In
“Man-Eater of Kumaon,” a 1948 feature now available on Blu-ray from Kino Lorber
Studio Classics, Dr. John Collins (Wendell Corey) undertakes an ill-fated
big-game hunt in the distant land of the movie’s title—an actual region of
India in the Himalayan foothills, not a fantasy world orbiting somewhere
between planets Coruscant and Dune as the exotic name might suggest nowadays.Stalking a tiger in the underbrush, Collins
inflicts an agonizing but not fatal injury as his bullet severs one of the
tiger’s toes.His Indian guides warn
that the wounded tiger will begin attacking and killing humans, and they urge
him to finish what he started.But the
American doesn’t
feel particularly responsible for the villagers now at the mercy of the
carnivore.In his case, it’s less a
matter of Western chauvinism than a general lack of empathy for other people
whatever their ethnicity, a shortcoming that cost him his marriage back in the
States.
After
recovering from an onset of malaria, Collins plans to try his luck inSumatra next.But the tiger has already begun its depredations, and on his way to
Delhi, the hunter encounters a little boy, Panwah, orphaned by the big
cat.Collins conveys the child to a
nearby village, where he is taken in by a young couple, Narain (Sabu) and Lali
(Joanne Page), whom the American befriends.In part, we infer, he becomes close to the loving couple because they
remind him of what he lost back home when his wife divorced him.Still, he resists the idea that, having
turned the tiger into a killer of humans, it’s up to him to restore peace and
security by finishing the job—until the attacks become personal when Lali is
badly mauled while saving Panwah.
“Man-Eater
of Kumaon” was loosely based on a best-selling memoir by big-game hunter Jim
Corbett, who in real life was neither an American nor a disenchanted
physician.This wasn’t the first or last
instance of filmmakers purchasing a popular book, keeping the title for name
recognition, and throwing out most everything else.Unlike many books and films that have
glorified big-game hunting as a macho rite of passage, the dilemma facing John
Collins is a crisis of conscience, not a challenge to his ability to secure a
trophy head.Still, animal-rights
advocates and conservationists are likely to be disturbed by scenes of the
hunter pointing his rifle at the tiger whatever the context.Now, laws would require that the cat be
tranquillised as the first resort and relocated to another habitat away from
humans, not killed.Aside from Sabu, all
the Indians in the story are portrayed by non-Indian actors, a practice that
wouldn’t begin to change for another ten years, when Kamala Devi and I.S Johar
appeared in prominent supporting roles in another movie about ferocious
felines, “Harry Black and the Tiger” (1958).Arguing that studios should have been more inclusive in the 1940s is a
little like contending that Ford’s Theatre should have had metal detectors in
1865.Nevertheless, it’s still a hurdle
for many viewers today, accustomed as we’ve become to the routine presence of
Indian and Indian-American actors in contemporary TV shows and movies, although
critically beloved classics like “Gunga Din” and “Black Narcissus” often seem
to get a pass in this regard.
Well
acted by the always dependable Wendell Corey and capably directed by Byron
Haskin (better known to Sci-Fi enthusiasts for 1953’s “The War of the Worlds”
and six episodes of “The Outer Limits” in 1963-64), “Man-Eater of Kumaon” shows
to good advantage in the new Blu-ray from Kino Lorber.The movie was filmed in black and white by
acclaimed cinematographer William C. Mellor, a choice that may have been
necessitated by the budgetary logistics of incorporating old B&W stock
footage into new shots of a tiger prowling through a backlot jungle set, but it
serves a dramatic purpose too.Mellor’s
glistening daytime shots and hi-def, misty nocturnal compositions underscore a
Film Noir quality in the plot, as fate manoeuvres John Collins into an
initially reluctant, then fiercely resigned showdown with the hostile force of
nature represented by the rogue tiger.Special features on the Blu-ray include several trailers for other
jungle movies and Wendell Corey pictures available from Kino Lorber, a
spirited audio commentary by David Del Valle and Dan Marino and reversible sleeve artwork.
Alan
Ladd and Geraldine Fitzgerald are American agents in the newly-formed WWII era spy
agency “O.S.S.,” on Blu-ray from Kino Lorber. Ladd is Philip Masson, an agent
in the recently formed Office of Strategic Services. The head of the spy group
is Commander Brady, played by Patric Knowles, who sends Masson and several
other agents on their first mission to German occupied France in 1942. Their
mission is to blow up a railway tunnel using plastic explosives and connect
with the French Resistance. Along the way they encounter Nazis, French
collaborators and informants. Joining Mason is Ellen Rogers played by Fitzgerald
and they meet up with fellow OSS agents Robert Bouchet, AKA Bernay the radio
operator, played by Richard Benedict, and Rodney Parrish, AKA Gates, the leader
of Team Applejack, played by Don Beddoe.
Philip
and Ellen have assumed new identities as John Martin, a pipe smoking laborer (his
pipe is a nifty gadget that turns into a gun), and Elaine Duprez, a visiting
artist. Gates is captured and killed by the Gestapo soon after the team parachutes
into France. Gates outs himself at a restaurant by using his fork and knife in
the wrong hand moving Philip into the leadership position. Philip becomes
romantically interested in Ellen which is complicated by the arrival of a local
German commander, Colonel Paul Meister (played by John Hoyt making his screen
debut) who is also interested in “Elaine,” after he asks her to create a bust
of himself. Soon he asks “Elaine” to join him on a trip via rail which will take
them through the tunnel they are sent to destroy.
Working
alongside Commander Brady in England is Gloria Saunders as Radio Operator
Sparky. She receives and sends coded messages with Bernay and they quickly form
a friendship. A local Gestapo agent, Amadeus Brink (played by Harold
Vermilyea), discovers the plot, and provides cover for the team of saboteurs as
long as his extortion demands are met. The bust created by “Ellen” is made of
the plastic explosives and this is used to destroy the railway tunnel. Philip
rescues Elaine during the chaos of the explosion and after they escape she
tells him, “Never come back for me again.”
Ladd,
Fitzgerald, Hoyt and Knowles are all terrific, as is the supporting cast. The
movie is dark, intense and a very good spy thriller making good use of light
and shadows. The film was directed by Irving Pichel, who is known for such
genre favorites as “The Most Dangerous Game,” “She,” “Mr. Peabody and the
Mermaid” and “Destination Moon” spanning the 30s, 40s and 50s. The screenplay
by Richard Maibaum was a forerunner to his work in the James Bond series
produced by Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman starting with the 1962
release, “Dr.r No” and continuing through “Licence to Kill” in 1989.
The
cinematography by Lionel Lindon is a highlight, as much of the action takes
place either at night or in dimly- lit rooms and the aforementioned tunnel.
Lindon was cinematographer or director of photography on the movies “Around the
World in 80 Days,” “Casanova’s Big Night,” “Dead Heat on a Merry-Go-Round,” “Going
My Way,” “Grand Prix, “The Manchurian Candidate,” “My Favorite Brunette,” “Submarine
Command,” and TV series episodes for “Alfred Hitchcock Presents,” “M Squad,” “McHales’s
Navy” and “The Munsters,” to name just a few of his many credits which spanned decades.
Released
by Paramount in May 1946, the movie was made with the approval and support of
the O.S.S. and definitely can be viewed as government propaganda, but it’s much
more than that. The disc features a fascinating audio commentary track by Samm
Deighan which is chock full of interesting information of the origins of the
O.S.S., spy movies and the post WWII communist and Hollywood blacklist. The
movie looks and sounds terrific in glorious black and white clocking in at 108
minutes. The disc also features the trailer for this and other Kino Lorber
titles. “O.S.S.” is highly recommended for fans of Alan Ladd, spy thrillers and
WWII drama.
As
a huge fan of Stanley Kubrick’s 1980 film version of Stephen King’s 1977 novel The
Shining, which I saw at the age of fifteen and was completely terrified by,
it is a daunting task indeed to watch any other (excuse the pun) incarnation of
this fantastic story as seen through the eyes of another filmmaker without
being drawn back to Mr. Kubrick’s much-maligned interpretation that was
initially criticized but subsequently revered by some as the greatest horror
film ever made. The Shining is a film that has affected me profoundly in
ways that only a handful of other films ever have. I felt a compelling
obsession with it that was nearly impossible to verbalize. It was my second
Jack Nicholson film, and it made me a lifelong fan of his; it introduced me to
pre-existing music and its use in a contemporary film; and perhaps, most
significantly, it was my introduction into the world of Mr. King’s writings.
Having read the novel a mere two months after seeing the film for the first
time, I was completely surprised to see how much Mr. Kubrick altered the source
material. Much has been written about his decision to jettison nearly all but
the bare bones plot of a former alcoholic schoolteacher-turned-writer taking on
the position of the caretaker of a Colorado hotel during the winter months with
his wife and young son. The film’s most vocal critic is perhaps the author
himself who, while acknowledging Mr. Kubrick’s genius as a film director, has
never held back his disdain for The Shining for which he wrote a
screenplay that was subsequently rejected by the director in favor of his own
collaboration with novelist Diane Johnson. Mr. King’s disappointment in the
film made him vow to make his own version one day, and The Shining, as
presented in a three-part mini-series on ABC in April and May of 1997 and
directed by Mick Garris, is the result.
Jack
Torrance (Stephen Webber) is a recovering alcoholic who has been fired for beating
up a student following the latter cutting the former’s car tire after an
argument. To say that Jack is skating on thin ice would be an understatement,
even after many AA meetings. His marriage is on the rocks with his wife Wendy
(Rebecca De Mornay) following him breaking their son Danny’s (Courtland Mead)
arm after a drinking bout. All he really wants is quiet time to write his play.
Taking care of the remotely located Overlook Hotel during the brutal winter
months is his opportunity to do just that. Stuart Ullman (Elliott Gould), the stern
and surly hotel manager, has been apprised of Jack’s past and is not too
pleased to have to offer him the job as a favor. Dick Halloran (Melvin Van
Peebles), the Overlook’s head chef, gives Wendy and Danny a tour of the
kitchen, and discovers that he shares
the gift of the Shining with Danny, a force described as a “psychic ability to
see visions of the past, present, and future, as well as communicate
telepathically with others who possess similar abilities.”
Once
on their own following the hotel’s seasonal shutdown, the Torrances spend time
acclimating themselves to the quiet solitude of the hotel and their quarters. It
does not take long for them, however, to realize that strange things are going
on in their midst. Unfortunately for Jack, there are evil forces at work that
threaten to unravel the very fabric of his family unit as well as his sanity. Evidence
of past horrors that occurred within the hotel begin to emerge in the form of an
undead and decaying woman in room 217, an anthropomorphized topiary, a hornet’s
nest of not-quite-dead wasps, and a scrapbook of news articles providing
evidence of the hotel’s sordid history. Wendy’s attempts to seduce her husband
into a night of lovemaking while dressed seductively are spurned multiple times
by a distracted Jack who is thinking of incorporating elements of the Overlook
into his play while also dealing with the demons of his alcoholism. In the
midst of this is their seven-year-old son Danny who plays referee between them while
trying to make sense of all that conspires to destroy his family. It isn’t long
before the ghosts of the Overlook’s past begin to show up in their evening
gowns and Jack loses his grip on reality, attempting to destroy his family
while Danny telepathically summons Mr. Halloran who comes to their rescue.
At
four-and-a-half hours, this version of The Shining is highly faithful to
Mr. King’s story and, except for the genuinely frightening woman in Room 217,
there is little in the way of tension and scares. Steven Webber does an
admirable job of portraying a man modeled after Mr. King himself who is trying
to go sober and keep his temper in check. Rebecca De Mornay, who was just
twenty years-old when she was cast in late 1980 as an understudy in Francis
Ford Coppola’s extravagant One from the Heart (1982) and found overnight
fame as Lana in Paul Brickman’s highly successful Risky Business (1983)
opposite Tom Cruise, plays Wendy much closer to Mr. King’s original vision in
his novel. She is a strong-willed mother fiercely protective of her young
charge against the adversity unfurling within the family unit. The film is
ultimately undone by the not-ready-for-prime-time computer-generated imagery
effects (CGI) that come off as silly and unfinished.
It
is impossible to avoid comparisons between this and Mr. Kubrick’s film, the
scariest film I have ever seen and which has only become more revered,
iconoclastic, studied and analyzed in the years since its original release, so
I will tread lightly. There are many areas that make Mr. Kubrick’s version,
which was faked on backlots and massive sets at Elstree Studios in England, a
standout. In his film, the Overlook, as represented by Oregon’s Timberline
Lodge, became a character of its own. The Torrance’s, as played by Jack
Nicholson, Shelly Duvall, and Danny Lloyd, felt as though they were really and
truly snowbound and had absolutely no recourse from the outside world. The same
cannot be said for the hotel in this version which, ironically, is the very
hotel that inspired the story: the Stanley Hotel in Estes Park, Colorado.
The
one area that neither film version touches upon that is a big fear of Danny’s
in the novel of the notion his parents will divorce, which is further
italicized to emphasize innate fear. The other words that do make their
way into both films are, of course, REDRUM and MURDER.
The
miniseries is now available on a double disc Blu-ray from Scream! Factory. Blu-ray
Disc One contains Parts One and Two, and Blu-ray Disc Two contains Part Three
and additional scenes that were cut from the film. The film begins with a
disclaimer: “To provide the most complete version of the film, a few scenes
have been upgraded from the best available, non-Interpositive source.” This
verbiage will go over the heads of the uninitiated, and as such it merely
states that the folks at Scream! Factory did their best to locate the best
available film elements for this high-resolution transfer. I must admit that
even to my trained eyes, I had difficulty differentiating between the best film
elements and whatever less-than-stellar footage was used in the transfer, which
is excellent. There is a highly enjoyable audio commentary by author Stephen
King, director Mick Garris, actor Steven Weber, actress Cynthia Garris, visual effects
supervisor Boyd Shermis, makeup supervisor Bill Curso, and cinematographer
Shelly Johnson that is worth the price of the movie alone. They give great
insight into how the film came to be, especially author King who discusses
staying at the Stanley Hotel in October 1974 with his wife. He explains that,
had the concierge not asked the Kings if they could pay cash to stay overnight,
the book would never have come to be. Talk about a fortuitous exchange. He also
talks about his own experiences and struggles with alcoholism and his relation
to Jack Torrance.
Director
Garris discusses how his version is not intended as a remake of Stanley
Kubrick’s film (which would have been a fool’s errand) but instead a filmed
representation of author Mr. King’s novel, and discusses the challenges of
making a film of a beloved book and working with a child actor, made easier
thanks to Dawn Jeffory-Nelson, an acting teacher. She appears as an unwitting
victim in David Schmoeller’s ultra-creepy Tourist Trap (1979), and worked
extensively with young actor Mead. Steven Weber provides his insights into
working with Ms. De Mornay and how the most difficult scene they did consisted
of nine pages of dialog and had to be in the can in one day.
The
film was originally released on DVD in 2003 and the commentary and additional
eleven scenes that run a total of sixteen-minutes appear to have been ported
over from that release. The image quality of this new double-disc Blu-ray,
however, easily bests that DVD so if you are a fan of this film this is a
worthy upgrade.
(A
previous edition of this film was released in 2017 by Classic Flix and was
reviewed on Cinema Retro in 2020. The film has been re-issued as a
“Special Edition” from Kino Lorber Studio Classics in 2024. Much of the
following review is repeated, but updated, from the earlier piece.)
A
sub-genre of film noir is that of the so-called “docu-noir,” a
crime drama usually based on a true story and told as a Dragnet-style
procedural. Most likely there is an omniscient voiceover narrator, a focus on
the lawmen who are investigating the case, and all the other stylistic and
thematic elements associated with film noir in general: starkly
contrasting black and white photography, urban locations, shadows, gritty
realism, angst and cynicism, and sometimes brutal violence.
Eagle-Lion
Films was a British/American production company that existed for only a few
years in the late 40s, disbanding in the early 50s. There was some talent
involved, and they produced a variety of genres and pictures of varying quality
(Powell and Pressburger’s The Red Shoes was a rare Best Picture
nominee). Many of the studio’s pictures were films noir that were shot
as B-movies with low budgets and barebones casts and crews. Anthony Mann
directed a couple of their classic crime movies—T-Men and Raw Deal,
both of which fall into the “docu-noir” category. Unfortunately, due to bad
management or negligence, many of Eagle-Lion’s titles fell out of copyright and
currently reside in the public domain. Hence, one can often find bargain bin,
cheap knock-off DVDs and Blu-rays of these films.
He
Walked by Night
is a prime example of a quality presentation of an equally impressive little
movie. Made in 1948, Walked is a true story loosely based on the crime
spree by Erwin “Machine Gun” Walker, who shot cops and committed burglaries and
armed robberies in Los Angeles in the mid-40s. In real life, Walker was
arrested and sentenced to prison, but he was paroled in the 70s. This is not the
ending to the story that is depicted in the film.
A
young Richard Basehart portrays disturbed war veteran Roy Morgan, a habitual
burglar and armed robber. An off-duty cop on the street suspects Roy of being a
burglar. Roy shoots and kills him. The POV switches to the police, especially
Lt. Marty Brennan (Scott Brady), who is based on the investigator of the true
case. He is assisted by Captain Breen (Roy Roberts), and forensics man Lee
Whitey (Jack Webb, in an early screen appearance). The story follows the police
investigation juxtaposed with Morgan’s eccentric and lonely existence, and the
criminal’s increasingly violent crimes. The big break comes when a stolen item
is recovered by an electronics pawn dealer (Whit Bissell), who has been
unwittingly fencing for Morgan.
It’s
all engaging stuff, and Basehart delivers an outstanding, creepy performance as
Morgan. The police procedural sequences are done well, such as when a composite
drawing of the suspect is created by all the witnesses to the crimes. The
climactic set piece of a chase in LA’s sewer system is exciting, atmospheric,
and pure noir. Oddly, it is similar to the ending of The Third Man,
which was released a year later.
Even
though Alfred Werker is credited as director, audio commentary speculates that
Anthony Mann stepped in to helm some of the movie. Is it one of those Christian
Nyby/Howard Hawks (The Thing) or Tobe Hooper/Steven Spielberg (Poltergeist)
controversies? No one seems to know. He Walked by Night, however, does
contain several sequences—including the final sewer chase—that are stylistic
stamps of Mann. That said, much of the credit for the picture’s success goes to
celebrated noir cinematographer John Alton.
Another
sidebar related to the picture is Jack Webb’s meeting and further networking
with the picture’s technical adviser Detective Sergeant Marty Wynn. This led to
the ultimate creation of Dragnet as a radio and television show.
Kino
Lorber’s new Special Edition Blu-ray presents a 16-bit 4K scan of the 35mm fine
grain, and it looks quite wonderful, a remarkable step-up from other public
domain transfers that are out there. It comes with English subtitles for the
hearing impaired, as well as an audio commentary by biographer and producer
Alan K. Rode and writer/film historian Julie Kirgo. New to this Special Edition
is a second audio commentary by film historian Imogen Sara Smith.
Unfortunately, the Kino Lorber edition does not contain other supplements that
the previous Classic Flix edition did, nor the 24-page booklet that accompanied
that packaging.
For
fans of film noir, police procedurals, and gritty crime dramas, He
Walked by Night is a good time at the movies.
Woody Allen’s Chekhovian-titled Hannah and Her Sisters
(1986) is reportedly only twenty percent of what he actually wrote for the film
on his Olympia SM-3 typewriter, which he has owned for decades and written all
of his films on. Given how extraordinary this outing is, one can only wonder what
the remaining projected film would have looked like. Conceived of as his answer
to Ingmar Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander (1982) which ran three hours
theatrically and nearly five-and-a-half hours on Swedish television as a
mini-series, Hannah is considered by many to be Mr. Allen’s finest hour,
although I am in the minority as I view Another Woman (1988) as his best
film, with Hannah coming in at a very close second.
Hannah is a sumptuous film, the first Woody Allen outing to be
photographed by the late great cinematographer Carlo
Di Palma who would go on to work on eleven more films with Mr. Allen. He
captures the visual splendor of New York and all its beauty and ugliness over a
two-year period between Thanksgiving holidays. It is also a family affair. Hannah
is a housewife/actress and is played wonderfully by Mia Farrow. Her parents are
her real-life mother, Maureen O’Sullivan, and actor Lloyd Nolan, who used to be
actors as well. Hannah is married to businessman Elliot (Michael Caine) and
they have a good number of children who are all played by Ms. Farrow’s and Mr.
Allen’s real-life adopted offspring. Hannah’s sisters consist of the
emotionally adrift Lee (Barbara Hershey), who is in a relationship of sorts
with the hermetic painter Frederick (Max von Sydow) and the actress-wanna-be Holly
(Dianne Weist) who always appears to be on the verge of a breakdown between
bouts of ingesting nicotine and alcohol following auditions. As with previous
Allen outings, especially his 1979 film Manhattan, Hannah revolves
around myriad romantic entanglements, but it is not all fun and games. Elliot
is intensely attracted to Lee who is a lost soul and is pulled to him thanks to
Frederick’s older age and insouciance. Holly and her actress friend April
(Carrie Fisher), with whom she runs a catering company to make ends meet, battle
it out for the affections of David (Sam Waterston), an erudite architect who
uses opera and fine wine as his tools of choice to woo them both.
As if this were not enough, Mickey (Woody Allen) is a television
producer/hypochondriac and is Hannah’s ex. He has a near-death experience when
he becomes convinced that he has a brain tumor and ponders the meaning of life,
questioning his parents and his co-worker played by Julie Kavner while also
looking to religion for answers, but stopping short after speaking with a Hare
Krishna, confirming the absurdity of shaving his head, wearing long robes, and
dancing around at airports. Though most of the action is that of a serious
theme (Crimes and Misdemeanors would take this to even further horrific
heights in 1989), the film also balances it with outright hilarity. The ending
is perhaps one of the most hopeful and positive in all the Woody Allen
filmography.
Hannah boasts two celebrated cinematic moments. The first occurs in a
restaurant among the sisters as Lee tries desperately to hide her affair from
Hannah who simultaneously attempts to talk Holly off the ledge when she announces
her decision to take off a year to try and find herself. The camera circles the
triumvirate in a 360-degree maneuver that illustrates Lee’s increasing
discomfort with the situation at hand as the tension mounts.
The second comes near the film’s end when Mickey notices Holly
perusing titles in Tower Records and engages in a humorous and heartfelt exchange
with her. The scene is done in one take and is a highlight.
Among Woody Allen fans the question has usually been which do they
prefer: Annie Hall (1977) or Manhattan (1979). They can add Hannah
to the mix. This was Ms. Farrow’s fifth outing with Mr. Allen and she does a
wonderful balancing act of being the confused wife of an adulterer and the
sister of a neurotic.
After being lensed in the fall of 1984, Hannah opened
nationwide on Friday, February 7, 1986 to near universal acclaim, leaving Mr.
Allen wondering how had he failed, the idea being that if you make something
that just about everyone loves, you must be making something that fails to be interesting
or challenging!
Hannah won Oscars for Best Original Screenplay for Woody Allen, Best
Supporting Actor for Michael Caine (who will never live down his unavailability
to accept the Oscar in person as he was away filming Jaws IV), and Best
Supporting Actress for Dianne Weist. It is one of his best-scored films,
boasting a soundtrack of both upbeat and melancholic tunes.
The film is available in a Region B Blu-ray from Fabulous Films, the
fine company that released Manhattan. The
source material is terrific and the film’s warmth shines through.
Click here to purchase this from Amazon’s UK site.
I
have never understood religious cults, and I still don’t. How someone can
permit themselves to be brainwashed into following a self-appointed “religious
leader” and hang on their every word represents, to me, a soul searching for acceptance
or love that they believe has been denied them. My initiation into the existence
of cults was in the December 4, 1978 issues of both Time Magazine and Newsweek
Magazine. Their reports about the Jonestown murders in Guyana, which completely
shocked my sensibilities with images of dead adults and children lying face
down in filth, were the stuff of nightmares. This horrific event has spawned
books, documentaries, and jokes about “drinking the Kool Aid” when referencing one’s
blind commitment to a ridiculous situation. An article two months later in my
local newspaper about “witches,” pagan practices, bowls of blood and animal
ribcages in the woods less than ten miles from where I lived did little to assuage
my fears about them. David Koresh, the leader of the religious sect
referred to as the Branch Davidians, led his followers into the Mount Carmel
Center, a compound in Waco, Texas, which culminated in a standoff with law
enforcement in April 1993 with most of them dying in a storm of bullets and
fire. NXIVM, the organization founded by Keith Raniere five years later
masquerading as a self-help and personal development program group, came under
fire for being a cult following reports of sex trafficking of branded women.
Hollywood is no stranger to films about such
subjects. Most of them are cut from the cloth of genre and horror films. Split
Image (1982) is a bit of a different take on this terrifying subject as
seen through the eyes of suburbanites and therefore is far more relatable. Directed
by Ted Kotcheff between April and June in 1981 just before he unleashed John
Rambo on the world with his phenomenal First Blood, also released in
1982. Split Image was originally reported on under the title of Captured
when it was featured in the wonderful but short-lived bi-monthly movie magazine
published in 1982 called “Coming Attractions.” I saw the film on CED Videodisc nearly
40 years ago and was amazed at how little I recalled of it.
Danny Stetson (Michael O’Keefe of Lewis John
Carlino’s 1978 film The Great Santini) is a parallel bars athlete eyeing
college. He lives with his parents Kevin and Diane (Brian Dennehy and Elisabeth
Ashley) and younger brother Sean (Ronnie Scribner of Tobe Hooper’s 1979 TV-Movie
Salem’s Lot) in a sprawling house like the killer’s in Dario Argento’s Tenebrae
(1982), complete with large see-through windows and a built-in pool. By chance
he meets a beautiful young woman named Rebecca (Karen Allen of Steven
Spielberg’s Raiders of the Lost Ark in 1981) who engages in small talk about
big subjects. Accompanying her to a weekend outing, he is introduced to scores
of people at a retreat called Homeland who welcome him with open arms –
literally – and who all chant and engage in reciting positive affirmations while
discussing Jungian archetypes such as the duality of man. The happy and joyous
atmosphere completely rubs him the wrong way when he meets the group’s leader,
Neil Kirklander (played wonderfully by Peter Fonda), but he stays and sleeps on
the premises and one night makes a break for freedom. Bill Conti’s score here
is recognizable as the precursor to his wonderful score to Robert Mandell’s
thriller F/X (1986). Confronted by Kirklander, he eventually falls under
his spell and informs his mother that he will not be coming home. He undergoes
a ritual whereby he renounces his identity as Danny and is reborn as “Joshua,”
prompting a visit from his parents that results in a near donnybrook
precipitated by his temperamental father.
Split Image, which opened in New York on Friday, November 5,
1982, does a decent job of exploring the practice of capturing and “deprogramming”
an individual who has fallen under the spell of a cult and this is done by
Charles Pratt (played by the incomparable James Woods) who, somehow, makes his
living “deprogramming” people. After kidnapping “Joshua” with his parents’
permission, he forces him to undergo “treatment” to bring “Danny” back to life.
Many of these scenes look as though they came out of a horror film, and it
makes one wonder how much of this was imagined by the writers and how much is
based on factual circumstances such as this. The film looks at the ethics of “interventions”
and how it can alter a person’s free will and their ability to make their own
choices. Like Irwin Winkler’s At First Sight (1992), it waivers between
being compelling and occasionally feels a little “TV Movie of the Week”-ish by
today’s standards.
The film is now available from Kino Lorber on
standard Blu-ray. Some of the shots within the house appear to be a little
darker than they should be, but it is probably just how the film was shot. Mr.
Kotcheff does an expert job of framing the film for 2.35:1 anamorphic
photography, which is a huge step up from the pan-and-scan transfer of the
early 1980’s.
This is a sparse disc in the way of extras, however
the major one is the feature length audio commentary by film historian and filmmaker Daniel Kremer who
mentions his own movie, Raise Your Kids on Seltzer (2015), which is
about retired “deprogrammers”. When I was in middle school, Ralph L. Thomas’s
1981 film Ticket to Heaven appeared in my Weekly Reader issue and
I had a much different idea of what that film was about. It turns out that
deprogramming is the theme, and Mr. Kremer also mentions Blinded by the
Light, which was released in 1980, and starred both Kristy and Jimmy
McNichol, directed by cinematographer John A. Alonzo. This is a very
entertaining and informative commentary which also touches on Mr. Kotcheff’s
other films and placing him into the auteur category.
The
Blu-ray also comes with the following trailers: Split Image, Gorky
Park, 52 Pick-Up, The Bedroom Window, The Wanderers,
and The Hard Way.
After the dramatic, Ingmar Bergman-esque directorial turn he took
with Interiors (1978) which came unexpectedly on the heels of
his masterfully hilarious Oscar-winning film Annie Hall (1977),
Woody Allen turned back to contemporary New York for a daring film that was
shot in black-and-white and scored with the music of George
Gershwin. Proclaimed as the only truly great American film of the 1970s by
film critic Andrew Sarris, Manhattan is a joy to behold from
start to finish and is quite simply one of the most romantic-looking films of
all-time (though its subject matter in the era of the MeToo movement will
indubitably raise more than a few eyebrows with the allegations of sexual
molestation launched against Mr. Allen). Gordon Willis’s beautiful
photography married with the sumptuous Gershwin music makes me wish that
filmmakers would make black-and-white films today. There are some who do, admittedly,
but they appear to only do it within avant-garde and independent circles.
Manhattan, released on Wednesday, April 25, 1979, stars Mr.
Allen as Isaac Davis, a television writer who is unfulfilled with his life as a
comedy writer. His second ex-wife Jill (Meryl Streep) has left him for
another woman and is writing a book about their marriage. Isaac is 42 and
is dating Tracy (Mariel Hemingway) who is 25 years younger than he is and is
still in high school. He feels very guilty about this, but genuinely cares
for her (this plot point was reportedly inspired by Mr. Allen’s affair with
actress Stacy Nelkin on the set of Annie Hall which was
shooting in 1976, though her part was eventually cut from that film). His
friend Yale (Michael Murphy) is writing a book about Eugene O’Neill and is
married to Emily (Anne Byrne) but has started an affair with high-strung and
neurotic Mary Wilkie (Diane Keaton) whom Isaac initially cannot tolerate but
increasingly grows fond of. Throughout the film we are confronted by these
characters who cannot seem to put their finger on what they want and stick with
it. They are not inherently bad people. They just keep making questionable
decisions. By the end of the film, the only person who seems to have their
head on straight is Tracy and the film ends, like Mr. Allen’s Hannah
and Her Sisters (1986), on a very positive and upbeat note.
The real star of the film is Manhattan itself, with its pulsating
and bustling people and automobiles. Rarely has the city looked so
luminous and beautiful onscreen (if ever). Gordon Willis, the revered
cinematographer of The Godfather films and a good number of Mr.
Allen’s early works, captures Gotham in all its beauty even during an era
when the city was beset by social decay. For the first time in his career,
Mr. Allen forgoes the relative constraints of the 1.85:1 flat ratio to the far
more accommodating 2.35:1 anamorphic Panavision vista and the results makes one
ache for further use of this format.
Manhattan was penned by Mr. Allen and Marshall
Brickman, who also co-wrote Annie Hall. The dialogue in Mr.
Allen’s films has always been a strong point, but here it really shines. His
use of long, uninterrupted takes that first surfaced in Annie Hall
shine here Rarely have onscreen walks and chats been so fascinating.
Manhattan was also one of the first movies to appear
on home video in the widescreen format, which retained much (but not all) of
the film’s original image. I have owned Manhattan on
letterboxed VHS, letterboxed laserdisc with a gatefold, letterboxed DVD, and I
must say that this Region B anamorphically-enhanced Blu-ray courtesy of Fabulous Films is beautiful.
It would be wonderful if Mr. Allen would be open to providing
commentary tracks on his older films, specifically this one which,
unbelievably, he reportedly was so displeased with that he imposed on United
Artists to shelve it and offered to do another movie for free.
Thankfully, they did not take him up on it.
Click here to purchase this from Amazon’s UK site.
"Number One" (released in certain
countries under the title "Pro") is an off-beat vehicle for Charlon Heston, who was then at his peak of popularity. The fact that the
movie under-performed at the box-office and failed to score with
critics didn't diminish Heston's status as a leading man. He would go on
to star in such hits as "The Omega Man", "Skyjacked", "Soylent Green"
"Earthquake", "Midway"and "Airport '75"- with cameos in the popular "The
Three Musketeers" and "The Four Musketeers". The poor response to
"Number One" doesn't diminish its many merits - and the fact that Heston
was willing to play against type in a largely unsympathetic role. For
the film, he reunited with director Tom Gries, with whom he made the
acclaimed 1968 Western "Will Penny". Curiously, both movies center on
the same theme: a macho man who can't come to grips with the fact that
he is aging and, therefore, his chosen way of life is threatened. In
"Will Penny", Heston played the title character: a middle-aged cowboy
who feels the inevitable aches and pains of trying to maintain a career
that is clearly suited for younger men. Similarly, in "Number One" he
plays "Cat" Catlan, a star quarterback for the New Orleans Saints
football team. Catlan has seen plenty of fame and glory as the team's
Golden Boy and the idol of the crowds. But now he is 40 years old and,
although still in Herculean physical condition compared to most men his
age, he's fallen victim to the constant brutalities he suffers on the
field.
The film opens on a particularly disastrous game in which Catlan
makes some serious misjudgments about plays and bungles some key passes.
The result is an embarrassing loss for the team. The Saints' gruff
coach Southerd (John Randolph) isn't ready to give up on Catlin but
seemingly every other team member is. Catlan is subjected to some cruel
jokes and he has to contend with the fact that a much younger player
(Richard Elkins) is breathing down his neck, hoping to replace him as
quarterback. Things aren't much better at home for Catlan. His
long-suffering wife Julie (Jessica Walter) patiently endures his
mysterious absences, unpredictable mood swings and volatile temper. She
is a very successful fashion designer but Catlan is "old school" when it
comes to the role of wives. He wants Julie to stay home and cater to
his needs. In the midst of one of their frequent fights, he even stoops
so low as to cruelly tease her about her inability to conceive a baby.
Still, she sticks with him even when he confesses to having an affair
with an attractive, self-made woman, Ann (Diana Muldaur). Faced with the
fact that his career is winding down, Catlan reluctantly explores his
options for his post-NFL life. They aren't very enticing. His best
friend Richie (Bruce Dern), is an obnoxious former Saints player who
brags about having gotten out of the game at age 34. He now runs a very
successful car leasing business and lives a playboy lifestyle. He wants
Catlan to work for him, a prospect that doesn't sit well with the aging
quarterback. He also gets an offer from a computer company to work for
them but the idea of dealing of being surrounded by machines in the
confines of an office is repugnant to him. Ultimately, Catlan is
inspired by his wife to go out on a high note. During one of their rare
moments of domestic detente, she convinces him that he still has some
good games in his future if he can shake off the funk and get his
confidence back. The film's climactic game is the very definition of
mixed emotions. Catlan performs well and has his mojo back but the
movie's ambiguous final shot is anything but uplifting.
Tom Gries was a good director for Heston. He somehow managed to tamp
down Heston's larger-than-life personality and afford him the
opportunity to play everyday men. In "Number One", Heston is subject to
the sorts of problems that plague most middle-aged men. He's nervous
about his future. He often takes his frustrations out on the people
closest to him. He tries to reassert his youth by exerting his sexual
prowess through having an affair. Throughout it all, Heston admirably
does not try to make Catlan into a hero. There is a level of sympathy
accorded to him because of the emotional and physical stress he is under
but his sheer disregard for others makes him more a villain than a
hero. (He even refuses to give fans his autograph). Even worse is his
sheer selfishness in how he deals with his wife's needs. He feels
threatened by the success she is enjoying in her own career and
therefore diminishes her achievements. Heston gives one of his finest
performances, ironically, in what was one of his least-seen films.He
gets able support from the woefully-underrated Jessica Walter, whose
performance a couple of years later in "Play Misty For Me" should have
assured her of major stardom (and an Oscar nomination). Director Gries
also utilizes the talents of real-life football players, some of whom
exhibit impressive acting skills. Diana Muldaur also excels as the siren
who lures Catlan into her bed. There is an air of authenticity to the
film, primarily because Gries shot much of it in front of packed
stadiums. (Cinematographer Michael Hugo's work is especially
impressive). Gries also captures the feel of New Orleans back in the
day, capitalizing on the local scenery, jazz clubs and even getting the
great Al Hirt to perform a number and do a bit of acting. About the only
dated aspects of the film concern the off-the-field activities of the
NFL players. Catlan complains that they are paid like peasants, which
was probably true in 1969, but is a rather laughable notion today. Also,
the NFL team is required to wear jackets and ties when traveling to or
leaving the stadium, another rule that would be virtually unenforceable
by contemporary standards.
"Number One" never found its audience in 1969 but hopefully retro movie lovers appreciate its
merits. Th film did have at least one critic who appreciated the movie and Heston's
performance. Writing in the New York Times, critic Howard Thompson
wrote: "Charlton Heston, minus a beard, a loincloth, a toga or the Red
Sea, tackles a starkly unadorned role in one of the most interesting and
admirable performances of his career. If Heston could have been better, we
don't know how." Our sentiments exactly.
The film is currently streaming on Screenpix with an add on subscription for Roku and Amazon Prime subscribers.
as an Iconic Warrior King and a Suspenseful WWII Epic with Peter O’Toole
On January 30th, Conan The Barbarian,the award-winning epic starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, arrives on 4K UHD and Blu-ray for the first time. John Milius directs Academy Award-winning writer Oliver Stone’s
adaptation of the pulp novels by Robert E. Howard to the big screen. A
global phenomenon ruling the box office upon its initial release in
1982, the fantasy forged Schwarzenegger’s status as a true cinematic
icon. Schwarzenegger stars as Conan – enslaved as a young boy after cult leader Thulsa Doom (James Earl Jones)
murders his parents. Conan pushes himself from slave to gladiator to
freed warrior in search of Thulsa Doom to exact his vengeance. Along the
way Conan learns of love, friendship, wisdom, and loyalty. The film
features electrifying star performances by Schwarzenegger and Jones, and
an impressive supporting cast, including Max von Sydow, Sandahl Bergman, Gerry Lopez, and Mako.
The
Limited Edition 4K UHD comes in a 2-Disc set, loaded with extras,
including new interviews with cast and crew, rarely seen footage and
archival materials. The Blu-ray and 4K UHD Limited Edition sets each
include a double-sided fold-out poster, six double-sided collectors’
postcards, an illustrated collectors’ booklet featuring new writing by
Walter Chaw and John Walsh, and an archive set report by Paul M. Sammon.
Also on the same day, Conan The Destroyer makes its debut on 4K UHD and Blu-ray. The sequel to the wildly successful Conan The Barbarian, Arnold Schwarzenegger returns as Robert E. Howard’s sword-wielding anti-hero. Conan is offered the opportunity to take a young princess (Olivia D’Abo)
on a quest to retrieve the jeweled horn of the dreaming god Dagoth. In
return, the love of his life Valeria will be brought back to life,
though Conan and his fellowship get more than they bargained for as
Dagoth may not be the benevolent demi-god they expected. Directed by Richard Fleischer, Conan The Destroyer features an international cast that includes supermodel/icon Grace Jones, Olivia D'Abo, NBA Hall of Famer Wilt Chamberlain, Tracey Walter, and Sarah Douglas.
The
Blu-ray and 4K UHD Limited Edition sets include a double-sided fold-out
poster, six double-sided collectors’ postcards, an illustrated
collectors’ booklet featuring new writing by Walter Chaw and John Walsh,
and an archive set report by Paul M. Sammon.Bonus
features include a brand new 4K restoration from the original negative,
4K Ultra HD Blu-ray (2160p) presentation in Dolby Vision (HDR10
compatible), newly restored original mono audio and remixed Dolby Atmos
surround audio, archive feature commentary by director Richard
Fleischer, actors Olivia d’Abo, Tracey Walter and Sarah Douglas, newly
filmed interviews and commentary with cast and crew, theatrical
trailers, and an image gallery.
The month ends with a bang in Murphy’s War, coming to Blu-ray on January 30. Peter O’Toole
stars as Murphy, the sole survivor of a German U-boat attack off the
coast of Venezuela at the end of WWII. Nursed back to health by a Quaker
nurse (Siân Phillips),
Murphy has one goal: to destroy the U-boat that killed his mates.
Nothing will stop Murphy from exacting vengeance. Featured co-stars of
O’Toole include Philippe Noiret (La Grande Bouffe, Cinema Paradiso), and Horst Janson (Captain Kronos – Vampire Hunter, Shout at the Devil),. The film is directed by Peter Yates (Bullitt) and beautifully shot by Indiana Jones cinematographer Douglas Slocombe, with a propulsive score from John Barry.Special features across the release include Running Out of War, a new visual essay by film critic David Cairns, A Great Adventure, an archive interview with assistant director John Glen, Dougie, Chic and Me, an archive interview with focus puller Robin Vidgeon, One Man Army,
an archive interview with film critic Sheldon Hall, the theatrical
trailer, an image gallery, a reversible sleeve featuring original and
newly commissioned artwork by Peter Strain, and an illustrated
collector’s booklet featuring new writing by film critic Philip Kemp.
Although
he had made two previous feature films and several shorts, it was Mean
Streets that placed Martin Scorsese into the minds of discerning filmgoers.
This low budget independent picture (released by Warner Brothers) proved, as
filmmaker Richard Linklater states in a Directors Guild of America interview
with Scorsese from 2011 (presented here as a supplement), that artists who
wanted to make a movie could go out and find the means to put their
vision on the screen without interference from studio brass. Indeed, that’s
what Scorsese did.
At
the time, Scorsese was trying to make it in Hollywood. It was John Cassavetes
who had urged him to stop working for Roger Corman (for whom Scorsese had made
1972’s Boxcar Bertha) and “go back to his roots.” Well, Scorsese’s roots
were in the Little Italy neighborhood of New York City. He had grown up there.
He had friends there. He knew the life there, all the “goodfellas” and wannabe
tough guys and low level (and some high level) gangsters. So the filmmaker
crafted a screenplay with fellow NYU film school alumnus Mardik Martin, cast
guys he knew such as Harvey Keitel in the lead (he had starred in Scorsese’s
first feature, Who’s That Knocking at My Door from 1967, retooled and
released in 1968 and again in 1969) and Robert De Niro (who had also grown up
in the neighborhood and had known Scorsese when they were younger; this was
Scorsese’s first collaboration with De Niro, then an actor who had done some
Roger Corman films and was still attempting to up his game). Other familiar
faces that have appeared in Scorsese’s oeuvre were also cast—Victor
Argo, Harry Northup, David Carradine, and Murray Moston—but also other notable
actors who have been in mob-related pictures such as David Proval, Richard
Romanus, and Cesare Danova. Amy Robinson, who later became a producer (she
co-produced Scorsese’s After Hours in 1985) was cast as the female lead.
Mean
Streets features
the hallmarks of what we would come to know to be in a “Martin Scorsese Film,”
especially when he focuses on the underworld, a topic to which he has returned
many times: brotherhood, loyalty, friendship, betrayal, guilt (lots of guilt),
Catholicism, sex, drugs, rock and roll, crime, and violence. This life in
Little Italy is edgy, gritty, dangerous, and quite self-contained. There isn’t
a moment in which an audience might think—oh, this couldn’t happen… because
Scorsese convinces you that it can and has.
Charlie
(Keitel) is a small time hood in Little Italy. His uncle is Giovanni (Danova),
a big time Mafioso. Charlie acts as a big brother figure to his friend, Johnny
Boy (De Niro), who is reckless and not the brightest bulb in the socket, and
who owes money to several gangsters, including Michael (Romanus). Charlie
secretly dates Teresa (Robinson), who is Johnny Boy’s sister. She suffers from
epilepsy and is an outsider to the closed-knit Italian culture of the
neighborhood. Giovanni wants Charlie to get away from Johnny Boy, but Charlie
can’t do it. Eventually the debtors come to get Johnny Boy to pay up, and Charlie
must make decisions that will tear him apart. And that’s when the violence
erupts.
What’s
truly amazing about Mean Streets is that, according to cinematographer Kent
Wakeford, only 6% of the film was actually shot in Little Italy (this reviewer
believes it is slightly more, but certainly not as much as 10%). The rest was
all shot in the Los Angeles area! Scorsese and his design team managed
to find locations in California that somewhat resembled New York City, and
nearly all of the interiors were shot in real spaces (existing bars, hotels,
and apartments). No sound stages were used. For decades, critics and film
historians have touted Mean Streets to be one of the “great New York
films, shot on the streets” when, in fact, it wasn’t! That’s not to say that
it’s not a great New York film, because it is.
Mean
Streets is
a rough and ready, visceral, fast moving, in your face crime picture with unsavory
characters and a vibe that will make you nervous. You might ask, well, is it
entertaining? You bet your life it is. But with these ne’er-do-wells, your life
may not be worth much.
The
Criterion Collection presents a new 4K digital restoration approved by Scorsese
and frequent collaborator/editor Thelma Schoonmaker (who was not involved with
the film), with an uncompressed monaural soundtrack. After several home video
releases in the past on DVD and Blu-ray, this one is obviously tops.
Supplements
include the excellent previously mentioned discussion about the film between
Scorsese and Richard Linklater at the DGA; an audio commentary by Scorsese and
Amy Robinson on specific scenes from the film; a new, observant video essay by
Imogen Sara Smith about the picture; an interview with DP Wakefield; excerpts
from a documentary about co-writer Mardik Martin; a vintage promo video from
1973 about the making of the film (the only supplement ported over from
previous home video releases); and the theatrical trailer. The package booklet
contains an essay by critic Lucy Sante.
Mean
Streets is
a must-have for fans of Martin Scorsese, Harvey Keitel, Robert De Niro, and New
York City mob movies. Get it now… just remember to pay your debts!
Released
on June 29, 1966, “Nevada Smith” was well-received by audiences who still
flocked to A-list Westerns in those days, earning $14 million in ticket
sales—about $132 million in today’s value.Produced by Joseph E. Levine and directed by Henry Hathaway, it starred
Steve McQueen in the title role, as a young half-Indian man, birth name Max
Sand, who determines to track down the three outlaws who murdered his
parents.The movie was a spinoff from a
previous Levine release, “The Carpetbaggers,” a sensational hit in 1964 based
on a Harold Robbins novel.There, in his
final role, Alan Ladd played the older Nevada Smith, a reformed gunfighter
turned B-movie cowboy actor in the 1930s.Thus the 1966 release was a prequel, as we’d now call it, based on a
lengthy section from Robbins’ novel.The
reviews for the 1966 production were mostly positive, except for two opinions
that observers continue to raise in on-line and print discussions about the
film.At 35, they argue, McQueen was too
old and seasoned to play a kid supposedly in his late teens.And with blond hair and blue eyes, nobody
would mistake him for anyone with Native American genetics.Does either point of view stand up to
examination?We McQueen fans would say,
not really.Movies are all about
illusion anyway, in case anyone forgets all those John Hughes films of the ‘80s
starring actors in their twenties as high school kids.At this late date with McQueen’s iconic
status firmly established, it’s impossible to imagine anyone else playing the
part.(Although someone else tried, not
counting Alan Ladd as the older, more sedate Nevada in “The
Carpetbaggers.”Cliff Potts essayed the
role in a 1975 TV production also titled “Nevada Smith,” designed as a direct
sequel to Hathaway’s picture.Filmed as
a hopeful pilot for a TV series, it’s pretty much forgotten now.Cliff Potts was a good actor, usually cast as
charming but devious characters, but he was no Steve McQueen.)
In
Hathaway’s movie, three drifters, Fitch, Bowdre, and Coe, ride up to young Max
Sand and claim to be friends of his father’s.The actors in the roles were Karl Malden, Arthur Kennedy, and Martin Landau.Try to find a trio of that caliber in any
2023 release.Helpfully, Max tells the
strangers to find the homestead, immediately getting a bad feeling when they
speed off, yelling and firing their pistols.The three drifters know the elder Sand all right, but they’ve really
come to demand the gold they believe he’s found in a nearby mine.When he says the mine is worthless, and all
it ever yielded was a $38 nugget, the intruders don’t believe him and work
themselves into a rage.Coe draws a
knife, cold-bloodedly cuts Sand’s Kiowa wife, and threatens to skin her alive
if the miner doesn’t tell them where he’s supposedly hidden his riches.By the time Max reaches the cabin, he finds
his parents’ mangled corpses, and the killers are long gone.
Max
sets out to avenge the murders, but inexperienced and naive, he isn’t cut out
for the job—at first.“If you want to
find those men, you’ll have to look in every saloon, hog farm, and whorehouse
you come to,” warns a chance acquaintance, Jonas Cord (Brian Keith), a friendly
traveling gunsmith.“You’ll have to
become what they are, and wallow in the same garbage they do.”Realizing he can’t persuade Max to call it
quits, Jonas teaches him the essential skills he’ll need to survive: draw fast
and shoot straight, learn to play poker, do everything you can not to give
yourself away, and don’t trust anybody, “not even your friends.”Working his way up through Coe and Bowdre,
he finally locates Fitch.Calling
himself “Nevada Smith,” he joins the outlaw’s new gang in a plan to rob a gold
shipment, bringing the story, neatly, full circle.Fitch knows Max Sand is after him, but he
doesn’t remember what Max looks like; regardless, he grows suspicious and
paranoid about Nevada Smith as the day of the robbery approaches.
Filmed
at locations in California and Louisiana (where Max robs a bank to get himself
sentenced to a prison farm, next to Bowdre), “Nevada Smith” impressed audiences
in 1966 with McQueen’s athletic performance againstscenic outdoor backdrops, beautifully
composed by Hathaway and his cinematographer, Lucian Ballard.This may not seem to be a remarkable
achievement until you revisit the old TV Westerns of the ‘60s, which still run
every day on streaming platforms like GritTV and Cinevault Westerns, and
remember their tired stock-in-trade of aging stars, repetitive storylines,
meager action, and generic backlot sets standing in for Dodge City, the
Ponderosa, and the Big Valley.A new
Blu-ray edition of “Nevada Smith” from Kino Lorber, in a 4K scan of the
original camera negative, reproduces the vistas in stunning detail and
richness, a long overdue boost for viewers who may have seen the movie only in
edited, pan-and-scan TV prints.C.
Courtney Joyner, Mark Jordan Legan, and Henry Parke offer a fine ensemble audio
commentary, pointing out—among other elements—the legion of fine character
actors in the supporting cast.Normally,
I pride myself on that sort of Hollywood trivia, but Joyner, Legan, and Parke
put me in my place.They pointed out
some faces I would have missed otherwise.
Filmmaker
Nicolas Roeg always managed to challenge cinematic norms. Even his most
accessible and popular film, Don’t Look Now (1973), still had what some
might call “arty” shots and experimental editing. Roeg was a director who loved
the images the camera caught, but he also enjoyed manipulating the narrative of
his pictures with the kind of radical editing likely inspired by the French New
Wave, but probably more by the so-called New American Cinema movement that included
revolutionary filmmakers such as Andy Warhol, Stan Brakhage, and others.
Roeg
began his work in film as a cinematographer—and a very good one, too (second
unit on Lawrence of Arabia, The Masque of the Red Death, Far
from the Madding Crowd, and more). After a co-directing (with Donald
Cammell) debut of Performance (1970), Roeg struck out on his own and
made a name for himself as a director of provocative art house fare.
First
out of the gate was Walkabout (1971). It was Australia’s official entry
to the Cannes Film Festival that year, despite it being primarily a British
production (and Roeg himself being English). It was based on the 1959 novel by
James Vance Marshall (a pseudonym of Donald G. Payne), which was first
published as The Children but subsequently renamed Walkabout.
Roeg had apparently wanted to adapt the book into a film for years, and he
finally got the chance to do it with only a million dollar budget. Producers
Max L. Raab and Si Litvinoff (both known primarily as executive producers of
Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange, because they had initially owned the film
rights) provided the funding for what was essentially an independent
production, eventually released by 20th Century Fox. Playwright Edward Bond wrote
a treatment that acted as the screenplay, but most of the picture was
improvised on the go.
Taking
a minimal crew and a cast of unknowns into the Australian outback, Roeg gave us
a haunting, enigmatic, gorgeous-to-look-at, existential treatise on innocence,
the loss of it, and the importance of communication.
“Girl”
(a young Jenny Agutter, who was sixteen when the film was made) and “White Boy”
(Nicolas Roeg’s son Luc Roeg, credited as Lucien John, who was age seven during
production) are siblings who live what appear to be “normal” lives with their
parents in Sydney. One nice, sunny day, “Father” (John Meillon), takes the two
children to the desert for a picnic. There, he attempts to shoot them, but Girl
protects her younger brother and they hide. Father kills himself and sets the
family car on fire. The two kids are now stranded in the outback. Lacking
survival skills, they manage to make it through a few days (but time is never
clear in the film). Then they meet a young “Black Boy” (Australian and Yolngu
actor David Gulpilil, whose age was unknown at the time but since estimated to
be about eighteen when cast) who is out in the wilderness alone. He befriends
the two, regardless of a language barrier, and effectively saves the white
kids’ lives by teaching them how to find water and hunt for game to eat. Interestingly,
it is White Boy who is able to communicate with Black Boy through mime and
playful gestures; Girl seems to be at sea when dealing with the human who is
totally foreign to her. Days pass as the trio travels across the striking
landscape, culminating in a moment in which the physical adolescence of Girl
and Black Boy follow a natural course to sexual tension. Black Boy performs his
native “courtship ritual” dance in tribal makeup and clothing for Girl. Not
understanding what he’s doing and fearful of him, Girl rejects him. Revealing
the rest of the tale would certainly be a spoiler.
A
“walkabout” is a rite of passage in Australian Aboriginal society. Adolescent
males must spend six months in the wilderness and survive—or not—to became an
adult. Hence, while Black Boy is likely enacting his own walkabout, the film
becomes a walkabout for Girl and White Boy. There’s a lot going on underneath
the surface here, including an examination of race and class differences in a
land where the British Empire encroached on an indigenous people, sexual mores
and taboos, and how one’s social environment dictates how one behaves.
Walkabout
is a
fascinating film, and it was highly praised by critics upon release—but, sadly,
it was a box office failure. It has since become a cult classic and a cinephile
favorite. There was some criticism (still is) of the picture’s display of
nudity of all three leads, seeing that, technically, Agutter and young Roeg
were underage. Some bits were cut for the initial release, but footage was
restored in the 1990s. The British Board of Film Classification, though,
determined that the film was not “indecent.” Agutter herself has contemporarily
defended the nude scenes and says that they are essential to the themes of the
movie.
The
Criterion Collection released the film on DVD and Blu-ray years ago, but now
the company has issued a new 4K UHD edition containing two discs. A 4K UHD digital
master in Dolby Vision HDR occupies the first disc, while a Blu-ray of the film
plus special features are on the second. The visuals are, naturally, stunning. An
audio commentary featuring both Nicolas Roeg and Jenny Agutter accompanies the
film. Special features include vintage interviews with Luc Roeg and Agutter, an
hour long documentary on the life and career of David Gulpilil, and the
theatrical trailer. An essay by author Paul Ryan is in the booklet.
With
John Barry’s lush score, Roeg’s own striking cinematography, the sweeping
panoramas of the Australian outback, and the likable, honest performances by
the cast, Walkabout is a highly recommended must-see.
Cinema Retro has received the following press release from the BFI concerning their new Region 2 Blu-ray of "Brannigan", which can be pre-ordered for 21 August release.
“The Duke is
in London, and London will never be the same!”
Veteran
Chicago detective Jim Brannigan (John Wayne, The
Searchers) is dispatched to London to bring back notorious gangster
Ben Larkin (John Vernon, Dirty
Harry), and is assured that the whole operation will run smoothly.
However, when things don’t go to plan, Brannigan finds himself in the
crosshairs of Larkin’s thugs. Reluctantly teaming up with by-the-book Commander
Swann of Scotland Yard (Richard Attenborough, The Great Escape), but determined to
recapture Larkin no matter what, Brannigan tears through London, leaving a
trail of destruction in his wake.
Boasting
incredible stunts, powerful punch-ups, dry dialogue and panoramic views of
1970s London shot by cinematographer Gerry Fisher (The Go-Between, Highlander), as well as a
superb supporting cast including Judy Geeson and Mel Ferrer, Brannigan still
stands tall as an explosive, action-packed, highly entertaining and peculiarly
British excursion for the legendary John Wayne.
Extras
Presented in High Definition
Audio commentary by Steve Mitchell and critic
Nathaniel Thompson (2017)
A Duke Out of Water (2023, 37 mins): reminiscences from the people
who made Brannigan
Frank Henson on Brannigan (2021, 4 mins): the veteran stuntman looks back
on doubling the Duke
Take It to the Bridge (1905-1956, 23 mins): historical glimpses of the
Thames, Tower Bridge and other Brannigan locations
A Policeman’s Lot (1896-1973, 35 mins): a copper’s clutch of films
concerning crimefighters and crooks, proceeding from the very earliest
days of cinema towards the Brannigan era
The Guardian Interview: Richard Attenborough (1983, 89 mins, audio only): the award-winning
actor and director, and John Wayne’s Brannigan co-star, reflects
upon his illustrious career
An extensive selection of location photographs,
featuring cast and crew
Original trailer
**FIRST PRESSING ONLY** Illustrated booklet with
new essays by Johnny Mains and John Oliver, notes on the special features
and credits
With Russia currently dominating world news in an unfavorable way and authoritarian political figures making headlines even in democracies, it's relevant to look back on the 1983 crime thriller "Gorky Park", which has been released on Blu-ray by Kino Lorber. The film was based on Martin Cruz Smith's international bestseller and was unique in its day because it centered on subterfuge within the Soviet law enforcement system and was set primarily in Moscow. Director Michael Apted had hoped to be the first major Hollywood studio production to shoot within the Soviet Union but unsurprisingly he was turned down due to the fact that the story dealt with systemic corruption throughout every layer of the government. Apted settled for the next best thing, shooting in Finland and Sweden, both of which make convincing substitutes for the USSR. Transforming the lengthy, complex novel to a screenplay could have been no easy task, even for acclaimed screenwriter Dennis Potter ("Pennies from Heaven"). Although the film has a leisurely running time of 128 minutes, there are still some portions of the story that are not fleshed out enough to be easily understood.
The movie gets off to a gripping start when three young people drift away from the crowd at a winter festival in Moscow's Gorky Park. They are shot dead shortly thereafter, although we don't know why or by who. Police detective Arkady Renko (William Hurt) is first on the scene and he discovers that the snow-covered bodies have been horribly mutilated with their fingers removed and their faces skinned so that their can be no recognition of the victims. This leads to some particularly gory scenes in which a pathologist skillfully manages to recreate their facial features using synthetic skin. In a country and political system in which everyone is justifiably paranoid, Renko begins to suspect that the KGB might have been behind the killings and are looking to set him up as a fall guy. An interesting cast of characters is gradually introduced. Irina Asanova (Joanna Pacula in her screen debut) is a glamorous actress who was a friend of the victims. Renko cannot persuade her that they are dead, as she has been assured that they escaped into exile by Jack Osborne (Lee Marvin). He's a well-connected, rich American businessman who deals in the lucrative trade of sable furs. Renko is immediately suspicious that Osborne, with his bought-and-paid for allies in Soviet law enforcement, is somehow tied to the murders. This results in a few of those scenes moviegoers love in which the hero and villain banter words, using euphemisms to represent their actual thoughts as they engage in a duel of wits. The more dedicated Renko becomes in solving the crime, the more he realizes his is putting his own life in danger. He later gets assistance from an American visitor, William Kirwill (Brian Dennehy), a detective who is in Moscow to try to solve the murder of his brother, who was one of the three victims. Together, he and Renko begin to unravel a tangled web of corruption, deceit, betrayal and more murders.
"Gorky Park" enjoyed good reviews at the time of its release but it was a boxoffice disappointment. Viewing the new Blu-ray, I found it more intriguing and enjoyable than I had previously- even though the plot gets very complicated and so many characters are introduced that by the end of the movie, I can't say for sure why the original three murder victims were killed. The movie was an important early starring role for William Hurt and he's adequate in the role but rather bland at times, although he and Pacula engage in the kind of steamy sex scene that was de rigueur at a time before movies became largely devoid of eroticism. Pacula gives a very fine performance that earned her a Golden Globe nomination and Dennehy steals every scene he's in, although the premise of an American detective thinking he will have free reign to operate in one of the most oppressive societies in the world is a bit of a stretch. Ian Bannen is a welcome presence as Renko's superior officer, who may be in the pocket of Osborne. As the American fur trader, Lee Marvin is terrific in a marvelous late-career role. It must be said that the largely British cast of supporting actors retain their natural accents, which proves to be a distraction since they are supposed to be playing Russians. Hurt supposedly complained about this because, for the sake of consistency, it forced him to adapt his own version of a British accent, which seems like a hybrid with American English. It doesn't work at all and it's surprising that a skilled director like Apted didn't simply encourage his cast to adopt Russian accents. The production design is rich and expensive-looking but James Horner's score, which was acclaimed in some quarters, sounds dated and very much from an era in which synthesizers were employed ad nauseum.
For those of who came of age during the Cold War period, the film is a reminder of how every aspect of Soviet life was put under scrutiny, with paranoia instilled in citizens to keep everyone off-balance and reluctant to trust anyone else. Despite the Putin regime's quashing of many societal freedoms, today's Russia still enjoys far more freedoms and prosperity than it did when "Gorky Park" was made. Michael Apted's direction is first-rate. Dennis Potter's screenplay excels at showing what life is like in an authoritarian state, where the trappings of democracy are undermined by the fact that everyone knows that there are people who follow the people who follow them. What I found surprising and refreshing is that Renko, who is aware of and frustrated by the Orwellian aspects of his country, remains a dedicated law enforcement official who proudly serves the Soviet state. "Gorky Park" is not a classic but it is a compelling and offbeat thriller that holds up today.
The Kino Lorber Blu-ray looks very good, indeed. Cinematographer Rolf D. Bode's cinematography really impresses, as he shot the film in a rather washed out, colorless manner to reflect the blandness of the Soviet state. The release is one of the few from KL that doesn't include a commentary track, but there is an excellent 16-minute recent interview with Michael Apted, who says he rarely revisits his own films but did so in this case. He says he was surprised at how well the film has held up but expresses his frustration that, despite good reviews, the movie was not successful at the American boxoffice, though it did well internationally. Apted recalls the challenges of trying to replicate Moscow in Helsinki and speaks well of his cast and crew. He says that Lee Marvin, though appearing healthy on screen, was in intensive care in a hospital just prior to filming, as he suffered from emphysema. He relates that Marvin was especially enthused about the film because it gave him a rare opportunity to play a character who was sophisticated and highly cultured. The Blu-ray also includes the original trailer, a teaser trailer and TV spots for "Gorky Park" and an extensive number of trailers for other action films available from KL.
A personal observation: it should be noted that the interview segment with Michael Apted was produced by Walter Olsen, co-founder with his brother Bill of the Scorpion Releasing video label. Scorpion had partnered with KL in recent years to release many under-radar-films on Blu-ray. Walter passed away in May just months after his brother died. Those of us who value their contributions to the home video industry mourn their passing.
Most rock 'n roll movies of the 1950s and 1060s were rightly regarded as disposable entertainment. With a few exceptions, they were low-budget attempts to cash in on the new fad before it might fade away. Elvis Presley's films were cinematic gold for a while but even they began to fade with the release of director Richard Lester's two Beatles films, "A Hard Day's Night" and "Help!", both of which brought innovation and style to the genre. The Monkees' feature film "Head" would also go boldly where no rock 'n roll flick would. "The Cool Ones", however, appears to have been made by people whose sensibilities were stuck in amber. Despite being released in an era when rock music was being defined by groups with a cutting edge, this musical comedy, released in 1967, has the hallmarks of similar films made a decade before. In short, it's a movie designed for hipsters but made by middle-aged squares.
The film centers on the adventures of Hallie Rodgers (Debbie Watson), a dancer seen on one of those "Shindig"-type TV series designed to appeal to teenagers by presenting musical groups performing their latest hits live on stage. Hallie feels she has true star power but the show's arrogant producer, played by Phil Harris, refuses to give her a chance to sing on the program. In an act of defiance on live TV, Hallie steals the microphone from guest performer Glen Campbell and belts out a song. As she is chased around the stage by production executives, she engages in wild mannerisms that the audience mistakes for a new dance. She's summarily fired but later learns she has gained a following and that her moves on stage are now the latest dance craze called "The Tantrum". (I'm not making this up, folks.) She then attempts to woo one-time teen idol Cliff Donner (Gil Peterson) to form a duo. Cliff has fallen on hard times and is currently performing in a failing nightclub run by avuncular British export Stanley Crumley (Robert Coote). The moody Gil is smitten with Hallie but is reluctant to try to regain his former stardom. Ultimately, he concedes when the sees the enthusiastic response from their duets, which help revive Stanley's nightclub. With Stanley as their manager, they set about promoting the act by performing The Tantrum in front of growing audiences. At this point, they are approached by Stanley's estranged brother Tony (Roddy McDowall), a legendary record producer who travels with his own posse and who enjoys a rabid fan base himself. Tony takes control of the act but his sheer narcissism and arrogance results in tension between Hallie and Gil, who break up and reunite more times than I can recount. The bizarre production gets even stranger with a closing act by Mrs. Miller, who was a sixtyish everyday woman whose cover version recording of Petula Clark's "Downtown" became a novelty hit that elevated her to temporary fame.
"The Cool Ones" is awful on every level, but it's so awful it has the virtue to keep the viewer glued to the screen to see if it becomes even more awful. The songs are mostly awful despite being the creations of notable talents Lee Hazlewood and Billy Strange, although the best of the lot, "This Town", would be a well-received recording by Frank Sinatra a couple of years later. The depiction of teenagers is awful, presenting them as brain-dead zombies who instinctively embrace every new song and dance move they experience on a TV show and instantly turn into raving mobs of fans. Young people are presented in an inoffensive, sanitized manner. No one smokes (cigarettes or anything else) and they're all satisfied sipping tonics and sodas in nightclubs. Cripes, to think this film was sandwiched between the release of "The Wild Angels" and the Woodstock festival....The direction by Gene Nelson (who displayed some talent in other films and TV series) is awful and so are the performances, with Debbie Watson overacting and Gil Peterson, who looks like a human Ken doll, underplaying with predictably boring results. They make for the least erotic couple seen on screen since the Ma and Pa Kettle series. But the scene-stealing awful performance is provided by Roddy McDowall, who chews the scenery and everything else in sight while presenting an over-the-top caricature of a fussy, demanding gay man. But since film producers felt that teenagers shouldn't know that gay people exist, a plot device is inserted in which we learn Tony's unseen girlfriend is pregnant, which sends him into an even greater hissy fit that only reinforces the gay stereotype. Only dear old Robert Coote emerges with some dignity intact. The film does have colors that jump out of the screen and it is fun to see location footage of old L.A., which is marvelously photographed by legendary cinematographer Floyd Crosby, whose achievements include "High Noon". This would be his final film. The dance numbers are also well-choreographed by Toni Basil, who would go on to have the hit record "Mickey" in the 1980s. In the end, however, the movie makes those Frankie and Annette beach pictures look like biting social commentaries on life in the 1960s. I expected young Mickey Rooney to show up on screen shouting, "Hey, kids- we can put the show on in the barn!!!" The film was released as the bottom attraction on double features. There was probably no damage to anyone's career because few people saw it.
In viewing "The Cool Ones", I came to the conclusion that I had to disagree with Huey Lewis and the News in that it isn't hip to be square. The film is available on DVD from the Warner Archive. It's a nice transfer and includes the original trailer. The DVD is region-free so that bad movie lovers everywhere can enjoy the film.
Click here to order from the Cinema Retro Movie Store
The
1957 romantic comedy, The Prince and the Showgirl has likely received
more press about what went on behind the scenes and the notorious animosity
that existed between the two stars, Marilyn Monroe and Laurence Olivier. The
latter was also producer and director of the picture, although the production
company was the first title made by the newly-formed Marilyn Monroe
Productions. The 2011 picture (was it that long ago?), My Week with Marilyn,
featuring Michelle Williams and Kenneth Branagh, depicted the stormy relationship
between Monroe and Olivier and how Monroe behaved rather, well, erratically and
irrationally toward her director/co-star, other actors, the cinematographer,
the costumer, and nearly everyone else on the set. The actress even brought
something of a “support coach” with her every day in the form of Paula
Strasberg, who, with her husband Lee, ran the Actors Studio.
Unless
one had actually seen the real movie, The Prince and the Showgirl,
one came away from My Week with Marilyn with the impression that Monroe
was a mess, that Olivier hated her guts, and that the movie they made was a
disaster.
The
Prince and the Showgirl is actually a charming, well-acted, funny, and
touching piece of work. This reviewer is happy to say that Marilyn Monroe is marvelous
in the role of Elsie Marina, a chorus line showgirl of a musical playing in
London’s West End in 1911, when the picture takes place. Monroe displays impressive
comic timing and wit, does a pratfall or two with aplomb, and categorially
holds her own against the likes of renowned thespian Olivier. He, too, is quite
winning, even though his accent as a “Carpathian” prince regent (from the
Balkans) sometimes causes one’s eyebrows to rise. But make no mistake—this
movie belongs to Monroe, and this reviewer would easily cite her performance
here ranked in her top five.
Funny
how the bad rep of a movie and its making clouds what one really sees on the
screen.
Granted,
The Prince and the Showgirl was received with lukewarm praise upon its
release. The BAFTAs honored it with several nominations, including Actor,
“Foreign” Actress, Screenplay, and British Film. It received no Academy Award
nominations. The film did very well in the UK, likely due to Olivier’s presence.
Perhaps the picture’s indifferent reception in the USA was due to its rather
slow pace, length (a few minutes under two hours), and the fact that the story
takes place mostly in static one-room sequences of the Carpathian Embassy.
That’s not surprising, because the movie is based on a stage play, The
Sleeping Prince, by Terrence Rattigan, who also penned the screenplay.
Perhaps Rattigan adhered too closely to the conventions of the stage. All of
these things are indeed flaws in the motion picture.
Still…
this is a worthwhile romantic comedy on the strength of the two leads,
especially Monroe’s luminous performance. Not only does she look fantastic, as
always, but she truly does light up the screen with charisma, warmth, and
delight. Other standouts in the cast would include Richard Wattis, who nearly
steals the movie as the frustrated foreign office suit who is charged with
keeping the prince happy during his stay in London, Sybil Thorndike as the
prince’s dowdy but often frank mother-in-law, and Jeremy Spenser as the
prince’s son, King Nicolas, who to this reviewer resembles what Quentin
Tarantino might have looked like at the age of sixteen.
The
Warner Archive has released a region-free, beautifully rendered, restored presentation of
the feature film in high definition. That 1950s-era Technicolor pops out, and
the costumes are undeniably gorgeous. Unfortunately, the only supplement on the
disk is the theatrical trailer.
The
Prince and the Showgirl is enthusiastically recommended for fans of Marilyn
Monroe. Fans of Olivier, who does what he can when someone so appealing is
sharing the screen with him, will find it interesting. For this reviewer’s
money, The Prince and the Showgirl is far more enjoyable than My Week
with Marilyn, which now seems to be a rather sordid coda to this romantic
comedy bauble.
Click hereto order from the Cinema Retro Movie Store.
To coincide with Paramount Home Video's new 4K release of the 1986 film Dragonslayer, Cinema Retro's Todd Garbarini caught up with the film's director, Matthew Robbins.
By Todd Garbarini
Matthew Robbins is a film director whose experience in the
industry goes back over fifty years. Born in New York City and a graduate of
Johns Hopkins University in 1965 with a BA in Romance Languages, he formed
friendships with Academy Award-winning film editor and sound mixer Walter Murch
(The Godfather, 1972) and Academy Award-nominated cinematographer Caleb
Deschanel (The Black Stallion, 1979). While a student pursuing his MFA
at the USC School of Cinematic Arts in Los Angeles, he met future film director
George Lucas who enlisted Mr. Robbins to work on his student film, Electronic
Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB (1967), which was later made into the feature film THX
1138 starring Robert Duvall and Donald Pleasence.
Well into his mid-twenties when he came into The New
Hollywood (aka the American New Wave or Hollywood Renaissance), his
professional career began during one of the most original and fruitful decades
in American Cinema, the 1970s. Along with his USC writing partner Hal Barwood,
they scripted the real-life 1969 escapades of ex-convict Robert “Bobby” Dent,
22, and his wife, Ila Fae Dent, 21, into The Sugarland Express, hailed
by New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael as “one of the most phenomenal debut
films in the history of movies,” as directed by Steven Spielberg and released
in 1974. Both Mr. Robbins and Mr. Barwood made brief appearances as two of the
World War II pilots returning to Earth from the mothership in Mr. Spielberg’s Close
Encounters of the Third Kind (1977).
After writing The Bingo Long Travelling All-Stars and
Motor Kings (1976) and MacArthur (1977), Mr. Robbins made his
directorial debut while co-writing Corvette Summer (1978), a comedy that
pitted Mark Hamill and Annie Potts against a ring of car thieves. Next, he
embarked on his most audacious outing yet – the fantasy film Dragonslayer,
the second film made a co-production with Paramount Pictures and Walt Disney
after Robert Altman’s Popeye in 1980. Starring Peter MacNicol as Galen,
apprentice to the wizard Ulrich (Sir Ralph Richardson), who must battle the
dragon Vermithrax Pejorative following Ulrich’s death, Dragonslayer has
had a poor representation on home video over the decades. All that has changed
now, thankfully, as Paramount Home Video has restored and released the film in
native 4K Ultra High Definition on Blu-ray and Standard Blu-ray. The result is
glorious. I spoke with Mr. Robbins recently about this new restoration.
Todd Garbarini: Dragonslayer
is one of my favorite movies from childhood. I fell in love with Merian C.
Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s King Kong from 1933 and had seen a lot
of the Ray Harryhausen stop-motion films prior to that. When I saw your film, I
thought, “Wow, they really have come a long way.” I was so impressed with the almost
seamless juxtaposing of the special effects and the live action and full-size
dragon. In the years since, I’ve had the film on every conceivable home video
format, but the picture always seemed very dark and murky, even the letterboxed
laserdisc. The new 4K UHD Blu-ray is just so beautiful, you can now really
enjoy the amazing production design, cinematography, gadgetry, matte paintings
and the incredible Vermithrax Pejorative, a dragon so bad-ass that he has a
surname!
Matthew Robbins: Yes! I have been very carefully
avoiding seeing this movie for about forty years because it looked so wretched.
They worked so many miracles with the new technologies of today to fix one
egregious problem after another (on the new 4K release). So, the fact that you are
so conscious of the difference here before and after, it means a lot.
TG: I would say it almost looks even better
than it did in the theater. Any movie that requires this amount of visual
design to create a world that does not exist, the intricacies and nuances, the optical
effects, the matte paintings and the go-motion with blur, it is truly an art
and collaborative effort. I am a real proponent of the real-world special
effects. I have loved reading Cinefex, Cinefantastique, Starlog and Fangoria
for decades and it is amazing how much time and effort goes into a film such as
this. It is very gratifying to see these movies get their due as none of them
have ever been properly represented on home video due to the limitations
inherent in those technologies. It is wonderful that younger audiences can
really benefit from seeing Dragonslayer in this new 4K ultra high
definition. It is my understanding that this movie got the go-ahead because of the
popularity of the Dungeons & Dragons imagination game.
MR: That’s right. When Hal Barwood and I
drummed up this story, we had been very much present when George Lucas was
creating ILM (Industrial Light and Magic) for Star Wars in 1976 when it
was being set up at the warehouse in Van Nuys with John Dykstra. We were at
that facility, and then he brought it up to Kerner Boulevard, here in Marin (County) where I live, and we
specifically created Dragonslayer to get all that horsepower attached to
something other than star fields and spaceships. So, it was like turning loose
Phil Tippett! Dennis Muren was super charged up because he got a new sandbox to
play in. In terms of what you mentioned before, we were aware of Dungeons
& Dragons, but we weren’t playing the game.
TG: Neither was I! I have no idea why,
either. I loved fantasy, and close friends of mine were very much into it, but
I just was never asked by them. I did love the 1978 Ralph Bakshi cartoon of The
Lord of the Rings with that wonderful score by Leonard Rosenman.
MR: Well, speaking of Lord of the Rings,
Hal was very influenced by Tolkien. He was a fan of Lord of the Rings and
got me acquainted, and I thought it was great.
TG: So many people have been influenced by
Tolkien. George R.R. Martin credits him for his Games of Thrones novels.
MR: Exactly! I was a big fan of Fantasia
with Mickey Mouse and the sorcerer. So, there’s that, and so we combined all
those elements, and then we went out with our agent to find a buyer for this
thing. While we were waiting, he came back with this news that both Paramount
and Walt Disney were both interested. Our first meeting about the film was with
Michael Eisner, who was the president of Paramount at the time. He pointed to
his desk, and he had a stack of scripts about dragons that they had tried to
develop based on their awareness of the Dungeons & Dragons game. So,
the fact that people were playing that game in droves really helped us get the
project off the ground. As far as I know, people still play it. That’s some of
the origins of Dragonslayer.
TG: Was that a long process in your
opinion, to your recollection, or did it all kind of come together fairly
quickly?
MR: It came together fairly quickly compared
to, say, (Guillermo Del Toro’s) Pinocchio.
TG: I had spoken to Robert Wise in February
1994 about my favorite film of his, 1963’s The Haunting, and he talked
about Elliot Scott, his production designer. He did such wonderful work on that
film, as well as Arabian Adventure (1979), The Watcher in the Woods
(1980), Labyrinth (1986) and two of the Indiana Jones films. His
work on Dragonslayer was no less stunning.
MR: Oh, I’m so pleased you’re asking about him.
He was the dean of production designers. When we went over there to England to
put together a crew, everybody was busy. I had actually met some of the people
that George (Lucas) had used on Star Wars and Sir Ridley Scott had used
on Alien. And so, we were very ambitious, and they were all busy, and
they kept saying, “Why aren’t you in touch with Scotty?” I didn’t know who they
meant! Everyone else had been kind of either directly his acolytes or had been
influenced by him. He was a remarkably talented and experienced individual, and
this was only my second picture. He was one of those people whom I relied upon
and he helped me tremendously. He would say things like, “I’m gonna put this
here for you, and you can do the thing,” or “It’s not attached to the rest of
the castle, but then you have this here, and your transition is easy.” He took
me in hand. He was a senior presence and a very lovely man. I was quickly sort
of in awe of him, really. I remember when we had met and we talked about it,
and then I’d had a meeting with him in the art department at Pinewood (Studios),
where he was working, and he had a staff. He was a beloved figure and he came
in with rolls of paper. He put them out on the desk, and he had drawn some
preliminary ideas about how he thought we might have the interior of Ulrich’s
Castle. But, I had something else in mind, something very different.So,
I said, “Well, I don’t know if this is exactly what I want, because I thought
maybe…” and before I could even finish, he took all the papers and he crumpled
them up, and he threw them away. And he said, “All right, we’ll start over.” I
was just appalled because these beautiful drawings, you know, had just gone to
waste! I thought that we were going to discuss it! (laughs) He just
scrapped them! I still have a vivid memory of that. I felt very much like what
they call the imposter syndrome. How could I have done such a thing? He was one
of my favorite people on that movie.
TG: How about cinematographer Derek
Vanlint? He was a veteran of television commercials, just like Sir Ridley Scott
and they had done Alien together. He brought a wonderful and original look
to that film as well. Was he your first choice?
MR: Yes, and he had a cadre around him as
well. He was hard charging, very demanding. His nickname for me was “Pet”. (laughs)
He was a really gifted cinematographer. I was not experienced enough to know
when I was asking for the impossible. He tried to tell me now and then, “We’ll
get you as close as we can get.” He was remarkable. I had not had much
experience with using more than one camera on set at once. So, I learned,
sometimes to my dismay, that I wasn’t free to put the camera just anywhere,
once the master was lit. I learned a lot. You can tell it was my second movie, as
it was on a vastly bigger scale than my first film. I was running to keep up
sometimes.
TG: Were you a fan of movies growing up,
and do you recall the first movie you ever saw?
MR: I was afraid of movies when I was
growing up! I was very easily frightened by not even scary movies, but films that
had a lot of drama or suspense in them.
TG: I was, too. I remember hiding behind my
grandmother’s chair while a documentary on Alfred Hitchcock was on and there
was a scene playing from Dial M for Murder. My father had told me that
the strangler gets killed by a pair of scissors and I was beside myself.
MR: It made me very anxious. I can remember
when I was very little, my father was very interested in classical music, and
he had a lot of classical LPs. He would put on classical music and I would get
scared. They would say, “Well, what’s scary?” And I would say, “Well, this…,”
and the fact that music could have things in a minor key, an orchestra music, it
meant that it was a score to what was happening in the house! It was background
music to what we were living. So, if we were in the kitchen and the music was
in the living room, but my mother was at the stove or something in the kitchen,
I just felt that something terrible was going to happen because Dimitri Tiomkin
was behind this and it was portentous. I was very interested in movies, even
though I was very scared of them. I can’t remember literally the first movie I
ever saw, though. My neighbors had a television set, and I saw some movies
there, such as the Bela Lugosi movies. They were scary. I would leave and then
listen at the door. That’s what my grandson does today. One of my grandchildren
is exactly like me with regard to being afraid of movies. He’ll flee from the
room, and then he’ll linger because he can’t stop, you know?
TG: Are you going to show them Dragonslayer?
Caitlin Clarke was my introduction to the female form. (laughs)
MR:(laughs) My grandchildren are
too young to see Dragonslayer. (pauses) But one day, soon,
they’ll see it!
Click here to order 4K UHD Limited Edition Steelbook edition from Amazon
Click here to order regular 4K UHD edition from Amazon
The
Asphyx Will Rip You Apart…The Asphyx
Will Invade Your Mind… The Asphyx Will Destroy Your Soul… If It Were In Your
Power… Would You Sacrifice Your Wife… Your Children For Immortality?
The answers to the questions posed above by the
advertising campaign for Peter Newbrook’s The
Asphyx (1972) was a resounding “yes.”As the gifted but obsessed psychic-research scientist Hugo Cunningham, celebrated
British actor Robert Stephens puts everyone in his family through the
proverbial ringer by film’s end.Such
single-minded research on his part is not accomplished without a measure of
personal guilt, mind you.But as a
curious man of science – and one obsessed with paranormal exploration -
Cunningham pushes forward determinedly with increasingly morbid experimentations.
Such “experiments” include the exhuming of his dead son
for some post-mortem testing, the photographing of a condemned man at a public
hanging, a self-administered electrocution, putting his daughter’s head through
a guillotine pillory and even willfully torturing a tubercular pauper.Hey, the last guy, a poorhouse resident, had
only forty-eight hours to live anyway… so he was fair game.
Like Shelley’s Dr. Frankenstein, Cunningham is a man driven
by obsession.Appearing before members
of the Psychic Research Society, the scientist presents to colleagues a series
of slides depicting a trio of unfortunates photographed at the precise moment
of their deaths.Each photograph has a
“smudge” present, a sort of phantasmagorical protoplasmic image hovering
nearby.It’s Cunningham’s theory that
the image is an Asphyx, a creature of Greek mythology.The Asphyx is a visual manifestation of one’s
tortured “soul the moment it departs the body.”It’s the scientists’ belief that if one could pre-emptively isolate and
imprison the Asphyx prior to expiration, that person might carry on as an
immortal.This appears to be
Cunningham’s endgame interest.
Though adopted son Giles (Robert Powell) is wary of his
father’s dark experiments (“This isn’t science!” he warns), he begrudgingly
becomes one-half of Cunningham’s research team – to disastrous results as one
might expect.Since Cunningham, to his
credit I guess, puts his own life on
the line in pursuit of science and immortality, it seems only fair to him that
members of the family do the same - and without complaint.Which certainly makes the case that, on some occasions,
father doesn’t know best.
Cameras began rolling on the The Asphyx on Monday, February 7, 1972, at Surrey, England’s Shepperton
Studios.Shooting wrapped a mere five
weeks following first photography. The film was to be helmed by first time
director Peter Newbrook, a former cameraman and cinematographer who boasted a filmography
dating back to the early 1940s.The film
certainly looks great, even if the
pacing of Newbrook’s direction is somewhat suspect.The Academy Award-winning Cinematographer
Freddie Young (B.S.C.) - of Lawrence of
Arabia, Dr. Zhivago, The Battle of Britain and You Only Live Twice fame - would use the newish Todd-AO 35mm
anamorphic system to great effect.In
many respects, Newbrook’s The Asphyx
is of similar construct to such British parlour-horror films being churned out
by Hammer and Amicus in the late 1960s/early 1970s.
The question now was whether or not a Victorian-era set horror
picture would make any money in 1972?The horror biz was already moving away from stately, moody gothic films to
more exploitative blood-splattered fare. Nevertheless, upon the film’s completion,
it was announced The Asphyx was to be
distributed in the British market by Scotia-Barber.On week later, Variety reported that Martin Grasgreen, President of Paragon
Pictures, had managed a deal with Glendale Film Productions (London) to handle
distribution of The Asphyx in both the
U.S. and Canada.In early winter of
1972, Paragon already had a number of exploitative horror-thrillers in release,
including Blood Suckers, Blood Thirst and Death by Invitation.
In August of 1972 the Independent
Film Journal announced that The
Asphyx, described as a “science-fiction suspense thriller,” would be
released the following month, the first of twenty-two films that Paragon had
waiting in the queue.Box Office promised the film would be
the recipient of “an extensive national advertising and promotion campaign,”
with “key theater” roll-outs in Dallas, New Orleans, New York City,
Philadelphia and Washington D.C.
Upon its September release, Variety noted The Asphyx
was – welcomingly - bucking the recent trend of blood and gore horrors:
Newbrook had intentionally delivered a more “cerebral” or “thinking man’s
horror film.”Acknowledging the film was
well cast and beautifully photographed, the trade review did rue that Brian Comport’s
verbiage-laden screenplay was slow going and riddled with historical
improbabilities. Other critics noted Robert Stephen’s mad scientist was one
seemingly gifted with precognitive invention.
It was true.As The Asphyx is set in the year 1875, scientist
Cunningham had somehow managed to prefigure such mechanical appliances as the
first motion picture camera (not actually developed until 1888) and an electric
chair (not developed into the early 1880s).To the credit of Box Office,
the trade paper cautiously suggested that, “Selling the film as a monster movie
would not be to its advantage: a more intelligent approach to sci-fi fans is
indicated.”I imagine “less-intelligent”
monster movie fans might have shifted restlessly in their seats back in ’72, awaiting
even the mildest of jump-scares.
The
Asphyx was the fourth and final of writer Brian Comport’s
screenplays to be produced.His first screenwriting
effort, Mumsy, Nanny, Sonny and Girly
(Cinerama Releasing Corp., 1970), was an out-and-out freaky and grisly
exploitation film.Technically speaking,
Girly wasn’t a completely original
invention of Comport’s.The original
story was loosely based on the stage play Happy
Family (aka All Fall Down) by the
novelist and BBC radio playwright Maisie Mosco.His second screen credit was a co-authorship with director Pete Walker
on Man of Violence (later re-titled The Sex Racketeers).That film was a convoluted and overly talky
international-gold smuggling-racketeer-caper-thriller with a pronounced sixties
swagger.
In one of those local-lad-makes-good-type newspaper
items, journalist Anthony Cardew of the Surrey
Mirror and County Post, shared an hour with Comport, then basking in the
success of his industry breakthrough with Mumsy,
Nanny, Sonny and Girly.“I was
offered a script which a producer wanted lived up,” the writer told
Cardew.“He wanted a bit more action or
something.I took the script apart and
rewrote it completely.I added new
characters, took some out and changed the thing entirely.I wrote it in note form, just suggesting the
way I thought it should go.”
The producer was pleased with Comport’s revised scenario
and formally commissioned him to draft a new screenplay, in the scripters own
words, “from the beginning, according to my own ideas.”With the film in production, Comport was also
approached by a representative from London’s Sphere books to turn his
screenplay into a novelization, a six-week effort bringing in a bit of extra
cash.
Many film critics found Mumsy, Nanny, Sonny and Girly – later retitled simply as Girly –aggressively unpleasant in its
lurid, sexually suggestive subject matter - and decidedly distasteful in its depiction
of depravity and violence.One critic would
unflatteringly suggest Comport as a leading “candidate for sickest mind of the
year award.” Another nonplussed reviewer thought the film as “Theater of the
absurd… absurdly vicious.”
Scolding reviews aside, Comport’s star seemed to be on
the rise.In October of 1970, only shortly
following the release of Mumsy, Nanny,
Sonny and Girly, production had already started on Robert Hartford-Davis’
thriller Beware My Brethren (Cinerama
Releasing Corp., 1972) also from a Comport script.Things then cooled for an interim but, following
a year or so of film-work drought, Comport was back with The Asphyx.
Though Comport’s script – adapted from a story provided
by Christina and Laurence Beers – would appropriate more than a few elements from
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the Independent Film Journal interestinglysuggested The Asphyx was of similar construct to William Castle’s B-movie
classic The Tingler (1959):“There
too a visible spirit of sorts popped up; but that one was of fear rather than
death.” Though some wondered why a
classically-trained actor of Robert Stephens’s caliber would agree to appear in
a film clearly beneath his station, the former board-trotter of the Royal
National Theatre thought The Asphyx “rather
good.”He told journalist Neville Nisse
of Staffordshire’s Evening Sentinel, “I
really enjoyed making it because I liked the script and the people
involved.”
The Asphyx performed
reasonably well at the box office – not boffo perhaps, but reasonably well.So much so
that in January of 1973, Paragon announced they were going to enter into a
co-production deal with Glendale for two additional features.Paragon would, of course, retain all U.S.
distribution rights, but would now also share in a generous slice of a film’s
international profit.When U.S. box
office receipts measurably dipped following the film’s initial run, The Asphyx was often paired on the
secondary market with other indie horrors:Night of the Living Dead, Son of Blob and Blood Suckers among them.
(Variety trade advertisement)
In Australia, The
Asphyx was given the more compelling title Spirit of the Dead, the adverts teasing an audience confrontation
with “The Horror That Lurks Halfway Between Heaven and Hell!” The campaign
posters for Spirit of the Dead featured
accompanying artwork promising a more ghoulish monster than the film would deliver.The Asphyx
would also enjoy a sustained life in the United Kingdom.Exploitatively re-titled The Horror of Death on its re-release, the film would play in cinemas
throughout the 1970s.It was often
incongruously paired on multi-bills with such chop-socky fare as Kung Fu Virgins and The Angry Dragon.
This 2023 Kino Lorber Studio Classics edition of The Asphyx replaces the Kino/Redemption
Films co-issue of 2012.The only really new
“Special Features” offered is the commentary track provided by film historians
Kim Newman and Stephen Jones and six trailers promoting other Kino
Product.This new edition is also
packaged in a protective slipcase that mimics the artwork of the case
insert.Both the 86 minute U.K.
theatrical cut and 99 minute U.S. expanded cut are made available to view.But, as the package warns, the
“reconstruction of the extended version blends HD footage mastered from the
35mm negative with SD footage mastered from the U.S. release print.” The
changes in visual quality are very significant as forewarned.
For the record, I watched the extended version.Though the inclusion of an additional
thirteen minutes is welcome, these extra fragments are of no great
interest.In fact, it’s possible the added
running time further slows down a film already in desperate need of judicious
editing.Newbrook’s direction is
competent, but Comport’s screenplay is weighed down by too many sermons: the
film’s main characters continually perseverate on the moral misguiding’s of
Cunningham’s tampering with spiritual and life-and-death issues.Such hand-wringing tires after a while.Having said all this, The Asphyx is an interesting film, if far from a forgotten classic.While aficionados of British horror should
certainly add the title to their watch list, it might be best to screen the
film with muted expectation.
The scenario of Mad
Love was adapted from Maurice Renard’s Grand
Guignol thriller of 1920Les Mains d'Orlac (The Hands of Orlac).Renard (born 1875) was an author of
science-fiction and fantasy tales.Not
surprisingly, he was an ardent admirer of literary forebears Edgar Allan Poe
and H.G. Wells.Both of these authors –
similarly to Renard – contributed to the pulp publications of their day.Les Mains d'Orlac was
Renard’s third pulp to be published. It was also his most famous.
Renard’s novel tells the story of a world-famous pianist,
Stephen Orlac, whose hands are tragically severed in a train wreck outside
Paris.A surgeon, Dr. Gogol, grafts a
new set of hands on the gifted Orlac, having not advised the pianist his “new” hands
once belonged to a notorious – and recently guillotined - murderer.Orlac is, not unreasonably, frightened when
he discovers the grafts are seemingly directing him to do evil things, the
bidding of the devil.
Upon Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s announcement that esteemed director
and cinematographer Karl Freund was planning on shooting the first sound
version of The Hands of Orlac – a
silent featuring Conrad Veidt had already seen light as early as 1924 – the
studio’s publicity department went into full press.They excitingly described Renard’s yarn, as “the
weirdest and most novel of all thriller mystery stories.”
Freund very much wanted the Hungarian actor Peter Lorre
to play Doctor Gogol, the mad surgeon.Lorre had already established a reputation as an impressive figure in
European – and especially German – cinema.But following his international success as the psychotic child murderer
of Fritz Lang’s grim M (1931) and in Alfred
Hitchcock’s production of The Man Who
Knew Too Much (1934), executives at Columbia were eager to put the exotic Lorre
under contract for his first U.S. film assignment.
They were, perhaps, too
eager to bring him to Hollywood.Columbia had not yet found a project for him – and the actor’s command
of the English language was still in a nascent stage.Though offered a role in one of the studio’s adventure
dramas featuring action-star Jack Holt, Lorre demurred: he wasn’t interested in
such low-brow fare.He was pressing
Columbia to cast him in a more high-minded production, a film for the ages: an adaptation
of Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment.Lorre was also insistent that esteemed
director Josef von Sternberg should helm the prospective epic.
There was a problem with this demand. Columbia’s co-founder and president, Harry
Cohn, wasn’t interested in such a project – nor was von Sternberg for that
matter.This resulted in Lorre sitting
in a state of contractual limbo of some “eight months,” at least by the actor’s
recollection.So it came as a relief
when MGM approached Cohn and Columbia asking for an inter-studio loan of Lorre
for Mad Love.Though not particularly a fan of horror
movies - then a recent box office rage thanks to Universal’s Frankenstein and Dracula pictures – the actor agreed to the one-off trade.
There was one condition of acceptance: that Columbia put Crime and Punishment on their production
schedule of 1935.Cohn agreed, without
enthusiasm, to greenlight the project.Though a New York Times interview
suggested Lorre’s subsequent relationship with Von Sternberg was a “happy one,”
the sentiment may not have been reciprocal.Though Von Sternberg would express admiration that Lorre was the only
actor on set who had actually read Crime
and Punishment, he felt the actor was completely miscast, “unsuitable” for
the role he was awarded.
In any event, on April 23, 1935, Variety reported Metro having secured Lorre’s loan from Columbia.Things moved quickly following that
announcement.By May 1st, MGM
had signed Ted Healy, Billy Gilbert and May Beatty to the cast.Screenwriter John L. Balderston was tapped to
freshen up the adaptive scenario of Guy Endore and the actual script of P.J.
Wolfson.Another source would report
that actress Francis Drake, on loan from Paramount, was also to be brought
aboard, as Yvonne, a Grand Guignol performer
in Paris and the primary target of Gogol’s romantic overtures and obsessions.
The final principal casting announcement was reported on
May 2 when Colin Clive – Dr. Henry Frankenstein himself - was conscripted to
play Yvonne’s husband, the amputee Stephen Orlac.With their star-studded cast in place, on May
3rd, Greg Toland was announced as a photographer on the project.Toland would work alongside both Chester Lyons
and director Freund.Freund was, of
course, the acclaimed cinematographer of such classics as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927) and Tod Browning’s Dracula (1931).
Freund was certainly taking the Mad Love project seriously.On
May 8, Variety reported he and Lorre
had visited California’s Lutheran Hospital, sitting quietly through several surgeries
“to get atmosphere” for the forthcoming production of Mad Love.A subsequent item
in the Los Angeles Times noted the
pair attended the gruesome surgeries as the invited guests of Dr. Albert and
Francis Alton.It was explained the
director and his star were to witness “the performing of several operations… in
order to study certain technical details of surgery for the picture.”
Though Lorre was pleased to be in front of cameras again,
he made it plain early on that he wasn’t a fan of horror pictures, steadfast in
his conviction that he would not be typecast as an actor of the genre.He needn’t have worried as a variety of interesting
work offers were coming his way.Just as
production on Mad Love was set to
roll, the actor was visited by the British producer Michael Balcon.Balcon had been spending a lot of time in
Hollywood looking to ingratiate himself with U.S. film executives.On May 6, 1935, Balcon announced he had managed
to sign Lorre and reigning boogeyman Boris Karloff for a pair of London-based projects
– both of which would come to fruition:Lorre
would act a second time for Hitchcock in Secret
Agent (1936), Karloff for Robert Stevenson’s The Man Who Changed His Mind (Gaumont-British Film Corporation,
1936).
With some of the film earnings and personal savings he
had accrued, it was reported that the savvy, self-starting Lorre had recently purchased
no fewer than three stage plays of European origin for development as possible
Hollywood films.The scripts, it was
noted, would be peddled to producers only “on the condition that he is spotted
in if and when made.”But first the
famously diminutive, pop-eyed actor, once described by Charlie Chaplin, as “the
world’s greatest living character actor,” had to get through the filming of the
Mad Love chiller.
Members of the Hollywood press were invited to visit the
set on May 8, the first day of shooting. Gossip wag George Lewis who, like
Lorre, was no fan of horror movies, arrived just as poor Francis Drake was
trussed to a wheel and branded with a hot iron at a grim Grand Guignol staging at Paris’s Théâtre
des Horreurs.Lewis made
note that Freund appeared “quite cheerful” as the macabre scenario played out
before him.Freund trumpeted his picture
was to be “the most colossal horror yet presented to the civilized world.”But following the preview screening of Mad Love on July 1, 1935, critic Lewis remained
nonplussed, sniffing the film only “capable of scaring to death at least a few
timid people.”
A more savvy reporter from the Oakland Tribune, also in attendance at the first-day shoot,saw MGM’s renewed interest in horror
pictures as the studio’s attempt to give Universal “a little competition in the
matter of fantastic films and regain, if possible, the position it held when
Lon Chaney was alive and Tod Browning in his prime.”Both Universal and Paramount had done very
well with their recent chillers, and MGM sensibly wanted a little taste.
Nothing if not a method actor, Lorre consented to shave
his head for the role of Dr. Gogol.Such
a dramatic shorn required the actor to visit the studio barbershop every
morning prior to shooting.Resting
between takes on set, Lorre needed to apply a wet chamois cloth on his eggshell
skull to protect him from the burn of the hot klieg lights hanging
overhead.
The consummate cinematographer, Freund expertly executed
an eerie monochrome contrasting of “hard lights and shadows” to create a moody
and mysterious ambience - one befitting Gogol’s personal gallery of
horrors.Continuing to do his part, the
roly-poly Lorre, thinking himself too heavy-set to play the mad surgeon
convincingly, went on a crash diet.On
alternate days, the actor would eat only fruit, then vegetables, then dried
meat, then boiled potatoes.He reportedly
dropped a total of nine pounds in four days’ time.
One journalist would go on to describe Lorre as “the
finest scarer of woman-and-children and even grown up men since Lon
Chaney.”Which was high praise
indeed.Chaney’s reputation in and around
Hollywood was as exalted as ever despite his having passed on August 26, 1930,
age 47.Though Lorre graciously
acknowledged the compliment, he nevertheless was of the opinion that grotesque
make-up appliances often disguised “an excuse for an ability to act… An actor
should find his expressions in his naked face.”The one exception to that rule, Lorre then sensibly corrected, was the
great Chaney since “He was an artist.”As a recent transplant to Tinseltown it was best not to kick up dust at
the expense of one of Hollywood’s most mourned and respected figures.
Despite Lorre’s disdain of make-up appliances, there was
a lot of press in the lead-up to the production of Mad Love that the filmmakers planned on using a series of Grand Guignol style masks in their
upcoming production.“Intensive
experiment went into the perfection of the new masks,” noted the Los Angeles Times, suggesting such
ghoulish set decorations were “often suggested in fiction but never before
worked out on a practical basis.”Such
artful masks are scattered about and
used as macabre decoration for the Théâtre
des Horreurs sequences near the film’s beginning.Otherwise they play little role in the
storyline.
June 15 would mark the final day of shooting, the
Hollywood press again invited to attend.It was a less exciting day to be on set, the film crew mostly finishing
up on various insert shots, the journalists watching Lorre’s double, “Raspy” Rasputin,
menacing Drake’s distressed double.The
genuine Lorre was on set as well, pacing about in silence, occasionally
breaking a studious concentration to relax and joke with members of the crew
with whom he had become friendly.
Following an industry preview of the film at Glendale’s
Alexander Theatre, Billboard was
certain Mad Love would score at the
box office, citing the “masterful performance” of Lorre in his U.S. film
debut.The critic did astutely rue, “the
significance of this grotesque film is likely to be obscured by its flimsy
title. It will take a change of title or heavy promotion to gain for this eerie
but well-done production the grosses it warrants.”This title change did, in fact, transpire.
In certain markets the title was changed to The Hands of Orlac in the hope of
increasing audience interest and box office revenue.With a production budget of just over
$217,000, domestic receipts of Mad Love
had totaled a disappointing $164,000.Some blamed the unrepresentative title of Mad Love for the film’s underwhelming performance.It
was believed that the audiences who routinely flocked to horror pictures passed
on Mad Love due to bad marketing.The title Mad
Love suggested the film was merely one-more dreary Hollywood romantic
drama.
London’s Picturegoer
thought the film a serviceable thriller, but little more.Acknowledging that Lorre’s performance
carried the production, the film otherwise “fails to grip to any great
extent.”Variety’s opinion was much the same.Suggesting Lorre’s role as the villainous Dr.
Gogol was an ideal one for the actor’s American film bow, “the results in
screen potency are disappointing.Being
a chiller, much will depend on exploitation.” The trade predicted Mad Love would “probably will do fair
biz on the whole.”
Subsequent reviews of Mad
Love were mostly positive, though some thought the grim subject matter too
sadistic and intense for the impressionable young and any patron with a weak
constitution.Lorre’s notices were uniformly
positive, one critic writing – likely to the actor’s chagrin – that he had managed
a spine-chilling performance both “menacing
and sinister.Karloff and Lugosi,
erstwhile nonpareil bogey-men of the movies, have a doughty rival.”Interestingly, Mad Love was released within weeks of Universal’s faux-Poe
thriller, The Raven featuring Messrs.
Karloff and Lugosi.Such release date synchronicity
might have hurt the box-office receipts of both films.There was, apparently, only so much sadism audiences
could sit through in the summer of 1935.
This Warner Bros. Archive Collectionregion-free issue of Mad Love is presented in 1080p High
Definition 16x9 with an aspect 1.37:1 and in DTS-HD Master mono audio. The transfer is excellent. As is often the case with these Warner
Archive Blu ray issues, there’s no abundance of special features offered
outside of the film’s trailer and a highly informative second-life commentary track courtesy of
Steve Haberman (screenwriter of Dracula:Dead and Loving It), ported over from the
six-film Hollywood Legends of Horror
Collection DVD box set of 2006.
Click here to order from the Cinema Retro Movie Store.
On March 31, 1931 Variety
reported that Paramount had secured, for an undisclosed sum, the sound rights
to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde from the estate
of Robert Louis Stevenson.Stevenson’s
classic short story of 1886, Strange Case
of Dr. Jekylland Mr. Hyde, had
already been filmed by Paramount as a well-regarded 1920 silent featuring John
Barrymore. But it was curious to some industry watchers why Paramount went to
the trouble to secure rights: the novella was, after all, already in U.S.
public domain status.
Though true, it soon became apparent why Paramount’s
legal team wisely chose a formal rights lockdown.One week following the studio’s announcement
– to feature actor Fredric March in the titular double-role – a British
filmmaker, I.E. Chadwick (described by Variety
as “an independent producer inactive three years”), announced he too was planning a sound version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.Chadwick’s competing version would not see
the light of day.On June 23, the trades
reported his production had been summarily derailed by Paramount’s buying out all
British rights to the story.
Though Fredric March was touted as Paramount’s new Dr.
Jekyll as early as April 1931, a challenger would soon surface.On May 12, Variety picked up on a syndicated Hollywood gossip report that Paramount
was interested in having John Barrymore reprise the role.Though a Barrymore reconsideration seemed an
unlikely prospect, on May 5, Louela O. Parsons of the Motion Picture Editor
Universal Services teased that Paramount was looking to woo Barrymore from Warner
Bros. for their new “talkie” version of Hyde.
It’s altogether possible that Parsons, an old friend of
Barrymore’s, was sending out a trial balloon on the actor’s behalf.Barrymore’s contract with Warner Bros. had in
fact not been renewed following completion of Michael Curtiz’s The Mad Genius in May of 1931.The high- salaried and hard drinking actor
was now casting about for new work and a new contract.Warner Bros. was already expressing
unhappiness with the dwindling box office appeal of the former matinee
idol.In the final tally, Barrymore’s last
two pictures for Warner’s, The Mad Genius
and its predecessor Svengali (1931),
had combined for revenue losses totaling a reported half-million dollars.Following his ousting, Variety was kinder in their assessment of the actor’s continuing public
appeal, reporting only that, “Sales reports on Barrymore have been mild.”
There had to be a measure of professional disappointment
on Barrymore’s part.While Fredric March’s
star was in the ascendant, his own was dimming.March, an equally handsome and talented actor, had even played a
thinly-disguised character based on Barrymore in both the stage and film
versions of The Royal Family of Broadway.
Barrymore was good-naturedly impressed by March’s gift of impersonation and
mimicry.Following his attendance at a
stage performance of The Royal Family of
Broadway, Barrymore conceded March’s performance had captured, “my
mannerisms, exaggerated but true to life.”
But by May’s end it was clear that Barrymore would not be
returning to the Jekyll/Hyde role.Gossiper
Parson sourly rued that while, “never has any actor had more matinee fans
flocking to his side than our John, […] the flapper age yearns for Fredric
March and Paramount knows it.”In fact,
“flapper” appeal aside, March wasn’t the first pick of Paramount co-founder Adolph
Zukor or of West coast studio boss B.P. Schulberg.Paramount’s front-office had initially considered
either Barrymore or contract actor Irving Pichel considered for the role.But director Rouben Mamoulian insisted that
while the naturally sinister-looking Pichel might have made a suitable Mr.
Hyde, he simply couldn’t convincingly pull off the handsome, pheromone-inducing
romantic that was Dr. Jekyll.
It was a bold if immovable position for Mamoulian to
take.The director had only recently
signed with Paramount, delivering two Pre-Code pictures of modest success: Applause (1929) and City Streets (1931).He had also
boldly demanded – and was granted - a stipulation in his contract that he be
given extended leave-of-absences from Paramount so he could continue working on
Broadway back in his beloved New York City.Stagecraft aside, Mamoulian did possess an eye for filmmaking.Upon the news that Mamoulian was to direct Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the editors of Film Weekly cheered, calling him, “a
wizard with the camera.”They promised
the Mamoulian Dr. Jekyll, “promises
to outdo even the weirdness of the celebrated “Dr. Caligari.”
March was to return to Hollywood from Astoria, Queens,
New York, to begin production of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde directly following work on George Abbott’s Morals and Marriage (later re-titled as My Sin).Production on Jekyll was originally
slated to commence on August 3, though delays seemingly caused a schedule push-back
to September 1935.
In August it was announced one of March’s doomed victims,
Ivy Pierson, was to be played by the fetching blond ingénue Miriam Hopkins,
just off her assignment playing opposite Maurice Chevalier in Ernst Lubitsch’s The Smiling Lieutenant. By late summer
nearly all of the film’s principal and auxiliary players had been cast: Rose
Hobart, Edgar Norton, and Halliwell Hobbes among them.This was to be a production of major
scope.There were reports that Paramount
was planning the hire of some six hundred screen extras, with as many as
eighty-one to be given speaking parts.Both of those estimates were certainly possible: the film features large
crowds attending both prim society dinner parties and déclassé backstreet
London music halls.
To successfully mount such an unwieldy production,
director Mamoulian desperately wanted a trusted assistant, in this case Robert
Lee, to help him out.Though the trades
reported Lee had only recently been given “full director” status at Paramount, the
budding helmsman agreed to put off this promotion – an opportunity which was,
sadly, not offered again.Mamoulian’s
direction was – as always - nothing if not inventive, with Karl Strauss’s acrobatic
camera roaming restlessly through POV tracking shoots, half-screen swipes and
the sorts of extreme close-ups later found in Sergio Leone films.
Though some film historians and fans believe – not
unreasonably – that John S. Robertson’s silent version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was the more groundbreaking effort, few
would argue that Mamoulian’s was the finest of the several sound versions that
would follow.Though the various film
adaptations were not always true to Stevenson’s original storyline, they were
far more cinematic in presentation.Following
in the wake of Universal’s horrific caricatures of Dracula and Frankenstein,
Paramount chose to eschew the original tale’s Jekyll’s split-psychologic
dichotomies and instead highlight Mr. Hyde’s physical appearance as a hideous, feral
beast.Mamoulian’s film was also
envelope-pushing in its Pre-Code depictions of implied - and sometimes more-
than-implied – scenes of on-screen debauchery and salacious sexuality.
The iconic make-up conjured by Wally Westmore for March’s
Hyde was certainly top-notch, as great as anything Jack Pierce had conjured for
Universal.Newspaper accounts contemporary
to the film’s production suggested March withstood nearly two-hundred hours in both
Westmore’s make-up chair and on set for the filming of the “eight” mind-blowing
transformation sequences expertly rigged by Mamaoulian and Struss. (If eight
transformations were photographed as reported, only six would make pass the
film’s final cut, the final one a mostly unconvincing time-lapse).
It was later revealed by Strauss that the justifiably
famous transformation sequences near the film’s beginnings had been created by a
novel use of panchromatic film stock and a blend of colored filters.Strauss was certainly the man for this
particular photographic effect.The
cinematographer had had already earned a well-deserved Academy Award for his photographic
work on F.W. Murnau’s German Expressionism masterpiece Sunrise (1927). Upon completion of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde’s fifty-one shooting days, Mamoulian celebrated
in style, throwing a huge party for the film’s cast and crew members at
Hollywood’s swanky Russian-American club.
Mamoulian’s Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was released during Christmas week of 1931.It was off to a good start, though
Universal’s Frankenstein (released
November 21, 1931) was still holding strong at cinema box-offices.Paramount brass continued to hold their
collective breaths through mid-January to see if Jekyll might have the same staying power.The film proved that it had, ultimately
bringing in earnings that made it one of studio’s highest grossing successes of
1932.One casualty of the runaway
box-office successes of Frankenstein
and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was, sadly
and ironically, Barrymore’s The Mad
Genius, released only a couple of weeks previous to the former.It’s interesting to note that both Frankenstein and The Mad Genius featured a struggling, middle-aged actor who would
receive absolutely no screen credit for the latter and only back-end credits of
the former – Boris Karloff.
Though Paramount would never become the fright-factory
that Universal was in the 1930s and 1940s, the studio would follow Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde with a few genre
classics and semi-classics of their own:Island of Lost Souls (1932), Murders in the Zoo (1934) and The Monster and the Girl (1941).No subsequent Paramount horror other than Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde would earn the
prestige of the Academy however.The
film would earn no fewer than three Oscar nominations at the 1932 ceremony
(Best Actor, Best Cinematography and Best Adaptive Writing).But only March would walk off with the
coveted trophy in the first category.
This Warner Bros. Archive Collection issue of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is presented in
1080p High Definition 16x9 with an aspect 1.19:1 and in DTS-HD Master 2.0 mono
audio.The film looks brilliant; if
there was a single visual on-screen blemish, it escaped my notice.Ported over from the film’s digital DVD issue
of 2004 is a commentary by Author/Film Historian Greg Mank and the Friz
Freleng/Bugs Bunny/Looney Tunes cartoon
short Hyde and Hare (1955).New to this Region-free Blu-ray set is a second impressive commentary featuring
screenwriter Steve Haberman and filmmaker Constantine Nasr.A very
special feature included is a Theatre Guild of America radio play of the tale,
first broadcast on November 19, 1950. This
radio show is of particular interest since it finds Fredric March reprising his
role as Jekyll/Hyde nearly twenty-years on, with Barbara Bel Geddes and Hugh
Williams assisting in the principal supporting roles.Essential.
Click here to order from the Cinema Retro Movie Store
RETRO-ACTIVE: THE BEST FROM THE CINEMA RETRO ARCHIVES
By Lee Pfeiffer
You don't have to be gay to admire John Schlesinger's 1971 film Sunday Bloody Sunday but it probably helps in terms of appreciating just how ground-breaking the movie was in its day. As a straight guy of high school age when the film was released, I do remember it causing a sensation, although it would literally take me many years before I finally caught up with the film. Gay friends always spoke reverently of the movie and expressed how the most refreshing aspect of the story was how normally a loving relationship between two adult men was portrayed. In viewing the film as a Criterion Blu-ray release, I feel I can finally appreciate that point of view. Gay men have long been portrayed in movies, of course, but for the most part they had been depicted as objects of ridicule or as sexual deviants. There were the odd attempts to present gay characters as sympathetic in films such as The Trials of Oscar Wilde and the brilliant Victim. Yet, even these fine efforts present homosexuality as a burden those "afflicted" must bear. Stanley Donen's 169 film Staircase offered fascinating and bold performances by Rex Harrison and Richard Burton as two aging queens. However, the studio marketing campaign over-emphasized the oddity of two of the film industry's great lady's men playing a gay couple. In fact, the ad campaign showed Burton and "Sexy Rexy" giddily dancing, thus falsely conveying that the film was a comedic romp instead of a poignant and intelligent look at loving homosexual relationship. Schlesinger, one of the first unapologetic directors to come out of the closet (if, indeed, he was ever in one), decided that the most daring aspect of this highly personal film would be in its very ordinariness. The story covers a complicated love triangle between three disparate people. Dr. Daniel Hirsh (Peter Finch) is a middle-aged, Jewish London doctor who is involved romantically with a much younger man, Bob Elkin (Murray Head). Hirsh doesn't flaunt his homosexuality, nor does he attempt to painstakingly deny it. He just lives his life as a respected member of his community, although it is clear his family thinks he's straight. (In one amusing, though uncomfortable sequence, Hirsh attends a Bar Mitzvah and has to endure attempts by nosy female relatives to set him up with his "dream girl"). The relationship between Hirsh and Bob is fairly intense, but is compromised by one uncomfortable fact: Bob is bi-sexual and is carrying on an equally intense love affair with an older woman, Alex Greville (Glenda Jackson). Both Hirsh and Alex know about each other and (barely) tolerate the triangle as the price of having Bob in their lives. For his part, Bob is a rather self-absorbed young man who seems to have genuine affection for both of his lovers, but is also either oblivious or uncaring about how the uncertainties of the relationship are affecting their psychological well-being.
Sunday Bloody Sunday was released a time when the gay rights movement was moving into high gear in the post-Stonewall period. It illustrates why the 1970s is regarded by many as the most liberating decade in film history, with old line directors like Hawks, Welles and Hitchcock working at the same time young turks like Schlesinger were shaking things up in a way the old masters never had the opportunity to do, thanks to the restrictive motion picture code. Sunday is primarily remembered for an eyebrow-raising scene in which Hirsh and Bob engage in a romantic kiss. There's nothing sensational about the tasteful way in which this rather routine gesture between lovers is presented on screen. In fact, it was the sheer lack of sensationalism that drove home Schlesinger's primary message: that loving gestures between gay men can be every bit as routine as they are between husband and wife. The fact that the kiss was enacted by two straight actors did add considerable gravitas to the moment and must have caused more than one straight viewer to think "Well, if they don't care about enacting such a scene, why should I feel uncomfortable watching it?" Schlesinger also dared to film tasteful but passionate bedroom scenes between Bob and Hirsh. Nevertheless, nothing much actually happens in Sunday Bloody Sunday. The story was based in part on real-life experiences and people from Schlesinger's own life. The story merely traces the ups and downs in the love triangle as Bob causes panic in both Hirsh and Alex by announcing he is thinking of moving to America. Hirsh and Alex do have an unexpected face-to-face meeting during this crisis and their sheer civility and inability to engage in more than light banter only adds to the dramatic tension.
The primary attribute of the film, aside from Schlesinger's spot-on direction, is the brilliance of the performances. Glenda Jackson was then emerging as a national treasure for the British film industry and the little-known Murray Head acquits himself very well indeed. However, it is Peter Finch's performance that dominates the movie as we watch his character go from loving acceptance of Bob's youthful self-absorbing actions to downright fury as his realization that Bob will never have the same passion for him. It's a superb performance on every level. Some viewers find the film's bizarre final sequence in which Hirsh addresses the viewer directly about his philosophy of life, but I found it to be a distraction and somewhat confusing. Nevertheless, this is a fine film, worthy of the praise it has generated over the years, and one that remains remarkably timely today.
The Criterion Blu-ray is right up to the company's top-notch standards. The transfer is beautiful and there are the usual informative extras including:
New interviews with Murray Head (who says that, as a young actor, he found his character to be rather despicable), cinematographer Billy Williams (who supervised the Blu-ray transfer), production designer Luciana Arrighi, Schlesinger biographer William J. Mann and the director's long-time partner, photographer Michael Childers who shot many of the great production stills for the film.
A 1975 audio interview with Schlesinger
Screenwriter Penelope Gillatt's original introduction to the published screenplay (there is plenty of coverage throughout the Blu-ray concerning the tense working relationship between Gillatt and Schlesinger, who accused the writer of taking the lion's share of credit for a screenplay he had extensively rewritten.)
The original theatrical trailer
Extensive liner notes by writer Ian Buruma, Schlesinger's nephew who appeared as an extra in the film.
In all, an outstanding tribute to an outstanding work by one of the era's great filmmakers.
Click here to order from Amazon. The film is also currently streaming on the Screenpix app, available for $2.99 a month through Amazon Prime, Roku and Apple TV.
Anne
Francis was director John Sturges’ only female actor in 1955’s “Bad Day at
Black Rock”, and she repeated her solo act ten years later on “The Satan Bug”.
But on that production, she and many cast members felt a preoccupation, a
distance, from the man who held together “The Magnificent Seven” and “The Great
Escape”. Francis was certain “He was thinking about “The Hallelujah Trail”.
This was Sturges’ next production, his entry into the world of roadshow
presentations; a mammoth production with a huge cast and even huger backdrop:
Gallup, New Mexico.
Bill Gulick’s 1963 novel, originally titled “The Hallelujah Train”, seemed a
perfect story to upend all western movie conventions, with the cavalry, the
Indians, the unions, and the Temperance Movement fighting over the
transportation of forty wagons of whiskey. Sturges was comfortable making westerns,
but this was a comedy western. He appreciated the Mirisch Corporation’s vision
of straight actors trying to make sense of the silliness, but still wanted to
persuade James Garner, Lee Marvin and Art Carney for major roles. Sturges knew
these actors could handle comedy.
Garner
passed. “The premise was too outrageous, not enough truth to be funny”, he
said. The rest of Sturges’ dream cast was not available, but what he got seemed
attractive: a pair of solid supporting actors, Jim Hutton and Pamela Tiffin,
and Lee Remick and Burt Lancaster for the leads. Lancaster had previously
worked with Sturges on “Gunfight at the O.K. Corral” and was impressed how the
film turned out. The rest of the supporting cast included Donald Pleasence,
Brian Keith, and Martin Landau. They were in for a tough shoot.
The
weather was unpredictable (you can spot thunderstorms heading their way in the
finished film) and the location had three hundred crew members miles away from
the hotels. Scenes contained countless stunts, and fifty tons of Fuller’s earth
was blown by several giant fans to create The Battle at Whiskey Hills. Bruce
Surtees, son of Sturges’ cinematographer Robert Surtees and focus-puller on the
set, recalled “All this and we’re shooting in Ultra-Panavision 70mm, which made
life even more difficult!” Despite the difficulties, the director was loving
what he saw on set; the film looked as breathtaking as any wide screen western
ever could, the stunts were amazing, and thank God he was also laughing all
through it.
The
hilarity was cut short near the end of the shooting. For the sprawling wagon
chase finale, stunt persons Buff Brady and Bill Williams convinced associate
producer Robert Relyea to let them delay their jump from inside a catapulted
coach. Permission was given, and in the attempt, Williams got tangled somehow
during his planned escape. He was killed instantly. Relyea nixed including the footage in the finished film, but was overruled by
Mirisch. It’s an incredible shot and it plays in every promotional trailer, probably the
most famous footage from the production. Was including it a bad decision or a
tribute? There is still a debate over this among retro movie fans.
“We
all thought it was going to be a hit picture”, said Sturges, “until we hit an
audience.” “The Hallelujah Trail” opened with a 165-minute cut that audiences and critics
found “belabored and overlong”. Sturges overheard some patrons wondering if
this was a straight western or a deliberate comedy. Screenwriter John Gay
blamed much of the response on the performances of Brian Keith and Donald Pleasence.
Gay wanted his lines played straight but the actors played it for laughs. The
film was soon cut to 156-minutes (the version on this Blu-ray) and the
reactions were much more positive; critics noted several inspired sight gags,
audiences enjoyed the cartoonish atmosphere of the DePatie-Freleng maps,
Variety found the film “beautifully packaged”, and the LA Times proclaimed “The
Hallelujah Trail” as “one of the very few funny westerns ever made, and
possibly the funniest.”
When the film finished its roadshow run, United Artists cut the film once more,
to 145-minutes. It didn’t help. Compared to “Cat Ballou” and even “F Troop”,
“The Hallelujah Trail” was unhip.Sturges
was done with comedy, but not with roadshow Cinerama, though his future films would have checkered histories. He was set to direct
“Grand Prix” but clashed with the original star, Steve McQueen. A year later
Gregory Peck turned down Sturges’ “Ice Station Zebra’, wary of its weak third
act. Rock Hudson, now middle-aged and wanting a strong lead role, came aboard
for this Sturges voyage instead. The MGM release still had a confusing third
act, but the film sails nicely mostly due to Patrick McGoohan and some clever
dialogue.
Decades
later, “The Hallelujah Trail” remains a nice memory to those who attended the
Cinerama presentation; not much greatness to retain but a great experience at
the movies. But that experience was tough to relive because the film remained
in legacy format limbo for years: a letterboxed standard definition transfer.
So when Olive Films announced a Blu-ray release in 2019, fans of comedy epics
sung Hallelujah! Now this film can be viewed in 1080P! Retreat! Unfortunately, the quality of the Olive release resembled an upscaled version of the original standard
definition transfer. But two years later “The Hallelujah Trail” was casually
spotted on Amazon Prime, and it was a new HD transfer. And a year after that,
it’s a new Kino Lorber Blu-ray release.
(Above: Dell U.S. comic book tie-in.)
Any
Cinema-Retro reader worth their Cinerama Chops should have this Blu-ray in
their collection. “The Hallelujah Trail” is an hour too long, but you get miles
of lovely landscape. My favorite portrayal? Donald Pleasence as Oracle, who predicts the future in
return for free drinks. And watch for his amazing jump off a roof! Certainly,
the most impressive part of the film is the finale: the runaway wagon chase.
There are sections where you swear it’s Remick, Keith and Landau handling those
coaches but you know it has to be well made-up stunt people, at least for most
of it. You’re also realizing that this sequence, and perhaps the entire film,
is performed without any process work or rear projection.
There’s a legitimate debate on how the film may have been more successful if
James Garner played the role of Colonel Gearhart, though only Lancaster could
have pulled off that bathtub smile scene. There’s no disagreement on the music;
Elmer Bernstein’s sprawling score contains so many themes that Sturges’
biographer Glenn Lovell qualifies the film as “almost a pre-“Paint Your Wagon”
musical." And here’s your tiniest “Trail”
trivia: decades ago, during the production
of the laserdisc version, MGM/UA discovered that a few reels were mono sound
instead of multi-channel, including the main title featuring the chorus. Yours
truly was working on a project for the company at the time, and I happily lent
them my stereo score LP. so the main title would be in stereo. That audio track
mix remains on this new Blu-ray as well. (You’re welcome, America!)
Kino
Lorber is kind enough to provide some expert guides to help you along the “Trail”:
the perfect pairing of screenwriter C. Courtney Joyner and filmmaker/historian
Michael Schlesinger. Joyner had already provided his Sturges bonafides with his
documentary on the director for the recent Imprint Blu-ray of “Marooned”, and I
can verify Schlesinger’s knowledge of film comedy, having been fortunate to
join him, along with Mark Evanier, for the commentary track on Criterion’s
“It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World”. Joyner and Schlesinger tackle and
acknowledge “The Hallelujah Trail”s social and political incorrectness, but
also deflate any virtue signaling by examining how the film is smartly an equal
opportunity offender: the Cavalry, the Indians, the Temperance Movement, all up
for farce. Thanks to this team, and the picture quality of this Blu-ray, I
finally spotted the gag of the Indians circling the wagons as the cavalry is
whooping and hollering. Both gents are in a fine fun mood to tackle this type
of film, and It’s one of my favorite film commentaries of 2022.
“The
Hallelujah Trail” now looks clearer and sharper than any previous home video
release, and somehow it makes the comedy and the performances sharper as well.
I think you’ll be entertained by this roadshow epic, and with Joyner and
Schlesinger as your commentary companions you may indeed learn, as the posters
proclaimed, “How the West Was Fun!”
Louis B. Mayer’s MGM was not a preeminent fright-movie
factory in the 1930s.In a 1935
interview with London’s Picturegoer,
C.A. Lejeune, managing director of MGM in Great Britain, boasted the studio
didn’t “specialise in any single type of production,” whether they be “musicals,
or comedies, or horror films.”That
said, following the successes of Universal’s Dracula and Frankenstein,
and the still-in-production The Bride of
Frankenstein, MGM wisely chose to dip their toe into the horror pool.In doing so, they managed to release a couple
of eerie 1930 classics of their own.In
1935-1936 MGM delivered to the big screen The
Devil Doll with Lionel Barrymore and Mad
Love with Peter Lorre.But the
studio was also interested in capitalizing on Universal’s success of Dracula.So much so they even sought out that film’s director, Tod Browning, to
do so.It was Browning, an earlier collaborator
on multiple silent-film classics starring Lon Chaney, chosen to helm the
production of MGM’s The Vampires of
Prague.
Mayer was not particularly enamored of horror pictures,
but business was business and he recognized Universal was doing good box office
with their string of chillers. MGM did insist writers tapped to scribe The Vampire of Prague should draw upon
an earlier property of theirs:Tod
Browning’s silent feature London after
Midnight (1927).Though only a relatively
few short years separated release dates of London
after Midnight and Mark of the
Vampire (as The Vampires of Prague
would be re-titled), it didn’t seem a large number of critics (circa 1935)
recognized the latter as a re-make of the earlier Lon Chaney film - an effort now
sadly lost for examination and contrast.
So it wasn’t too surprising that MGM brought Tod Browning
on.Though Lon Chaney was dead and gone,
the director had an ace-in-the-hole, an actor holding current high attention.Bela Lugosi had come to Browning’s attention
with his casting in the director’s cinematic adaptation of Bayard Veiller’s 1916
three-act stage mystery of The Thirteenth
Chair (1929).Though Lugosi’s role in
that film was relatively minor – he was only the seventh-billed of the cast – his
subsequent popularity as Bram Stoker’s Count Dracula on stage productions
cemented Browning’s decision to cast the actor in the title role of the iconic
Universal film of 1931.
With this bankable asset in place, Variety reported in December of 1934 that Sam Ornitz and Hy Kraft
had been conscripted to write the screenplay for The Vampires of Prague: but this news was not only late arriving,
but incorrect.When production commence
directly following the New Year (January 12), Guy Endore and Bernard Schubert were
handling screenplay chores. Endore was something of an anomaly among
horror-writers.The author of such works
as The Werewolf of Paris (1933) and Babouk (1934), Endore was a devout
leftist who dressed mysteries with subliminal doses of theoretic Marxism.
That said, the most controversial aspect of Endore’s scenario
was not necessarily political, though its inclusion was completely excised from
the finished film.It’s never explained
why Lugosi’s Count Mora (a virtual mirror-image of his Count Dracula persona) displayed
a visible bullet-hole in his right temple.Actress Carol Borland, playing Mora’s daughter Luna, later reminisced Endore’s
script was envelope-pushing in its construction.In a scene excised from the film, the actress
recounted the original screenplay explained it was an act of incest that caused
Mora to strangle to death his daughter and take his own life with a bullet to
the head.
It was this ghastly act that caused the restless souls of
Mora and Luna to solemnly walk the earth in perpetuity.Endore’s plot device, needless to say,
conjured a scenario far beyond any sort of supernatural hokum: MGM, not without
cause, demanded its exclusion from the finished film.If such a scene was actually filmed, it was
likely excised along with fourteen other minutes reportedly trimmed from the
final cut.In any event, Mark of the Vampire clocks in at a tidy sixty-one
minutes which, all things considered, is probably for the best.
The production was allotted a twenty-four day shooting
schedule and budget of some 305,000 dollars, $3000 of which went to Lugosi for his
(mostly) silent walk-through role.For
those cineastes who complain Lugosi was under-used in Mark of the Vampire – given that the actor’s only speaking lines consisted
of only one or two sentences uttered at the film’s end – such fans should enjoy
the film’s trailer (included here on this new Blu-ray from the Warner
Archive).Lugosi serves as the trailer’s
singular narrator, spookily warning - in his Slavic trademark style, of course
- cinemagoers “Shall be the judges of
this eerie conspiracy!”It was nice
to see the trailer included with the set, however misleading its vampiric content.
In Mark of the
Vampire, Browning and MGM borrow generously from Universal’s established horror
film tropes:cinematographer James Wong
Howe’s photography is atmospheric and moody, particularly in scenes where Luna
stoically skulks the graveyard in her “cemetery clothes.”The film’s exterior setting is a quaint
eastern European village, peopled by superstitious residents who enjoy a bit of
folkloric dancing in the daylight hours - but who wouldn’t dare travel at night
should they encounter such ghouls as Mora and Luna.No string of garlic cloves or wolfs bane are
used to protect the villagers from evil.They prefer a regional botanical they refer to as “Bat’s Thorn.”
In the unlikely scenario someone reading this is not
already conversant with the plot of the film, I don’t want to give too much
away.So I’ll just say elements that
work best and prove memorable are the ghostly mute walk-throughs of Lugosi and
Borland.The latter’s swooping entrance
on a set of animated bat wings during one scene is particularly cinematic.The performances of the cast are all up to
par, though one gets the feeling Lionel Barrymore regards his leading role as unworthy
of his talent.
There are stories of Browning carping on Barrymore’s diffident
performance while the film was in production. Which is surprising as the two were certainly familiar
with each other’s work habits.Though
Browning earned a reputation as a stern taskmaster on set, the director had
worked with Barrymore earlier:on the
Lon Chaney Sr. silent West of Zanzibar
(1928).Though Barrymore is tasked to
play only one-half the character Lon Chaney played in London after Midnight, it is obvious Browning would have preferred
Chaney in the lead role – if only the silent-screen legend had not tragically
already passed in 1930.
Browning’s opinion of Chaney bordered on the
worshipful.In 1928 he enthused the “Man
of a Thousand Faces” famous make-up appliances and grotesqueries were hardly “Chaney’s real secret.He could put the same make-up on the face of
another man and that man would fail on the screen.There is a personality, a something about the
man that grips one.” Even accepting Browning’s
preferences, Barrymore’s performance is not the crux of the problem plaguing Mark of the Vampire. The main weakness of the film is the
implausibility of its red-herring scenario.
Based on Browning’s own short story, The Hypnotist, both London
after Midnight and Mark of the
Vampire are atmospherically disguised as genuine “horror” pictures, but in
truth they’re simply routine mysteries dressed as ghoulish entertainment.While I actually enjoy Mark of the Vampire, I concede the picture might otherwise be regarded
a middling whodunit without the presence of Lugosi and Borland.The actress – who had earlier worked with
Lugosi on a stage production of Dracula,
acknowledged neither she nor Bela were made aware they were merely red
herrings; the final “reveal” page of the script had been withheld until the
final day of production.Universal’s
lawyers tried to get an injunction to stop production of the MGM film,
believing MGM’s use of Lugosi’s Dracula-persona in the film seemed an
uncomfortable infringement of their intellectual properties.But threatened legal action against MGM was dropped
when Universal’s lawyers deemed the case unwinnable.
Universal needn’t have worried: the film doesn’t really
work as a great mystery, much less a gripping vampire tale.One doesn’t need to wait breathlessly until
the closing minutes for the murderer’s reveal.Instead, we’re only given insight into how the perpetrator is entrapped
into confessing.Which doesn’t make for
a particularly exciting climax.The
film’s other weakness is its parlor-room staginess – a plodding element also plaguing
Browning’s otherwise iconic staging of Dracula.
With that said, it wouldn’t be fair to
throw the baby out with the bathwater.Mark of the Vampire is still a classic –
albeit a somewhat minor one – from Hollywood’s Golden Age of Horror.
Previously issued in 2006 on DVD as part of the six-film Hollywood Legends of Horror set, Mark of the Vampire makes its first U.S.
appearance on Blu-ray via this Warner Archive Collection release.Ported over from that earlier set is the
audio commentary supplied by film historian’s Kim Newman and Stephen Jones as
well as the film’s original trailer.“New” to the Blu-ray release are two items of tangential interest to
people interested in circa-1935 cinema: the 8 minute-long The Calico Dragon (a 1935 MGM cartoon) and an episode from MGM’s Crime Does Not Pay series of film shorts
A Thrill for Thelma (1935).
Be warned neither bonus has really anything to do with Mark of the Vampire though there’s a slight connection to the latter bonus.The Crime
Does Not Pay series served as both a long-running film and radio series.On December 12, 1949, Lugosi was a featured
player on the series’ radio broadcast of Gasoline
Cocktail.This arguably might have
been a more interesting audio supplement to include on this archive release,
but interested fans can listen to the Lugosi program easily via You Tube should
they desire.In any event, the release
from Warner Archive looks great: 1080p High Definition 16x9 1.37.1 DTS-HD
Master Audio.This Blu-ray should be on
the shelf of any fan of classic horror film fan or enthusiast of Browning’s
work.
The tagline for the 1971 crime movie The Last Run reads "In the tradition of Bogart and Hemingway..." That would probably seem preposterous to assign to an action film with most of today's soft-boiled leading men, but it seemed perfectly appropriate at the time for a movie starring George C. Scott. The script by Alan Sharp, who also wrote such underrated gems as The Hired Hand, Night Moves and Ulzana's Raid, is perfectly tooled to Scott's persona. With facial features that look like they were chiseled out of granite, the actor, who had just won the Oscar for Patton, is well-suited to the tough-as-nails character of Harry Garmes. Harry has forsaken a life in crime for a seemingly idyllic retirement in a small Portugese fishing village. Happiness, however, does not follow him. Shortly after their young son died, Harry's wife left for Switzerland to have her breasts lifted only to run off with another man. In one of the film's most amusing lines, Harry says he thought she was having them lifted as part of a surgical procedure. He finds that old adage "Be careful what you wish for- you just might get it" has special pertinence to his life abroad. He has succeeded in establishing the low-key, no risk lifestyle he so badly desired. However, he is now bored and feels out of place. He has a friendship with a local fisherman (Aldo Sanbrell) and a middle aged hooker who genuinely likes him (Colleen Dewhurst), but he feels he'll die of boredom. Thus, he decides to take on one more simple crime run, a seemingly low-risk job that involves transporting an escaped convict over the border to France.
The escape is cleverly planned and goes well, but Harry immediately gets a bad vibe from his passenger, a smart-mouthed, often manic career criminal named Paul Rickard (Tony Musante in a truly unnerving performance.) Ignorant of what the caper is actually all about, Harry is soon disturbed to learn he has to pick up Rickard's sexy young girlfriend Claudie (Trish Van Devere) to accompany them. Harry is the kind of man who doesn't like unexpected developments and his instincts prove correct. Before long, he finds himself wrapped up in a complex situation defined by double crosses and deathtraps. To say much more would ruin some of the more surprising elements of Sharp's gritty script, which is punctuated by smart dialogue. Director Richard Fleischer and the great cinematographer Sven Nykvist fully capitalize on the exotic scenery (the film was actually shot in Spain) and eschew studios to shoot even the interiors in actual locations. The decision adds immeasurably to the atmosphere of the movie, which is tense and engrossing throughout.
The film also benefits from a wonderful score by Jerry Goldsmith and fine supporting performances. From a trivia standpoint, the movie afforded Scott to star on-screen with then-present wife Dewhurst and future wife Van Devere.
The Last Run is an atmospheric crime thriller. It may not have looked like a work of art in its day but today it approaches that status, basically because when it comes to stars like George C. Scott, they just don't make 'em like that anymore.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM THE CINEMA RETRO MOVIE STORE
The summer of 1978 was one of the best summers that I can recall
from childhood. My grandmother took my sister and I to see Heaven Can Wait,
Warren Beatty's remake of 1941’s Here Comes Mr. Jordan. I immediately
took to Mr. Beatty’s interpretation of Joe Pendleton, despite not being an avid
fan of football. Two years later I was introduced to Jack Nicholson's work
when, in July 1980, I saw a broadcast of Mike Nichols’ 1975 film The Fortune
on ABC-TV in which he co-starred with Mr. Beatty, along with Stockard Channing.
It was not a particularly memorable film, but I enjoyed both of them in their
respective roles.
In the winter of 1981, Paramount Pictures released Reds, a
three-and-one-quarter hour long drama that Mr. Beatty wrote, produced, and
directed. I had seen the ads for the film and while traveling to and from New
York City with my Boy Scout troop to broaden our horizons of the world of art by
visiting the Museum of Modern Art. We spent a significant amount of time in New
York's Pennsylvania train station awaiting our journey home, which was an
education in and of itself. Aside from the cross-dressers and drug addicts,
there was a video playback system positioned near the rear of the terminal.
This advertising mechanism the name of which completely escapes me, was sponsored
by Paramount Pictures. It ran movie trailers on ¾” U-matic videotape for
several films released by the studio. One of them was Raiders of the Lost
Ark, my favorite film of that year, and another one was Reds. I
never had the opportunity to see Reds theatrically, and my parents correctly
figured that the film would have gone way over my head. The prospect of sitting
in a theater for nearly three-and-a-half hours did not sit well with them,
understandably so. Movie theater seats in those days were simply not
comfortable. I did not catch up with Reds until many years later, but
the film has finally found its way restored on Blu-ray for its 40th
anniversary. I’m finally getting around to review it.
If there is anything that can be said about this film, Reds
is about many things. It is a love story, it is an ambitious work, it is the
brainchild of a man who managed to pull off an extraordinary feat of
filmmaking, and it is arguably the last of the big-budgeted sprawling epics of
the time, following Michael Cimino’s failed Heaven’s Gate from the
previous year. While I am not completely understanding of the ideologies in the
politics involved, I can safely say that Reds is probably not the sort
of film that would be green-lit today, as the climate of filmmaking now is
completely different than it was four decades ago.
Reds opened on Friday, December 4, 1981 nationwide, however the story it
depicts begins sixty-six years earlier in 1915 when Louise Bryant, expertly
portrayed by Diane Keaton who had already appeared in TheGodfather
(1972) and The Godfather Part II (1974) and played opposite Woody Allen
in six films, meets fellow journalist John Reed (Warren Beatty) at a Portland,
Oregon lecture. She interviews him in an hours-long session that compels her to
leave her stuffy husband (Nicolas Coster) and move with Reed to Greenwich
Village in New York City where she is introduced to anarchist and author Emma
Goldman (Maureen Stapleton, who won an Oscar for her performance) and Eugene O’Neill
(Jack Nicholson), the playwright.
Following a move to Provincetown, Massachusetts, Bryant and Reed
find themselves involved in the local theater scene. Bryant has realized that
her writing is what makes her truly happy, and her ideologies begin to align
with Reed’s, who is now involved in labor strikes with the Communist Labor
Party of America. These people are called “Reds,” hence the film’s title. While
Reed is off covering the 1916 Democratic National Convention in Missouri, Bryant
becomes romantically involved with O’Neill, the truth of which comes to Reed’s
attention when he returns to Massachusetts and finds a letter O’Neill wrote
Bryant inside the pages of a book. Despite this, he still loves Bryant and
after marrying, they move to upstate New York. However, a fight ensues when
evidence of his own affairs comes to light, which causes Bryant to take a
position of war correspondent in Europe, a role that Reed also follows despite
his doctor’s admonitions to slow down. The Russian Revolution commences, and
Bryant and Reed are reunited.
Following an intermission (possibly the last major American film
to feature one, not counting Serio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in America in
1984), Reed publishes his famous Ten Days That Shook the World and
becomes inebriated on the ideals perpetuated by the Revolution and does his
best to introduce the United States to the political theory of Communism, the
antithesis of the beliefs espoused by Grigory Zinoviev (Jerzy Kosinski) and the
Bolsheviks. Unfortunately, the effects of typhus catch up with him following a
prison stint in Finland. The film’s most celebrated sequence is Reed’s return
to Moscow and his reunion with Bryant at a train station. His demise occurs
shortly thereafter, while Bryant can only look on, helplessly.
The supporting cast is excellent and the transfer on this Blu-ray is
beautiful. Cinematographer Vittorio Storaro added this film to his Oscar
collection following his win for his work on Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse
Now (1979). He would later win again for Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Last
Emperor (1987), although not having even been nominated for his stunning
work on Signor Bertolucci’s The Conformist (1970), Last Tango in
Paris (1972) or Luna (1979) makes one scratch their head in
disbelief.
Reds was a
boxoffice bomb despite the fact that the film was nominated for Best Picture
and Beatty was named Best Director. Beatty’s sentimental look at a man who
espoused Communism was ill-timed for the beginning of the Reagan era.
There is a second Blu-ray added which consists of the same extras
that accompanied the 25th anniversary DVD edition:
Witness To Reds:
The Rising (SD, 6:29)
Comrades (SD, 13:30)
Testimonials (SD, 11:58)
The March (SD, 9:07)
Revolution, Part 1 (SD,
10:18)
Revolution, Part 2 (SD,
6:55)
Propaganda (SD, 9:11)
The
story of the making of this film and Paramount Pictures’ (which was owned by Gulf
and Western at the time) willingness to make it is a fascinating one. While the
film looks beautiful, I would have loved a running commentary from the major
performers giving their insights and memories of the making of the film. A
missed opportunity to be sure, but the film alone is enough to warrant the
purchase.
“Wagon Master” (1950), a Blu-Ray release from the Warner Archive, is
director John Ford’s film about the first wagon train of Mormons to cross miles
of treacherous desert and mountain terrain in order to settle in Utah’s San
Juan Valley. It opens, however, with a short, almost incongruous prelude, in
which an outlaw family known as the Cleggs robs a bank. They kill a bank
employee and, after family patriarch Uncle Shiloh (Charles Kemper) takes a
bullet in the shoulder, they run off into the desert with the money. They are
pursued by the sheriff and his posse but we don’t see much of them again for
another 40 minutes. But you know they’re out there.
Ward Bond, one of Ford’s “stock company” players, is Elder
Wiggins, the Mormon leader, who started out for San Juan without exactly
knowing how to get there. He runs into a couple of wandering cowboys, Travis
Blue (Ben Johnson) and Sandy (Harry Carey, Jr.), who’ve just come from the San
Juan River area. At first they resist his offer of a job, until Sandy meets
Prudence Perkins (Kathleen O’Malley), daughter of Adam Perkins (Russell
Simpson) one of the Mormon Elders. He convinces Travis to accept the job as
Wagon Master.
The next half hour shows us the hardships they had to
endure during the desert crossing, while Sandy and Prudence start a romance,
and the laconic Travis whittles a stick and plays with his lariat. On the way,
however, they encounter a broken down medicine show wagon belonging to Doctor
A. Locksley Hall (Alan Mowbray), who is accompanied by two showgirls, Denver
(Joanne Dru) and Fleuretty Phyffe (Ruth Clifford). Mowbray plays almost the
same character he played in Ford’s “My Darling Clementine” and Denver is one of
Ford’s typical Shady Ladies, similar to Dallas (Claire Trevor) in “Stagecoach”
(1939). Travis falls for her.
The wagon train starts to run out of water at one point
but they make it to a river and that night everybody’s happy and they do what
all John Ford pioneer do in that situation. They have a hoe down—in the middle
of which, who should show up, looking like a pack of mangy coyotes? You guessed
it. The Cleggs. They come in out of the night carrying rifles and have the
Mormons at their mercy. The Cleggs must have been close relatives of the
Hammonds, the subhuman gold miners who would show up some 12 years later in Sam
Peckinpah’s “Ride the High Country” (1962). Surely Peckinpah was “inspired” by
Hank Worden’s imbecilic Luke Clegg when he cast Warren Oates as the degenerate
Henry Hammond, who never took baths and wanted to share his brother Billy’s new
bride on their wedding night. The whole Hammond clan look, talk, and act
exactly like the Cleggs. But that’s a topic for another discussion.
At any rate, they force Doc Hall to take the bullet out
of Uncle Shiloh’s shoulder and decide to stick with the Mormons until such time
as they can be sure the sheriff and his posse have stopped looking for them. Next
some Navajos show up. But they are friendly, because, while they don’t like
white men “because they’re thieves,” they do like Mormons because they are only
“little thieves.” But when one of the Cleggs molests a Navajo woman, Wiggins is
forced to order the offending Clegg tied to a wagon wheel and whipped. When
Uncle Shiloh protests, Wiggins tells him a whipping is better than a scalping.
But the incident creates resentment in Uncle Shiloh that will result in a final
showdown later on.
“Wagon Master” is classic John Ford, filmed on location
in Monument Valley and Moab, Utah, with Ford’s iconic imagery and the usual thematic
statements about the indomitability of the human spirit, and the development of
a community in an unfriendly wilderness. But it differs from most of his other
films in two ways. First of all, although it was filmed on Ford’s favorite
location, it was shot by cinematographer Bert Glendon in black and white
instead of color. He eschewed the gorgeous hues of Monument Valley, and instead
created a backdrop that seems more fitting the grim life and death struggle of
the Mormons trying to reach the Promised Land. Second, unlike the other films he
shot there, whether in color or black and white, there is no larger- than- life
hero, no John Wayne, or Henry Fonda, to take on the heavies and save the day. In
“Wagon Master” the main characters are all average people. Travis and Sandy are
simply drifters. Elder Wiggins is a man of strong character, but neither he,
nor Sandy or Travis are gunmen. They admit to themselves and each other they’re
scared of the Cleggs, but Wiggins says he’ll never let them know it. Nor will
he let his people know it. Without the Duke, the little people have to stand up
for themselves.
The Warner Archive has provided a clear, sharp 1080p high
definition transfer of the film to disc, as well as a terrific audio commentary
track, featuring director Peter Bogdanovich and cast member Harry Carey, Jr.
talking about the film as they watch it. Carey tells what it was like, and how
he felt, working with Ford. His comments are priceless. In one scene where Ford
tilted his hat to one side, Carey gripes to Bogdanovich: “Why did he have me
wear my hat that way? I look like a village idiot!”
Bogdanovich and Carey’s commentary is interspersed with
audio clips of Bogdanovich’s 1966 interview with Ford himself, in which he
presents his own view of his work. He tells Bogdanovich he never thought of his
films in terms of them being art. “I am a hard-nosed director,” he says. “I’m
not carrying any messages. I have no personal feelings about the pictures. If I
liked the script, I shot it. It was nothing earth-shaking. It was a job of
work.”
It may have been just a job as far as Ford was concerned,
but it was a job he did extremely well and sometimes a job of work can be a
work of art. Highly recommended.
When they say "They don't make 'em like that anymore" it could well
be in reference to "The Honey Pot", a delightful 1967 concoction.The film is the
kind of star-studded comedy/mystery that has recently made a comeback through the "Knives Out" movies.
However, this film barely registers in the minds of most movie-goers and
was not successful when it was first released. (The studio even reissued
it under a new title, "It Comes Up Murder".) The project was cursed
from the beginning. The original cinematographer, Gianni Di Venanzo,
died before production was completed. When the film was released in
select engagements, the running time was 150 minutes, which was deemed
to be far too long for this modest enterprise that is confined largely
to interiors. For general release, 18 minutes were cut, although some of
those scenes still appeared in lobby cards advertising the movie. One
well-known character actor, Herschel Bernardi, had his entire role
eliminated. Additionally, the film's producer Charles K. Feldman was
under a great deal of stress, as he was simultaneously overseeing
production on his bloated, out-of-control spoof version of the James
Bond novel "Casino Royale". Yet, what emerges somehow managed to end up
being quite entertaining, thanks in no small part to the
larger-than-life Rex Harrison having a field day playing an equally
larger-than-life rich cad. Essentially, he's playing Henry Higgins from
"My Fair Lady" once again- only this time with a more devious streak.
Both characters are filthy rich. Both are erudite and sophisticated
snobs who devise cruel games involving innocents in return for his own
self-amusement. Harrison is a wicked but lovable character. You can't
help cheering him on despite his lack of ethical convictions.
The film, written and directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz, is cobbled
together from Frederick Knotts' play "Mr. Fox of Venice" and Thomas
Sterling's novel "The Evil of the Day" with a healthy dose of Ben
Johnson's play "Volpone" tossed in. In fact the film opens with Harrison
as the pretentiously-named Cecil Sheridan Fox enjoying a performance of
"Volpone" at a magnificent Venetian theater. The camera pans back to
show that this is a private performance for Fox alone. He stops the play
before the finale, thanks the cast members for a spirited production
and leaves the scene. Yes, he's that rich. We soon learn that he
is using elements of "Volpone" to orchestrate an elaborate and expensive
practical joke. The first step comes when he hires an unemployed
American actor, William McFly (Cliff Robertson) to be his hired hand. He
informs McFly that he must pose as Fox's long-time major domo in his
elaborate mansion house, which is impressively located right on one of
the canals. Fox explains to McFly that he has written to three former
lovers and told them he is terminally ill. None of the women know that
the others have been informed. He reasons that they will all make a
bee-line directly to him, ostensibly to care for him, but in reality in
hopes of inheriting his fortune. First on his list is Lone Star Crockett
(Susan Hayward), who Fox wooed when she was a wild teenager. In the
course of their affair, he put her on the road to a life of luxury and
pleasure. Then there is Princess Dominique (Capucine), an exotic beauty
who is in a troubled marriage and Merle McGill (Edie Adams), a famous
but fading movie star. On the surface, all three of these women are
independently wealthy and shouldn't need his fortune. But he suspects
that, in reality, all are in some degree of financial distress and he
wants to see if they will compete with each other to earn his favor.
Sure enough, each of the ladies arrive at his home and are surprised to
see they have two female competitors. Lone Star is now a cranky
hypochondriac who requires constant pampering from her ever-present
companion, a spinster named Sarah Watkins (Maggie Smith). Dominique
tries to put on an air of self-assurance and Merle is a wise-cracking
cynic. All of them individually express their sympathies to Fox and
there is even the occasional attempt at seduction. Fox puts on a show
that he is desperately ill and even sits in bed affixed to an oxygen
tank. In private, however, he blasts classical music and dances around
the room, delighted that his perceptions of human behavior are proving
to be true. The plot takes several major swings in due course, however,
when one of the women ends up dead, ostensibly from an overdose of
sleeping pills. However, McFly and Sarah suspect murder is afoot. The
film then becomes one of those time-honored drawing room mysteries with
upper crust characters matching wits with the local inspector (Adolfo
Celi, marvelous in a rare comedic role.)
To
describe the plot in any further detail would necessitate providing
some spoilers. Suffice it to say there are plenty of red herrings and a
complex plot that will demand your constant attention or you will be
hopelessly lost.
The performances are all first rate, though Capucine (never one who
mastered the light touch that these sorts of comedies require) is a bit
stiff. However, Hayward and Adams pick up the slack with very funny
characterizations. The scene stealer among the women, however, is Maggie
Smith, who is more streetwise than any of the others suspect. As for
Harrison, he seems to be having a genuine ball, chewing the scenery and
dispensing bon mots that are consistently amusing. The sequence in which he dances around his bed chamber is one for the ages.
"The Honey Pot" deserved a better fate than it received when it was
released theatrically. Hopefully it will get a more appreciative
audience through streaming and a Kino Lorber Blu-ray that is available.
"Kill a Dragon", a 1967 action-adventure production from United Artists, is the perfect example of kind of film I've praised many times before. Namely, it's a low-budget flick designed for a fast playoff (perhaps as the second feature on double bills) and a modest profit. Often, as in this case, they were marketed with terrific movie posters that often promised more sex and violence than the films delivered. Studios thrived on such mid-range fare which inevitably employed actors in leading roles who would generally be playing supporting parts in more prestigious productions. They still enjoyed enough respect and name recognition to market the films successfully internationally. "Kill a Dragon" is based in an around Hong Kong and stars Jack Palance as Rick Masters (now there's a cinematic name for a hero), who is an American jack-of-all-trades who enjoys a laid-back lifestyle with his mistress, nightclub "hostess", Alizia Gur (who memorably squared off against Martine Beswick in the gypsy catfight in "From Russia with Love".) In the umpteenth Hollywood attempt to crib from the scripts of "Seven Samurai"/"The Magnificent Seven", Masters, who specializes in maritime salvage operations, is approached by peasants from an impoverished village. They inform him that recently a ship was grounded on their island and the crew deserted it because of its cargo: a gigantic load of highly volatile nitroglycerine. The peasants offer Masters a 50/50 split of the profits if he can smuggle the goods into Hong Kong and sell it on the black market. There is a catch, however. The nitro shipment is the property of Nico Patrai (Fernando Lamas), a local crime kingpin who warns the peasants to turn over the goods or have their village destroyed. Masters accepts the assignment and contacts his frequent collaborators: Vigo (Aldo Ray), who is now relegated to hosting bus excursions for tourists, Jimmy (Hans Lee), a local aspiring boxer and martial arts expert and his British manager, Ian (Don Knight). They are outnumbered and outgunned so they must use their instincts to outwit Patrai.
"Kill a Dragon" is the kind of goofy action flick that never takes itself very seriously. It opens with what is possibly the worst title song in the history of film and presents Latin heartthrob Fernando Lamas as a Hong Kong crime lord without a word of explanation as to how he managed to arrange this. The film is laden with Bond-style quips and the fight scenes are pretty limp under the direction of Michael Moore. (Obviously, not that Michael Moore.) But there is a great deal of fun to be found in the film. The Hong Kong locations adds an exotic element and cinematographer Emmanuel L. Rojas makes the most of it, capturing the hustle and bustle of the city center and the serenity of the surrounding areas very effectively. Palance gives a low-key performance (for him, at least) and minimizes his tendencies to ham it up. Lamas is a villain in the Bondian style and its a pleasure to see him and Palance in the requisite scenes in which they banter with witticisms and civility even though they have marked each other for death. An unusual and pleasurable aspect of the movie is that all of the Asian characters are played by Asian actors, a rarity in 1967 and they are presented in a dignified manner.
I don't want to overstate the merits of "Kill a Dragon", as it's the epitome of a "B" movie and nothing more. However, if one approaches it with those expectations, you may well find it as enjoyable as I did.
Kino Lorber has released the film on Blu-ray, a significant upgrade to MGM's previous burn-to-order DVD. Quality is very good and the original trailer is included along with a gallery of other action films from KL.
Director Franklin J. Schaffner was fresh off his Best Director Oscar triumph for Patton when he teamed with legendary producer Sam Spiegel for the historical epic Nicholas and Alexandra.
The film was an adaptation of a best-selling book by Robert K. Massie
that traced the tragic events leading to the assassination of Russia's
last czar, along with his entire family. With a screenplay by the
esteemed James Goldman (The Lion in Winter), the film had the
potential to be another Spiegel classic. After all, Spiegel had teamed
with director David Lean to produce two of the great cinematic
masterpieces: The Bridge on the River Kwai and Lawrence of Arabia. Despite
their mutual triumphs, Lean (like most people in the film industry)
came to loathe the gruff Spiegel, whose mercurial temper knew no bounds.
He would chastise gaffers and esteemed directors alike and Lean had had
enough. When he began production on his 1965 blockbuster Doctor Zhivago, Spiegel's
ego was bruised because Lean had teamed this time with producer Carlo
Ponti. If Lean had made a boxoffice smash out of the Russian Revolution,
Spiegel would prove he could do the same thing. Thus, Nicholas and Alexandra was
borne more out of revenge than inspiration. In addition to hiring
Schaffner for the project, Spiegel conspicuously brought two key members
of the Zhivago team with him: production designer John Box and
cinematographer Freddie Young. However, Spiegel's finances were not
adequate to afford the big name stars he had hoped to cast in the lead
roles. Thus, he was forced to cast relative unknowns from the British
stage: Michael Jayston and Janet Suzman. To give the film some boxoffice
allure, he cast a "Who's Who" of British acting royalty in supporting
roles, comprised of legendary established stars and up-and-comers. They
included Laurence Olivier, Michael Redgrave, Brian Cox, Ian Holm, Jack
Hawkins (whose part was dubbed due to the actor's recent throat
surgery), Harry Andrews, Tom Baker, John Wood, Roy Dotrice, Alexander
Knox, Eric Porter and Timothy West.
The story, steeped in historical accuracy, finds Nicholas
ill-prepared to serve as czar over a troubled Russia beset by
devastating economic conditions. With the majority of his people facing
starvation and a daily struggle to survive, Nicholas resides in palatial
splendor in Petersburg with his headstrong wife, Alexandra. Nicholas is
a good man in his own way. He cares about the peasants but lives in a
bubble that prevents him from relating to their day-to-lives. Born of
privilege, he knows no other life. The Romanovs have ruled Russia for
three hundred consecutive years and he sees no reason for the tradition
to stop with his dynasty. He is delighted when Alexandra presents him
with a male heir to the throne, but the boy is sickly and suffers from
life-threatening hemophilia. Still, it's a happy family with Nicholas
doting over his daughters and young son. He seems oblivious that there
is great resentment towards his wife, who manipulates his every move and
keeps him cut off from personal friends. He ignores warnings from his
ministers that he must tone down Alexandra's lavish spending habits,
especially during the poor economic climate. A protest by peasants in
1905 builds tension further when a mishap causes the army to fire on the
people, slaughtering hundreds of them. The seeds of revolution continue
to grow with the agitator Lenin leading the charge in hopes of
establishing a Bolshevik ruling party and deposing the czar. Nicholas'
ill-fated decision to enter WWI against Germany brings about
catastrophic results. Not only are his armies no match against the
Kaiser's but Alexandra is of German heritage, which further builds
public resentment against her. As Russian forces face devastating
defeats on the battlefields, revolution spreads quickly through the
country. Lenin's popularity grows, especially when he promises to make
immediate peace with Germany if he is given power. Before long, the czar
finds himself essentially powerless. He and his family are arrested but
he still believes they will live an idyllic and peaceful life in exile.
Instead, they are shunted between distant locations and housed in
barely-livable conditions as the new order debates their fate. As we all
know, it is a tragic one with Nicholas and his family abruptly shot to
death by an assassination squad.
These dramatic developments play out slowly but in an interesting
manner throughout the film's 183-minute running time. The performances
are all first rate, with Jayston especially good as the sympathetic (if
clueless) czar. Suzman is every bit his match as the egotistical
Alexandra and each member of the supporting cast provides a gem of a
performance, with Olivier and Harry Andrews especially impressive and
Tom Baker stealing the entire movie with his mesmerizing performance as
Rasputin, the crazed monk who had a Svengali-like influence over
Alexandra, much to her husband's disgust. Yet, despite those attributes
and a rich production design, the film never emotionally moves the
viewer as much as one would expect. The characters remain somewhat
opaque and the great historical events that affect them are only given
marginal background and explanation. Schaffner clearly wanted to
emphasize personal relationships over visual splendor and by and large
he succeeded. However, there is some emotional component missing here.
He crafted an impressive movie on many levels but one that perhaps did
not fulfill its ultimate potential. The movie was greeted with the
customary (some would say obligatory) Oscar nominations generally
accorded historical epics. It was nominated for 6 awards (including
nods for Best Picture and Actress) and won in two technical categories.
Nevertheless, overall critical response was mixed and the film was
considered a boxoffice disappointment. Schaffner would go on to make
three more impressive films (Papillon, Islands in the Stream and The Boys From Brazil)
and several flops before passing away in 1989 at age 69. Spiegel never
regained the mojo he once enjoyed in the industry. He would only make
two more relatively low-key films (The Last Tycoon, Betrayal) before he died in 1985 at age 84.
Nicholas and Alexandra may not be the classic Spiegel and
Schaffner had envisioned, but in this age of dumbed-down action movies,
it plays much better than it did upon its initial release in 1971. It's a
film that educates even as it entertains.
(The film is currently streaming on Amazon Prime.)
The setting is early 20th Century India-- the
location, an ancient burial site. Workmen dig up a grave and discover what
appears to be a corpse of a man, sitting huddled over in the dirt with his head
tucked down between his knees, his arms wrapped around his shins. The workmen
lift the body out of the grave carefully, slowly, delicately and place it in a
palanquin and carry it to the entrance of a cave. They carry the body down a
long flight of steps, past an endless row of statues of ancient Indian gods.
They arrive in the bowels of a temple and climb up to the top of a huge altar
hundreds of feet high and begin the process of unlocking his limbs from their
knotted positions, pull nose plugs from his nostrils, and ear plugs from his
ears. They open his mouth and slowly pull his tongue loose. They pour water into
his mouth and it begins to foam. Slowly the corpse’s eyes open. Thus does Yogi
Ramagani (Bernhard Goetzke) return from the Land of the Dead.
He looks up and sees Prince Ayan III, Maharaja of Bengal
(Conrad Veidt), standing over him and says: “You have brought me back from the
dead.I am bound to obey you. What is
your command?” The maharaja replies: “You are omniscient, Rami. You already
know what you must do.” With that the Yogi proceeds to walk slowly, ever so
slowly, along the edge of the high altar on which they stand and takes a step
into empty space. Instead of falling, the Yogi simply fades from view. And
thus, with this 12-minute sequence, in which everything moves as if in a
slow-motion dream, begins “The Indian Tomb,” one of the strangest, most
engrossing, if not mesmerizing, films, you will have ever seen.
Based on a novel by German novelist Thea von Harbou, who
co-wrote the screenplay with the legendary Fritz Lang, “The Indian Tomb,” was
directed by Joe May, who directed “Homecoming” (1928), and “Asphalt” (1930) during
the heyday of German cinema but who is little known today. May, like Lang and
Harbou, emigrated to America to escape the Nazis, but, unlike Lang, failed to strike
pay dirt in American films—some sources say, because of his dictatorial style
of direction and his refusal to speak English. Perhaps his best known American
film was “The Invisible Man Returns.” But in 1921, May was big in Germany and was able to raise
a budget of 20 million Deutschemarks for “The Indian Tomb,” the most money ever
spent on a movie in Germany up until that time. And every mark is right up there
on the screen. The sets May built for the film are gigantic. The maharaja’s
palace is a huge structure, with towers reaching high into the sky. The set
includes an amphitheater for the prince’s pet tigers to play in. There’s a cave
below the palace housing a torture chamber, where the maharaja’s enemies lie
chained up in painful-looking positions. There’s another cave for lepers, and a
high mountain location with an Indiana Jones-style rope bridge that gets some
spectacular use by the picture’s end. Over the one hundred years that have
passed, the sets have crumbled into ruins, but pieces of it can still be found
in the German countryside.
The plot of “The Indian Tomb” is as outsized, bizarre and
spectacular as the setting. The film was originally presented as two separate
features: “The Mission of the Yogi” and “The Tiger of Eschnapur.” The mission the
maharaja sends Yogi Rami on takes him to Great Britain, where he suddenly
appears out of thin air in the study of Herbert Rowland (Olaf Fonss), an
architect who dreams of one day designing something as grand as the Taj Mahal.
By sheer coincidence, the yogi has come to offer Rowland a huge sum of money to
come to India and build a tomb that will honor the beauty of the maharaja’s
lady love, Princess Savitri (Elena Morena). Rowland jumps at the chance even
though it means his planned wedding to Irene Amundsen (Mia May) will have to be
postponed. The only condition the yogi puts on his offer is that he must leave
for India within the hour and can tell no one where he’s going. Rowland agrees,
but secretly leaves Irene a note explaining everything. The yogi’s not fooled,
however. While he and Rowland take off on a steamship for the Orient, Ramigani’s
ghost-like hand appears in Rowland’s study and grabs the note. But Irene,
fearing for her fiancee’s safety, is not a woman to be trifled with. She still manages
to find out where he’s gone and takes the next steamship east.
Bernhard Goetske, an actor totally unknown today, gives
an amazing performance as Yogi Ramigani. His stone-faced expression and blazing
eyes, somehow lit up by cinematographer Werner Brandes to look like they’re on
fire, make you believe he could in fact walk through walls and impose his will
on others hundreds of miles away. Mia May, who was Joe May’s real life wife, is
also convincing as the determined bride-to-be who overcomes numerous obstacles
to find her man.
Conrad Veidt (perhaps best known as Col. Strasser in
“Casablanca”) gives a powerful performance as Prince Ayan, a man with a
magnetic presence who is both passionate and obsessed by the woman he loved.
The pieces of the plot finally come together when Rowland discovers that Princess
Savitri isn’t dead and that the prince wants him to build the mausoleum not to
entomb a dead princess, but to bury her alive for betraying their love. She had
an affair with Mac Alan (Paul Richter) an English military man, whose hobby is hunting
tigers.
It’s a complex tale that takes four hours to come to a
resolution. One of the reasons for the film’s length is the glacial pace with
which May directed it. Everything is done with meticulous attention to detail,
with the actors moving at half speed. The camera is stationary most of the
time. The soundtrack, recorded in 2019 by Irena and Vojtek Have,l consists of
exotic droning instruments, gongs and percussion. Some reviewers dislike the
slow pace of the film and complain about the monotony of the soundtrack. But I
found it a refreshing contrast to the lightning-fast speed of most films today
with the emphasis on action coming at you at the rate of 100 different shots a
minute. If you accept the film for what it is, and have your favorite
refreshment handy, you can almost have a nice out of body experience with “The Indian
Tomb.”
Kino Lorber has done a remarkable job of putting the 2K
transfer of both parts of “The Indian Tomb” on a single disc. The picture is
sharp and clear. The soundtrack is in Dolby stereo. Also included on the disc
is “Turbans Over Waltersdorf,” (2022—45 minutes) a visual essay written by
David Cairns and Fiona Watson that reveals much about the historical
significance of the film. “The Indian Tomb” is highly recommended.
(Note: If searching for the film on IMDB, look under "Mysteries of India", an alternative title for the movie.)
The
year 1976 was a phenomenal time for films that went into production. George
Lucas’s space opera, Star Wars, began
principal photography in March; Steven Spielberg, fresh off the success of Jaws, was given carte blanche to bring Close
Encounters of the Third Kind to the screen and began shooting in May; and
Dario Argento, who became emboldened by the financial success of his latest and
arguably best film to date, Profundo
Rosso (known in the U.S. as Deep Red),
embarked upon Suspiria, a murder
mystery involving a dance academy hiding in plain sight while doubling as a
home to a coven of witches, which began filming in July. Suspiria is
just one of a handful of films directed by Signor Argento over a fifty-plus
year career, and it’s also being showcased in full-blown 4K Digital Cinema
Projection as part of the sinisterly titled Beware of Dario Argento: A
20-Film Retrospective at the Walter Reade Theater in New York City now through
June 29th. You can see the full calendar at this link here. The one omission from the roster of
titles is his 2009 thriller Giallo, starring Adrien Brody, which was
stopped from being released due to the actor’s failure to be paid for his role
until he successfully sued the producers.
Beginning
on Friday, June 17th, the first film shown in the retrospective was
his debut outing, the phenomenal The Bird With the Crystal Plumage from
1970, lensed by straordinario cineasta Vittorio Storaro, on a double
bill with his equally fine thriller Tenebre/Tenebrae from 1982. Bird
is amazing in that it was the first film that he ever directed…ever.
There were no interminable student films made prior to it. Somehow, following
his years as a newspaper film critic and having contributed to the 1968 western
Once Upon a Time in the West, he made a visually dazzling cinematic yarn
loosely inspired by Fredric Brown’s 1949 novel The Screaming Mimi (itself
made into the 1958 film of the same title by Gerd Oswald starring Anita Ekberg),
though there are also some similarities to the creepy 1949 “Birdsong for a
Murderer” episode of the Inner Sanctum radio drama that starred the late
great Boris Karloff.
The
standout in this series is clearly Suspiria, with its amazingly bright
color palette and virtuoso camerawork. Also of note, at least for die-hard
Argento completists, is his sole non-thriller/horror outing, the 1973 Italian
comedy set during the Italian Revolution of 1848 called The Five Days (Le
Cinque Giornate) shot by cinematographer Luigi Kuveiller who would go on to lens Deep
Red (Profondo Rosso) (1975). While available on Youtube in Italian,
this is an extremely rare presentation of the film with English subtitles –
restored in 4K to boot. It’s also quite funny; not on the level of the Pink
Panther films, but enough to elicit audible chuckles. The seldom-seen Inferno
(1980), his beautiful follow-up to Suspiria, will also be shown, the sole
title to be showcased in 35mm.
The
Italian Maestro appeared in-person at several of the screenings over the
weekend, most notably on Sunday in a Q & A session emceed by Argento expert
Maitland McDonagh, the author of the excellent book Broken Mirrors/Broken
Minds: The Dark Dreams of Dario Argento, originally published in 1991. Following
the sold-out screening of his 1985 film Phenomena, a phantasmagorical fairytale/murder
mystery that was presented to an audience of mostly younger fans who, judging
by their applause and reactions to the film, were new to it. The plot of Phenomena
has long been the subject of ridicule and derision by critics and fans alike
since its initial release. The inevitable complaints about the film range from
the bad dubbing and stiff performances. If the film’s title does not sound
familiar, that could be attributed to the fact that Phenomena was severely cut by 34 minutes and retitled Creepers when it opened in the States on
Friday, August 30, 1985. Fortunately, the 116-minute cut of the film was shown.
Signor Argento responded through an
interpreter to Ms. Donagh’s questions about the film.
Photo: Todd Garbarini. All rights reserved.
Maitland McDonagh:I've always thought that Phenomena was extraordinary
because it's a story that is sort of both a cross between the operatic and the
fairy tale. Dario, what were the origins of Phenomena?
Dario Argento: I was on vacation with my mother on a small
island, and we were listening to Radio Monte Carlo. There was a person telling
a story about how in Germany they had discovered that by examining insects,
they could discover when a person had died. I was very struck by
this and when I returned to Rome, I went to see an entomologist and asked
him how this was possible. He told me, for example, that if somebody fired a
gun off in a room full of insects, that the insects would die. He also
explained that for a whole series of reasons, that it would be possible to
identify a person’s exact date of death using insects, which is described in-depth
in the film.
MM: The insects are one of the most remarkable parts of this film.
Working with them must have been a great challenge. How did you work with your
crew and your on-set insect experts to get the insects to almost be their own
characters in their own right?
DA: For this movie, I needed thousands of flies. I rented a small
theater and completely sealed it off. I put some fly larvae in there and every
week I would throw some raw meat in the room. Eventually, after several
weeks, they turned into a mass of flies that just went after the actor the way
that we had intended and that’s how we shot the end of the film. The insects in
the scenes with Donald Pleasence, who plays the entomologist, were all
manipulated by insect handlers on the set and through editing.
MM: One of the things that really struck me after having viewed this
film after many years, was that it tells the story of two abandoned females.
First, there is Jennifer Corvino played by Jennifer Connelly, whose mother
leaves the family on a Christmas morning, and her father is currently away
shooting a movie in the Philippines, unable to be reached by telephone. The
other female is Inga, the chimpanzee, who loses her friend, played wonderfully
by Donald Pleasence.
DA:Tanga, the chimpanzee who plays Inga in the film, suffered greatly from the loss of
her friend (the Donald
Pleasence character) halfway through shooting. She escaped from the
set. We were working and shooting right near a large forest, and she went into
that forest for almost three days. As
you can well imagine, she became very hungry and so the forest rangers put out
some food and they were able to lure her back out. Tanga was a
remarkable creature; I would tell her what to do and she would simply do it. I
recall that in the film there is a scene where she must break up the wooden
slats on the shutters in order to get into her friend’s house. I showed her how
to do it, and she did it exactly how I showed her. Jennifer Corvino is also a very sad character.
Even though a lot of her classmates must think that she’s so lucky to have this
famous father for an actor, she’s very much alone and off by herself. Because
of this, she becomes prey to a very evil person. This is the story that I
wanted to tell, the loneliness of a young girl. This was a girl that was my
daughter’s age at the time. Jennifer Connelly was thirteen when she played this
role, and she did it with a tremendous amount of elegance.
MM: I also
love the way that you use the Swiss locations in the film, especially the trees
and the wind. They really work well in conveying the mindset of the characters
and the larger forces of nature that are at work.
DA: I have
the character of the professor talk about the foehn, the wind in the Swiss Alps,
with the link into the insects. At the very start of the film, where we see the
trees and the wind, there is this little house set against this vast landscape.
It looks like something right out of a fairy tale, sort of like a gingerbread
house. This young Danish tourist who is accidentally abandoned by her tourist
bus, is all alone in the midst of this panorama of forests, mountains and trees.
There’s this awful thing that is about to happen. The girl who plays her is my
first daughter, Fiore Argento. I really studied for this film very thoroughly.
I put a lot of time and effort into it. I did my best to create this, as you so
put it, operatic fairytale. I did it with great love, and I especially
appreciate the wonderful performance by Jennifer Connelly and what she had to
offer. She was thirteen years-old when we shot the film. This was her first big
movie, and I was just dazzled by her beauty, her intelligence, and her grace.
Photo: Todd Garbarini. All rights reserved.
Dark
Glasses
The
evening was rounded out with the premiere of his new film Dark Glasses (Occhiali
Neri), his first film in ten years, and while it fails to crack the Top Ten
Best Argento Flicks list, it’s still worth seeing in a theater. It was shot in mid-2021
in Italian and has English subtitles. Written over twenty years ago and
consigned to a drawer in 2002 after the financier went bankrupt and ended up in
prison, Dark Glasses was resurrected by his daughter, actress Asia
Argento, who stumbled across the script, read it, and urged him to make it. Described
as a “tender thriller”, this is highly misleading as there is a fair amount of
brutal violence and explicit gore, far more than anything seen in Profondo
Rosso, Suspiria, Tenebrae, Phenomena, or even Opera
– arguably the last truly great film he has made – the films often cited as his
most violent and most censored. If I had to compare Dark Glasses to
anything in his filmography of the past 35 years following Opera, it
would be Sleepless (Non Ho Sonno) (2001).
Diana
(Ilenia Pastorelli) is a matter-of-fact prostitute who finds herself blinded in
an accident caused by a maniac out to kill women in her line of work. Her
misfortune puts her in contact with a young orphaned Asian boy named Chin
(Andrea Zhang) as well as a woman named Rita from the Association for the Blind
and Visually Impaired (Asia Argento, in a refreshingly realistic and subdued
performance, with her own voice to boot!) who works with people to help them
get on with their lives. There is also a seeing-eye dog who comes to the rescue
to help our protagonists out of danger. While some of the plot points feel a
little silly and predictable, the film possesses an extremely atmospheric score
by Arnaud Rebotini. Missing from the film are the very directorial flourishes
that fans have come to love and expect from the Maestro’s golden era, his
genius method of cinematically propelling a story forward with astonishing set
pieces: there are no cameras booring into brains or over buildings, or
excessive jump-cuts, etc. The film boasts a decent performance from Ilenia
Pastorelli and young Andrea Zhang whose characterization of Chin is ultimately
sympathetic as the Mandarin youth the audience roots for. One of the director’s
shortest films at just 90 minutes give or take, the lack of visual splendor may
be a result of the director’s getting on in years – he is currently 81 – and
unwillingness to perform time-consuming set-ups. Or it may be having to make a
film on a smaller budget.
Once
wonders what fate has befallen the director’s as-yet-unfilmed project, The
Sandman, first announce in the fall of 2014. As of this writing, there is
still no word on it, however in the meantime, Dark Glasses fits the bill
as a bright spot in the director’s later filmography.
Kino Lorber has released
the 1975 Charles Bronson crime thriller "Breakout" as a Blu-ray special edition. Bronson
was riding high at the time, coming off the sensational success of
"Death Wish". The film was originally supposed to star Kris
Kristofferson under the direction of Michael Ritchie but those plans
soon fell apart. Bronson took over the lead role with veteran director
Tom Gries at the helm. The film finds Bronson well-cast as Nick Colton, a
shady businessman/con man/grifter who operates a variety of small time
business ventures on the Mexican border with his partner Hawk Hawkins
(pre-kooky Randy Quaid.) Nick is living hand-to-mouth when he is
approached by Ann Wagner (Jill Ireland) with a proposition to help her
husband, equally shady rich guy Jay (Robert Duvall), escape from a Mexican prison where he has
been sentenced after being framed for a murder. Time is of the essence
because Jay is in declining health and may well be too weak to help
effect his own escape. Colton and Hawk's first attempt to spring him
ends disastrously and they barely escape back to America. Colton
concocts an audacious plan for a second escape attempt that involves
split-second timing. He will arrange for a helicopter to land in the
courtyard of the prison and in the inevitable confusion, Jay is to make
his way on board and presumably fly away to freedom. In order to pull
off the caper, Nick enlists the help of a professional helicopter pilot
as well as Myrna (Sheree North), a married ex-call girl who will be used
to distract some of the guards when the copter lands inside the prison.
When the pilot gets cold feet, Nick is forced to fly the chopper
himself despite the fact that he only has minimum experience doing so.
Another complication ensues when Jay is confined to the prison hospital
and doubts he will be able to be in the courtyard at the precise moment
Colton lands.
"Breakout" was inspired by an incredible 1971 real life escape in
which an American was indeed rescued by helicopter from a Mexican
prison. The screenplay has some other sub-plots that are poorly
developed and quite confusing, but some of which are obviously related
to the actual escape including some rumored involvement by the CIA. In
the film, Jay Wagner's frame-up takes place at the behest of his evil
tycoon grandfather, Harris Wagner (John Huston) for reasons that never
become clear. Apparently, Harris is concerned that Jay may inherit some
control over the company Harris runs with an iron fist, though these
plot points remain murky as does the involvement of some CIA characters.
Another potential plot device, which finds Nick and Ann obviously
attracted to each other, also goes nowhere. The film has a rushed look
to it and there are some unsatisfying aspects caused by the movie's
rather abrupt ending. The movie studio, Columbia, apparently felt the
film was a rather weak production and thus gambled on a massive ad
campaign that probably cost more than the film's modest budget. Ads for
"Breakout" were everywhere: in newspapers, on TV and on radio.
Additionally, the film opened wide in 1,000 American theaters, which was
a big number in 1975. The movie was dismissed by critics with Variety
calling it a "cheap exploitation pic", and indeed the main poster
artwork (different from the Blu-ray sleeve artwork) and graphics looked surprisingly amateurish considering this was
a golden age for film poster designs. Nevertheless, Bronson's appeal
seemed to override these negative factors. "Breakout" proved to be a
major hit and helped cement his status as a top boxoffice attraction ,
though his clout would gradually diminish henceforth.
Scene stealer: Sheree North in posed cheesecake publicity photo for the film.
Like a lot of older movies, "Breakout" probably plays better today
than it did at the time of its initial release. Bronson is in top form
and gives an unusually energetic performance that allows him to stress
his rarely-used talent for light comedy. The only other standout member
of the cast is Sheree North, as the epitome of the sexy cougar. She's a
fast-talking, tough cookie who parades about in sexy lingerie in an
attempt to seduce Bronson. (Surprisingly, Bronson's character does not
engage in any sexual action throughout the movie.) Robert Duvall is
largely underutilized in a low-key role and performance that could have
been credibly played by almost any other competent actor. Huston's
presence in the movie is disappointing, also. His role is confined to a
few scattered cameo appearances that probably don't last more than two
minutes. Some other familiar faces include Paul Mantee, Alejandro Rey,
Roy Jenson and the Mexican cinema's favorite bad guy, Emilio Fernandez.
As for Bronson teaming for the umpteenth time with real life wife Jill
Ireland, the gimmick was wearing thin. Some screen couples could team
without wearing out their welcome. Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton
made many films together but they were always playing entirely different
characters in entirely different scenarios. Bronson and Ireland,
despite being competent actors, were no Liz and Dick. It became clear
that their films together were largely made possible by Bronson's clout
with the studios. Although Ireland always gave credible performances,
she never lit up the screen. After a while the sheer predictability of
their on-screen teamings probably undermined Bronson's popularity
because it constrained him from interacting with other actresses. It was
a trap Clint Eastwood also fell into for a period of time when he cast
Sondra Locke in the female lead in six of his movies over a period of
only seven years. Despite these gripes, it must be said that director
Tom Gries keeps the pace moving briskly and there isn't a dull moment.
He also knows how to milk some genuine suspense out of the helicopter
escape scene, which is exceptionally well photographed by the great
cinematographer Lucien Ballard. Jerry Goldsmith also contributes a
typically fine score. The movie was shot in a wide number of locations
including California, Mexico, Spain and France, where the impressive
edifice that serves as the prison is located.
The Kino Lorber Blu-ray looks great and features a very informative commentary track by Paul Talbot, author of the excellent "Bronson's Loose" books, which analyze his action movies. There is also a trailer, TV spot and radio spot. In all, an impressive package for a fun '70s adventure flick. Recommended.
I will admit to a degree of bias up front.I’ve never been particularly enamored of
MGM’s 1941 interpret of Robert Louis Stevenson’s famed novella Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.And it occasionally bothers me that I’m
not.The so-called “Golden Age” of the
Horror film (1931-1948) has long been, and will likely always remain, my
favorite cinematic era.Since the start
of the home video revolution I dutifully acquired (and subsequently upgraded)
practically every monochrome classic – OK, and some not-so-classic – genre films
issued from that era to hold in my private collection.It was of little concern to me if a film was
the product of a major studio (Universal, Columbia, MGM, Warner Bros. et. al.)
or of a low-rent independent (Monogram, Republic or PRC).Practically every U.S and British film – as
well as few from the continent – would find its way into my home archive.
So it’s telling that prior to this Blu ray debut of
Victor Fleming’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde,
recently issued as part of the Warner Bros. Archive Collection, the only copy
I’ve held in my collection is the old Laserdisc of the title. Published in 1986
as part of MGM’s “Great Books on Video” series.I simply never had the desire to channel any additional discretionary
income into an upgrade of the film.So
in some way the arrival of this High-Def edition by WAC was welcome.It has allowed me the opportunity to reassess
long-held opinions or prejudices.
Similar to Stoker’s Dracula
(1897) and Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818)
monster, Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr.
Jekylland Mr. Hyde (1886) stands
as the third point of the immortal crown of literary monsters: the trio of
select ghouls to have made a seamless transition from written page to the stage
to the silver screen.Though the most
celebrated earliest cinematic adaptation was the 1920 Paramount silent classic
featuring John Barrymore as the titular rogue, even that film version wasn’t
the earliest.Stevenson’s novella had
been brought to the silent screen on a number of earlier occasions (1908-1914),
though several of those earliest efforts are now thought forever lost in time.
Of the sound films, my favorite big screen adaptation of
the novella will forever be Rouben Mamaoulian’s 1931 Paramount remake featuring
Fredric March.In some manner of
speaking, Mamaoulian’s version is a bit more faithful to Stevenson’s original
work than MGM’s 1941 version, in other ways not.Stevenson’s conception of Mr. Hyde presents him
not as physical monster with deformities, but merely a compassionless, selfish
human whose heart has grown cold and actions sadistic.Hyde is described by Jekyll’s lawyer friend,
Gabriel John Utterson (a major character of the novella completely missing from
the Fleming version), as a sinister fellow with a “displeasing smile,” one who
appeared “pale and dwarfish.” Stevenson’s Hyde gave off “an impression of
deformity without any nameable malformation.”
But following in the wake of Universal’s box-office
success in 1931 with Tod Browning’s Dracula
and James Whale’s Frankenstein, it
was in Paramount’s interest to portray Fredric March’s Mr. Hyde as a feral
beast in a physical as well as psychological sense.The applied iconic make-up conjured by Wally
Westmore for March’s Hyde was certainly appealing to the “monster kid” in
me.When I was first introduced to
images of March’s Mr. Hyde first in the pages of Famous Monsters of Filmland and later via the (very) occasional
television broadcast, I was left duly impressed.As I was with the imaginative camera-trickery
rigged by Mamaoulian and cinematographer Karl Struss.The sight of March’s mirror-reflected
transformation from Jekyll into Hyde remains a stunning and impressive optical
effect to behold even in 2022.It must
have been mind-blowing to audiences some ninety-one years prior.
It’s not entirely clear why MGM chose to move forward
with their own version of the Stevenson work, but in November of 1940 the
trades were reporting that MGM was planning their own version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde to feature actor
Spencer Tracy in the lead role.The
following month it was announced in Box
Office that veteran screenwriter John Lee Mahin (who had earlier adapted
Stevenson’s Treasure Island for MGM
in 1934) had been assigned scripting duties.In an interesting example of casting against type, the Pin-Up model and
screen vixen Lana Turner was contracted to play the role of a good girl done
wrong, with Swedish good girl Ingrid Bergman signed to portray a Cockney barmaid.It must be said, both actresses pull off their
respective challenges rather admirably.Production on Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
Hyde was to commence on Wednesday, February 5, 1941.
Despite the overall gloss of the MGM remake, Spencer
Tracy’s Jekyll and Hyde is not nearly as enigmatic nor tortured a character as
March’s was.Tracy’s a great actor of
course, no one is contesting that.And
I’m certainly not knocking his performance in the film; I’m sure he does all he
can in role with the material given him.But as the most essential component of cinema is in its visuals, Tracy’s
Hyde falls short - even if his presentation is more aligned with Stevenson’s original
descriptions.Tracy’s Hyde is violent
and malignant and an unpleasant suitor to both fiancé Beatrix Emery (Turner)
and Ivy Peterson (Bergman), the maligned barmaid he uses and abuses.But Tracy’s Hyde remains a decidedly human
monster in his appearance.Yes, he’s
sadistic and manipulative but his soul conceivably,
at least, might still be saved with a bit of religion, a session of drug
counselling, or an anger-management class or two.
David Hanna, a drama critic and entertainment writer for
the Los Angeles Daily News was hardly
the only critic who, upon the film’s release, registered disappointment with
Tracy’s physical non-transformation into the villainous Mr. Hyde.There had been a lot of Hollywood press
ballyhoo that the sound stage was to be closed to all visitors when Tracy’s
Jekyll-to-Hyde scenes were to be lensed.So the eventual ho-hum big reveal of the new “Mr. Hyde” was a crushing
disappointment. Hanna sighed, “The first time Tracy changed character the
make-up looked as though he just needed a brace on his teeth and a little
filling to make him appear a most respected member of society.”
This opinion was shared by London’s Picturegoer magazine. Their critic offered, the “scenes when Tracy
assumes a grotesque make-up are included to make one smile, rather than creep.”It’s true that Tracy’s Hyde is an
underwhelming sight to behold.No
physical personification of evil flashes before us.Tracy looks like someone who merely awoke
from a night’s bender: mussed hair, sagging dark bags under crowfeet lined
eyes, slightly askew, bushy eyebrows and a leering countenance.
Though Fleming’s Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde was far from a box-office disappointment, it certainly
wasn’t the impressive, timeless effort his two most recent pictures, The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind, had been – and would
forever remain. Most critics seemed to agree Paramount’s 1931 was by far the better
film.Though some argued Tracy was so
capable an actor that he required “no gargantuan make-up to denote his
transformation from the good Dr. Jekyll into the evil Mr. Hyde,” others countered
this 1941 remake had problematic issues beyond make-up expectations.Mahin’s script offered a sprinkled layer of Freudian
psychoanalysis into the mix, a reinterpret sure to offer cinemagoers a lesser experience.As the critic from Picturegoer noted, “March’s ape man make-up, crude though it was”
managed to convey “a stronger sense of horror than Tracy’s milder conception,
which comes as sheer anti-climax.”
There is an interesting “art against expectation” side
note to all this.With the box-office of
Hyde underperforming, Variety reported in September of 1941
that MGM had chosen to “revise its national campaign on the picture.”The original campaign (“A Good Woman – A Bad Woman.He
Needed the Love of Both!”) hyped the film’s romantic elements at the
expense of its (admittedly minor) horrific elements.A new campaign was struck, the “too
prettified” and posh original publicity stills withdrawn. Replacement images
were ordered, MGM choosing to “slice into the film for a blowup of Spencer
Tracy’s face in the ‘Mr. Hyde’ impersonation.”This tactic and a new accompanying blurb (“It CHILLS you!Half-Man!Half-Monster!”) proved so successful in such
markets as Detroit, that subsequent regional exhibitors were requesting use of
the same ad mats used in that city’s exploitation campaign.
It’s possible there’s a gaggle of English professors who
prefer the 1941 version above all others, but neither this version nor the better
1931 film is faithful to the original source material.Mahin script is interesting as it mines and mixes
elements of both Stevenson’s work with ideas conjured by Oscar-nominated ’31
screenwriters Percy Heath and Samuel Hoffenstein.This is an “actor’s film.”There’s lots of long and drowsy oral discourses
that take place in tony parlors, but as an adventure of any sort it’s exciting only
in the smallest of episodes.Fleming and
Mahin’s version might have made for a compelling, intimate stage show, but as a
film it’s overlong and not terribly involving.
In its review of July 1941, a scribe from Variety hit the nail on the head:“It may be that Fleming, keeping closer to
the literal than spirit of the text, missed some of the more subtle points.”’31 Director Mamaoulian would likely agree with
that assessment.He boasted a few years
hence that his version of Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde remained the “best one ever made.”“Spencer Tracy is a very competent actor,” Mamaoulian mused to the St. Louis Post Democrat.“But the man who plays Jekyll has to be
superbly handsome.As Fredric March
was.Then the changeover to Hyde is
gripping.Tracy was miscast.”‘Tis true in MGM’s 1941 version the potion
brewed by Dr. Jekyll this time out was, at best, a weak tea.
This Warner Archive Collection Blu ray edition of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is presented
here in a pristine 1080p High Definition 16x9 1.37.1 and DTS-HD Master 2.0 Mono
Audio.There’s hardly a visual blemish
throughout, and it is doubtful admirers of the film will find any fault with
this transfer.This is a bare bones
release, the set’s only special features are the film’s original trailer and
removable English subtitles.
It’s certainly great to see Chris' Soundtrack
Corner back on the pages of Cinema Retro. It’s been a little while, but rest
assured, Christian Riedrich and his team have been hard at work and it’s always
worth the wait.
CSC has released no less than three brand new
soundtracks, all of which are essentially their world premiere debuts. Sure, if
you deep long and hard enough you may discover an odd track or a popular main
title that has previously surfaced here and there or perhaps on some obscure
library compilation – but hey, good luck with that search, should you wish to
undertake it.
Across these three releases you will
certainly unearth a delightful range of styles and moods as well as sampling
various flavours of the exotic Mediterranean.
Daniele
Patucchi’s Il Sorriso Del Ragno (1971) (CSC 031)
sets us on our way rather nicely.
This rarely seen 1971 Italian film
(translated as, The Spider's Smile) was recognised more by its international
title, Web of Deception. It was the only film directed by Massimo Castellani, a
more established second unit director who had enjoyed greater success as a
script supervisor. Based on a script written by Italo Gasperini and Armando Morandi,
with dialogue by Fabio Piccioni, Il Sorriso Del Ragno, this is a crime thriller
disguised as a roaming travelogue. With locales ranging from France to multiple
regions of Greece, all of which was captured beautifully by cinematographer
Giorgio Tonti,– it was pretty much guaranteed that both cast and crew would
enjoy their opportunity in the sun- soaked regions.
The story involves private investigator Tony
Driscoll; a ladies' man perhaps, but he also has a good reputation when it involves recovering
stolen goods. So when thieves make off with $5 million in jewels from a French
bank, Driscoll is hired to get them back. However, certain questions point
fingers at Driscoll and the film’s plot makes the most of this twist up until
its conclusion.
A self-taught musician, composer Daniele
Patucchi was born in 1945 in Turin. By the time he began writing and performing
music professionally, he was adept in a wide range of styles, from jazz and
rock to classical and displayed a certain amount of flair when it came to digital
synthesizers – all of which served him well over 35 movie soundtrack scores.
His music for Il Sorriso Del Ragno is based around five central musical styles.
Three of them- Main, Suspense and Action themes- occupy the majority of the
score's structure and serve to enhance the adventure, tension, and intrigue as
the story unfolds. Additional musical motifs signify more regional themes and
local instrumentation. Acoustic guitar and Greek mandolin in particular feature
prominently and work to wonderful effect throughout.
Il Sorriso Del Ragno is really enjoyable little
score. There’s plenty of variation, but never too much. It never spills over
into a heavy clash of styles, and retains a comforting, common thread. Christian
Riedrich’s pin sharp production and remastering by Stefan Betke is what we have
come to expect. Only three tracks have been previously released. Additionally, five
tracks that were not used in the movie have been added as bonus tracks:
alternate or varied versions composed for the movie or re-edited for inclusion
on one of CAM's promotional library music albums. The CD includes a 12-page
illustrated booklet by Aletta Heinsohn and features detailed, exclusive notes
on the film and its score by film music journalist Randall D. Larson.
Chris' Soundtrack Corner’s second score
release is another by Daniele Patucchi, Sans
Sommation (1973) (CSC 032). This was a much harder hitting German-French-Italian
co-production (released in the UK as Without Appeal and Internationally as
Without Warning). Made by French director Bruno Gantillon, Sans Sommation was a
tougher, straight-shooting thriller which again presented composer Daniele
Patucchi the opportunity to demonstrate his diverse range of talents.
Maurice Ronet stars as Raoul Maury, a former Police
inspector who made a seriously bad career move when he attempted to take down
the son of a prominent politician on drug charges. As a result, Maury finds
himself demoted to the role of archivist in the police records department. When
it is discovered that Maury bears a striking resemblance to Lt. Kieffer, an
associate of wanted mercenary Pierre Capra, he is reinstated in order to
impersonate Kieffer in order to get close to Capra and assassinate him.
However, conflicting acts of suspicion and trust will all head for collision
and loyalties will become strained and tested to the full.
Patucchi's film compositions were plentiful
throughout the 1970s and '80s. Sans Sommation is one of more than 35 European
movie soundtracks he composed throughout the 1970s and '80s. His gift for
tuneful melodies served him well in this score. Its opening theme in particular
offers a dusty, smooth Jazz trumpet and for the first couple of tracks the ride
seems distinctly mellow and easy-going. But don’t get fooled, by the time
‘Elikiller’ kicks in we are on much tougher, off road territory and the bold,
brassy action cues are allowed to take full flight. There’s a good degree of
suspenseful tracks, too, that really build nicely along with some very cool
Hammond organ playing on display. The single central theme is a brisk,
high-energy, driving motif that continuously helps the score race forward.
The album is produced again by Christian
Riedrich and mastered this time by Manmade Mastering – all of which results in
a big, fully rounded sound. The main score consists of 12 tracks with 3 bonus
tracks included. The CD is accompanied by a 12-page illustrated booklet
designed by Aletta Heinsohn and featuring detailed, exclusive notes on the film
and its score by film music journalist Randall D. Larson, who deconstructs the
score's elements in deeper detail.
Finally, Ingrid
Sulla Strada (1973) (CSC 036 rounds up this excellent trilogy of scores and
sees a welcome release from composer Carlo Savina. Ingrid Sulla Strada is an Italian
psychological drama written and directed by Brunello Rondi. Rondi was arguably better known as a
script-writer and script consultant, a reputation which had lead him to several
collaborations with Federico Fellini. Rondi's directorial debut came more than
a decade earlier in 1961 with the film Una vita violenta (aka Violent Life). Rondi
went on to make a number of psychological/sexual dramas of which Ingrid Sulla
Strada was one of the last.
Ingrid Sulla Strada is a drama in which young
Ingrid (Swedish model and actress Janet Agren) leaves her home after being
raped by her father. After her arrival in Rome, Ingrid, with little option,
slips into prostitution. Life is not
easy for Ingrid and soon her life begins to spiral out of control and
eventually leads to her suicide. Ingrid Sulla Strada is not an easy film to
find, and the limited amount of footage revealed within the trailer tends to
suggest a rather bleak narrative and a Fellini- influenced style of filmmaking.
Ingrid Sulla Strada is without doubt an
eclectic score. At its heart, Savina provides a light, delicate melody which is
quite charming. And yet, the score’s overall soundscape doesn’t naturally
provide a standardised form or perhaps an obvious sense of continuity. There’s
certainly nothing wrong with Savina’s music, but the styles are so varied, one
could almost be excused for thinking certain cues could had been taken from
entirely different scores. As a collective it’s incredibly diverse and perhaps
reflects the up-and-down nature and psychological aspect of the story.
Regardless of its random style, it remains a fascinating listening experience.
Chris' Soundtrack Corner has completed an
excellent challenge in making this obscure title available for the first time.
Only the main theme and the pop organ track, ‘Walking through the falling
leaves’, have been previously released. Christian Riedrich has beautifully
produced the release, which certainly must have been a challenge. The result is
the release of an entirely engaging score. Consisting of 15 tracks and 2
additional bonus tracks, the CD comes with a 12-page illustrated booklet
designed by Tobias Kohlhaas and featuring detailed, exclusive notes by Randall
D. Larson.
A fine collection of European scores for
which everyone involved should be congratulated.
American Cinematographer magazine is providing plenty of catnip for James Bond fans by publishing on-line reprints of its coverage of the series from over the decades. In this article, Second Unit Director (and future Bond Director) John Glen provides a first-hand report on the filming of the 1969 classic "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" starring George Lazenby in his one, memorable turn as 007. Click here to access the article.
In
the early 1980s, Israeli cousins and co-producers Menahem Golan and Yoram
Globus – the men behind then-thriving outfit The Cannon Group – decided that
they would like to add an old-fashioned style horror film to their burgeoning
library of titles. They approached director Peter Walker, renowned for a slew
of successful exploitation pictures throughout the 1970s, suggesting he create
something for the likes of Bela Lugosi, Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff, blissfully
unaware the three actors were dead. Regardless, Walker took the baton and ran
with it, the result being 1983’s rather splendid House of the Long Shadows.
Probably
best remembered for assembling icons of horror cinema Peter Cushing,
Christopher Lee, Vincent Price and John Carradine under one roof, House of
the Long Shadows didn’t wow critics at the time and with hindsight it’s
easy to see why. Times had moved on since the relatively harmless monster
flicks of the 1930s and 40s and audiences were becoming accustomed to seeing
grisly fare such as Friday the 13th, Halloween and the
nerve-shredding remake of The Thing. Nevertheless, Cannon had requested
a throwback to those old movies and that’s what Walker delivered, being sure to
tick all the requisite clichéd boxes; an imposing house, creaking floorboards,
lightning storms, hidden tunnels, furtive sideways glances, locked doors to
attic rooms, and a series of murders that wouldn’t be out of place in And
Then There Were None were all present and correct.
After
he was initially approach by Golan and Globus, Walker had tried unsuccessfully
to acquire the rights to restage The Old Dark House. He then turned to
screenwriter Michael Armstrong, who conjured up a story based upon the 1913
novel “Seven Keys to Baldpate” by Earl Derr Biggers, playwright and creator of
Charlie Chan. Shooting took place on location at Rotherfield Park in East
Tisted (near Alton) in Hampshire.
The
plot is a simple one. An American novelist (Desi Arnaz, Jr) accepts a $20,000
bet from his publisher (Richard Todd) that challenges him to write a classic
chiller in one night. He travels to Wales and pitches up in a long-unoccupied
manor house at Bllyddpaetwr – pronounced Baldpate – convinced that the
surroundings will furnish him with the all the inspiration he needs.
Unfortunately,his attempts to get started are hindered by the arrival of an
assortment of mysterious visitors who, as the night progresses, are revealed to
have more in common first apparent.
The
aforementioned titans of terror aside, joining them on screen are Walker
regular Sheila Keith (who only ever got to play unpleasant characters, yet by
all accounts was the sweetest woman you could hope to meet), Julie Peasgood,
Richard Hunter, Louise English and (fleetingly) Norman Rossington. What a
fantastic cast, eh?
But
naturally enough the big draw is the four main stars. Lee is his usual reliably
imposing presence, commanding your attention every time he’s on screen. Cushing
turns in a particularly memorable performance; hobbled by an endearing speech
impediment – he can’t pronounce his Rs – his character also gets to deliver one
of the film’s best bits of dialogue as he melancholically explains why he’s
such a timid man. Price meanwhile gets the cream pf the blackly pithy lines (upon
discovering the body of a character who’s been strangled with piano wire he
remarks, deadpan, “They must have heard her singing.”). Carradine appears to
struggle a tad, occasionally not looking too sure where he is (he was in his
late 70s at the time this was made), but his performance is nothing to be
ashamed of and somehow that adds to the quirky charm of the piece.
With
a runtime of 121-minutes, it’s a bloated affair and could certainly have lost
several scenes in which characters wander around lost in the maze of tunnels;
it doesn’t make for tedious viewing as such, but they fail to move the story
along. All the same, as the climax approaches there are some nifty little
twists and at the end of the day it’s a pleasure to watch, if only to bask in the
fun that Cushing, Lee and Price evidently had making it.
Neglected
for years, House of the Long Shadows finally got to see a belated
release to DVD ten years ago andRegion A Blu-ray from Kino Lorber a few years back. Fans can now rejoice; it has been
spruced up for a Region 2 Blu-Ray release from Fabulous Films, including a host
of worthy supplements. The film itself has always suffered from a slight
murkiness, but here it looks better than ever it has and is accompanied by an
optional commentary track from Peter Walker and Derek Pykett. The standout
among the bonus inclusions is a feature-length documentary, “Return to House of
the Long Shadows”, originally shot and directed by Pykett – who clearly holds
the film in great esteem – in 2012. Running only 15-minues less than the movie
itself, much like that it might have benefited from a little judicious editing,
but it’s nonetheless an invaluable treasure trove of information and
reminiscences. Built around a revisit to Rotherfield Park by Walker, actress
Julie Peasgood (who barely seems to have aged a day) and cinematographer Norman
Langley, it boasts an impressive collection of additional interviews with
actors Desi Arnaz, Jr, Richard Hunter and Louise English, production designer
Michael Pickwoad, production manager Jeanne Ferber, writer Michael Armstrong,
camera operator John Simmons, costume designer Alan Flyng and composer Richard
Harvey. Additionally, there’s a separate 15-minute interview with Walker, a
short step-through gallery of stills and a trailer.
"The Deadly Affair", directed by Sidney Lumet, is the 1967 film based
on John Le Carre's 1961 novel "Call for the Dead". Le Carre was riding
high during the Bond-inspired Bond phenomenon of the 1960s. Unlike the
surrealistic world of 007, Le Carre's books formed the basis for gritty
and gloomy espionage stories that were steeped in realism and cynicism.
The film adaptation of Le Carre's "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold"
had been released the previous year to great acclaim. Lumet, who made
"The Deadly Affair" for his own production company, rounded up top
flight British talent including screenwriter Paul Dehn, who had written
the film adaptation of "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold" and co-wrote
the screenplay for "Goldfinger".
As with all Le Carre film adaptations, the plot is complex to the
point of being confusing. There are many intriguing characters of
dubious allegiance to one another, a scarcity of violence in favor of
people talking in back alleys and living rooms and a desire to paint the
world of Cold War espionage as a tawdry environment in which the good
guys are indistinguishable from the bad guys. James Mason plays Charles
Dobbs, a veteran British Intelligence agent who takes a leisurely walk
through St. James Park with a civil servant, Fennan (Robert Flemyng),who
is aspiring to get a promotion to the Foreign Office. Dobbs informs him
that there is a bit of concern about his security clearance because an
anonymous person has tipped off MI6 through a letter that states
Fennan's may have a dual allegiance to the communists. Dobbs considers
the matter somewhat trivial and tries to assure Fennan that his name
will probably be cleared. The men part on seemingly upbeat terms but the
next day Dobbs is told by his superiors that Fennan has committed
suicide. Dobbs is flabbergasted and insists the man showed no signs of
instability. Nevertheless, Dobbs feels he is being made to be the fall
guy for failing to see obvious weaknesses in Fennan's personality.
That's not his only problem. Domestically, his young wife Ann (Harriett
Andersson) is causing him great distress by taking on numerous lovers
under his very nose. (Dobbs is even instructed to phone her before he
comes home in case she has a bed mate in their house.) Dobbs is
humiliated at playing the role of cuckold but can't bring himself to
divorce Ann- even when it is revealed that his old friend Dieter
(Maximilian Schell), a German Intelligence agent who is visiting London,
has also been seduced by her.
Dobbs smells a rat at MI6 and doubts Fennan committed suicide. He
starts his own investigation into who killed him and why. An interview
with Fennan's widow (Simone Signoret) only makes matters more complex
when he begins to suspect she might be a Soviet agent. Dobbs enlists the
only two colleagues he can trust: agent Bill Appleby (Kenneth Haigh)
and the semi-retired agent Mendel (Harry Andrews). The trio find that as
they get closer to the truth, the trail is getting more dangerous with
numerous murders occurring and their own lives in danger.
To bring Le Carre's novel to the screen, certain recurring characters
from his books, such as legendary spy George Smiley, had to have their
names changed because Paramount had the rights to "The Spy Who Came in
from the Cold" and the characters appeared in the novel and screen
version. Paul Dehn's screenplay is confusing but never boring and by the
end you can pretty much figure out what is going on even if some of the
peripheral characters' significance remains a bit vague. Sidney Lumet
was the ultimate "actor's director" and could always be counted on to
get top-rate performances from his cast. "The Deadly Game" is no
exception, with James Mason in fine form as a man who has been disgraced
professionally and personally but who still has enough pride to attempt
to clear his name. Lumet hired two fine actors who appeared in his 1965
masterwork "The Hill"- Harry Andrews and Roy Kinnear- to reunite for
this production and they have a great scene together. (Andrews must be
one of the most under-rated actors of all time.) Maximilian Schell only
appears sporadically but his role is pivotal and he is typically
impressive, as is Simone Signoret as a woman of doubtful allegiance.
Harriett Andersson, whose proficiency in English was limited, is
occasionally difficult to understand (she was reportedly partially
dubbed because of this). She accepted the role at the last minute when
Candice Bergen had to back out of the film. She is suitably sultry and
her character is quite interesting, professing to love her husband even
as she revels in submitting him to sexual humiliation. The only humor in
the film is provided by a very amusing Lynn Redgrave in a small role as
Virgin Bumpus (!), an inept set designer for a Shakespearean theater
production. Quincy Jones provides a fine jazz score that fits in well
with the lounge music craze of the era and Freddie Young's
cinematography depicts London as an ominous, rain-spattered place that
adds to the chilling atmosphere of any Le Carre story. Adding to the impressive roster of talents involved with the film are Quincy Jones, who provides a fine jazzy score and cinematographer Freddie Young. Sidney Lumet wanted to film the production in B&W but the studio insisted on color. Thus, the ever-inventive Young created a process to intentionally make the scenes look drab and dubbed it "colorless color."
Although John Le Carre was not overly-impressed with the film, he did joke that he was beguiled by Harriet Andersson's nude scene. Le Carre's opinion aside, "The Deadly Affair" was highly acclaimed in Britain, having been
nominated for five BAFTA awards but it was largely overlooked amidst the
tidal wave of other spy movies from the time period. It's a first-rate
thriller and Indicator have done it justice with an equally excellent Blu-ray special edition, which is happily region-free and features a high definition remaster. In addition, the Blu-ray contains the following special edition features:
Original mono audio sound
An excellent commentary track by film historians Michael Brooke and Johnny Mains
"The Guardian Lecture with Sidney Lumet", a wonderful audio recording of a 1983 interview at the National Film Theatre conducted by Derek Malcolm, who gets the low-key director to discuss his own movies and the general state of cinema. Interestingly, even in 1983, Lumet predicted the short attention span (or perceived short attention span) of audiences would alter the way movies were made. He griped that in several recent films he had seen, no shot lasted for more than seven seconds without a cut being made.
"A Different Kind of Spy: Paul Dehn's Deadly Affair", a featurette in which writer David Kipen discusses the life and career of the esteemed screenwriter. Kipen is loquacious and interesting, providing background of Dehn's fascinating background. He was an instructor at a spy school while in the British military in WWII and among his students were Ian Fleming and John Le Carre. He later engaged in undercover activities himself. After the war, Dehn became a screenwriter and Kipen laments the fact that many of the economically-made, but expertly scripted films he worked on in post-war Britain remain largely unseen by international audiences. Kipen also informs us that Dehn was a gay man living in Britain when homosexuality was still a crime and how his closeted life and long-time lover affair with film composer James Bernard may have influenced his work.
"Lumet's London" is a short featurette that shows "then-and-now" footage and photos of the various locations seen in the film.
"Take One and Move On" is a short but interesting interview with camera operator Brian West, who recalls the inventive way cinematographer Freddie Young planned some innovative shots.
"The National Film Theatre Lecture with James Mason" is a rare gem from 1967. Mason didn't give an abundance of interviews and wasn't a common presence on chat shows. This marvelous interview before an enthusiastic audience is worth the price of the Blu-ray alone. Mason is, as you might expect, urbane, charismatic and very witty as he relates stories of his life and career including some tidbits about the pleasures and stresses of working with Hitchcock and Kubrick.
In all, this is a first-rate release of a first-rate, if underrated, espionage thriller.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THE REGION-FREE BLU-RAY, WHICH IS CURRENTLY ONE OF A NUMBER OF TITLES ON SALE.
Cinema
Retro has received the following press release from Paramount:
Paramount Pictures Celebrates the 50th Anniversary of Francis Ford Coppala's Cinematic Masterpiece
HOLLYWOOD,
Calif. – March 1, 2022 — In celebration of the 50th anniversary of
Francis Ford Coppola’s Academy Award®-winning* masterworkThe Godfather, Paramount Pictures will be releasing all three films
in the epic trilogy on 4K Ultra HD for the first time ever on March 22, 2022,
with all the films having been meticulously restored under the direction of
Coppola.
“I
am very proud of The Godfather, which certainly defined the first third
of my creative life,” said Francis Ford Coppola. “With this 50th
anniversary tribute, I’m especially proud Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda:
The Death of Michael Corleone is included, as it captures Mario and my original
vision in definitively concluding our epic trilogy. It’s also gratifying to
celebrate this milestone with Paramount alongside the wonderful fans who’ve
loved it for decades, younger generations who still find it relevant today, and
those who will discover it for the first time.”
Coppola’s
masterful film adaptation of Mario Puzo’s novel chronicles the rise and fall of
the Corleone family and the film trilogy is rightfully viewed as one of the
greatest in cinematic history. In preparation for the 50th
anniversary of the first film’s original release on March 24, 1972, Paramount
and Coppola’s production company American Zoetrope undertook a painstaking
restoration of all three films over the course of three years. Every
effort was made to create the finest possible presentation for today’s
audiences who can watch the films using technology that has advanced
dramatically since 2007 when the last restoration was completed by eminent film
historian and preservationist Robert Harris. Using that work as a blueprint,
the team spent thousands of hours to ensure that every frame was evaluated to
create the most pristine presentation while remaining true to the original look
and feel of the films.
The
monumental effort included the following:
Over
300 cartons of film were scrutinized to find the best possible resolution
for every frame of all three films.
Over
4,000 hours were spent repairing film stains, tears, and other anomalies
in the negatives.
Over
1,000 hours were spent on rigorous color correction to ensure the high
dynamic range tools were respectful of the original vision of Coppola and
cinematographer Gordon Willis.
In
addition to the 5.1 audio approved by Walter Murch in 2007, the original
mono tracks on The Godfather and The Godfather: Part II have been restored.
All
work was overseen by Coppola.
“We
felt privileged to restore these films and a little in awe every day we worked
on them,” said Andrea Kalas, senior vice president, Paramount Archives.
“We were able to witness first-hand how the brilliant cinematography, score,
production design, costume design, editing, performances, and, of course,
screenwriting and direction became famously more than the sum of their
parts. It was our commitment to honor all of the filmmakers’ exceptional
work.”
Newly
restored and remastered in Dolby Vision, all three films in the landmark
trilogy will be released together with HDR-10 on 4K Ultra HD Digital and 4K
Ultra HD Blu-ray™ for the first time ever. The 4K Ultra HD
Blu-ray set will include The Godfather, The Godfather: Part II,
and Coppola’s recently re-edited version of the final film, Mario Puzo’s THE
GODFATHER, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone. The disc set includes
legacy commentaries by Coppola, as well as access to Digital copies of The
Godfather, The Godfather: Part II and Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda:
The Death of Michael Corleone.
In
addition to the widely available 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray set, a 4K Ultra HD Limited
Collector’s Edition will also be released in deluxe packaging and includes a
hardcover coffee table book featuring stunning photographs, as well as portrait
art prints on archival paper. Both 4K Ultra HD sets include new bonus
content including an introduction to The Godfather by Coppola, a
featurette about the preservation process, photos by acclaimed photographer
Steve Schapiro, home movie footage, and comparisons of the new restoration to
earlier versions of the films. A full list of new and legacy bonus
content follows:
NEW
BONUS CONTENT:
·
Introduction to The Godfather by Francis Ford Coppola
·
Full Circle: Preserving The Godfather—Paramount Pictures
archivists detail the incredible restoration process with archival footage
showing the evolution of the film through various home entertainment
incarnations as picture and audio technologies make quantum leaps over the
decades.
·
Capturing the Corleones: Through the Lens of Photographer Steve Schapiro—
In this reflective and frank discussion, special photographer Steve Schapiro
shares his unique perspective and cherished memories as a witness to the making
of this seminal film. Commentary on curated archival images makes for a
fascinating, never-before-seen addition to the production’s history.
·
The Godfather: Home Movies— An assortment of 8mm home movie
footage shot in 1971 offers a candid glimpse into the production of The
Godfather. Shot on location at the Norton family estate on Staten
Island’s Emerson Hill, this is the first time it’s been made available to the
public.
·
Restoration Comparisons— Before and after highlights showcase extensive
picture quality improvements to The Godfather.
LEGACY
BONUS CONTENT:
The Masterpiece
That Almost Wasn’t
Godfather World
Emulsional
Rescue—Revealing The Godfather
…when the
shooting stopped
The Godfather on the Red Carpet
Four Short Films
on The Godfather
oThe
Godfather vs. The Godfather: Part II
oCannoli
oRiffing
on the Riffing
oClemenza
·The
Family Tree
·Crime
Organization Chart
·Connie
and Carlo’s Wedding Album
·2008
Credits
·Behind
the Scenes
oA Look
Inside
oOn
Location
oFrancis
Ford Coppola’s Notebook
oMusic
of The Godfather
§Nino
Rota
§Carmine
Coppola
oCoppola
& Puzo on Screenwriting
oGordon
Willis on Cinematography
oStoryboards
– The Godfather: Part II
oStoryboards
– The Godfather: Part III
oThe
Godfather Behind the Scenes 1971
·Additional
Scenes
·Galleries
·Trailers
·Acclaim
& Response
·Additional
Material
·The
Filmmakers
·The
Godfather: Part III—newly
remastered and restored versions of the original theatrical cut and Coppola’s
1991 cut (note: these are exclusive to the 4K Ultra HD Collections)
Newly
restored and remastered versions of The Godfather, The Godfather: Part II, and
Mario Puzo’s THE GODFATHER, Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone will
also be available together on Blu-ray™ with access to Digital copies
and the new and legacy bonus content detailed above.
Production Designer Ken Adam, Producer Albert R. Broccoli and Director Lewis Gilbert on the original "007 Stage" at Pinewood Studios.
It was the biggest James Bond film to date. Released in 1977, Roger Moore's third 007 film, "The Spy Who Loved Me", restored the series to its former grandeur, following the anemic reaction to the previous film "The Man with the Golden Gun". Producer Albert R. Broccoli was making his first Bond movie without his former partner, Harry Saltzman, who ended their partnership after "Golden Gun". Broccoli was determined to go all-out and backed his plans by getting United Artists to provide the biggest budget the franchise had ever enjoyed. Broccoli made sure every penny was on the screen and constructed the largest sound stage in the world at Pinewood Studios. American Cinematographer magazine has long provided detailed behind-the-scenes coverage of the making of the Bond films. They have reprinted their on-set visit to Pinewood where contributing editor David Samuelson interviewed production designer Ken Adam and Director of Photography Claude Renoir.
A
concentration camp survivor returns home after the war only to find betrayal
and deceit in “Phoenix,†a Blu-ray release from Criterion. Nina Hoss is Nelly
Lenz, a German Jew returning to Berlin in 1945 both physically and
psychologically damaged after years in concentration camps including the
notorious Auschwitz death camp. A successful nightclub singer prior to the
horrors of Nazi Germany, she returns home with a disfigured face hidden under
bandages when we first meet her on screen. Nelly is aided by her friend Lene Winter
(Nina Kunzendorf), a fellow German Jew who fled to England before the war.
Nelly receives reconstructive surgery on her face which alters her looks,
although we never see what she looked liked prior to her facial disfigurement.
We first see her after the bandages are removed post surgery.
Nelly
wants to be reunited with her husband, she married shortly before being taken
by the authorities to a Jewish detention camp. She finds her husband, Johnny Lenz
(Ronald Zehrfeld), who had not been arrested because he is not Jewish, working
at a local restaurant. He doesn’t recognize her when they talk and it appears
he is oblivious to who she is. Johnny returns to her the next day with a
request. He asks if she will pretend to be his (presumably) dead wife so he can
make a claim for her estate and then he’ll share some of the money with her. Nelly
agrees to the ruse if only to be with her husband even though it is play acting
on his part.
The
psychological scars are deep for both Nelly and Lene, who has survivor’s guilt
from avoiding internment. Those scars are deeper than the physical scars for
Nelly which prevents her from revealing her true identity to her husband as she
learns more about him. Nelly hopes her husband will somehow come to recognize
her as the real Nelly, but plays things out maintaining the ruse in an attempt
to learn how he survived throughout the war. The climax is chilling, as it is
revealed how Nina was betrayed and by whom. These developments are played out
in flashback.
Nina
Hoss and Ronald Zehrfeld are excellent as Nelly and Johnny. as is Nina
Kunzendorf as Lene. Directed by Christian Petzold with a screenplay co-written
by Petzold and Harn Farocki,, the story is based on “motifs†from the novel “Le
retour des cendres†by Hubert Monteilhet. I found it fascinating to watch as
Johnny teaches Nelly how to act like Nelly, dress like Nelly and sign her name
like Nelly in order to “fool†her own family and friends who survived the war. The
movie has a definite “Vertigo†vibe going for it, almost as though we are experiencing
a lucid daydream.
Nina
Hoss may be familiar to fans of the television series “Homelandâ€, wherein she
played Astrid in 13 episodes of the Showtime series from 2014 to 2017. She was
also in the Showtime 2020 series “The Defeated.†Her co-star, Ronald Zehrfeld,
is also terrific and convincing as the “widowed†husband who does not recognize
his own wife, but knows this “other†woman looks close enough to hopefully fool
everyone and claim Nelly’s estate. Zehfred appears in mostly German
productions, but does appear in the 2020 Netflix series “Barbarans†as Berulf.
If
the basic plot of “Phoenix†sounds familiar, as it did to me while I first
viewed the Blu-ray, it’s because the same novel was adapted for the 1965 thriller,
“Return from the Ashes,†which is also the English translation of the novel. That
movie, directed by J. Lee Thompson and adapted by Julius Epstein, features
Maximilian Schell, Samantha Eggar and Ingrid Thulin. I’ve never read the
original novel, but a quick check on the web revealed “Return from the Ashesâ€
is the more faithful while “Phoenix†focuses on “motifs†lifting the basic plot
of the inheritance claim and changes the location from post- World War II
France to Germany and adds the plastic surgery subplot.
“Phoenixâ€
was released in September 2014 in Germany and found an audience as an American
film festival and art house release throughout 2015. While not a blockbuster,
the film did brisk business and deserves a fresh viewing. The movie is 98 minutes
and filmed in German language. The Criterion Collection Blu-ray of “Phoenixâ€
looks and sounds terrific in the original German with English subtitles. The
disc also includes a making of documentary, interviews with the director,
cinematographer, cast and also the trailer. There’s also an informative booklet
with an essay about the film by Michael Koresky included with the disc
packaging. The movie is highly recommended and makes a great double feature
with “Return From the Ashes.â€
Charlton Heston fans will appreciate the fact that one of his most underrated films has finally made it to Blu-ray through a joint release by Kino Lorber and Scorpion Releasing. "Number One" (released in certain countries under the title "Pro") is an off-beat vehicle for the superstar, who was then at his peak of popularity. The fact that the movie under-performed at the box-office and failed to score with critics didn't diminish Heston's status as a leading man. He would go on to star in such hits as "The Omega Man", "Skyjacked", "Soylent Green" "Earthquake", "Midway"and "Airport '75"- with cameos in the popular "The Three Musketeers" and "The Four Musketeers". The poor response to "Number One" doesn't diminish its many merits - and the fact that Heston was willing to play against type in a largely unsympathetic role. For the film, he reunited with director Tom Gries, with whom he made the acclaimed 1968 Western "Will Penny". Curiously, both movies center on the same theme: a macho man who can't come to grips with the fact that he is aging and, therefore, his chosen way of life is threatened. In "Will Penny", Heston played the title character: a middle-aged cowboy who feels the inevitable aches and pains of trying to maintain a career that is clearly suited for younger men. Similarly, in "Number One" he plays "Cat" Catlan, a star quarterback for the New Orleans Saints football team. Catlan has seen plenty of fame and glory as the team's Golden Boy and the idol of the crowds. But now he is 40 years old and, although still in Herculean physical condition compared to most men his age, he's fallen victim to the constant brutalities he suffers on the field.
The film opens on a particularly disastrous game in which Catlan makes some serious misjudgments about plays and bungles some key passes. The result is an embarrassing loss for the team. The Saints' gruff coach Southerd (John Randolph) isn't ready to give up on Catlin but seemingly every other team member is. Catlan is subjected to some cruel jokes and he has to contend with the fact that a much younger player (Richard Elkins) is breathing down his neck, hoping to replace him as quarterback. Things aren't much better at home for Catlan. His long-suffering wife Julie (Jessica Walter) patiently endures his mysterious absences, unpredictable mood swings and volatile temper. She is a very successful fashion designer but Catlan is "old school" when it comes to the role of wives. He wants Julie to stay home and cater to his needs. In the midst of one of their frequent fights, he even stoops so low as to cruelly tease her about her inability to conceive a baby. Still, she sticks with him even when he confesses to having an affair with an attractive, self-made woman, Ann (Diana Muldaur). Faced with the fact that his career is winding down, Catlan reluctantly explores his options for his post-NFL life. They aren't very enticing. His best friend Richie (Bruce Dern), is an obnoxious former Saints player who brags about having gotten out of the game at age 34. He now runs a very successful car leasing business and lives a playboy lifestyle. He wants Catlan to work for him, a prospect that doesn't sit well with the aging quarterback. He also gets an offer from a computer company to work for them but the idea of dealing of being surrounded by machines in the confines of an office is repugnant to him. Ultimately, Catlan is inspired by his wife to go out on a high note. During one of their rare moments of domestic detente, she convinces him that he still has some good games in his future if he can shake off the funk and get his confidence back. The film's climactic game is the very definition of mixed emotions. Catlan performs well and has his mojo back but the movie's ambiguous final shot is anything but uplifting.
Tom Gries was a good director for Heston. He somehow managed to tamp down Heston's larger-than-life personality and afford him the opportunity to play everyday men. In "Number One", Heston is subject to the sorts of problems that plague most middle-aged men. He's nervous about his future. He often takes his frustrations out on the people closest to him. He tries to reassert his youth by exerting his sexual prowess through having an affair. Throughout it all, Heston admirably does not try to make Catlan into a hero. There is a level of sympathy accorded to him because of the emotional and physical stress he is under but his sheer disregard for others makes him more a villain than a hero. (He even refuses to give fans his autograph). Even worse is his sheer selfishness in how he deals with his wife's needs. He feels threatened by the success she is enjoying in her own career and therefore diminishes her achievements. Heston gives one of his finest performances, ironically, in what was one of his least-seen films.He gets able support from the woefully-underrated Jessica Walter, whose performance a couple of years later in "Play Misty For Me" should have assured her of major stardom (and an Oscar nomination). Director Gries also utilizes the talents of real-life football players, some of whom exhibit impressive acting skills. Diana Muldaur also excels as the siren who lures Catlan into her bed. There is an air of authenticity to the film, primarily because Gries shot much of it in front of packed stadiums. (Cinematographer Michael Hugo's work is especially impressive). Gries also captures the feel of New Orleans back in the day, capitalizing on the local scenery, jazz clubs and even getting the great Al Hirt to perform a number and do a bit of acting. About the only dated aspects of the film concern the off-the-field activities of the NFL players. Catlan complains that they are paid like peasants, which was probably true in 1969, but is a rather laughable notion today. Also, the NFL team is required to wear jackets and ties when traveling to or leaving the stadium, another rule that would be virtually unenforceable by contemporary standards.
"Number One" never found its audience in 1969 but hopefully the impressive Blu-ray transfer will help retro movie lovers appreciate its merits, even if it lacks bonus extras except for a single trailer. The film did have at least one critic who appreciated the movie and Heston's performance. Writing in the New York Times, critic Howard Thompson wrote: "Charlton Heston, minus a
beard, a loincloth, a toga or the Red Sea, tackles a starkly unadorned role in
one of the most interesting and admirable performances of his career…If Heston
could have been better, we don’t know how." Our sentiments exactly.
Includes 4 films premiering on Blu-ray & DVD on December
14, 2021
Los Angeles, CA (November, 2021)
Synopsis: Cult Epics proudly presents the Sylvia
Kristel 1970s Collection, featuring four of the legendary Dutch icon's most
diverse films in new 2K transfers and entirely uncut, for the first time on
home video in the United States.
New 2K HD Transfers
(from original 35mm film elements) and Restoration
Original LPCM 2.0 Mono.
New DTS-HD MA 2.0
Mono
Audio Commentaries by
Tim Lucas, Jeremy Richey, and Peter W. Verstraten
New and Vintage
Interviews with Cast & Crew
Poster & Photo
Galleries
Original Theatrical
Trailers
Limited
numbered Edition of 2500 copies made (Blu-ray) includes 40-Page illustrated
booklet written by Jeremy Richey and Poster with Art by Gilles Vranckx. DVD
Ltd. Edition of 1000 includes booklet and poster
Cult Epics website
exclusive includes an additional DVD with Interview with director Just Jaeckin
on Sylvia. Limited to 200 copies www.cultepics.com
In conjunction Cult
Epics will release Sylvia Kristel: From Emmanuelle written by Jeremy Richey as
a Hardcover book, on January 17, 2020 (new release date). 352 Pages, fully
illustrated, 12x10 inches.
(Note:
Portions of this review appeared on Cinema Retro in 2014 for an earlier
Kino Lorber edition.)
Robert
Altman was a very quirky director, sometimes missing the mark, but oftentimes
brilliant. His 1973 take on Raymond Chandler’s 1953 novel The Long Goodbye is a case in point. It might take a second viewing
to appreciate what’s really going on in the film. Updating what is essentially
a 1940s film noir character to the
swinging 70s was a risky and challenging prospect—and Altman and his star,
Elliott Gould as Philip Marlowe (!), pull it off.
It’s
one of those pictures that critics hated when it was first released; and yet,
by the end of the year, it was being named on several Top Ten lists. I admit
that when I first saw it in 1973, I didn’t much care for it. I still wasn’t
totally in tune with the kinds of movies Altman made—even after M*A*S*H, Brewster McCloud (an underrated gem), and McCabe & Mrs. Miller. But I saw it again a few years later on a
college campus and totally dug it. Altman made oddball films, and either you
went with the flow or you would be put off by the improvisational, sometimes
sloppy mise-en-scène that the director used. And the sound—well, Altman is
infamous for his overlapping dialogue (one critic called it “Altman Soupâ€). If
you didn’t “get†what the director was doing with sound, then you would
certainly have a hard time with his pictures.
Yes,
Elliott Gould plays Philip Marlowe. A very different interpretation than
Humphrey Bogart or Dick Powell, obviously. And yet, it works. Gould displays
the right amount of bemused cynicism, as if he had been asleep for twenty years
and suddenly woken up in the 1970s. And that’s exactly how Altman, screenwriter
Leigh Brackett (who co-wrote the 1946 The
Big Sleep), and Gould approached the material. Altman, in a documentary
extra on the making of the film, called the character “Rip Van Marlowe.†He is
an anachronism in a different time. For example, Marlowe can’t help but be
bewildered by the quartet of exhibitionist hippie lesbians that live in his
apartment complex. And he still drives a car from his original era. And therein
lies the point of the picture—this is a comment on the 70s, not the 40s or 50s.
The
plot concerns the possible murder of the wife of Marlowe’s good friend, Terry
(played by baseball pro Jim Boutin), who is indeed a suspect, as well as a
suitcase of missing money belonging to a vicious gangster (extrovertly portrayed
by film director Mark Rydell), an Ernest Hemingway-like writer who has gone
missing (eccentrically performed by Sterling Hayden), and the author’s hot
blonde wife who may know more than she’s telling (honestly played by newcomer
Nina van Pallandt). The story twists, turns, hits some bumps in the road, and
finally circles back to the initial beginning mystery.
It
may not be one of Altman’s best films, but it’s one of the better ones. It’s
certainly one of the more interesting experiments he tried in his most prolific
period of the 70s.
Kino
Lorber already put out a Blu-ray release several years ago, but it didn’t
really improve much on the original DVD release prior to that. The company has
now re-issued the film in a brand new 4K master that is a vast step-up from the
previous release. It looks great. The soft focus cinematography by Vilmos Zsigmond
is no longer a hazy gaze but is instead a crystal transfer of that distinctive
1970s film stock imagery. The movie now comes with an informative audio
commentary by film historian Tim Lucas.
Some
of the extras are ported over from the previous Kino Lorber release, such as
the aforementioned “making of†documentary, a short piece on Zsigmond, an
animated reproduction of a vintage American
Cinematographer article, the trailer, and a few radio spots. New to this
edition are featurettes with film historian/critic David Thompson on Altman and
the film, author Tom Williams on Raymond Chandler, and author/historian Maxim
Jakubowski on hard-boiled fiction in general. There is also a “Trailers from
Hell†segment with Josh Olson.
If
you’re an Altman fan and don’t already own the out of print DVD or previous
Blu-ray, you may want to pick up the new, improved The Long Goodbye. It
probably won’t be long before this, too, like Philip Marlowe himself, is a rare
collector’s item.
Max is released from Folsom Prison after
completing a six-year incarceration for burglary. Despite being mild-mannered,
we sense that there is something brooding beneath the surface just waiting to
erupt out of control. (Actor Jason Isaacs portrayed Irish mobster Michael
Caffee in the Showtime series Brotherhood from 2006 to 2008 who returns
home following a jail stint with a similar disposition.) Max makes the six-plus-hour
bus ride down to Los Angeles and he gets his first taste of life outside of
prison when he calls and leaves his parole officer Earl Frank (M. Emmet Walsh)
a message that Earl says he didn’t get when Max meets him the following day.
They get off on the wrong foot when he makes the mistake of not going to a
halfway house, rubbing Earl the wrong way. The conditions of his parole are
that he is to discuss all his intentions with Earl first. After getting a room
at the Garland Hotel for the week, he tries out for a typing job at the
Wilshire Agency. Under the eye of Jenny Mercer (Theresa Russell), we see that
Max has a problem with rules as he continues typing long after Jenny calls
“time†on the test. Despite this and his revelation of his past, she agrees to
date him. Max looks up a former convict, Willy Darin (Garey Busey just before
his breakout role in the Oscar-winning The Buddy Holly Story), at Willy’s
house in the Echo Park suburb of Los Angeles. Willy’s wife Selma (an
unrecognizable Kathy Bates) is less-than pleased at their reunion and confides
her trepidation to Max who, although visibly hurt, leaves the house. The look
he gives her on his way out is one of a wronged man who doesn’t forget. Yes,
that’s Gary Busey’s real-life son, then-credited as Jacob, playing his onscreen
son Henry. Again, Max abides by his own rules, and it costs him when Willy
shoots up heroin in his room and leaves behind evidence that Earl discovers
when he visits Max unannounced, costing him time back in L.A. County jail for a
week. When Earl springs Max, he asks him the identity of the person who shot up
in his room. Max flips out and steals Earl’s car, leaving him hanging half
naked against a freeway divider fence. Max is now back to his old ways, pulling
petty hold-ups to make ends meet while looking for shotguns and semi-automatic
pistols.
Straight
Time began life as No Beast So Fierce,
an intriguingly titled 1973 novel written by the late paroled and convicted
felon Edward Heward Bunker, who would go on to achieve a modicum of success in
Hollywood by appearing in Steve DeJarnett’s Miracle Mile (1988) and
Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs (1992) among other films. Reportedly,
Mr. Hoffman began directing the film himself before handing over the reins to
veteran director Ulu Grosbard whom he worked with previously on Who is Harry
Kellerman and Why is He Saying Those Terrible Things About Me? in 1971 so
that he could focus on playing Max. Mr. Bunker appears briefly in the film, and
the plot is bolstered by the always excellent Harry Dean Stanton as Jerry, an
ex-con who, like Willy, is also bored by his legit profession and wants to get
back into the game and do jobs with Max. The trouble with Max is, he’s reckless
and takes unnecessary risks, allowing his temper to get the better of him. He
wants the bigger scores and when he and Jerry rob a prominent bank in broad
daylight, he goes way beyond the time at which he should leave, narrowly escaping.
Things go awry when his hunger for more money gets them into big trouble
following a jewelry store that he scoped out earlier with an unassuming Jenny who
thinks he is buying her an expensive watch.
Straight
Time raises a lot of questions: Why does
Jenny, an attractive woman, get involved with Max? Why do Max and Jerry take
scores with no masks on? Is The System really trying to help ex-convicts assimilate
back into a free society, or is it simply there to give the impression of
attempting to handle ex-convicts as they try to get back on their feet? Do we
sympathize with Max for a life of crime? Is a life of crime better than working
for The Man? Who is responsible for the recidivism rate among paroled convicts?
If the film seems familiar in how it handles the issue of thievery, it might
not come as a surprise that writer and director Michael Mann did some
uncredited work on the screenplay. His films Thief (1981), L.A.
Takedown (1989) and Heat (1995) are all examinations on thieves and
the way they live their lives, especially how the rush of stealing is what they
find exciting. Tom Sizemore said it best in Heat: “For me, the action
is the juice.â€
It
would be another six years before premium cable viewers would have an
opportunity to see the film; four years after that my visit to the new
Blockbuster Video in an adjacent town made me giddy with delight as the aisles
were filled with VHS copies of movies that I knew of yet never saw before. Max
Dembo beckoned me from the cover of the oversized Warner Home Video clamshell
box for Straight Time, his large sad eyes asking me to rent it and give
it a chance, which I did and did not regret in the slightest.
Straight
Time was released on DVD by Warner Home
Video in May 2007 with a much-needed upgrade from the old VHS transfer. It’s
now available on Blu-ray through their Warner Archive line and it looks even
better. I appreciate Warner Archive retaining the original black and red “A
Warner Communications Company†logo from the period. This edition carries over
the audio commentary track featuring director Grosbard and star Hoffman who
both give wonderful anecdotes about the making and history of the film. The
aforementioned trailer is also included. It’s marvelous hearing Mr. Hoffman
talk about this film, as it reminds me of the excellent commentary that Jack
Nicholson provided to Michelangelo Antonioni’s The Passenger (1975),
arguably the actor’s greatest film.
Cinematographer
Owen Roizman, already a veteran of some great New York-lensed films such as
William Friedkin’s The French Connection (1971), Joseph Sargent’s The
Taking of Pelham 123 (1974), Sidney Pollack’s Three Days of the Condor
(1975) and Sidney Lumet’s Network (1976), brings his characteristic
visual genius to the Hollywood and Wilshire Boulevard streets of Los Angeles
and makes the city another character, with close-ups of Montgomery Ward and
Woolworths, their signage stylized in long-gone and forgotten fonts.
Composer
David Shire provides a wonderfully catchy minimalist score that I would love to
see released on compact disc (remember those?).
Ironically,
Dustin Hoffman and his roommate, Gene Hackman, were both were voted least
likely to succeed in their Pasadena Playhouse classes when they first started
out. Hilarious.
When it comes to defining cinematic guilty pleasures, one need not look any further than the lame-brained beach movies that were marketed to teenagers in the mid-1960s. The formula started in 1963 with "Beach Party", teaming Annette Funicello and Frankie Avalon for the first time as loved-starved teens who are addicted to fun and sun in the surf. The film was such a hit that it spawned numerous sequels, delighting producers Samuel Z. Arkoff and James H. Nicholson and American International, which was mining gold by making big profits from low-budget productions. The beach series didn't vary much in terms of content and many of the most popular actors were utilized in each successive film. There were also simlarly-themed films starring Avalon in different geographical settings ("Pajama Party", "Ski Party"). But if the beach series burned brightly, its flame was short-lived. By 1965, the young audiences that initially craved this fare were moving on to more sophisticated movies. The Beatles had made two movies by then and they defined what was hip. Suddenly, the perpetual horndog males and the virginal girls they were perpetually trying to seduce seemed about as cutting edge as an episode of "Leave It to Beaver". By the time the final entry in the series, "How to Stuff a Wild Bikini" limped into theaters in 1965, the bloom was off the rose. This time around, even fans of Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello were disappointed. The script has them in different parts of the globe and they are only seen together briefly at the conclusion. Making matters worse, their appearances in the film are abbreviated with most of the screen time going to supporting players. As was the norm in these films, well known mature character actors are cast in humorous roles apparently to ensure that any parents in the audience stay awake. In this case, we have the legendary Buster Keaton and Mickey Rooney along with the rather bizarre casting of Brian Donlevy. Go figure.
This time around Frankie (who is cleverly cast as a character named "Frankie") is in the U.S. Navy and assigned to Tahiti, where is he basking in the affections of the local beauties including lovely Irene Tsu. The implication is that the Tahitian girls are far more liberal in terms of sexual activities than their American counterparts and its hinted that monogamy isn't a high priority for them. Frankie is understandably intoxicated by having his own harem until he begins to fret that his fiancee, Dee Dee (Annette Funicello) might also be tempted to stray during his long absence. He seeks the advice of the local medicine man (Keaton), who comes up with a strategy: he will concoct a beautiful girl, Casandra, to suddenly appear in the midst of Frankie's beach crowd and prove to be so desirable that every guy in the group will spend their time trying to seduce her instead of pursuing Dee Dee. (This is somewhat of an insult to Dee Dee, implying she would no longer turn heads in the presence of the mystery woman, who is played by Beverly Adams.) The ploy doesn't work because there is indeed a potential suitor for Dee Dee- local playboy Ricky (Dwayne Hickman). Dee Dee plays along, nursing anger and broken heart when she learns that Frankie is not remaining chaste. There is a crazy subplot involving Rooney as a manic marketing executive working for greedy tycoon Donlevy. They scheme to woo Casandra to make her the national model for their brand of motorcycles. In the midst of all this are zany fights, humor that is juvenile enough to alienate the average 10 year-old and climactic (and seemingly) endless cycle race that is filmed in the Keystone Cops mode. One can only suspect that Avalon saw the script and demanded a reduced role. Funicello, who was pregnant at the time, is often relegated to sitting alone on the beach attired in beach wear that skillfully hides this fact. If all of this sounds awful, it plays out on the screen even worse. The only saving grace is some genuinely amusing bits from Keaton and a brief "Bewitched"-inspired cameo by Elizabeth Montgomery, whose presence here is attributed to the fact that she was married to the director/screenwriter William Asher. Even the rock group the Kingsmen aren't used strategically. Instead of playing their smash hit "Louie Louie", they are relegated to performing an instantly forgettable tune. There is some estimable talent behind the scenes including the esteemed cinematographer Floyd Crosby and composer Lex Baxter, both slumming in search of a quick pay check. Watching the film from the standpoint of a more enlightened era, its astonishing how crass the treatment of the young actresses is. In some shots, they are filmed minus such unnecessary appendages as their heads, as the camera lingers on only the parts that jiggle.
One hates to be a curmudgeon about such simple fare and it is necessary to view it in the context of the era in which it was made. But there lies the rub: "How to Stuff a Wild Bikini" was considered awful even back in 1965 and time has not been kind to it. The Olive Blu-ray has a very nice transfer, though. An original trailer is the only bonus feature.
In the early spring of 1961, shortly following the
completion of his work on A.I.P.’s Master
of the World - and following a series of lectures regarding “The Enjoyment
of Great Art†– Renaissance man Vincent Price was to jet off mid-April for two acting
assignments in Rome, Italy.The two
productions he had signed onto for producer-writer Ottavio Poggi were Gordon, il Pirata Nero (Gordon, the Black
Pirate) and Nefertiti, Regina Del
Nile (Nefertiti, Queen of the Nile).The former film – arguably the better of the two - was belatedly released
in the U.S. in June 1963 under the title Rage
of the Buccaneers.The film was distributed
regionally in the U.S. with neither fanfare nor critical attention.
Rage
of the Buccaneers would first appear on the drive-in circuit as
the odd undercard to such films as Broccoli and Saltzman’s Bob Hope/Anita
Ekberg comedy Call Me Bwana.Rage was later paired, a bit more
sensibly, with The Playgirls and the
Vampire, an Italian-horror production mostly recalled by old-school monster
movie fans and admirers of voluptuous continental on-screen beauties.The weak-tea newspaper campaign in the U.S. for
Rage of the Buccaneers could have
hardly been helpful in exciting foot traffic into neighborhood cinemas.Though the posters for the U.S. release
promised Furious Action!Passionate Love!, the accompanying
newspaper adverts offered the far less sensational promise of Excitement plus… Emotional Turbulence.Emotional Turbulence?Meh.
In truth, Rage of
the Buccaneers would be dimly recalled, if at all, by U.S. movie fans due
to it popping up on television as 1964 drew to a close.In early November of 1964 it was announced -
with some degree of ballyhoo - that the NBC network had acquired no fewer than eight
post-1960 “first-run†films for television distribution.But even the network’s big newspaper
announcement was late out of the starting block.Rage of
the Buccaneers had already been televised by several NBC affiliates as
early as September 1964.
Several essays and film books would note that Price’s latter
ill-fated Italian film, Nefertiti, Queen
of the Nile would not actually see a theatrical release in the U.S. market.This is actually untrue.The film had the briefest of runs – as a second
feature in support of the Buddy Ebsen comedy Mail Order Bride - at a drive-in theater outside of Phoenix, AZ in
March 1964.The film then seemingly disappeared
from movie screens - both big and small - until it was picked up as a
late-night television programmer in 1966.Shortly thereafter, Nefertiti
too fell pretty much off the face of the planet, at least as far as U.S.
audiences were concerned.
Then, in 1985, with the home video boom in the ascendant,
Nefertiti, Queen of the Nile was briefly
resurrected as a “big box†VHS cassette release in the U.S. on the Force Video
label.In the UK, there were at least
two video cassette releases of Gordon, il
Pirata Nero, first as The Black
Pirate (Apex Video) and later as Gordon,
The Black Pirate (Midas Video).As
far as I’m aware, these are the only three editions of these two obscure
Vincent Price films to be officially
released on the English-speaking home video market, though there are bootlegs
circulating of both films.I only dredge
up this old history in the, perhaps, overly optimistic hope that Kino Lorber
might make note of these glaring deficiencies in their own burgeoning catalog
of Vincent Price home video offerings.
In any case, Price’s second professional visit to Italy
would prove to be more successful.In
January of 1963, Hollywood scene gossip columnists reported that Price would
celebrate the New Year by preparing a return to Italy for a “Halloween release
of his next horror movie, The Last Man on
Earth.â€The film was to be based on
the novel I am Legend by Richard
Matheson.Matheson’s novel, the author’s
first, was published in August of 1954 by Fawcett Gold Medal books.It was a slim paperback of one-hundred and
sixty pages, but Matheson was no amateur writer, having previously published a
score of science-fiction-based short stories in magazines and anthologies.
Matheson’s novel was optioned by Britain’s Hammer Films
in 1957, that studio even commissioning the author to write a screenplay for a
proposed production.The problem was
that the British censor board found Matheson’s screenplay unrelentingly grim
and violent, warning should any production be mounted, there was little chance
that the film would pass code.So a wary
Anthony Hinds at Hammer chose to sell the rights of Matheson’s screenplay to American
producer and cinema theater chain owner Robert L. Lippert (Curse of the Fly).Lippert
subsequently engaged Price to star in the project, traveling to Rome in late
summer of 1962 to arrange crew and casting of the film’s Italian supporting
players.
Matheson’s I am
Legend recounts the final years of Robert Neville, one of the few survivors
of a pandemic turned plague that killed off most of the earth’s population.The rub is that while those afflicted
remained technically dead, they retained
mobility.Neville goes to great lengths
to investigate why the “undead†have transformed into bacillus vampires of a sort:they drink blood and avoid the rays of the sun much as did the Gothic
and folkloric vampires of yore did.But
otherwise they remained mostly human in appearance save for a decided graveyard
pallor.
Neville (renamed Robert Morgan in the film) is a reluctant,
modern day, post-apocalyptic Van Helsing. He has chosen to actively seek out and
confront the vampire hordes.He really
has no other choice as, much to his disdain, he’s under near-constant assault
by them.Matheson’s book is an
undeniably grim one with an equally fatalistic ending, but his slim volume
would go on to influence countless filmmakers and aspiring science-fiction
writers in years following publication.In manner of tone and presentation, it’s reasonable to say that George
Romero’s Night of the Living Dead was
highly and undeniably influenced by The
Last Man on Earth.
Price wasn’t terribly excited to travel to Italy in the grim
winter season of 1963, but the offer to visit Rome would give the actor the
opportunity to canvas galleries and antique stores in search of artworks.In June of 1962 it was announced that Price had
entered into his semi-famous partnership with the Sears, Roebuck & Co. to
search out art that could be consigned and sold as lithographs through the
department store chain.This interest in
art was a lifelong passion of the actor’s and he had already been collecting
artworks for Sears a month prior to the official press release of their
collaboration.The actor told columnist
Bob Thomas that his searching out the Vincent
Price Collection for Sears had already resulted in a “whirl†of activity,
and that he’d already “bought 1,700 paintings and etchings: I’ve got to have
2,500 before the sale starts.â€
By Mid-January of 1963 Price was already in Europe, first
visiting Paris before traveling on to Rome to begin filming. In the space of three days and visits to the galleries
and artist studios of the City of Lights, Price offered that he had already
purchased one hundred and fifty paintings that he thought Sears could sell for
$300 or less back in the U.S.Columnist
Doris Sanders noted that Price had already admitted dropping four thousand U.S.
dollars on the very first day of his Parisian shopping spree.It was also noted that the artists Price
approached were appreciably happy as the actor – funded by his corporate
sponsor - always chose to pay cash up-front.
Send-ups
of classic horror films are nothing new. Bud Abbott and Lou Costello starred in
the granddaddy of horror comedies, Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein,
in 1948 after the original working script The Brain of Frankenstein had
its title changed. They later took on the Invisible Man, Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
Hyde, and Boris Karloff himself. Mel Brooks danced his way into the cinema history
books by making his own comic version of the fabled Mary Shelley classic of a
deranged scientist fabricating a man made from body parts and even had the guts
to shoot the film in black and white on the original soundstages that James
Whale used just over forty years earlier: Young Frankenstein (1974) was
the result. The lesser-known Texas-lensed Student Bodies (1981) from
Woody Allen collaborator Mickey Rose did an admirable job of poking fun at the
slasher movie subgenre that plagued American movie theaters through most of the
early to mid-1980’s and is still humorous today, even after the Scary Movie
franchise.
I
was introduced to Elvira, Mistress of the Dark in September 1982 in Fangoria
Magazine (issue #22) from their “Horror-Host Series†by Dan Farren. Having begun
as a horror hostess in September 1981 on Southern California’s KHJ-TV’s Movie
Macabre weekend show, Elvira (in reality red-haired actress Cassandra
Peterson) slowly made her way into syndicated television markets and became a
huge sensation, turning verbally ragging on silly horror and science fiction B
movies into an art form. The schtick-laden show ran 137 episodes over five
years. Well-endowed with impossible-to-not-see cleavage, a huge mane of dark
hair and deep red lipstick, Elvira eventually starred in her own film, the 1988
outing Elvira, Mistress of the Dark. While many other Elvira outings
occurred in the form of short films and TV-movies, Ms. Petersen reprised her
role in Elvira’s Haunted Hills (2002), a loving parody of the Vincent
Price/Edgar Allan Poe/Roger Corman thrillers of the 1960’s that she and the
filmmakers saw in their youth.
It
is the year 1851 and the setting is the Romanian Carpathian Mountains. Elvira
and her maid Zou Zou (Mary Jo Smith) are forced out of their room by an
innkeeper who does his best Jack Torrance impression from The Shining to
rid the premises of these freeloaders. On their way to a can-can show they are
due to perform in Paris, they encounter Dr. Bradley Bradley (Scott Atkinson) –
no relation to Humbert Humbert – who invites them into his coach to stay the
night at Castle Hellsubus. Upon arrival, they meet Lady Emma Hellsubus (Mary
Scheer), Count Vladimere Hellsubus (Richard O’Brien) and Lady Roxana (Heather Hopper), Lady Emma and
Count Vladimere’s daughter.
It turns out that Elvira bears more than a striking resemblance to Count
Vladimere Hellsubus’s deceased wife, Elura (not to be confused with the capromorelin
oral solution indicated for the management of weight loss in cats with chronic
kidney disease of the same name. Whew!)
While
investigating the castle, Elvira stumbles into the room of Adrian (Gabi
Andronache in a role originally intended for Fabio who declined), a
deliberately poorly dubbed hunk with mismatched lips and dialog in a direct nod
to Italian horror films. Elvira gives the folks an example of her can-can show
and later Count Vladimere thinks Elura is alive after seeing her in the hallway
and blames it on a hallucination.
There
are several laugh out-loud moments, one involving an empty knight suit, a
throw-away line about the Village People, a visual zoom a la Jaws (1975),
and other modern-day film references. Even the Academy Awards aren’t
off-limits. The ageless Ms. Peterson is endearing in her Elvira get-up and
obviously the title is a comic play on her famous, always-on-display assets.
This is a film played for laughs and it is amusing and fun. The real stars,
however, are the beautiful and opulent sets fashioned by the Romanian crew modeled
primarily after The Pit and The Pendulum (1961) and The Haunted
Palace (1963). I was even reminded of Narciso Ibáñez Serrador’s The
House That Screamed (1969). The beautiful lighting is also reminiscent of
cinematographer Luciano Tovoli’s colorful work on Dario Argento’s Suspiria
(1977) and Romano Albani’s lighting schemes in Suspiria’s follow-up, Inferno
(1980).
Elvira
does a fun song number and Richard O’Brien at times looks like Reggie Nalder as
Mr. Barlow in Tobe Hooper’s Salem’s Lot (1979).
Elvira’s
Haunted Hills was
originally released on DVD in October 2002 and again in October 2011 in a
“Specially Enhanced Editionâ€. The bonus features are all ported over from the
previous DVD incarnations:
The
Blu-ray consists of a restoration from a 4K scan of the original camera
negative and it looks stunning in 1080p. The original DVDs did not grasp the
image so well and were often murky and dark. This transfer is bright, colorful
and clear and the sets look amazing.
There
is an introduction by Elvira, Mistress of The Dark which is comical and runs
4:40.
There
is an audio commentary with Cassandra Peterson, Mary Scheer, Mary Jo Smith and
Scott Atkinson, and Director Sam Irvin who all have terrific fun commenting on
the action and memories of filming on a shoestring.
Transylvania or Bust
Featurette – this cutely-titled High Definition piece from 2011 runs just over
28 minutes and includes Mary Jo Smith, Mary Scheer, Scott Atkinson and others discussing
their experiences not just making the film, but the misadventures entailed in
getting to the locations, which were more scary than what ends up in onscreen!
The Making of Elvira’s Haunted Hills is
Standard Definition, runs 22 minutes and features interviews with much of the
cast and crew, but best of all it contains behind-the-scenes footage shot
during principal photography.
Elvira in Romania
Featurette – this is a cute Standard Definition interview with a Romanian
television crew and Elvira
and runs about 46 minutes. There are also test shots and Elvira mingling with
locals.
Interview
with Co-Star Richard O’Brien
runs 6:08 and is an onscreen interview that was shot during filming.
Trailers – two trailers for Elvira’s Haunted
Hills
Outtakes – this runs 54 seconds and my only
complaint is I would have liked to have seen more of it.
Scottish
filmmaker Lynne Ramsay burst onto the scene in the late 1990s with the striking
independent picture, Ratcatcher, which may or may not have been somewhat
of an autobiographical meditation on being a young child in early 1970s
Glasgow.
Ratcatcher brought Ramsay the
Carl Foreman Award for Newcomer in British Film at the BAFTA Awards, as well as
other prizes from various film festivals. It is indeed an art film of high
quality that is filled with haunting imagery, melancholic moods, and wonderful
performances by a host of young child actors (as well as adults).
The
year is 1973 or thereabouts, and ghetto-like sections of Glasgow, Scotland, are
on track to be demolished. The residents have been promised new housing in more
modern structures that are being built. Life on these tenement-like streets is
harsh. Often there are no utilities, a stagnant and dangerous canal runs along
the street, and currently there is a garbage strike. Trash is piled on the
sidewalks, creating a massive health hazard and an attractive gathering spot
for rats. The children run around and play in this environment. Our
protagonist, James (William Eadie), is a rather lonely, unhappy kid with few
real friends. He is the middle child with two sisters (one older and one
younger). James is often the target of bullies (a gang of slightly older boys
who roam the streets causing trouble). His father (Tommy Flanagan) is a drunk
and wife-beater, and his well-meaning mother (Mandy Matthews) does what she can
to keep the family together and fed. After accidentally causing the unwitnessed
drowning of one of his only friends in the canal, James buries the guilt and
lives with it as he navigates the horrid conditions of his life. At one point,
James befriends a slightly older girl, Margaret Anne (Leanne Mullen), who is
unwillingly the community tart for the boy-gang. Ultimately, James must come to
terms with what accounts for his existence, such as it is, while the family
waits to be called to their new home.
The
film is a slice of life, a combination of street scenes and life in tiny,
decrepit flats. The squalor is tangible, and one can almost smell the stench. Director
Ramsay has presented a visceral and yet poetic, impressionistic look at
poverty. Her approach might remind one of the works of Terrence Malick, as
there is much more visual storytelling than dialogue (and, in fact, one of the
pieces of music heard in the film is what Malick used as the main title song
for his Badlands, the Orff-Keetman piece Gassenhauer).
The
dialogue is heavy Scottish, which may be unintelligible to North American
audiences. When Ratcatcher was released in cinemas in the U.S., English
subtitles accompanied the film. It is highly recommended to those outside of
the U.K. to turn on the subtitle function of this superb Blu-ray disk produced
by The Criterion Collection.
Upgraded
from an earlier Criterion DVD edition, Ratcatcher comes in a new 4K
digital restoration, supervised by Ramsay and cinematographer Alwin Küchler
(Ramsay and Küchler attended film school together). The
movie is in 2.0 surround DTS-HD Master Audio.
Supplements
on the original DVD are ported over: a 2002 interview with Ramsay, and three of
her early shorts (Small Deaths, Kill the Day, and Gasman),
and the trailer.New to the Blu-ray supplements are an updated 2021
interview with Ramsay, and a 2020 audio interview with Küchler.
The booklet comes with essays by film critic Girish Shambu and filmmaker Barry
Jenkins.
Ratcatcher
is
for fans of international cinema, modern Scottish culture and history, and
independent filmmaking.
In
Jonathan Mostow’s Breakdown (1997), Jeffrey and Amy Taylor (Kurt Russell
and Kathleen Quinlan) seem like a normal and nice middle-aged couple moving
from New England to San Diego to hopefully start a new life from a past we are
not privy to, though it’s one fraught with financial issues. On the way, Jeffrey
nearly sideswipes a dirty brown Ford F150 while reaching for his thermos and
suffers invective from the driver (M.C. Gainey). A minor confrontation ensues
later when both men refuel at the same gas station. Words are exchanged. Upon
leaving, the Taylor’s new Grand Cherokee soon malfunctions, and they are
temporarily stranded as the F150 blows past them. Fortunately, an 18-wheeler soon
stops to help. The truck’s driver, Red Barr (the fine character actor J.T.
Walsh in his penultimate screen performance), gives Amy a ride to Belle’s
Diner to
call for help – except that she never makes it.
If
you recall Steven Spielberg’s 1971 television film Duel, Dennis Weaver
portrayed David Mann, an Everyman traveling to a sales account when his life
suddenly changes after passing a huge oil truck. Incensed by this perceived
breach of road etiquette, the truck driver chases and taunts Mann throughout
the rest of the film. Duel is arguably the granddaddy of road rage
movies, making riveting cinema out of a cat-and-mouse game that holds the
audience’s attention the entire time. Likewise, Breakdown holds the
equivalent mantle as it pertains to missing persons thrillers. As a horror film
fan of forty years, there is little that I have seen that gets under my skin,
George Sluizer’s icy 1988 Dutch/French character study Spoorloos, known
in the States as The Vanishing, being a notable exception. Mr.
Russell and Mr. Walsh have shared the screen multiples times together,
specifically in Robert Towne’s Tequila Sunrise (1989), Ron Howard’s Backdraft
(1991), and Stuart Baird’s Executive Decision (1994). Here they pair up
again in a frightening game that begins when, following unsuccessful attempts to glean info from the
patrons and owner of Belle’s Diner (a terrific turn by character actor Jack
McGee), Jeffrey catches sight of Red’s truck and pulls him over to the side of
the road. Jeffrey’s interrogation of Red regarding his wife’s whereabouts is
met by a perplexing display of gaslighting when Red claims he doesn’t even know
what Jeff is talking about. For a moment, we feel that perhaps this is even
Red’s twin and that there has been a complete mix-up. Following a search
of Red’s vehicle aided by a passing sheriff (Rex Linn), Jeffrey is, like Cary
Grant in Alfred Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (1959) as described by
Cliff Robertson in the 1973 documentary on Mr. Hitchcock, “a man alone –
innocent, defenseless…†He realizes that it’s up to him to find Amy – and he
has no idea who to trust or even where to begin. What follows is the most intense
nail-biting thriller I’ve ever seen. I don’t want to oversell the film, but I
will anyway. Jeffrey moves mountains to locate his wife and when he does, the
tension and anxiety could not be more powerful. One thing I noticed: Red has
white wings in his hair like the Paulie Walnuts character on The Sopranos.
The
ending of Breakdown has been shrugged off by some critics as being unworthy
of what comes before, and even “ludicrousâ€. I must respectfully disagree. By
the end of the film, what we are looking for is a massive payoff, and I believe
that we get it in spades. The “ludicrous†ending is, instead, tension-filled
and satisfying. Detractors never seem to offer an alternative. I am personally
thankful to Dino DeLaurentiis for making a go of it and letting Jonathan Mostow
direct this film. Everyone has to start somewhere, and this directorial debut
is remarkable.
In
the days of VHS and laserdisc prior to large-screen televisions, Breakdown
is a film that I owned on the latter format in a letterboxed edition. In 1998,
the film suffered the indignity of a rather lackluster transfer on DVD when it
was window-boxed and lacked 16 x 9 anamorphic enhancement, rendering the DVD
nearly unwatchable. The new Blu-ray from Paramount Pictures Home Entertainment
is part of “Paramount Presents†which is described as a line of Blu-ray
releases for collectors and fans showcasing movies that have generally not made
it to Blu-ray before. Breakdown is number 26 in the list of
titles of
films showcased on Blu-ray in these new special editions. The new transfer is a
revelation.
In
addition to the new transfer, the Blu-ray contains the following extras:
A
feature-length audio commentary with the director and Kurt Russell. If you have
ever heard any of the previous commentaries that Mr. Russell has been involved
with, specifically with director John Carpenter on Escape from New York
(1981) and The Thing (1982), you know that he is one of the most
entertaining people to listen to. He also has a phenomenal laugh and chuckles
through most of the film, even making fun of Jeffrey! Hilarious. They speak
about Dino DeLaurentiis; having gotten cinematographer Doug Milsom who worked on
four films with Stanley Kubrick; Mr. Russell imitating Dennis Weaver in Duel
(“You can’t catch me on the grade!â€); the director discussing how he wrote a
role for Morgan Freeman as a character whose wife was kidnapped and teams up
with Jeffrey, the idea later wisely written out of the script; Roger Ebert
criticized the bank scene, but the commentary states that they were rushed to
get it done on the location but I think it works just fine. Overall, a truly
fun and entertaining listen and easily the best extra.
Newly
commissioned alternative artwork.
The
musical score is isolated on one of the audio tracks, a great feature that I
wish more companies would provide.
Filmmaker
Focus - Jonathan Mostow
(10:45) – This piece is a spotlight on the director that highlights much of
what was said during the commentary.
Victory
is Hers: Kathleen Quinlan on Breakdown
(4:22) – I was so happy to see Kathleen Quinlan included in this edition and
she discusses some of her experiences making the film.
A
Brilliant Partnership: Martha De Laurentiis on Breakdown (8:18) – This is a piece dedicated to
one of the producers of the film. Mrs. De Laurentiis worked with her late
husband, Dino, on the film and this is a look at their partnership.
Alternate
Opening with optional Jonathan Mostow commentary (11:00) – Along with the film’s commentary,
this is a very cool piece to see, as its inclusion changes the whole mood of
the film. The credits run slowly over the opening and the sequence establishes
Jeffrey as all-thumbs – lightyears removed from the Snake Plissken Mr. Russell
played fifteen years earlier. It was the correct decision to remove this
footage, though I feel badly for the other actors in the scene to have been
excised from such a terrific film!
Rounding
out the extras are trailers for Breakdown, Kiss the Girls, and Hard
Rain.
There
are two Blu-rays of this film available, one from the Australian company Via
Vision’s Imprint line and the Paramount Presents disc. Both Blu-rays are worth
owning for die-hard fans of the film as they each contain completely different
extras, but if you have to choose just one, I recommend the Paramount disc as
it contains the director/actor commentary and the excised alternate opening.
In
anticipation of the upcoming release of Denis Villeneuve’s remake, the
excellent boutique label Arrow Video has issued a superb 2-disk Limited Edition
package of David Lynch’s 1984 film, Dune. It comes in two versions—one
in 4K Ultra HD, and the other in standard Blu-ray.
Filmmaker
David Lynch today refuses to discuss Dune, which he made for producer
Dino De Laurentiis (the actual producer was his daughter, Raffaella De
Laurentiis) for a whopping $40-42 million. It was a colossal flop at the time,
was critically reviled, and audiences didn’t care much for it either. However,
over the years, Dune has gained a cult following and it assuredly has
its share of defenders, including Frank Herbert, the author of the original
1965 novel.
The
history of the production has long been a topic of discussion among film
historians and cinephiles. Attempts to film the complex, epic science fiction
tome began shortly after the book’s publication. Perhaps Alejandro Jodorowsky’s
version has the most legendary status in Duneworld, but his vision never made
it past some pre-production work. Producer Arthur P. Jacobs had his fingers in
the sand at one time, and even Ridley Scott wanted to make the movie.
Laurentiis
ended up with the rights, and he hired Lynch, fresh off the success of The
Elephant Man (1980), to write and direct. Lynch had reportedly been offered
the job to direct Return of the Jedi around the same time, but he chose
to go with Dune. He has regretted it ever since, for he had no idea what
a can of worms—er, sandworms—he was opening.
The
challenge was to condense the complicated story into a feature-length film. The
smart thing at the time would have been to create a television miniseries (as
was done by others years later). Lynch’s first assembly after shooting wrapped
was around four hours long (prior to post-production visual effects work), but
the producer was required by the studio (Universal) to deliver a motion picture
half that length. Lynch’s theatrical cut clocked in at two hours and seventeen
minutes, and therein lies the problem with Dune.
Dune
is a
multi-hour story; there is simply no way to tell it in two hours and seventeen
minutes. After the experience of making Dune, Lynch would forever insist
on creative final cut on anything he would make.
So…
despite the rather negative reputation Dune has, there is quite a lot to
admire about it. Firstly, if one is a fan of David Lynch and his rather unique
visual sensibilities, the picture is a feast of wonder, awe, and eye candy.
No other movie looks like Dune. Hats off to production designer Anthony
Masters who, with Lynch at the helm, created a fantastically grotesque and
gorgeously macabre world in which the story takes place. It is part cyberpunk
and Jules Verne and yet also very Lynchian in terms of the organically bizarre.
Secondly, the cast is terrific. Besides the aforementioned actors named in the
synopsis above, we also are treated to eccentric performances by Sean Young,
Max von Sydow, Everitt McGill, Brad Dourif, Sting, Dean Stockwell, Linda Hunt,
Virginia Madsen, Freddie Jones, Patrick Stewart, Richard Jordan, Paul Smith,
Leonardo Cimino, Jack Nance, and many others. Thirdly, technical aspects are
top-notch. The visual effects are wondrous and weird, and the cinematography by
the great Freddie Francis is masterful. Fourthly, there is no question that the
direction displays a command of style and mood that only Lynch can evoke. There
is a poetry and melancholy and horror about the proceedings that is
unquestionably Lynch’s doing.
Unfortunately,
though, all this isn’t enough. Dune fails to engage an audience in its
very heady tale that is meant to be as profound as it is visually scrumptious.
Lynch was forced to cram important exposition and wholesale sequences into
short monologues and dream sequences. It is understandable that those
unfamiliar with the novel were completely bewildered by the movie (this
reviewer was already well familiar with the book in 1984 and thus enjoyed the
picture—to a point—more than most).
Still…
for fans of David Lynch and Frank Herbert… Dune is worth seeing.
Arrow
Video’s Limited Edition 2-disk package is impressive. The new 4K restoration of
the movie itself looks spectacular, much improved over previous releases. It
comes with an original uncompressed stereo audio and DTS-HD MA 5.1 surround
sound, and optional English subtitles for the hearing impaired. Two new audio
commentaries accompany the picture—one by film historian Paul M. Sammon, and
another by Mike White of The Projection Booth podcast.
Supplements
abound. A few are port-overs from previous home video releases, which include a
2003 documentary on the making of the film, and several featurettes on the technical
aspects of the picture. Approximately fifteen minutes of deleted scenes,
introduced by producer Raffaella De Laurentiis, are also repeated from an
earlier Blu-ray release. Brand new supplements include an excellent feature
on the score by Toto (and Brian Eno, for one track), featuring interviews with
band members Steve Lukather and Steve Porcaro. A piece on Dune merchandising
hosted by toy collector/producer Brian Stillman is interesting for the history
of the misguided marketing campaign for a film that couldn’t possibly appeal to
children. There is a new interview with makeup effects artist Giannetto de
Rossi, and archive interviews with production coordinator Golda Offenheim,
actor Paul Smith, and makeup effects artist Christopher Tucker. Destination
Dune is a 1983 featurette used to promote the movie at conventions and
publicity events. Theatrical trailers, TV spots, and an image gallery round out
the disk supplements.
There
are goodies, too! A 60-page booklet contains writings by Andrew Nette,
Christian McCrea, and Charlie Brigden; a 1984 American Cinematographer
interview with sound designer Alan Splet; excerpts from the book Lynch on
Lynch; and a Dune terminology glossary. There’s a large fold-out
double-sided poster featuring original and newly commissioned artwork by Dániel
Taylor, as well as postcard-sized lobby card reproductions. The jewel case sports
a reversible sleeve with the original artwork on one side and the new art by
Taylor on the other.
No
matter what one might think of David Lynch’s Dune, Arrow Video’s Limited
Edition release is worth a revisit. Dune may have been a failure, but it
is a puzzling, glorious, and fascinating piece of cinematic art that is one of
a kind.