish and fascinating, it hits the
spot very nicely. The whole album has been completely remixed and includes a
bonus new track. The whole package (while strictly limited) is again in line
with Cineploit’s exceptional standards with an LP/CD set (180g Vinyl 300
coloured bone/red mix /200 black. housed in plastic outer sleeve) and the CD
housed in a matching card gatefold sleeve.